Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 16
‘Nuns in Space: Strict Enclosure and the Architecture of the Clarisses in the Thirteenth Century Caroline Bruzelius Ja formalist art historical tradition that has tended to focus on great monuments and large-scale projects there has been little interest in the snchitecture of convents: They tended to be small, poor, and humble. ‘Their physical isolation often led to their destruction: in France in Believing” was delivered at the ‘he material From that talk had ‘Believing. Clarssan Architecture ca. Hike to thank the Fulbright Foundation in Italy mech during the Fall of 1983, as well as Beth Lynn, Ingeid lyn Valone, Anita Voland, Paul Lachence, nd Margaret Peres tis exeay the term convent is used conventionally to designate + monastic house for women, whereas manasiy designates one for en Tmoder literature on {n Twellth-Centary Monasticism,” The Medieeat aa nese ota 1988) 4352; and idem, Monks and Nurs Reforming» Mafraan, Wort ‘Cstercon Expansion into Southern France, orthcoming. In 1982 Constance Berman. cited volume of essays on convent ar and architecture in Geta, 31. (1992). 961 LAr, OK Mon “znsAog 95 yvontun sirauoatuog ig aunaisuy UeostUeIg YL “HS'O ‘vostaeg pufuy 4q pups, IIA eumjo, siadug posaapas asafaioyy UDULOY, Usapoys PuD joaapays sasissis fo any JONPH [eIUED “D‘g ‘O ‘suoY souery Arey sauias hssuazuad atv) smoneaqnd enyysuy uvos~uerg -aso ‘wosmed pati ‘Ka pana ce, ‘sojareip ve uani8 suonequnsoid wis Shesse PAPSIAS imAsA) sradeg papa[9s 3824971) ‘UEWIOM WIaPOW PUe TEASTPaIA W FISESSV JO OFE[D sessy jo ano 10 AudesBora poneep » pausugnd saosmaiog pba € podlovse som sainoe, BOUL 7661, &2 “Gawutdy Ul ssakiuoD TeASTDOW auh 12 Pe {uasemon] suonpeSHseauy :1SISsy JO TET) puooag ayy pu ‘oweeg wes 30 soyPe] 100g ap a Bue dove aug ur pajsaianul auokue 20) 2pm ue “5.0 euoH spueny Arey 35 30 120 UDp tasuon] apy orydesSoriqra V LrapsQ F9Y{ PUR ISISSY 30 VID IS opr reursresg — ALSUMIOA, ar tedsop jo moa sare IeUMIOA, ypmyp ain Ui pop Jo anoT aR sieAODSICL AFT TTSUMIOA, spoueng Aq poumsog rome) TaUNION sonpa [e12W2H "2D °g ‘0 BUH spULIy Arey anny sueos fo yung, ayn fo soupy 30 sans uae ayBi sauas hevuaquad aityD 54 / Caroline Bruzelius particular a vast proportion of women’s monasteries were demolished in the Revolution, among them the remarkable and historically important convents such as Longchamp, Port Royal, and Maubuisson. Furthermore, convents were frequently founded in the abandoned buildings of older abbeys, churches, farms, or hospitals, which sometimes reverted to their former state.? Not often, then, do convents present an aesthetically unified or coherent appearance or ground plan. ‘There are few of the satisfactions of studying the systematic approaches to design and layout such as those of the Cistercians and the other orders which emphasized the regularity and consistency of the monastic plan. From the evidence of architectural organization of the Clarisses in particular, the model for convent spaces shifted away from that of the male monastery to that of the anchorite, Choirs, rather than being integrated into the design of the church, were often positioned in locations analogous to that of the anchoritic cell adjacent to a parish church. As a result, the choirs of the Clares were rarely integral to the plan and design of a church, which tended to exist as an independent and often pre-existing entity. They were tacked on here or there, like barnacles on a pier, around a structure that had its own separate and independent architectural coherence. We shall see in this essay that this “appended” quality also reflected the character of the liturgical experience of nuns and their relation to the sacraments. ‘The difficulties of an architectural history of convents are com- pounded by the fact that historical documentation for female monastic establishments is rarely adequate, and sharp distinctions between the various phases and permutations of individual convents (from hospital to convent, from order to order) are difficult to track As a number of historians have noted, the finances of women’s communities were often San Damiano, in spite of short life span (ca historical prominence, is an excellent example of the jously been a small and red church, and today. On the fuidity of ‘women’s religious on, passim. The common ‘rote of wore’ elgus huts peably prove ore conan then than {ssues pertaining to afliation with any particular order. “Thompson, esp. 38 ‘Nuns in Space: Architecture inthe Thirteenth Century / 55 strained, and the lack of resources inevitably determined the nature of their buildings > ‘The central and overriding fact of all women’s monasticism by the late Middle Ages was strict enclosure. Enclosure in some form was of course fundamental to all monasticism from the outset. But in the male orders it was intended to insulate the spiritual life from the distractions land temptations of the external world, whereas for women enclosure as traditionally defined evolved to protect and isolate them from contact with lay society, or the violence of invaders.” For women’s com- mu enclosure also meant a greater degree of financial and administrative dependence, for the regulations against the egress of women religious from the monastery to attend to properties and to sell goods meant that these matters had to be carried out by agents oF Cervantes ® Visitation, the annual “checkup” of a community, for female houses was usually performed by a male supervisor, either by an abbot from a male house of the same order ot by a local diocesan official? ‘Thus conformity to a rule, which in men’s houses often depended upon ‘an annual visitation from a member of the same order, was for women’: houses enforced by an outsider to the order.” While enclosure in various forms had been an organizing an¢ fundamental principle of convents from the outset,!" it waxed anc SC. Berman and C. Bruzelivs, “Introduction,” Gest, 31 (1992): 78-75. The article b ‘pernaditis Bensbre in that Sseue, "The Cistercian Convent of Coyroux in the Twelfth an Thinwenth Centuries,” pp. 7652, i particuasly helpful as regards the special conditions female monasticism in the context of the Cistercian order. fan Leclerq, “Clausura,” in the Dizionario deg 190, Le reco rae in tellin ofthe Foor Claes See for ap ed 5 Chae Ae) sr oman (25195) Man San especly p92, 29. As, Shaler Sn ser Sclebrg 7 aan ee Rosen's comments onthe vistations of the convents is se etc cane oud in We ies Medel Earp Suen Emi Ant ew York/ London. 199) 2155. Tr a ert "lau," cl 117, hat unl the en oft ee ee er ina fron were ble toattend General Chapt Ele ce thay Shaler, 8734 74 1 Caroline Bruzelius presented by the proliferation of new spirituality in the early thirteenth century, and their subecquent suppression during the Fourth Lateran Council of 125, only reiniomod the need for the church to control, manage, and define women religious, imposing traditional formulae on any obstreperous attempts including Clare's Form of Life, to redefine female monastidiams orders and new types of Za she ha bargined for when she ran aay from home. Te wa the Fanscan ve fe for which he yearned the wey of adventure and harsship. aig Cara tration, there were many ich convents near Ase could have chosen to join inseed The Beguine ne vided ano Sau have howe ins noth ofthe Als provided another The Implications of Fasting and Illness in the Death of Clare of Assisi Joanne Schatzlein, O.S.F Death as an experience remains a mystery, one of the few mysteries which we humans have yet to solve despite our medical knowledge, technology, and scientific exploration. Death provokes questions such as why, how did it happen, what is its meaning. Death evokes feelings of anger, confusion, loss and loneliness, but also invites belief, faith, reverence, and praise. ‘As a Franciscan woman who is also a registered nurse by profession, I have witnessed illness and death and all of its accom- anying questions and emotions. It is this experience of death that led me as a student at the Franciscan Institute at Saint Bonaventure University to explore the implications of illness in the death of Francis. More recently I have been intrigued by the life of Clare and find myself asking similar questions related to her experience of illness, her fasting practices, her penitential life-style, and how these experiences may have contributed to her death. In order to explore adequately these elements in the life of Clare, it is necessary to research demographic statistics and medi- eval medicine. This leads to difficulties due to a dearth of availabl information. In an article entitled “The Diagnosis of St. Francis: Evidence for Leprosy,” Dan Sulmasy, OFM, and I point out that any venture into understanding medical illness and cause of death in the Middle Ages must be undertaken cautiously, recognizing that our present day resources only allow us avenues for com- prehensive study rather than precise conclusions ? Aoanne Schatelein, OSF, RN, MA, and Daniel Sulmasy, OFM, MD, "The Diagnosis of St. ands Evidence for Leprosy,” Froncsca Stade, 47, (1987) Aschataein and Sulmasy, 18. 