G.R. No. L-14639 March 25, 1919 ZACARIAS VILLAVICENCIO, ET AL.

,
petitioners, vs. JUSTO LUKBAN, ET AL., respondents.
Facts:
One hundred and seventy women were isolated from society, and then at night, without
their consent and without any opportunity to consult with friends or to defend their rights,
were forcibly hustled on board steamers for transportation to regions unknown. Despite the
feeble attempt to prove that the women left voluntarily and gladly, that such was not the case
is shown by the mere fact that the presence of the police and the constabulary was deemed
necessary and that these officers of the law chose the shades of night to cloak their secret and
stealthy acts. Indeed, this is a fact impossible to refute and practically admitted by the
respondents.

ISSUE:
Whether or Not Mayor Lukban has the right to deport women with ill repute.

HELD:
Law defines power. No official, no matter how high, is above the law. Lukban committed
a grave abuse of discretion by deporting the prostitutes to a new domicile against their will.
There is no law expressly authorizing his action. On the contrary, there is a law punishing public
officials, not expressly authorized by law or regulation, which compels any person to change his
residence Furthermore, the prostitutes are still, as citizens of the Philippines, entitled to the
same rights, as stipulated in the Bill of Rights, as every other citizen. Their choice of profession
should not be a cause for discrimination. It may make some, like Lukban, quite uncomfortable
but it does not authorize anyone to compel said prostitutes to isolate themselves from the rest
of the human race. These women have been deprived of their liberty by being exiled to Davao
without even being given the opportunity to collect their belongings or, worse, without even
consenting to being transported to Mindanao. For this, Lukban etal must be severely punished.