Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
#/.4%.43
!"342!#4
)
).42/$5#4)/.
))
6) #/.#,53)/.
!00%.$)8 #-3 ./-).!,
0!2!-%4%2
2%&%2%.#%3
) ).42/$5#4)/.
4HIS PAPER DEALS WITH THE FOLLOWING FOUR
SUBJECTS THE #$-! SIGNAL PROPAGATION
CHARACTERISTICS THE SYSTEM PARAMETER OP
TIMIZATION FOR THE POWER CONTROL AND LINK
BUDGET UNDER VARIOUS MOBILE ENVIRONMENTS
THE CAPACITY AND PERFORMANCE TEST RESULTS OF
THE #$-! -OBILE 3YSTEM #-3 AND THE
#-3 SYSTEM DESIGN ISSUES
4HE CON`GURATION AND MEASUREMENT SYS
TEM FOR THE #-3 TESTBED WHICH HAS BEEN DE
SIGNED AND IMPLEMENTED TO VERIFY AND EVAL
UATE THE FUNCTIONALITY AND THE PERFORMANCE
OF THE #-3 IS DESCRIBED IN SECTION )) 4HE
2& SIGNAL PROPAGATION TESTS HAVE BEEN PER
FORMED IN THE -(Z BAND WHICH #-3
USES 4HE FADING AND DELAY CHARACTERISTICS
HAVE BEEN MEASURED AND ANALYZED 4HESE
RESULTS ALSO ARE DISCUSSED IN SECTION ))
4HE #$-! SYSTEM REQUIRES THE POWER
CONTROL TO MAXIMIZE THE CHANNEL CAPACITY BY
REDUCING THE RECEIVED %B .O REQUIRED FOR
FRAME ERROR RATE &%2 OF TRAbC CHANNEL
4HE POWER CONTROL INVOLVES MANY #$-!
SPECI`C PARAMETERS 7E NEED TO ANALYZE
THE E_ECTS OF THE #$-! PARAMETERS ON THE
SYSTEM PERFORMANCE COMMUNICATION QUAL
ITY AND THE CAPACITY 3ECTION ))) DISCUSSES
THE EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS FOR THE PARAMETER
OPTIMIZATION
-./
%
6
6
.9
6
!6"
<G
.
6
8
-EASUREMENT 3YSTEMS
4HE MEASUREMENT SYSTEMS CONSIST OF
TEST VAN MEASUREMENT SYSTEM OF "3 `ELD
STRENGTH MEASUREMENT SYSTEM AND DELAY
MEASUREMENT SYSTEM 4HE `RST TWO SYSTEMS
ARE USED FOR MEASURING THE PERFORMANCE OF
#-3 4HE REMAINING TWO SYSTEMS MEASURE
THE #$-! PROPAGATION CHARACTERISTICS
4EST 6AN
%42) DESIGNED A TEST VAN TO GATHER AND
RECORD THE RECEIVED DATA DURING THE CAPAC
ITY AND PERFORMANCE TEST OF THE "43 4HE
TEST VAN CONSISTS OF SIX -3S TWO MOBILE DI
AGNOSTIC MONITORS -$- AND A '03 RE
CEIVER SEE &IG 4HE -$- HAS THE FUNC
TIONS OF GATHERING THE #$-! INFORMATION
FROM -3 )T ALSO RECORDS THE MOBILE LOCATION
AND SPEED USING '03 WITH DEAD RECOGNITION
FUNCTIONALITY
-EASUREMENTS 3YSTEM OF "ASE 3TATIONS
$URING THE CAPACITY TEST AND THE OPTI
MIZATION PROCESS THE TEST DATA ARE STORED
IN ANALYSIS DATA LOGGER !$, WHICH IS IN
STALLED AT "3# #$-! SYSTEM ANALYSIS TOOL
#3!4 THAT WAS DEVELOPED BY %42) IS
USED AS A DEDICATED ANALYSIS TOOL TO POST
PROCESS THE STORED DATA FROM -$- AND
!$, ;=
&IELD 3TRENGTH $ELAY -EASUREMENTS 3YS
TEM
&IELD STRENGTH MEASUREMENT SYSTEM WAS
IMPLEMENTED TO MEASURE THE PATH LOSS AND
!"A,2&
!+",2&
0ROPAGATION #HARACTERISTICS
7E MEASURED AND ANALYZED THE SIGNAL
STRENGTH AND DELAY CHARACTERISTICS AROUND
'ALMA AND %42) "43S 4HE RESULTS OF THE
MEASUREMENT ARE AS FOLLOWS
*=, 7
- 2
3
&
&
- -
- 5
3
0
10
B
-
- 8
- 4
- ?
- 3
- 33
5
3
+/
(+
*(
(
B-#
3
3
35
-
2
5
N*O
3
&
&
-
-
-
- 2
-
-
- 3
3
&IG 4YPICAL LONG
TERM FADING AROUND TEST STATIONS
&IG .ORMALIZED LEVEL CROSSING RATE FOR #$-!
AND !-03 SIGNALS .2 LEVEL CROSSING RATE FM
MAXIMUM DOPPLER FREQUENCY 2RMS RMS VALUE OF
MEASURED SIGNALS 2 MEASURED SIGNAL ENVELOPE
- 5-
- 8
- 8- 4
- 4- ?
- ?-
3
3
N*O
!VERAGE OF RMS
DELAY SPREAD
%42) (4 8 METERS
}S
'!,-! (4 8 METERS
}S
p
3ITE
3
=
3
3
3
2
-
%
62
=631>
;
".1
*
2
3
" *
27
3
*
G(
%
2
3
*
G(
7"
62
%
*
&REQUENCY .UMBER
3PEED
.UMBER OF 0ATHS
0ATH 0OWER
2ELATIVE TO 0ATH
0ATH 0OWER
2ELATIVE TO 0ATH
$ELAY FROM PATH
TO INPUT
$ELAY FROM PATH
TO INPUT
$ELAY FROM PATH
TO INPUT
#ASE
KMH
#ASE
KMH
D"
D"
.!
p D"
SEC
SEC
.!
MS
.!
MS
A !VERAGE
0MAX
0ILOT
&%2 COMPARISON
D"
&7$
263
.!
.!
.!
.!
D"
&7$
263
0MAX
D"
D"
0ILOT
&7$
263
&7$
263
B 4HE COMPAISON OF AVERAGE ALLOCATED FORWARD
TRAbC GAIN
0MAX
D" D" D" D"
0ILOT
.!
.!
C 4HE COMPARISON OF
%C)O
0MAX
D"
0ILOT
.!
p
.!
D"
D"
D"
p
p
p
p
p
p
p
p
p
D"
0OWER #ONTROL
0OWER CONTROL IS THE SCHEME OF MAINTAIN
ING THE RECEIVED SIGNAL STRENGTH OF EACH LINK
AT THE MINIMUM REQUIRED VALUE FOR COMMU
NICATION 4HE PERFECT POWER CONTROL CAN
SOLVE THE NEAR FAR PROBLEM ON THE REVERSE
LINK AND REDUCE THE INTERFERENCE BETWEEN
CELLS ON BOTH LINKS "UT THERE ARE SOME RE
STRICTIONS ON POWER CONTROL SUCH AS THE UNRE
CIPROCITY BETWEEN FORWARD AND REVERSE LINKS
THE PREDICTION ERROR FOR CHANNEL CONDITION
POWER CONTROL DELAY TIME ETC IN THE AC
TUAL ENVIRONMENT 4HEY DECREASE THE RADIO
CAPACITY AND WORSEN THE TRAbC QUALITY
!S THE `RST STEP OF THE OPTIMIZATION TEST
FOR POWER CONTROL WE SELECT THE MOBILE RADIO
CONDITION AS 2AYLEIGH FADING CHANNEL AND A
NUMBER OF POWER CONTROL PARAMETERS 4HE
CRITERION OF VOICE QUALITY &%2 IS BELOW
ON THIS TEST 7HEN WE PERFORMED THE
OPTIMIZATION TEST FOR ONE PARAMETER WE SET
THE OTHER PARAMETER AS THE NOMINAL VALUE
!FTER `NISHING THE OPTIMIZATION TEST FOR SE
LECTED PARAMETER WE CHOSE THE BEST ONE
AMONG EACH RESULTS AND DID THE PERFORMANCE
TEST FOR THE SELECTED VALUES
0ARAMETERS
3TEP 4IL &AST
6ALUE
2EMARK
i
MS
i
MS
i
GAIN UNITS
&%2 4HRES
i
62
=631>
%
;
".1
*
B%
2
3
" *
7"
27
62
2
3
" *
)OR M)OC
%C )OR FOR 0ILOT CHANNEL
%C)OR FOR 4RAbC
#HANNEL BPS
#ASE
D"
p D"
#ASE
D"
p D"
p D"
p D"
A 4HE RESULTS FOR 3TEP 4IL &AST AND &AST $OWN $ELTA
#HANNEL
#ASE
#ASE
2EMARK
&AST $OWN $ELTA &%2 &ULL &7$ 'AIN &%2!LL &7$ 'AIN
.OMINAL
B 4HE TEST RESULTS FOR 3LOW $OWN $ELTA
#HANNEL
#ASE
#ASE
2EMARK
3LOW $OWN $ELTA &%2 &ULL &7$ 'AIN &%2!LL &7$ 'AIN
