2015 Waseca SD Powerpoint - Facilities Results

Waseca School District
2015 Residential Study
The Morris Leatherman Company
Survey Methodology
2015 Waseca School District
400 random household sample of the

Waseca School District
Telephone interviews conducted
between February 5th and 18th, 2015
Average interview time of 18 minutes
Non-response level of 4.8%
Projectable within +/- 5.0% in 95 out of
100 cases
Quality of Education
Excellent 27%
Good 66%
Unsure 2%
Poor 1%
Only Fair 4%
Like Most
Good Teachers
30
Good Education
25
Variety of Programs
13
Good Communication
Broad Curriculum
Parent Involvement
Excellent Education
Good Sports
Scattered
Unsure
7
0
10
15
20
Percentage
25
30
35
Most Serious Issue

Lack of Funding
23
Poor Spending
12
High Taxes
11
Large Class Sizes
11
Lack of Discipline
Declining Quality
Aging Facilities
4
2
Scattered
Unsure
12
NOTHING
13
0
10
15
Percentage
20
25
30
Compared to Three Years Ago...

Somew hat Worse 6%
Somew hat Better 27%
Much Better 5%
About the Same 53%
Unsure 9%
Meeting Learning Needs

All 55%
Struggling 29%
Gifted and Talented 15%
Underachievers 12%
Average 12%
Unsure 3%
Only Some 8%
Most 34%
Specific Perceptions I
100
87
76
80
69
69
68
60
40
26
28
26
16
20
6
11
2
0
Spent Effectively
Only as Last Resort

Honest about Spending
Agree
Trust to Do What is Right

Increases Home Values
Disagree
Unsure
Specific Perceptions II
100
84
87
83
92
90
80
60
40
20
11
13
6
11
5
8
2
0
Accountable Enough
Good Investment
Good Job Involving
Agree
Disagree
Safe and Secure Environment

Proud and Recommend
Unsure
District Characteristics
54
Class Sizes
36
81
Music/Theater/ Arts
13
87
Regular Academics
8
70
Special Education
13
65
Guidance Services
20
70
Opportunities for Academically Advanced
19
68
Vocational/Technical Programs
19
87
Extra-Curriculars/Athletics
7
72
Support for Struggling Students
17
20
40
Favorable
60
80
Unfavorable
100
Technology
Absolutely Essential
36%
Excellent 19%
Good 60%
Not too Important
1%
Very Important
50%
Unsure 8%
Poor 1%
Somewhat Important
13%
Importance of Technology
Only Fair 12%
Rating of Technology
Opportunities
Buildings and Facilities

Needs Updating 28%
Too Small 26%
Need Repairs 23%
Too Old 19%
Good 71%
Excellent 16%
Poor 1%
Only Fair 12%
Job Performance Ratings

120
100
93
85
80
72
71
60
40
23
19
20
10
10
0
School Board
Principals
Superintendent
Positive
Teachers
Negative
Unsure
Financial Management
Good 58%
Excellent 8%
Unsure 5%
Poor 7%
Only Fair 22%

Perception of Property Taxes

50
39
40
36
38
35
30
21
20
17
10
10
5
0
0
Very High
About Av erage
Somewhat High
Very Low
Somewhat Low
Total
School Only
Unsure
Adequately Funded
Yes 54%
Unsure 6%
No 40%
Willingness for Tax Increase

Against All
29%
Persuadable
51%
For All
20%
Property Taxes for Bond Referendum

40
35
Median: $8.60 per month
34
30
25
21
20
15
13
12
9
10
5
0
Nothing
$10 a month
$20 a month
$30 a month
Over $35
$5 a month
$15 a month
$25 a month
$35 a month
Unsure
Percentage
Bond Referendum Options

66
Building Infrastructure
32
62
Safety and Security
37
60
Science Labs/JSHS
36
60
Additional Classroom Space/Elem & JSHS
37
60
Technology Infrastructure
37
59
Shop and Ag Classrooms/JSHS
37
52
Media Center/Hartley
42
50
47
49
47
Performing Arts Center

Multi-Purpose Room and Gym/Hartley
42
Stadium Bathrooms and Concessions
53
40
Gym and Locker Rooms/JSHS
56
10
20
30
Agree
40
50
Disagree
60
70
80
Idea of Improvements
Good Idea
54%
Good Idea/Strongly
9%
Stadium Upgrades 26%

