Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
The testing was done over a period of five days. D came willingly with the examiner the
first three days. D worked hard on those days, which covered math and reading. He
wanted to do well. Although he had trouble looking the examiner in the eyes and often
avoided eye contact altogether, he did answer when asked conversational questions. He
was aloof at the beginning of each session but appeared to become more comfortable
throughout the session. The final two sessions were more difficult for D. Both sessions
were writing. D was eager to start the second to last session but halfway through, no
longer wanted to continue. When asked if writing made him nervous, he shrugged his
shoulders and answered, Maybe. He did not want to continue. The last testing session
was to finish the unanswered writing portion. D resisted coming with the examiner. At
first he did not want to answer the questions but eventually wrote nonsense answers.
After a few minutes, he went back and rewrote what he had originally written. While the
examiner believes that the reading, oral and math scores are valid and D tried his best,
the writing section is questionable. D was clearly uncomfortable completing the writing
portion, did not want to try and appeared stressed. The examiner questions the validity
of the writing section.
Assessments:
I-Ready Reading Diagnostic
The Woodcock Johnson
NWEA
DRA-2
I-Ready:
The i-Ready is a diagnostic adaptive reading test that pinpoints student needs down to
the sub-skill level, and ongoing progress monitoring that shows whether students are on
track to achieve end-of year targets. The i-Ready also provides rigorous, on-grade-level
instruction and practice. It is proven to predict student performance on state
assessments. D took the I-Ready assessment on12/11/2014. His RIT score was 547.
Scores:
Phonological Awareness:
Tested Out
Phonics:
Tested Out
Tested Out
Vocabulary:
569 Level 4
Comprehension Literature:
523 Level 3
Comprehension Informational:
548 Level 4
Overall:
Level 4
These results indicate that D is decoding accurately, but the Vocabulary score points to
some gaps in word knowledge that might make it hard to read for meaning. Instruction in
word meanings and word-learning strategies will support Ds continued growth in overall
Comprehension.
NWEA:
The NWEA is an adaptive computer-based assessment. The MAPS assessment is a
personalized assessment that adapts to each students learning level. As the student
answers the questions, the assessment tailors the questions to find the level the student
is achieving at. The NWEA is a multiple choice computer program that predicts PARCC
assessment scores.
Scores:
RIT score
%ile
210
58
199
16
These results show that in the fall of 2014, D tested in the average range for reading. His
math score in the fall of 2014 was in the low range when compared to his peers.
DRA-2:
The DRA2 Benchmark Assessment measures each students reading proficiency
through systematic observation, recording and evaluating of performance. The
assessment is given in a 1 on 1 setting. The student is asked to read a book at a specific
level. The student is timed for fluency, errors are noted for accuracy and comprehension
is measured.
Scores:
Level
Fall 2014
34
Winter 2015
40
These results indicate that D made growth during the first semester in 5th grade. He is
slightly below grade level for reading.
Scores
%ile Rank
SS
Listening Comp
39
96
Broad Reading:
27
91
Broad Math
14
84
78
Brief Reading
33
94
Reading Comp
34
94
75
17
80
Written Expression
80
28
91
Individual Tests
Letter-Word Identification
Reading Fluency
12
82
Understanding Directions
37
95
Calculation
10
80
Math Fluency
77
Spelling
12
83
Writing Fluency
78
Passage Comprehension
49
100
Applied Problems
33
93
Writing Samples
19
87
Word Attack
37
95
Picture Vocabulary
35
94
Oral Comprehension
43
97
Editing
33
94
Reading Vocabulary
23
89
Listening Comprehension
This cluster is a measure of listening ability and verbal comprehension. Its made up of
the Understanding Directions and Oral Comprehension subtest. D has a standard score
of 96 for Listening Comprehension. Ds listening comprehension is in the average range.
Broad Reading
The Broad Reading cluster provides a comprehensive measure of reading achievement
including reading decoding, reading speed and the ability to comprehend connected
discourse while reading. This cluster is a combination of letter-word identification,
reading fluency, and passage comprehension. D had a standard score of 91, which
places him in the average range for reading.
Brief Reading
Brief Reading includes reading decoding, and the ability to comprehend connected
discourse while reading. D had a standard score of 94, placing him in the average range.
Reading Comprehension
The Reading Comprehension cluster is a combination of Passage Comprehension and
Reading Vocabulary and provides a measure of basic reading skills. It is a composite
measure of comprehension, vocabulary and reasoning. Ds reading comprehension
standard score is 94 which is in the average range.
Broad Math
The Broad Math cluster provides a comprehensive measure of math achievement
including problem solving, number facility, automaticity and reasoning. This cluster is
made up of Calculation, Math Fluency and Applied Problems. D had a standard score of
84 which places him in the low average range.
Brief Math
Brief Math includes problem solving, number facility and reasoning. Ds standard score
of 86 is in the low average range.
Written Expression
The Written Expression cluster is an aggregate measure of meaningful written
expression and fluency providing a measure of written expression skills. It is made up of
the writing fluency and writing samples tests. D had a standard score of 80, which places
him in the low average range.
Recommendations:
Based on the assessments given, D has a strength in his ability to decode words and to
comprehend what he is reading. He has shown growth in his reading level and has
tested in the average range on several assessments. He would benefit from vocabulary
instruction but overall shows that he is a strong reader. Reading should be encouraged.
D shows weaknesses in the areas of math and writing. He would benefit from practice
and instruction in math reasoning and math computational skills. Learning new concepts
may be difficult for D and instruction on foundational skills will benefit him. Writing is also
an area of concern for D. Although the validity of the results are questioned, it is clear
that writing is a source of anxiety and difficulty for D. He may benefit from different types
of thinking maps, including drawings to organize thought and breaks during writing time.
Additional support in writing will also benefit D.