.OMINAL
C 4HE TEST RESULTS FOR &AST $OWN 4IME
#HANNEL
#ASE
#ASE
2EMARK
&AST $OWN 4IME &%2 &ULL &7$ 'AIN &%2!LL &7$ 'AIN
.OMINAL
D 4HE TEST RESULTS FOR &%2 4HRES
#HANNEL
#ASE
&%2 4HRES &%2 &ULL &7$ 'AIN
#ASE
&%2!LL &7$ 'AIN
2EMARK
.OMINAL
#ASE
4ABLE /PTIMIZED FORWARD POWER CONTROL PARAMETER
ON A GIVEN 2AYLEIGH CHANNEL
!7'. 0OWER
AT "43
/PTIMIZED .OMINAL
6ALUE
6ALUE 2EMARK
3TEP 4IL &AST
3LOW $OWN 4IME
MS
&AST $OWN 4IME
MS
&AST $OWN $ELTA
GAIN UNITS
&%2 4HRES
#HANNEL -ODEL
#ASE
0ARAMETERS
#HANNEL
"EFORE
!FTER
#ASE
&%2
&7$
&ULL
'AIN
#ASE
&%2
&7$
!LL
'AIN
0ARAMETERS
0$
06$
$ELTA 'AIN
6ALUE
i
i
2EMARK
&ORWARD 0#
4ABLE 4HE OPTIMIZATION TEST RESULTS FOR THE SELECTED PARAMETER
%B .O
3ETPOINT
D"
D"
D"
2X
%B .O
D"
D"
D"
2EMARK
.OMINAL
/PTIMIZED .OMINAL
2EMARK
6ALUE
6ALUE
0$
06$
$ELTA 'AIN
&ORWARD 0#
0ARAMETERS
62
2
;
".1
*
=631>
3
" *
%
27
3
*
%
2
3
*
62
G(
*
G(
&%2
%B .O
2X
-OVING
2OUTE 3TATIONARY KMH
-ISCELLANEOUS
-OVING
3TATIONARY KMH
-ISCELLANEOUS
-3S EVENLY DISTRIBUTED
AT EACH SECTOR
#ALL #OMPLETION
#ALL COMPLETION RATE IS TO TEST WHETHER A
SYSTEM SUCCESSFULLY CONNECTS THE CONTINUOUS
CALL ATTEMPTS FROM MANY MOBILE STATIONS TO
EACH DESIGNATED PARTS OR NOT AND WHAT THE
SUCCESS RATE IS 4HIS INDEX INDICATES THE SYS
TEM PERFORMANCE OF CALL COMPLETION UNDER
6) #/.#,53)/.
4HE PROPAGATION CHARACTERISTICS OF
#$-! SIGNAL PATH LOSS AND DELAY WERE
PRESENTED IN THIS PAPER 4HE PATH LOSS
SLOPE CHARACTERISTIC OF #$-! SIGNAL IS
SIMILAR TO THAT OF K(Z !-03 SIGNAL
4HE MEASURED DELAY SPREAD CON`RMED THE
RAKE RECEIVER DESIGN OF THE #-3 TESTBED
7E ALSO PERFORMED THE #$-! PARAM
ETER OPTIMIZATION TEST 7E SELECT THE PA
RAMETERS AMONG THE LINK BALANCE AND THE
FORWARD AND REVERSE POWER CONTROL TO DE
CREASE &%2 ON BOTH LINKS AND DECREASE THE
ALLOCATED TRAbC GAIN ON FORWARD LINK AND
%B.O ON REVERSE LINK 4HE LINK BALANCE
TEST SHOWS THAT IT IS NEEDED TO REDUCE THE
PILOT GAIN AND 0MAX FROM CURRENT VALUES
UNDER THE MOBILE CHANNELS IN TEST )N ORDER
3UGGESTED
$E`NITION
0AGING
4X 'AIN
0ILOT
0ILOT 'AIN
3YNC
3YNC 'AIN
3UGGESTED
$E`NITION
.UMBER OF CONSECUTIVE SLOW DOWN POWER CONTROL STEPS BEFORE
SWITCHING TO FAST DOWN POWER CONTROL
.OM 'AIN
-AX 4X 'AIN
-IN 4X 'AIN
&%2 4HRES
"IG 5P $ELTA
3MALL 5P $ELTA
$ELTA 'AIN
$ELTA 'AIN
$ELTA 'AIN
3UGGESTED
0NOM
D"
$E`NITION
4ARGET &%2
)NITIAL TARGET %B .O WHICH IS THE STARTING POINT WHEN THE CALL
IS SETUP
0MAX
D"
&IELD
3UGGESTED
$E`NITION
-INIMUM TARGET %B .O DURING THE CALL
0MIN
D"
050&
050%
050%,
0$
06$
0&7
0&22
p
0%2,
2%&%2%.#%3