56 / Caroline Bruzelius enclosure was for the most part more oriented towards the entrance of men into the community of women than the egress of the nuns, and it was understood that nuns often exited the convent to attend to convent business."? As he notes, Hildegard of Bingen preached publicly.23 Among the Clarisses, Clare's Form of Life of 1253 recognized the occasional practical needs for the women to attend to the needs of the community 0 the walls, although the other earlier rules es tablished for the Clarisses strictly forbade egress. In the convent, strict enforced enclosure meant that nuns were to be protected and separated not only from the lay public, but also, and equally importantly, from the clergy. Indeed, the issue of the clergy Presents the fundamental irony of women’s religious vocation: to ‘women’s communities, which sought isolation and removal from the world of men, men were nonetheless indispensable. Only clerics could administer confession, the Mass, and the Eucharist. In the thirteenth century a new spirit of rigor concerning enclosure, inaugurated by the regulations imposed beginning in 1219 upon the Clarisses, even effected the administration of the sacraments, ‘One last observation related to enclosure is also essential for an understanding of the architectural history of women’s houses. As noted above, since enclosure prohibited meetings and travel by nuns, there could be no overall organizational structure for women’s communities that would ensure consistency and uniformity between all houses on architectural (or other) matters. Whereas modern scholarship on architecture has often focused on a uniform approach to the \d design of monastic buildings within an Order (whether . Benedictine, or Dominican, for example), a systematic Studi Prancescan, Assisi, 1980) 67, 83, The distinction is between “active” enclosure, the runs being able to leave the convent, versus “passive” enclosure, access tothe convent by outsiders, See Schulenburg, 5. 3 Ledeng, 67 Chae of A ary Documents, ed. Regis J. Armstrong (New York/Mahwah, 1988) 63, For a synthetic discussion ofthe various phases and controversies concerning the rules of the Clares, see Micheline de Fonttte, “Les Clarstes,” in Lev religieses age dic droit canon: our lea structures uviigues des branches féminines des adres (Paris, 1967) 129- view, se Sister Ciara Augusta Lainal, "The Enclosure of St. Clare and of lares in Canonical Legislation and in Practice,” The Card 28 (1978) 4-15, ‘nluns in Space: Prchitecture in the Thirteenth Century / 57 analysis is rarely possible for convents.15 Each convent perforce existed 1s a separate cell, inaccessible except under exceptional circumstances ‘even to nuns from other houses of the same order. The transmission of systematic architectural solutions from one female house to another could happen only through four channels: the founding of a new house by “colonializing” sisters moving from one house to another, letters the travels or special demands of an important lay patron," or an unusually active role played by a Minister General. But normally, as noted above, the simple fact that a large proportion of convents were established in already existing buildings militated against consistency in architectural solutions; in each case the acquired buildings were adjusted or remodeled to suit the needs of the new community, modifying pre-existing structures to meet the demands of enclosure. The solutions varied widely depending on the configuration of the erited buildings. nae history of ‘vromen’s monastic architecture, therefore, cannot be neatly organized for many reasons. By the end of the thirteenth century, there was far less unity within the overall phenomenon of the nuns’ architecture than between their male counterparts."® In other words, by the end of the thirteenth century it becomes more difficult to identify and describe an architecture as characteristically Cistercian, Clarissan, or Benedictine when it comes to wore ments. As we shall see, social and intellectual changes, especially within the structure of the church, by 1200 led to a reaffirmation of strict enclosure ‘eample, my own work on the thirteeth-century churches ia the I Ctra ory which demonstrated st modular pipe ape in ‘early twellth-century churches of the order, suchas Fontenay, contined to ‘Sap cemers in the deg of henge ce cures o te thee. See CA Bruzalius, “Cistercian High Gothic: The Abbey Church of Longpont and the Architecture ofthe Cistercian Order inthe Tenth Century, "Anlece cerciensis®. 