Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 10


SOCIAL WORK 4441 002 CRN 4441

(1 credit hour)
Professor Althea M. Grant, LMSW, ACSW
Office Hours: By arrangement
Room 43 Thompson Home
Email: ad9444@wayne.edu
Office number: 313-577-9886
cellular number: 313-706-0876
Understanding the learning experience through critical reflection on field and course work.
Social Work 4441 BSW Field Education Seminar II is a one credit hour seminar held
concurrently with SW 4998 Field Practice II (5 credits) during the fall semester. Students MUST
be enrolled in SW 4998 Field Practice II in order to earn credit for this course. Social Work 4441
BSW Field Education Seminar II facilitate students understanding of the learning experience
through critical reflection on field and courses. The course helps students reflect on their field
experiences and to draw from their course content, all of which help define them as social work


2.1.1 Identify as a professional social worker and conduct oneself accordingly
Practice Behaviors:

Advocate for the client access to the services of social work; practice Personal reflection and
self-correction to assure continual professional development; attend to professional roles and
boundaries; demonstrate professional demeanor in behavior, appearance and communication;
engage in Career long learning; use supervision and consultation
2.1.2 Apply social work ethical principles to guide professional practice
Practice Behaviors:
Recognize and manage personal values in a way that allows professional values to guide
make ethical decisions by applying standards of the NASW Code of Ethics; tolerate

ambiguity in resolving conflicts; apply concepts of ethical reasoning to arrive at principled

2.1.3 Apply Critical thinking to inform and communicate professional judgments
Practice Behaviors:
Distinguish, appraise, and integrate multiple sources of knowledge, including research based
knowledge, and practice wisdom; analyze models of assessment, prevention, intervention and
evaluation; demonstrate effective oral and written communication in working with
individuals, families, groups, organizations, communities, and colleagues
2.1.4 Engage diversity and difference in practice
Practice Behaviors:
Gain sufficient self-awareness to eliminate the influence of personal bias and values in working
with diverse groups; recognize and communicate the importance of difference in shaping life
2.1.5 Advance human rights and social and economic justice
Practice Behaviors:
Advocate for human rights and social justice; Engage in practice that advance social and
economic justice
2.1.6 Engage in research- informed practice and practice informed research
Practice Behaviors:
Use research evidence to inform practice; Use practice to inform scientific inquiry
2.1.7 Apply Knowledge of human Behavior and the social environment
Practice Behaviors:
Utilize conceptual frameworks to guide the process of assessment, intervention and evaluation;
Critique and apply knowledge to understand person and environment
2.1.8 Engage in policy practice to advance social and economic well-being and to deliver
effective social work services.
Practice Behaviors:
Analyze, formulate, and advocate for policies that advance social well-being; Collaborate with
colleagues and clients for effective policy action
2.1.9 Respond to contexts that shape practice
Practice Behaviors:
Continuously discover, appraise, and attend to changing locales, populations, scientific and
technological developments, and emerging societal trends to provide relevant services; provide
leadership in promoting sustainable changes in service delivery and practice to improve the
quality of social service
2.1.10 Engage, assess, intervene and evaluate with individuals, families, groups,
organizations and communities
Practice Behaviors:
Substantively and affectively prepare for action with individuals, families, groups,

organizations and communities; use empathy and other interpersonal skills; develop a
mutually agreed-on focus of work and desired outcomes
(b) Assessment
Collect, organize, and interpret client data; assess client strengths and limitation develop
mutually agreed-on intervention goals and objectives; select appropriate intervention
(c) Intervention
Initiate actions to achieve organizational goals; implement prevention interventions that
enhance client capacities; help clients resolve problems; negotiate, mediate, and advocate for
clients; facilitate transitions and endings
(d) Evaluation
Critically analyze, monitor, and evaluate interventions
11 Analyze the impact of the urban context on a range of client systems, including practice
Practice Behaviors:
Examine the distinct characteristics of the urban context and apply the analysis to social work
It is expected that students effectively utilize field instruction by:
a. identifying own learning needs, areas of difficulty, and feelings of discomfort
b. continuing to take responsibility to prepare and plan for supervision
c. continuing to accept, integrate, and apply guidance and feedback received from field
d. continually re-evaluating the development of practice skills in light of field and
classroom instruction
Module 1 Discussion Board
Module 2 Group
Module 3 Ethics Activity


