Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 3

A.

THE LAWYER AND SOCIETY


i.

a. CANON 1
Soriano vs. Dizon, A.C. No. 6792, 25 January 2006
ii.
Quijano vs. Bartolabac, A.C. No. 5649, 27 January 2006
iii. Tomlin vs. Moya, A.C. No. 6971, 23 February 2006
iv. Malhabour vs. Sarmiento, A.C. No. 54171, 31 March 2006
v.
Bautista vs. Bernabe, A.C. No. 6963, 9 February 2006
vi. Lim-Santigo vs. Sagucio, A.C. No.6705, 31 March 2006
vii. Lingan vs. Calubaquib, A.C. No. 5377, 15 June 2006
viii. Imson vs.Souweha vs. Rondez, Adm. Case No.3961, 18 September 1997
ix. Delos Reyes vs. Aznar, A.C. No.1334, 28 November 1989
x.
Ui vs. Bonifacio, A.C. No. 3319, 8 June 2000
xi. Daras vs. Paras, A.C. No. 5333, 18 October 2000
xii. Nunga vs. Viray, Adm. Case No.4758, 30 April 1999
xiii. Cordova vs. Cordova, A.C. No.3249, 29 November 1989
xiv. Toledo vs. Abalos, adm. Case No. 5141, 29 September 1999
xv. Co vs. Bernardino, Adm. Case No. 3919, 28 January 1998
xvi. Sebastian vs. Calis, Adm. Case No. 5118, 9 September 1999
xvii.
In Re: Lontok, 7 April 1922
xviii. In Re: Gutierrez, Adm. Case No. L-363, 31 July 1962
xix. In Re: Valloces, Adm. Case No. 439, 30 September 1982
xx.
Avilla vs. Reyes, A.M. No. 01-34-CA-J, 23 January 2006
xxi. Santayana vs. Alampay, A.C. No. 5878, 21March 2005
xxii. Quiambao vs. Bamba, A.C. No. 6708, 25 August 2005
xxiii. Pineda vs. Macapagal, A.C No. 6026, 29 November 2005
b. CANON 2
i. Canon 14, Rule 14.03
ii. Rule 138, Sec. 27
iii. Khan vs. Simbillo, A.C. No. 5299, 19 August 2003
c. CANON 3
i. Paas vs. Almarvez, A.M. No. P-03-1690, 4 April 2003
ii. San Jose Homeowners Association, c. vs. Romanillos, A.C. No. 5580,
15 June 2005
iii. In Re: Tagorda, G.R. No. 32329, 23 March 1929
iv. Ulep vs. Legal Clinic, Bar Matter No. 33, 17 June 1993
v. Canons of Professional Ethics, Canon 27 and 46
vi. Dacanay vs. Baker & McKenzie, Adm Case No. 2131, 10 May 1985
vii. Philippines Constitution
1. Art. 6, Sec. 14
2. Art. 7, Sec. 13
3. Art. 9, Sec. 2
viii. Republic Act 6731, Sec. 7 (b)
d. CANON 4
i. Magno vs. Velasco Jacoba, A.C. No. 6296, 22 November 2005
e. CANON 5
i. Williams vs. Enriquez, A.C. No. 6353. February 27, 2006
ii. Cuevas vs. Bais Steel Corporation, G.R. No. 142689,17 October
2002
iii. Santiago vs. Rafanan, A.C. No. 6252, 5 October 2004
f.

CANON 6
i. Republic Act 6731, Sec. 4
ii. Pimentel vs. Llorente, Adm. Case No. 4680, 29 August 2000
iii. Suarez vs. Platon, G.R. No. 46371, 7 February 1940
iv. Igoy vs. Soriano, A.M. No.2001-9-SC, 11 October 2001
v. Ali vs. Bubong, A.C. No. 4018, 8 March 2005
vi. Vitriolo vs. Dasig, A.C. No. 4984, 1 April 2003
vii. Huyssen vs. Gutierrez, A.C. No. 6707, 24 March 2006
viii. PCGG vs. Sandiganbayan, G.R. Nos. 151809-12, 12 April 2005