0579) Teach as those from Clare to Agnes of Bohemia, though inthis case there survive no architectural instructions Me ‘ssue in particular the work of Thompson, 161-90, Ina forthcoming ‘Tian Eice t rreentrcentury Quen Sancia of ofthe convent of St. Chiara in ad an important role in tbe conception and design (rtheoming in Memoir ofthe American Acer in Rome, 1995). he ‘ecerg (1973), 167, divided the history of enclosure ino thee periods: up end of the eighth century from the end ofthe eighth until the end ofthe thisten then afterwards, Our research here concems the periods. 58 / Caroline Bruzelius that in 1298 resulted in universal regulations for the enclosure of all female religious. The new regulations stipulated elaborate architectural s, and screens for female communities regardless of The regulations for the Clarisses are of particular interest with losure of women. Clare of Assisi was woman to have her rule for San Damiano (Clare herself described it as the “Form of Life”) approved by papal authority.” ‘The regulations of the Clarisses (though not in fact Clare’s own rule) subsequently became regulations of 1298 on female f the Clarissan rules specified in is, and turning wheels by about 1220 a particularly rigorous ¢ had been imposed on Clare and her companions at San Damiano, and that this Clarissan model, irrespective of its par- ticularly complex evolution, sources or origins, had a profound impact on female monasticism of the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries.2 ‘An examination of the first century of Clarissan churches (c. 1212- 1310) reveals that a wide variety of solutions for the relationship of the choir to the church existed within the order. Although in some houses the choir is placed in a lateral space flanking either nave or apse (Plate 1; the choirs are indicated by an arrow), in other cases, as at S. Tomaso in Potenza Picena, the choirs were behind the altar (Plate 2), ot, alternatively in an upper gallery or room at the west end of the building (San Paolo at Tuscania, Plate 3). Interconnecting windows or api, "Fratri mendicant e pinzochere in Toscana,” Tem ¢ problemi nella nistcafemminle recentesca (Tod, Accademia Tudertina, 1983) 109.35, reprinted in Misiche © devote nal tardomeicoale, ed. Daniel Bornstein e Roberto Rusconi (Liguori Editore, 192) 85-106, ‘Nuns in Space: Architecture in the Thirteenth Century / 59 Plate 1. San Darniano, Assisi, plan. The arrow indicates the present choir 60 / Caroline Bruzelius Pate3S Paolo Toscana (Toearel 7 , carl), rom Hlipak ‘The arrow indicates the choir. ss ‘uns in Space: Architecture in the THrteenth Century / 61 doors permitted the passage of sound and the delivery of the consecrated host for communion. A well-preserved arrangement 1) which would have permitted sound 6 pass from the through the upper door at the back of a small upper (Plate 5). The nuns could descend a small wooden staircase for confession behind the curtain (right side of Plate 5) and the host could the same stairs. However, from of the existing choir stalls, fitted into the comer of the choir (Plate 4, left side) itis clear that vision into the church would have been difficult if not imposs The one common f generally the sisters could of all these churches, however, is that strated represent a generé is rules of the Clares: thy attendance at the Mass experience. The central act of the liturgy, the elevation of the host anc the dramatic visual allegory of the Mass, were not visually accessible te the resident female population. ‘There is ample evidence to suggest that enclosure, above all managed the senses by rejecting vision in favor of the more controllablt and distilled sense of heating. For example, the various versions of rules provided for the Clarisses make references to grills which are t be covered with a cloth on the inside of enclosure. These permitted th passage of sound but prevented sight. Within the various regulation of the Clarisses, only Clare’s own Form of Life, 1253, approved on he deathbed, stipulates that the cloth may be removed during Mass: “Let curtain be hung inside the grille which may not be removed excer when the Word of God is being preached, or when a sister is speaking 62 / Caroline Bruzelius Ns in Space: Srcitecture in te Trteeth Century / 62 Plate 4 §, Sebastiano, Alats, view of the nun's choir