Related Course Competency

Competency #1
Competencies #1, #3, #10


Competencies #1, #2, #3,

Competency #1, #3, #7
Competencies #3, #4, #7,
Competencies #2, #3, #5,#
7, #8, #10
Competencies #1, #3, #10
Competency #1, #3, #10,

Module 4 Journal
Module 5 Blog


Module 6 Group cases


Module 7 Blog
Report on Field Placement




Students may pass the course with a grade of D but must maintain a C average during the junior
and senior year. (See Undergraduate Bulletin, Wayne State University).
Incomplete grade policy: http://www.socialwork.wayne.edu/incomplete_grade_policy.pdf
100-95 A

94.9-90 A-

89.9-87 B+

86.9-83 B

82.9-80 B-

79.9-77 C+

79.9-77 C+

76.9-73 C

72.9-70 C-

69.9-67 D+

66.9-63 D

62.9-60 D-


This is a one credit web course composed of lecture and discussion with seven online modules.
First module begins Thursday, August 28, 2014 and last module ends Tuesday, November 25,
2014. The modules are seven days in length and a new module begins every other week. The
students are required to participate in discussion about field placement and the integration of
coursework and fieldwork. The focus of the course is to help students integrate their coursework
learning with their experiential learning in the field practicum. Through lecture and group
discussions, case analyses, a reflective journal, and blogs, students learn about professional
social work practice with an emphasis on critical thinking, self-awareness, ethics and values, and
culturally responsive practice with an emphasis on human rights and social justice.
The sessions are organized around the following areas:

Defining and describing agency services

Learning to ask for help
Effective use of supervision
Review of professional behavior and demeanor
Ethics in Social Work
Boundary issues
Communication skills
Realistic expectations
Time management skills
Self care


Students are expected to attend all online class modules; absences from class may affect the
student's grade, particularly excessive absences and tardiness. Two or more absences will result

in a student being asked to withdraw from the course and may also impact the students field
placement. Students are expected to be prepared at class time for discussions based on assigned
readings as class participation enhances the learning experience. Assignments must be received
by the identified day. For further details about the role of a student, see the Universitys
Statement of Obligations of Faculty and to the Instructional Process in the Wayne State
University Graduate Bulletin. http://www.bulletins.wayne.edu/fib/fib2d.html
The instructor will closely monitor all postings, offer additional questions to guide discussions
and help maintain focus if the class has difficulty focusing on the topics. All assignments must
be completed on Blackboard and not submitted by email to the instructor.
The instructor will respond to student questions that are not related to the assignments by email.
The grade points will be posted in the Grade Center within a reasonable time period after the
deadline of each assignment.
At the end of module four, the instructor will email to each student personal feedback of their
progress in the seminar.
Members of the class, including the instructor, will request confidentiality of others as not to
repeat or share personal, professional, or assignment related issues discussed or disclosed in
Assignments must be received by the identified deadline dates in the Course Calendar located on
the course menu on the Blackboard home page. To complete all assignments and the required
responding posts, the online modules of this course will require adherence to the periods
specified in the Course Calendar. All assignments will be assessed by a Grading Rubric that is
related to the specific assignment. The course Grading Rubrics are located on the course menu
on the Blackboard home page.
Students who are late in their postings will lose points for each assignment in accordance with
the Grading Rubrics associated with each assignment. There is no extra credit for assignments in
this course. There is no opportunity for revision of assignments after submission for grading.
For a missed session at instructors discretion, (considered only in extreme cases life events
beyond ones control), student may be allowed an optional make-up assignment (i.e., a 3-5 page
paper with minimum of 3 sources and using APA format focusing on topic covered in session
missed OR another assignment identified by the instructor). Students who elect this option and
successfully complete the makeup assignment will receive partial points (minus late points
indicated in the grading rubric) for missed session. Students who miss a second session and who
did a first make-up will not have an option for a second make-up these students would lose all
points for the second missed session. Students who miss more than three classes and do no
make-up work should drop the class.
Being a responsible student in an online seminar entails regular class attendance and active
class participation with consideration for others. When students participate actively in class
discussions, learning is enhanced. To be able to participate actively and with relevance to the

course subject matter, it is important that you log into each class as soon as the assignment is
available. It is the students responsibility, whether present or absent, to keep abreast of
assignments and class discussion.
Academic honesty is expected therefore, all submitted work must be original. The presentation of
anothers words or ideas as ones own, without giving credit to the source with a properly noted
citation, is regarded as plagiarism. Any work that is submitted in this class found to contain
portions that are plagiarized will receive a ZERO.
Report on Field Placement setting
30 points
Report on Field Placement Setting due Monday, November 10, 2014 by 11:59
pm. A written report, minimum of 5 pages, must be submitted using outline
below. This report addresses performance outcomes related to the field placement
(practicum) setting. This report builds on the assignment required in SW 4020
Social Work Macro Theory and Practice. The following content must be

