Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
At first reading this poem is about the futility of war; particularly the first world
war. Hughes's father had come through the First World War, psychologically
scarred by his ordeal and the trauma of witnessing the slaughter of nearly all his
friends and fellow soldiers at Gallipoli in 1915. Hughes's father was one of just
two per cent of his regiment to survive.
Newsnight Review critic Tom Paulin has pointed out that Ted Hughes, having
been born in 1930 belonged to 'that slightly different species' - a generation 'who
took in the blood of the First World War with their mother's milk, and who up to
their middle age knew Britain only as a country always at war, or inwardly
expecting and preparing for war…'
However, this poem does more than attack war. It is also about the knowledge of
our own death and non-existence. We are reminded that one day all that will be
left of us will be a smiling face in a photograph.
http://www.hebdenbridge.co.uk/news/news07/102.html
Ted Hughes
Edward James Hughes OM (17 August 1930 – 28 October 1998) was an
English poet and children's writer, known as Ted Hughes. Critics routinely rank
him as one of the best poets of his generation. Hughes was British Poet Laureate
from 1984 until his death.
Hughes was married to the American poet Sylvia Plath, from 1956 until her
death. She committed suicide in 1963 at the age of 30. His part in the
relationship became controversial to some feminists and (particularly) American
admirers of Plath. Hughes himself never publicly entered the debate, but his last
poetic work, Birthday Letters (1998), explored their complex relationship. To
some, it put him in a significantly better light whereas, to others, it seemed a
failed attempt to deflect blame from himself and onto a neurotic father fixation
he ascribed to Plath.
Hughes studied English, anthropology and archaeology at Pembroke College,
Cambridge. At this time his first published poetry appeared in the journal he
started with fellow students, St. Botolph's Review, and at a party to launch the
magazine he met Sylvia Plath. He and Plath married at St George the Martyr
Holborn on 16 June 1956, four months after they had first met.
Hughes and Plath had two children, Frieda Rebecca and Nicholas Farrar, but
separated in the autumn of 1962. He continued to live at Court Green, North
Tawton, Devon irregularly with his lover Assia Wevill after Plath's death on 11
February 1963. As Plath's widower, Hughes became the executor of Plath’s
personal and literary estates. He oversaw the publication of her manuscripts,
including Ariel (1966). He also claimed to have destroyed the final volume of
Plath’s journal, detailing their last few months together. In his foreword to The
Journals of Sylvia Plath, he defends his actions as a consideration for the couple's
young children.
On 25 March 1969, six years after Plath's suicide by asphyxiation from a gas
stove, Assia Wevill committed suicide in the same way. Wevill also killed her
child, Alexandra Tatiana Elise (nicknamed Shura), the four-year-old daughter of
Hughes, born on 3 March 1965.
In August 1970 Hughes married Carol Orchard, a nurse, and they remained
together until his death. He was appointed a member of the Order of Merit by
Queen Elizabeth II just before he died.
His later work is deeply reliant upon myth and the bardic tradition, heavily
inflected with a modernist, and ecological viewpoint. Hughes' first
collection, Hawk in the Rain (1957) attracted considerable critical acclaim.
In 1959 he won the Galbraith prize which brought $5,000. His most
significant work is perhaps Crow (1970), which whilst it has been widely
acclaimed also divided critics, combining an apocalyptic, bitter, cynical
and surreal view of the universe with what appears to be simple verse. In
Birthday Letters, his last collection, Hughes broke his silence on Plath,
detailing aspects of their life together and his own behaviour at the time.
The cover artwork was by their daughter Frieda.
Read the poem and make notes on each verse following these points of
enquiry: –
1. Who and what is being presented in the first verse? Put this into
your own words. Where would you say the speaker of the poem is
standing? What is the speaker’s perspective?
2. There are changes of focus in the second verse. What are these
changes? (Think of how Hughes changes focus in ‘Wind’.)
3. The focus changes again in the third verse, how? Think of the
mechanical function of a camera lens.
Closer reading …
4. The six young men are seen as fixed in time – what technique,
beyond the key image of the photograph itself, does the poet use to
achieve this?
5. The key theme of the first verse can be seen as change. What
changes and what doesn’t? Identify the lines that express the
change that occurs/does not occur.
7. A famous line from a World War One poem seems to find its echo in
the first verse. Do you know what it is? It is always read at the
Remembrance Day Service at the Cenotaph in London and at
memorial services throughout the land. What do you think its key
effect is on the reader – how do we feel when reading it?
8. What is the immediate impact on the reader of the final line of the
first verse? What type of language is used to achieve this effect?
9. The third verse ends with a smile. This smile is not linked to
laughter, but what? What would you say is smiling – ‘forty years
rotting into soil’?
A photograph of
six young men
who have died in Imagery of photography and photographic techniques is
the Great War is used throughout the poem. The key single image is the
found by the photograph, which seemingly captures life in a frozen
speaker. The moment, but this is an illusion, as they and we shall die.
poem is an Language – blunt, simple, often monosyllabic, illustrated
account of the
thoughts and
feelings about the by the title – the men are simply that; ‘six young men’.
brevity of human Hughes creates a picture of them as typical young lads on
life that are an outing together; the descriptions are given added
induced in the poignancy by the final statement. The sorrow of their
speaker by such a deaths is conveyed simply; they were young, they were
discovery. friends, there were six of them and their lives were brief –
‘six months after’, ‘they were all dead’. The stanza ends
(as do all of the others) with an abrupt, shocking
statement. The repetition of ‘six’ hammers home this fact.
The poet’s
role
As observer of the The second stanza illustrates the key idea of permanence
photograph. This, and impermanence that runs throughout the poem. The
however, is not a speaker knows the photograph’s setting well, ‘I know that
‘war poem’. The bilberried bank, that thick tree, that black wall,/ Which are
photograph is there yet and not changed’. (Hughes’ frequently used
almost a ‘memento
technique of alliterative plosive consonants draws our
mori’, a reminder
that we shall die. attention to this simply described background.) Forty years
We are exposed to have passed, but nature remains untouched by time.
this inescapable Hughes contrasts human life and nature here, emphasising
‘horror’, just as the the key concept of the brevity of human life compared with
six young men the landscape, the ‘valley has not changed its sound’.
were and as is the Human life seems to have no impact on nature.
speaker of the
poem.