Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Poker Hands
Setting
PEOP
Biomechanical FOR
Subjective
Occupational Profile
Interview
Functional
COPM
MOHO assessments
Activity card sort
Objective
Self Report Measures (DASH)
Goniometry (AROM & PROM)
Manual muscle test (MMT)
Dynamometry (grip and strength
testing)
Circumferential measures (edema)
Wound care
Sensation (Semmes Weinstein
Microfilament)
Pain scales
(Gillen, 2014)
Evaluation
PEOP
Biomechanical
Bottom up approach
Restore or establish client-level
factors, performance skills,
performance patterns.
The clients impairment can be
remediated or restored
(Rybski, 2011)
(Cole & Tufano, 2008)
Intervention
Occupational Profile
Mr G:
56 years old
Poker Dealer
Lives alone
Family in Michigan
Independent
Has a small dog
Enjoys scenic driving and
traveling
Very competitive
Prior level of function - Independent in
ADLS, IADLS, full duty/seasonal worker
as a poker dealer
PEOP
Retrieved from www.wellsearch.com
PEOP MODEL
Physiological- Client is very active, works out everyday, enjoys taking his dog for
2 mile walk at Sunset park. Has not been able to lift weights due to his recent
injuries. He has limited ROM and decreased strength in his both of his small
fingers.
Cognitive- Clients memory intact, rational with reasoning, adequate attention
span, executive functioning in working order. No injury was made to his head
during accident. However sometimes his pain medication may influence his mood.
Spiritual- Client believes that he will get better and attends church every Sunday.
He believes in staying positive will produce positive outcomes in life.
Neurobehavioral- All sensory and motor systems are intact. Mr. G experienced
numbness and tingling around his PIP joint in both small fingers as well as pain.
Psychological-Very optimistic person, happy, he believes he can do anything he
puts his mind to, he is anxious to get better to start working again.
(Cole & Tufano, 2008)
Person
Occupation
Occupation Performance
and Participation
Performance
Environment (Cont.)
PEOP- Interventions
PEOP Outcomes
Biomechanical FOR
Evaluation
Extension
Left
Right
MP
-5 (0)
PIP
-55 (0)
-55 (0)
IP
-10 (0)
-5 (0)
Flexion
Left
Right
MP
30 (90)
20 (90)
PIP
55(100-105)
55(100-105)
IP
35 (80)
35 (80)
Evaluation -ROM
Intervention
Intervention
Interventions
Interventions
Occupational Performance
Prevention
Increased ROM
Increased Strength
Increased Endurance
More functional!!
(AOTA, 2014)
Outcomes
Questions?
AOTA. (2014). Occupational therapy practice framework: Domain and process (3rd ed.). American Journal of
Occupational Therapy, 68(Suppl. 1), S1-S48. http://dx .doi .org/10 .5014/ajot .2014 .682006
Cole, M.B., & Tufano, R. (2008). The Person-Environment-Occupation-Performance Model. In Applied theories in
occupational therapy: A practical approach. (pp. 127-133). Thorofare, NJ: Slack Inc.
Gillen, G. (2014) Motor function and occupational performance. In B.A.B. Schell, G. Gillen, & M.E Scaffa (Eds). Willard
and Spackmans occupational therapy (12th ed., 750-778). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams &Wilkins.
OBrein, J., & Hussey, S. (2012). Introduction to Occupational Therapy (4th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Mosby.
Rybski, M. (2011). Kinesiology for occupational therapy. Thorofare, NJ: Slack Incorporated.
References