EDCU 11022 Numeracy in Action

Assessment task 1 - 50% Planning for mathematics teaching and learning

Student name:

Marker name:

Criteria

High Distinction 85 100%

1. Knowledge and
application of
curriculum documents
to plan for teaching
and learning.

Expert knowledge and

application of curriculum and
planning documents for
teaching and learning in
mathematics.

2. Knowledge of
learning challenges
and diagnosis of
learning issues.
3. Knowledge of
effective pedagogical
approaches for
teaching mathematics.
4. Evidence of group
collaboration about
curriculum matters
related to planning,
teaching
and assessing the
chosen mathematics
topic.
5. Individual
synthesis of key
understanding of
teaching & learning.
6. Communication and
referencing

7. Contribution and
teamwork
(*Rated by group)

Distinction 75 84%

Grade:
Credit 65 74%

Pass 50 64%

Fail < 50%

Comprehensive knowledge and

application of curriculum and
planning documents for teaching
and learning in mathematics.

Accurate knowledge and

application of curriculum and
planning documents for teaching
and learning in mathematics.

Knowledge and application of

curriculum and planning
documents for teaching and
learning in mathematics.

The three levels of planning

demonstrate thorough
understanding of
mathematics and primary
school planning and
preparation requirements.

The three levels of planning

demonstrate
comprehensive
understanding of
mathematics and primary
school planning and
preparation requirements.

The three levels of planning

demonstrate an accurate
understanding of
mathematics and primary
school planning and
preparation requirements.

Detailed and accurate

understanding of learning
issues.

Accurate understanding of
learning issues.

Understanding of most
learning issues.

Limited/no understanding of
learning issues.

Very clear and in-depth

explanation of teaching
approach and sequence for
developing understanding of
mathematics topic.
Group member collaboration
provides evidence of
professional communication
and problem-solving with
regard to curriculum matters
in scope, depth and
willingness to challenge each
others thinking.
Clear insightful justification
that identifies all key points.

Clear and concise

explanation of teaching
approach and sequence for
developing understanding
of mathematics topic.
Group member
collaboration provides
evidence of professional
communication and
problem-solving with
regard to curriculum
matters in both scope and
depth.
Clear insightful justification
that identifies most key
points.

Appropriate explanation of
teaching approach and
sequence for developing
understanding of
mathematics topic.
Group member
collaboration provides
some evidence of
professional
communication and
problem-solving with
regard to curriculum
matters.
Clear justification that
identifies some key points.

Mostly complete
explanation of teaching
approach and sequence for
developing understanding
of mathematics topic.
Group member
collaboration provides
some evidence of
communication and
problem-solving with
regard to curriculum
matters.

Incomplete explanation of
teaching approach and
sequence for developing
understanding of mathematics
topic.
Group member collaboration
provides little evidence of
communication and problemsolving with regard to
curriculum matters.

Justification identifies some

key points and is clearly
written.

Justification requires further

editing for clarity.

Communication is exceptional and

utilises correct language, grammar
and terminology.
Scholarly referencing
throughout.

Communication is clear and

utilises language, grammar
and terminology correctly
with minimal errors.
Accurate referencing
throughout.

Oral and/or written skills

are adequate and utilise
language, grammar and
terminology with some
errors.
Evidence of referencing.

Communication is inadequate
and utilise language, grammar
and terminology with many
errors.

Full participation and valuable

contribution to every aspect of the
research and preparation of the
presentation response.

Full participation and

insightful contribution to
the research and
preparation of the

Communication is effective
and utilises language,
grammar and terminology
accurately with minor
errors.
Consistent referencing
throughout
Keen participation and
helpful contribution to the
research and preparation of
the presentation response.

Participation and
contribution to most
aspects of the research and
preparation of the

Little participation and/or

contribution to the research
and preparation of the
presentation response.

The three levels of planning

demonstrate thorough and
in-depth understanding of
mathematics and primary
school planning and
preparation requirements.
Thorough and in-depth
understanding and
application of learning
issues.

Limited knowledge and application of

curriculum and planning documents
for teaching and learning in
mathematics.
The three levels of planning do
not demonstrate
understanding of mathematics
and primary school planning
and preparation requirements.

Little or no referencing.

presentation response.

presentation response.

Please note: Criteria 1- 4 will be graded from evidence on the wiki and will be the same for all group members. Criteria 5 - 7 will be graded individually.

Comments: