REGENT

UNIVERSITY.

College of Arts and Sciences

WEEKLY EVALUATION OF TEACHER CANDIDATE BY COOPERA
Teacher Candidate's Name: J e n n y Leary
Date:
April 3,
School: G e o r g e t o w n Primary
Cooperating Teacher:
Sharon Bohn
This form has been designed to the help cooperating teacher give the te
specific feedback. After checking the applicable items in each area, contin
sections and provide specific information regarding strengths and areas fo
our students, please consider how they rank compared to other tea
had in your classroom.
2.
1. Attendance
_Frequently absent
_Rarely absent
X Exemplarv attendanceX

Punctuality
Frequently late
Generally punctual
Always on time

Oral Expression
3. _lVIakes
frequent

usage/grammatical errors
Jnarticulate
_ Articulate
_Expressive, animated
4. Written Expression5. Tact/Judgment
6. Reliability/Dependability
Written works demonstrate
_Thoughtless: Insensitive
_Sometimes
to
fails to complete
frequent misspelling and/or
others' feelings and opinions
assigned tasks and duties
grammatical errors
_Limited sensitivity and _Sometimes needs to be
Writing is often unclear or
diplomacy
reminded to attend to assigned
disorganized
_Perceives what to do or tasks
say inor duties
X Organizes and clearly order to maintain good _Responsible: Attends to
/expresses ideas
relations with others andassigned tasks or duties
rrequently and effectively
responds accordingly _Self-starter: Perceives needs
communicates with parents
_Highly sensitive to others'
and attends to them
and/or administrators feelings and opinions: immediately
Diplomatic
Self-lnitiative/Independence
Collegiality
Relating Theory to Practice
7.
9. _No
_Passive: Depends on8.others
_Prefers to work in isolation
evidence of implementing
for direction, ideas and Reluctant to share ideaspedagogical
and
theories
guidance
materials
.Sometimes relates theory to
_Has good ideas, works Prefers being part of a team
practice
effectively with limited _^Willingly shares ideas and
.Frequently bases practical
supervision
materials
work on sound pedagogical
.Creative and resourceful:
theory
Independently implements
plans
12. Interaction with Faculty/
10. Response to Feedback
11. Interaction with Students
Staff
.Unreceptive to feedback.Sometimes antagonisticIs sometimes antagonistic
.Receptive - BUT doesn'ttowards student
Shy: Hesitant to work with
implement suggestions .Shy: Hesitant to work with
school personnel
.Receptive - AND adjustsstudents
Relates easily and positively
performance accordingly.Relates easily and positively
X Outgoing: Actively seeks
.Solicits suggestions andwith students
opportunities to work with
feedback from others .Outgoing: Actively seeksschool personnel
opportunities to work with
She is e v e n participating in
students
our faculty follies.
.Accepts responsibility for
student learning

REGENT
^XUNIVERSITY.
College of Arts and Sciences

WEEKLY EVALUATION OF TEACHER CANDIDATE BY COOPERAT

(CONTINUED)
If there are elements of professional development or instructional develo
that need more attention, please provide specific examples of how the t
strengthen these areas.
J e n n y is doing very well. If you w a l k e d into her classroom during a lesson you
w o u l d b o surprised to loom she is a studont toochGr.

In the space below, please describe how the Regent University teache
compared to other interns that you had observed. You may use the
final evaluation to highlight strength or weakness.

Sharon Bohn

4-3-15
Cooperating Teacher Signature Date
In the space below, the teacher candidate will briefly outline plans to s

improve areas noted above by the cooperating teacher.

Vxx

ISDate

44