towards the church ie i laced Plate 6, Sta, Maria Iacobi, Nola, upper choi towards the apse Plate 5.S. Sebastiano, Alatri, view of the church towards the choir. (Photo Chester Brummme!) (Photo Chester Beummel) Plate 7. San Damiano, Assisi, upper oratory: 64 / Caroline Bruzelius with someone The rules for the Clarisses of 1219 and 1247, on the other hand, insisted that the curtain be kept in place during the Mass as well as at all other times, The 1219 Rule of Hugolino states that the cloth be placed so that “no sister is able to see anything in the chapel outside;” no mention is made of removing the cloth during the liturgy.26 Irrespective of important differences in other matters, all regulations for the Clarisses (1219, 1247, etc.), as well as Clare’s own Form of Life, ‘emphasize the importance of silence within the convent. The result is thus that hearing the Mass must have had particular pungency, and indeed the terminology in all the rules states that the mass is heard (as opposed to seen). These strictures are reiterated in the 1247 Rule of Innocent IV.” In all the rules formulated for the Clarisses other than Clare's own, the assumption is that the cloth remains in place even during the performance of the Mass. The language used to describe the sister's participation in the liturgy is exclusively one of listening and hearing. The character of Clare's Form of Life, approved in 1253, suggests that slightly different liturgical arrangements may have prevailed at San Damiano, although we cannot be exactly sure of the location and character of the original choir of the sisters, and therefore of the degree of their visual access to the liturgy. According to Jean-Frangois Godet, Clare herself never referred to her community and sisters as reclusae but rather as inclusae, the difference being between the definition of sacred and community space in the latter as opposed to the complete separation and isolation suggested by the former.?# As it exists presently, a process of listening, rather than seeing, would seem to have existed at San Damiano and all other convents of the Clares that I know of prior to 1310” At San Damiano private and collective gazing lare's Form of Life simply codified San Damiano had lived for & long time. 6. Forts, ed. Marie Therese Becker, Jean-Francois Gade, and Thadée ) 82.3. No serious study of San Damiano tas yet been undertaken. Professor Romanini in Rome is presently proposing an excavation project at the site, which we hope will be cor Nuns in Space: Architecture in the Thirteenth Century / 65 upon the host would have taken place primarily, and perhaps exclusively, in the privacy of the nun’s oratory upstairs (as distinct from the choir downstairs) and not during the liturgy itself. As can be seen in Plate 7, the oratory contains a small niche to the left of the altar whose purpose as a container of the host is emphasized by the paintings of the adoring nuns below. in general practice within lay communities as well. Though modem studies of the medieval liturgy usually describe the medieval Mass as sacred “drama,” and the gestures of the priest as an allegorical re-enactment of the Passion, architectural evidence suggests that by the late thirteenth century seeing the elevation at the high altar may have been an increasingly rare event for the lay public; participation in the liturgy for laymen was evolving towards an ever more internalized, private, meditative affair* Indeed, one might wonder if the jingling of bells that accom- pany this moment in the Mass might not have functioned as a signal for what was not only not audible but also, perhaps, not easily visible.®> No doubt there were wide regional variations in these practices, but the ubiquity of choir screens reveals an increasing physical separation of the clergy and main altar from the lay public. The viewing of the ray well ny some of the ues concerning th ao the {bodiaten ete See uecfer ef hure ben pkad n consid wea es xpos ont saeogg hates sacaatn Ser oerghaee "ppc, pet ret speak ost that the could not have been tear Seton he ncs Yeph hn The of he Res Re ls Ong ot Becta rn ran se Mt et rm on Ree nese pT apd eng Gogo, a SB apis, 36 Se also OLB Hardon, Cristian Ril and Cristian Drama in the Mile Ages: Inc rl Lay wy Md Dreier 9065. Ps tannes 1. Eminghauy, The Scart Ene, Frm, Cotati, weary, angmann points oa heh lee ang hat ae weigh ls ul pe nn ve ae placed in a monstrance in a niche, such as that found inthe up (Plate 7). 65 / Caroline Bruzelius clevation of the Eucharist within the choir was ever more reserved for an elite few, primarily the clergy. “Though the separation of nuns from the church and altar may seem surprising to modern sensibilities, it is useful to recall that internal screens and barriers were common in medieval churches, and that by the second half of the thirteenth century these were often of considerable height? Although in Continental Europe almost all of these choir screens were destroyed during the Counter Reformation and the Enlightenment, it is clear that by the end of the thirteenth century the canonical clergy tended to be separated from the lay public, and the ‘Mass was evolving towards a ritual that could be directly experienced (Geen as well as heard) only by an elite, mostly clerical.°* Tt may also be that there evolved a hierarchy of vision that was enforced by the physical barriers or screens and roods.?” The ‘proliferation of subsidiary chapels and altars in large-scale churches meant that there was often a large number of services conducted during any given day, ideally timed with precision so as not to interfere with one another3* As a result, there was a whole range of subsidiary clergy whose primary function was to officiate at such secondary masses.” High Mass, celebrated once a week, became an exalted and separate phenomenon, celebrated with processions and music, most of which by the middle of the thirteenth century seems to have been only partially audible and visible to the lay public. For laymen, vision of the elevated. Meike Doberer, "Der Lettner seine Bedeutung und igleichende Kunstforschurg in Wien, TX (1956) ‘out in "Women Mystics and Buch ‘Century in Women’s Studies, XI, (688) 193, women's eucharistic visions often compensated for the absence of access to the altar, and even projected them into the role of the Celebrant. See also Miri Rubin, Corpus Christi: the Eucharist in Late Madieoal Culture ty Press, 1951), 22 Bynum, Holy Fes en Holy Fat The Ralgiows Signicac oF Medios! Wormer (Berkeley, 1387) <0, Centres later, the Counc of Trent fired te pret of ent gu xpi 9 eer Se apudal here contingent on vision i alluded on an interesting Bosra sSoil Space in the Englah Medieval Parish Church” Troy ond Sty 18 (1989) 316. angen, Te Mas, 1301 funganan, The Mas, 1S ‘Nuns in Space: Architecture in the Thirteenth Century / 67 host must have occurred primarily at the smaller subsidiary altars at which the lower clergy officiated.“ Jungmann points out that by the late thirteenth century looking, at the host during the elevation was further complicated by requirements placed on the physical position of the body during the consecration” A thirteenth-century Roman Ordo written under Gregory X (d. 1276) required the clerics to stretch out face down on the floor, and the lay public to kneel not only during the consecration, but from the Sanctus onwards.” A position of reverence to the host, either in prostration, or with the head bowed, took precedence over the need to see. Within the ‘community of lay men and women, however, there were further distinctions, as women and men did not necessarily have access to the same spaces at the same times. Although there are few surviving examples that preserve the internal barriers of churches, occasional historical sources give some information about some of the various forms of divisions of church space separating men and women? Women were generally placed on the north side. An interesting example is the seventh-century convent and parish church in Kildare, Ireland, described in detail in a life of St. Brigit in the following terms: ‘A new church has been erected in the place of the old one in order to hold the increased number of the faithful. Its ground- plan is large, and it rises to a dizay height. . . . The interior contains three large oratories, divided from one another by ‘walls of timber, but all under one roof. One wall, covered with linen curtains ‘and decorated with paintings, traverses the ‘eastern part of the church from one side to the other. There are doors in it at either end. The one door gives access to the sanc- tuary and the altar, where the bishop and his school of clerics and those who are called to the celebration of the holy mysteries, offers the divine sacrifice to the Lord. By the other “Dx, 590, and Jungmana, I, 129 and 223. Nunneries,” Archuslogic Simeon of Durham's comments on the segregation ofthe sexes are also interesting, see Women’s Lies, 231-3. 