An Outline of a Theory of Civilization Revise Tansaton David A Dilworth and G. Cameron Hurst II Intreductin by Takenori nok wy ‘COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY PRESS Now York* ESTABLISHING A BASIS OF ARGUMENTATION ‘ore and bow, log and sho, good and ba, rgh and wrong I ae al cative tem, Edre were no lg, there cook be mo uae; ere were no goed, there could be no bad. Thus, Hight igh reve wo bevy, and good good relive to tad. hore were notsich latvty between onan he the, could not debate ver Tight aad ey of good and Ba The exeron in germs of which somthing i fudged eatively heey or good muy be cle he basi of sepnention An oki prover sys that "Te bly must besaved ae he (cot ofthe bac.” Anather art, “Sicice dhe unl or the ang: “Tht nde cine ofthe nama boy one se praec ee stamach eed ae expen of receiving wound on dhe back, bees he stomach rn vl than the backs And in deing th ania, eke cre of {reve ale than the each so the loach red food fhe rane the change fom the feudal order, in which the daimyo and srs lived in lene, eo the systems we now ave, ie may hive seemed unnecesry to dips those with rope and free on them the tardip othe propertyes. But iyo think of the panic oason and the indian live tenn, hen dhe ation pot, the a ‘unimportant, Abolishing the hen i che same at pltng eater ‘rem onthe stomach than onthe back, and aking ay te spend the dimyo and dhe mura ke Kling the oa fed the can, ‘When inviting things i neceary t clear sway the nom ceva and get back to their source. By doing thi, dtl can besubsumed) under geetal pvp and thereby the bass of ‘egunenation canbe even more aceraind Newion, in dcoveting the lw of gravity, is extablabed eh principle of nei the fit law ‘of motion), mney: something begin o move, it wll continue to ‘ove without xopping. and iit is stopped, wl enain all nd noe ‘move ut acted spon by an extemal force. Oe be lea established thi aw, the peacper of movin ofall things nthe univene mus orm wot Sach “Tw canbe called sas of ath, there were no such wn debating the principles of moon the opinions om the subject woul be of nde very. There would be ne principle or the motion ofshps, another principle fr voices, The umber items 'rougt inothe dcusson would merely kep oa increng, nd thee would be no singe fndamenal lav upoa which they all would re without someone aime princi, nothing coud be sablshed with ty certiude “Therefore one cannot dc the right and wrong, the mess and ee ome nor merit they spend thelr whole lives lilly lowing he «1owd. Such people const the fo-clled “common man,” They se the source of soled “public opinion." Nether eefleting upon te st nor looking ahead ¥6 the four they simply react to thet lnsmedite cieumances—a if their heads were locked in a Sted poson, Today there ae many such peopleand thei oie ae fod ‘They would lini dcusion in the couney to thet ess and rand anything dae depars even sihly fom thee scheme of thingy ‘orthodox. Wat kind of minis do they hive thew people wh squeeze everthing int her own ame of reference and ey to Fre al