Netflix, Inc. v. Blockbuster, Inc. Doc.

129
Case 3:06-cv-02361-WHA Document 129 Filed 01/10/2007 Page 1 of 2

1 KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP

JEFFREY R. CHAN - #103649
2 DARLYN J. DUR - #169825
ASHOKRAMAN - #200020
3 710 Sansome Street
San Francisco, CA 94111-1704
4 Telephone: (415) 391-5400
Facsimile: (415) 397-7188
5
Attorneys for Plaintiff
6 NETFLIX, INC.

7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9

10
NETFLIX, INC., a Delaware corporation, Case No. C 062361 WHA (JCS)
11
Plaintiff, DECLARTION OF EUGENE PAIGE IN
12 SUPPORT OF NETFLIX'S CLAIM-
v. CONSTRUCTION REPLY BRIEF
13
BLOCKBUSTER, INC., a Delaware Date: Januar 31,2007
14 corporation, DOES 1-50, Time: 1 :30 p.m.
Dept: Courroom 9, 19th Floor
15 Defendant. Judge: Hon. William H. Alsup
16

17

18 AN RELATED COUNTERCLAIS
19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PAIGE DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF NETFLIX'S CLAIM-CONSTRUCTION REPLY BRIEF

CASE NO. C 06 2361 WH (JCS)
Dockets.Justia.com
 Case 3:06-cv-02361-WHA Document 129 Filed 01/10/2007 Page 2 of 2

1 I, EUGENE M. PAIGE, declare and state as follows:

2 1. I am an attorney duly licensed to practice before this Court, and am an associate

3 with Keker & VanNest, LLP, counsel to Plaintiff and Counterclaim-Defendant Netflix, Inc. I
4 have personal knowledge ofthe facts set forth below, and if called to testify as a witness thereto

5 could do so competently under oath.

6 2. Attached hereto as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of pages 188-189 from the

7 transcript ofthe deposition of Eric P. Meyer, taken September 22,2006.

8 I declare under penalty of peijur under the laws of the State of California that the

9 foregoing is tre and correct. Executed on this 10th day of Januar 2007, at San Francisco,

10 California.

11

12 Isl Eugene M. Paige

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1
387753.01 PAIGE DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF NETFLIX'S CLAIM-CONSTRUCTION REPLY BRIEF
CASE NO. C 06 2361 WH (JCS)