68 / Caroline Bruzelius door of the dividing wall, the abbess enters with her virgins land with pious widows in order to participate in the Supper of Jesus Christ, which is His flesh and blood, The remainder of the building is divided lengthwise into two equal parts by another wall, which runs from the western side to the transverse wall Priests and lay persons of the male sex entet by an ornamental door on the right-hand side; matrons and virgins enter by another door on the left-hand side. In this way the one basilica is sufficient for a huge crowd, separated by walls according to state, grade and sex, but united in the Spirit, to pray to the almighty Lord.# No doubt, as suggested by this text, different parts of the church were signalled in various ways, either through the decorations on doors, and perhaps also by the paintings and hangings, to reinforce the categories of gender and status. For nuns in the later Middle Ages, the problem of vision and separation involved particular difficulties. These resided not only in the common metaphor for the monastic vocation as either a death or an imprisonment, but also, and much more importantly, in the ‘understanding of the female body. Women were seen to have special difficulties managing the senses, and numerous authors refer to the permeability of the female body.46 Because women were less able to manage the wide range of stimuli to the senses, their virtue was considered more fragile, and their souls were in need of greater guidance and protection. As a purely passive form, then, women presented special problems. But women were also villified as the active source of temptation and evil. Medieval authors revived ancient sources which stressed the ‘essential fleshliness of women, elaborating a view of the female sex as a dangerous, aggressive, and disruptive sexual force not easily or naturally in control of its own intemal urges. Whereas men represented “iyawig Bieler, Ireland: Harbinger ofthe Middle Ages (Loneion 1960) 28. Marjorie Kee and Translations ofthe Flesh Philadelp Block, Mediceal Mizgury andthe Invostion of Western Romantic Love (Chicago, 1991, ‘Nuns in Space: Architecture in the Thirteenth Century / 69 t, women represented matter, and matter of an especially bumptious nature that required control and supervision” As has been pointed out by Bynum and others, by the late twelfth century women were prohibited from contact with the altar vessels, and the practice of frequent communion for women was opposed because it was felt that their frequent reception of the host would trivialize it*¥ ‘The relationship drawn between chastity and bodily enclosure is, of course, a natural one. It has its sources in the earliest discussions of female monasticism. Ailred of Rievaulx also speaks of female che terms of bodily enclosure in his instructions for anchorites, institutione Inclusarum.? Because women’s bodies had the particular quality of perme: the integritas of the female body had to be preserved by physical sealing—a sealing that concerned not only phys- ical chastity but also the senses of sound, sight, and touch. 5° Perhaps because of the particular material physicality of women’s bodies, it is perhaps not surprising that some authors developed an analogy between the female body and architecture. As noted by Bloch, both popular and religious texts refer to the female body as a building, either because of its beauty (the Jongleur d’Ely) or because of its permeability.®! The relationship of the body to architectural openings had already been explored by Jerome, who referred to the five senses as the windows through which vice has access to the soul. These concepts appear later in the fourteenth century with particular pungency. For example, the biographer of Colette of Corbie stated that she guarded her senses as though they were doors and windows? while Bridget of Sweden in a lengthy parable speaks of the body as a ‘house whose foundations must not be undermined, nor its walls scaled or breached, and that no enemy enter through the gates. Loci, and Bynum, passin, “Bynum, 58 and 123. The Clarsses were permitted communion seven times a yea, although they may have actually received it more frequently ‘PLochrie,25 and 51, 57 chrie, 39, ‘Bloch, 32. rey F. Hamburger, “Art, Enclosure and the Cura Monialum: Prologomena inthe Guise ofa Posterpt,” Gest 31 (1992194 n. 184 ‘Snirgita of Sweden: Life and Selected Revelations, ed. with a preface by Marguerite ‘Teer Haris, trans. Albert Ryle Kezl Paulist Press, New York/Mahwaly 1990) 164-7 70 1 Caroline