B. THE LAWYER AND THE LEGAL PROFESSION

a. CANON 7
i. PAGCOR vs. Carandang, A.C. No. 5700, 30 January 2006
ii. Re: 1989 Elections of the Integrated Bar of the Philippines, Bar
Matter No. 491, 6 October 1989
iii. Santos, Jr. vs. Llamas, Adm. Case No. 4749, 20 January 2000
iv. Leda vs. Tabang, Adm. Case No.2505, 21 February 1992
v. Zoreta vs. Simpliciano, A.C. No. 6492, 18 November 2004
vi. Tan vs. Sabandal, Bar Matter No. 44, 24 February 2992
vii. Macarrubo vs. Macarrubo, A.C. No. 6148, 27 February 2004
b. CANON 8
i. Cruz vs. Cabrera, A.C. No. 5737, 25 October 2004
ii. Yared vs. Ilarde, G.R. No. 114732, 1 August 2000
iii. Nuez vs. Astorga, A.C. No. 6131, 28 February 2005
iv. Dallong-Galiciano vs.. Castro, A.C. No. 6396, 25 October 2005
v. Likong vs. Lim, Adm. Case No. 3149, 17 August 1994
c. CANON 9
i. Cambaliza vs. Cristal-Tenorio, A.C. No. 6290, 14 July 2004
ii. Alawl vs. Alauya, A.M. SDC-97-2-P, 24 February 1997
iii. Five J Taxl vs. NLRC, G.R. No. 111474,22 August 1994
C. THE LAWYER AND THE COURTS
CANON 10
i. Jimenez vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 144449, 23 March 2006
ii.
Perea vs. Amadro, A.C. No. 5246, 2 May 2006
iii.Asa vs. Castillo, A.C. No. 6501, 31 August 2006
iv. Maligaya vs. Doronilla, A.C. No. 6198, 15 September 2006
v.
Masinsin vs. Albano, G.R. No. 86421, 31 May 1994
vi.Santos vs. Paguio, A.M. No. MTJ-93-781, 16 November 1993
vii.
Libit vs. Oliva, A.C. No. 2837, 7 October 1994
viii.
Bongalonta vs. Castillo, CBD Case No. 176, 20 January 1995
ix.Insular Life Issurance Co. Employees Association vs. Insular Life
Assurance Co., G.R. No. L-25291, 30 January 1971
x.
Comelec vs. Noynay, G.R. No. 132365, 9 July 1998
xi.Adez Realty vs. CS, G.R. No. 100643, 30 October 1992
xii.
Cobb-Perez vs. Lantin, G.R. No. L-22320, 29 July 1968
CANON 11
i. Lacurom vs. Jacoba, A.C. No. 5921, 10 March 2006
ii. Tiongco vs. Savillo, A.M. No. RTJ-02-1719, 31 March 2006
iii. In re Sotto, 82 Phil. 595 (1949)
iv. Guerrero v. Villamor, G.R. Nos. 82238-42, 13 November 1989
v. De Gracia v. Warden of Makati, G.R. No. L-42032, 9 January 1976
vi. Fernadez v. Bello, 107 Phil. 1140 (1960)
vii. Sangalang v. Intermediate Appellate Court, G.R. No. 71169, 30 August
1989
viii.
Penticostes v. Hidalgo, Adm. Matter Nos. RTJ 89 -331, 28
September 1990
ix. Mocles v. Maravilla, Adm. Matter No. MTJ 93 -873,14 December 1994
x. Wicker vs. Arcangel, G.R. No. 112869,29 January 1996
xi. Const., Art. VIII, s. 6
xii. Maceda v. Vasquez, G.R. No. 102781, 22 April 1993
CANON 12
i. Lim vs. Montano, A.C. No. 5653, 27 February 2006
ii. Maronilla vs. Jorda, A.C. No. 6973, 13 February 2006
iii. Garcia vs. Revilla, A.C. No. 7056. September 13, 2006
iv. Rule 138, s. 20
v. Const., art. III, sec. 16
vi. Economic Insurance Co. v. Uy Realty Co., G.R. No. L 28056, 31 August
1970
vii. Li Kim Tho v. Sanchez, 82 Phil. 776 (1949)
viii. Aguinaldo v. Aguinaldo, G.R. No. L 30362, November 26, 1970
ix. Afurong v. Aquino, Adm. Case No. 1571, September 23, 1999

x.
xi.
xii.
d.

Garcia v. Francisco, Adm. Case No. 3923, March 30, 1993


Benguet Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Flores, A.C. No. 4058, 12 March 1998
PNB v. Uy Teng Piao, 57 Phil. 337 (1932)

CANON 13
Nestle Phil. V. Sanchez, G.R. No. L-75209, 30 September 1987
Lantoria v. Bunyi, Adm. Case No. 1769, 8 June 1992
Cruz v. Salva, 105 Phil. 1151 (1959)
In re Almacen, G.R. No. L 27654, 18 February 1970
Maglasang v. People, G.R

Вам также может понравиться