Mission/purpose of the agency

Overview of the population served
Your role within the agency
Other disciplines represented within the organization and your (or social
work) interaction with each discipline
How clients access/enter the system, eligibility, intake policies, and
procedures, etc.
How clients progress through the system
How clients leave/terminate the system
Discuss the agencys commitment to the community and surrounding areas it
serves and examples of how this is achieved




Introduction and orientation to the course
Student introduction
Review of course syllabus
Review expectation of all parties
Discussion on field assignments: learning
plan, process recordings, evaluations

Defining and describing agency services

Learning to ask for help


#1, #3, #10

Effective use of supervision

Review of professional behavior and


Ethics in Social Work

Boundary issues

#1, #2, #3, #10


Time management skills

Self care

#1, #3, #7

Group discussion and problem-solving

Understanding the perspective of the client

#3, #4, #7, #10


Reflecting feelings and integrating skills

Group discussion and problem-solvingDifficult clients
Reporting of child abuse and neglect

#2, #3, #5, #7, #8, #10

Reflections on personal growth in field

Performance Achievement Rating forms
Transition and reviewing objectives for next

#1, #3, #10



Students with disabilities
Academic integrity and student code of conduct
Counseling and Psychological Services (CAPS) at Wayne State:
(All students are able to download the manual from the Schools web site)
The Field Education Manual, 7th Edition (2013). Wayne State University School of Social Work.
Recommended Texts
Birkenmaier, J. M., and Berg-Weger, M. (2011). Practicum Companion for Social Work:
Integrating Class and Fieldwork, The (3rd Edition) (Connecting Core Competencies). Allyn &

Sweitzer, H. & King, M. (2004). The Successful Internship: Transformation and Empowerment
in Experiential Learning. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Arkin, N. (1999). Culturally sensitive student supervision: Difficulties and challenges. The
Clinical Supervisor, 18(2), 1-16. doi:10.1300/J001v18n02_01
Baker, D. R., & Smith, S. L. (1987). A comparison of field faculty and field student perceptions
of selected aspects of supervision. The Clinical Supervisor, 5(4), 31-42.
Baum, N. (2011). Social work students' feelings and concerns about the ending of their fieldwork
supervision. Social Work Education, 30(1), 83-97. doi:10.1080/02615471003743388
Bogo, M. (2010). Achieving competence in social work through field education. University of
Toronto Press.
Bogo, M., & McKnight, K. (2005). Clinical Supervision in Social Work: A Review of the
Research Literature. The Clinical Supervisor, 24(1-2), 49-67. doi:10.1300/J001v24n01_04
Caspi, J. and Reid, W.J. (2002) Educational Supervision in Social Work: a task-centered model
for field instruction and staff development, NY: Columbia U.P.
Catalano, S. J. (1985). Crisis intervention with clinical interns: Some considerations for
supervision. The Clinical Supervisor, 3(1), 97-102. doi:10.1300/J001v03n01_08
Chui, E. T. (2010). Desirability and feasibility in evaluating fieldwork performance: Tensions
between supervisors and students. Social Work Education, 29(2), 171-187.
Dolgoff, R. Loewenberg, E.A., Harrington, D. (2009) Ethical Decisions for Social Work Practice,
Fortune, A. E., Feathers, C. E., Rook, S. R., & Scrimenti, R. M. (1988). Student satisfaction with
field placement. The Clinical Supervisor, 6(3-4), 359-381. doi:10.1300/J001v06n03_25
Fortune, A. E., & Kaye, L. (2002). Learning opportunities in field practica: Identifying skills and
activities associated with MSW students' self-evaluation of performance and satisfaction. The
Clinical Supervisor, 21(1), 5-28. doi:10.1300/J001v21n01_02
Fortune, A. E., McCarthy, M., & Abramson, J. S. (2001). Student learning processes in field
education: Relationship of learning activities to quality of field instruction, satisfaction, and
performance among MSW students. Journal of Social Work Education, 37(1), 111-124.