Bruzelius The issue that this view of the female body presented for women’s monasticism, of course, was that the control and supervision of religious women was undertaken by the clergy. Two important conditions may have had an important impact on the shaping and character of enclosure in relation to definitions of gender in the later Middle Ages. ‘The first, as Susan Stuard has argued, is that the concept of gender took hold in the twelfth century and led to a new definition and separation of the sexes, which in practical terms eventually translated into an eventual loss of autonomy in many aspects of the daily life of medieval women. Although some authors dispute this view, and instead situate the origins of gender in the patristic literature of first centuries of Christianity ‘it may be that the Renaissance of the twelfth century, which brought about such a clear consciousness of Early Christian sources, also revived patristic notions concerning women. The second condition that had an impact on the shaping of architectural enclosure was caused by the changing nature of the clergy. wrocess of Gregorian reform, which increasingly insisted on ibacy, culminated in the final promulgations of the 11305.” increasingly defined (end perilous, at least to the life of the spirit) “other,” but also an “other” of ever growing unfamiliarity to the very population entrusted with its care, supervision, and spiritual pethaps not surprising that a sense of gender difference began ise medieval discussions of women. Although some of the more conspicuous examples of the literature concerning the dangers of women is possibly spurious, and at times no doubt the authors exaggerated for thetorical effect, the misogyny of Gusan Stuard, “The Dominion of Gender: Women’s Fortunos in the High Middle Ages,” in Becoming Visible, Women in Ewopean History, 2nd ed, Boston, 1987) 165-70. ‘Bloch, 37-53, 5a, general survey ofthe phenomenon of the twelfth century revival canbe found in Renaissance and Renewal in the Twelth Contury, ed. Robert Benson and Giles Constable, with forbade married priests to perform thelr iow, Marie Priests and the Reforming Pepacy 2) 7B. For some general comments on the fee Caroline Walker Byntim, Jesus as Mother: Stutcs inthe Spirituality ofthe High Middle Age (Berkeley, 1984) 10. aymum (1964), 15. ‘Nuns in Space: Architecture in the Thirteenth Century / 71 twelfth- and thirteenth-century authors is nonetheless striking, especially in relation to the writings of the previous centuries. ‘The “monasticizing” of the clergy imposed by the final impositions of clerical celibacy in the twelfth century was certainly one of the most important transformations of the medieval church, and had a wide range of repercussions. It has been suggested, for example, that the eroticized spirituality of the devotional literature that developed in this period reflected the channels into which the human need for intimacy found expression." But for our purposes in this essay, the separation and alienation of women led to a series of phenomena that changed the character of female monasticism in many ways. There was not only the well-documented disassociation and rejection of female branches of the Promonstratentian and Cistercian orders, but also important aspects of the legislation on strict enclosure. ‘The final and complete set of regulations imposing universally strict enclosure for all female communities are those of Boniface VIII in 1298. ‘The opening and concluding lines strikingly of Boniface VIN’s bull, Periculoso exemplify the new tone of much of the literature concerning women Desiring to provide for the perilous and detestable state of certain nuns, who, having slackened the reins of decency and having shamelessly cast aside the modesty of their order and their sex, who sometimes gad about outside their monastery... and frequently admit suspected persons within their monasteri decree with healthful intent that all and sundry nuns shall henceforth remain perpetually enclosed in their monasteries; 0 that no Barstow, 175. pars, 17. ‘Ry ehe end ofthe thirteenth century, clerical celibacy was extended as a model for and found expression in a period of intense interest in conjugal celibacy asin ied in the marrage of Saint Eloéar and Delphine de Sabran. See for example M, ‘Sainteté et mariage as cours dela seconde querelle pélagienne,” Mystique et cor les proces de canonization tle documents hagiographigue, Bibliotheque des études francases

Вам также может понравиться