Multi-Purpose Room 19%
Gyms/Locker Rooms 13%
Bad Idea
23%
Unsure
6%
Bad Idea/Strongly
8%
$30 Million Fair Price

Yes
42%
Unsure
5%
No
53%
$30M Bond Referendum

Support
44%
Strong Support
12%
Unsure
2%
Oppose
28%
Strong Oppose
15%
Reason for $30M Bond

Education Important
Needed
Reasonable Cost
Kids in District
Old Facilities
22
11
11
9
3
Taxes Too High

Poor District Spending
Cost Too High
Not Needed
No Kids in District
Scattered
3
0
15
13
7
4
10
15
Percentage
20
25

Support
34%
Strong Support
4%
Unsure
3%
Oppose
42%
Strong Oppose
18%

Education Important
Reasonable Cost
Children in District
Needed
Old Facilities
14
8
7
6
2
Cost Too High

Taxes Too High
Not Needed
Don't Close Hartley
No Children
17
Scattered
14
13
7
5
10
Percentage
15
20

Support
24%
Strong Support
3%
Oppose
48%
Unsure
4%
Strong Oppose
22%

Education Important
Reasonable Cost
Needed
Children in District
Cost Too High
Taxes Too High
Not Needed
Don't Close Hartley
No Children
Scattered
10
6
5
4
25
15
14
10
4
3
4
10
15
Percentage
20
25
30
Option Most Favor

Hartley 21%
W IS/Strongly 10%
W IS 13%
Hartley/Strongly 11%
New Elem/Strongly 2%
New Elem 3%
Unsure 5%
Neither 36%
Principal Source of Information

Local Newspaper
30
District Newsletter
19
Word of Mouth
17
District Website
14
Building Newsletter
Teachers/Staff
E-Mail
Cable Television
Nothing
2
1
10
15
20
Percentage
25
30
35
Most Effective Way

Mailed Newsletter
33
Local Newspaper
26
E-mail
19
District Website
10
Word of Mouth
E-newsletter
School Website
Community Ed Catalog 1
Cable TV
Scattered
2
0
10
15
20
25
Percentage
30
35
40
Sources of Information
Waseca County New s
30
District New sletter
36
15
District Employees
39
District Website
23
11
School Websites
17
12
Social Media 1 3
Informal Discussions
18
0
10
41
20
30
A lot
40
Some
50
60
70
Amount of Information
Yes 81%
No/Unsure 1%
No/Too Much 1%
No/Too Little 17%

2015 Waseca SD Powerpoint - Facilities Results

Загружено:

Сведения о документе

Исходное описание:

Оригинальное название

Авторское право

Доступные форматы

Поделиться этим документом

Поделиться или встроить документ

Параметры публикации

Этот документ был вам полезен?

Это неприемлемый материал?

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

2015 Waseca SD Powerpoint - Facilities Results

Загружено:

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

Waseca School District

2015 Residential Study

The Morris Leatherman Company

400 random household sample of the

The Morris Leatherman Company

Most Serious Issue

Large Class Sizes

Compared to Three Years Ago...

The Morris Leatherman Company

Meeting Learning Needs

Only as Last Resort

Trust to Do What is Right

Safe and Secure Environment

Opportunities for Academically Advanced

Support for Struggling Students

The Morris Leatherman Company

Only Fair 12%

Buildings and Facilities

Only Fair 12%

The Morris Leatherman Company

Job Performance Ratings

Only Fair 22%

Perception of Property Taxes

The Morris Leatherman Company

Willingness for Tax Increase

Property Taxes for Bond Referendum

Median: $8.60 per month

Bond Referendum Options

Safety and Security

Additional Classroom Space/Elem & JSHS

Shop and Ag Classrooms/JSHS

Performing Arts Center

Stadium Bathrooms and Concessions

Gym and Locker Rooms/JSHS

Stadium Upgrades 26%

The Morris Leatherman Company

$30 Million Fair Price

$30M Bond Referendum

Reason for $30M Bond

Taxes Too High

$41M Bond Referendum

The Morris Leatherman Company

Reason for $41M Bond

Cost Too High

$46M Bond Referendum

Reason for $46M Bond

Option Most Favor

The Morris Leatherman Company

Principal Source of Information

Most Effective Way

District New sletter

No/Too Little 17%

The Morris Leatherman Company

Вам также может понравиться