Ganzer, C., & Ornstein, E. D. (2004). Regression, self-disclosure, and the teach or treat dilemma:
Implications of a relational approach for social work supervision. Clinical Social Work Journal,
32(4), 431-449.
Garthwait, C. (2005). The Social Work Practicum: A Guide and Workbook for Students. Allyn
and Bacon, Boston.
Gelman, C. (2004). Anxiety Experienced by Foundation-Year MSW Students Entering Field
Placement: Implications for Admissions, Curriculum, and Field Education. Journal of Social
Work Education, 40(1), 39-54.
Gelman, C., Fernandez, P., Hausman, N., Miller, S., & Weiner, M. (2007). Challenging endings:
First year MSW interns' experiences with forced termination and discussion points for
supervisory guidance. Clinical Social Work Journal, 35(2), 79-90. doi:10.1007/s10615-0070076-6
Hay, K., & O'Donoghue, K. (2009). Assessing social work field education: Towards
standardising fieldwork assessment in New Zealand. Social Work Education, 28(1), 42-53.
Holden, G., Barker, K., Rosenberg, G., Kuppens, S., & Ferrell, L. W. (2011). The signature
pedagogy of social work? An investigation of the evidence. Research on Social Work Practice,
21(3), 363-372.
Homonoff, E. (2008). The heart of social work: Best practitioners rise to challenges in field
instruction. The Clinical Supervisor, 27(2), 135-169. doi:10.1080/07325220802490828
Johnson, A.K.( 2000). The Community practice pilot project: integrating methods, field,
community assessment, and experiential learning. Journal of Community Practice. 8(4): 5-25
Kanno, H., & Koeske, G. F. (2010). MSW students' satisfaction with their field placement: The
role of preparedness and supervision quality. Journal of Social Work Education, 46(1), 23-38.
Lazar, A., & Eisikovits, Z. (1997). Social work students' preferences regarding supervisory styles
and supervisor's behavior. The Clinical Supervisor, 16(1), 25-37. doi:10.1300/J001v16n01_02
McNeece, C. A., & Thyer, B. A. (2004). Evidence-based practice and social work. Journal of
evidence-based social work, 1(1), 7-25.
Noesen, J. (1999). The intern and the challenging client. Smith College Studies in Social Work,
70(1), 27-45.
Reisch, M., Jarman-Rohde, L. (Spring/Summer 2000). The future of social work in the United
Sates: implication for field education. Journal of Social Work Education. 36(2): 201- 214.
Regehr, C., Regehr, G., Leeson, J., & Fusco, L. (2002). Setting priorities for learning in the field

practicum: A comparative study of student and field instructors. Journal of Social Work
Education, 38(1), 55-65.
Royce, D., Dhooper, S. & Rompf, E. (2010) Field Instruction: A Guide for Social Work Students.
NY: Allyn and Bacon
Sun, A. (1999). Issues BSW interns experience in their first semester's practicum. The Clinical
Supervisor, 18(1), 105-123. doi:10.1300/J001v18n01_07
Smith, S. L., & Baker, D. R. (1988). The relationship between educational background of field
instructors and the quality of supervision. The Clinical Supervisor, 6(3-4), 257-270.
Triezenberg, G. E. (1984). Learning magic: Social work internship and beyond. The Clinical
Supervisor, 2(4), 43-51. doi:10.1300/J001v02n04_05
Urdang, E. (1999). Becoming a field instructor: A key experience in professional development.
The Clinical Supervisor, 18(1), 85-103. doi:10.1300/J001v18n01_06
Urdang, E. (1995, August). Self-perceptions of the beginning field instructor: The experience of
supervising a social work intern. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A, 56
Vonk, M., & Thyer, B. A. (1997). Evaluating the quality of supervision: A review of instruments
for use in field instruction. The Clinical Supervisor, 15(1), 103-113. doi:10.1300/J001v15n01_08
Wayne, J., Bogo, M., & Raskin, M. (2010). Field education as the signature pedagogy of social
work education. Journal of Social Work Education, 46(3), 327-339.