Mid-Term Evaluation by University Director of Student Teaching: Site 2 (rev.

2011)

#43

COMPLETE
Collector: New Link (Web Link)
Started: Tuesday, March 31, 2015 8:56:19 PM
Last Modified: Tuesday, March 31, 2015 9:11:41 PM
Time Spent: 00:15:21
IP Address: 108.11.182.216

PAGE 1: Personal Information

Q1: Teacher Candidate's Name

Allison Workman

Q2: Internship Start Date

March 2, 2015

Q3: Internship End Date

April 24, 2015

Q4: School

Atlantic Shores Christian School

Q5: District

Private Christian School

Q6: State

Virginia

Q7: Evaluator's Name

Dr. Cheryl A. Gould

Q8: Evaluator's Position

Director of Student Teaching

PAGE 2: Instructional Planning/Delivery: Active, Successful Student Participation

1/4

SurveyMonkey

Mid-Term Evaluation by University Director of Student Teaching: Site 2 (rev.

2011)

SurveyMonkey

Q9: Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas
below.
Students are actively engaged in learning.

Above Average

Students are successful in learning.

Above Average

Students behaviors indicate learning is at a high

cognitive level.

Above Average

Students are self-directed/self-initiated as appropriate

to lesson objectives.

Satisfactory

Students are connecting learning to work and life

applications, both within the discipline and with other
disciplines.

Above Average

Appropriate pace, sequencing, and variety of activities.

Above Average

Value and importance of content is emphasized.

Satisfactory

Appropriate questioning and inquiry techniques are

used.

Satisfactory

Available technology is used appropriately and

effectively.

No Opportunity to Observe

Instruction has been designed to be responsive to

learner needs (differentiated readiness, interest,
learner modality) if appropriate.

Above Average

Lesson activities have been designed to promote

retention and transfer.

Satisfactory

PAGE 3: Instructional Planning/Delivery: Learner-Centered Instruction

Q10: Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas
below.
Instruction is based on objectives and core curriculum
demands.

Above Average

Content is learner-centered.

Above Average

Strategies promote critical thinking/problem-solving.

Above Average

Strategies include motivational techniques.

Satisfactory

Strategies are aligned.

Above Average

PAGE 4: Instructional Planning/Delivery: Evaluation and Feedback on Student Progress

2/4

Mid-Term Evaluation by University Director of Student Teaching: Site 2 (rev.

2011)

SurveyMonkey

Q11: Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas
below.
Academic progress is monitored and assessed using
formal and informal assessments.

Above Average

Assessment and feedback are aligned with goals,

objectives, and strategies.

Above Average

Assessment strategies are appropriate.

Above Average

Student learning is reinforced.

Above Average

Students receive constructive feedback.

Satisfactory

Teacher provides opportunities for relearning and reevaluation.

Satisfactory

PAGE 5: Instructional Planning/Delivery: Mgmt of Student Discipline, Instr Strategies, Time & Materials

Q12: Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas
below.
Teacher effectively implements discipline
management.

Satisfactory

Teacher establishes climate that promotes selfdiscipline and self-direction.

Satisfactory

Teacher interacts with students equitably.

Above Average

Teacher specifies expectations for behavior.

Satisfactory

Teacher intervenes and re-directs behavior.

Satisfactory

Teacher reinforces desired behavior.

Satisfactory

Teacher uses equitable instructional materials.

Above Average

Teacher effectively manages materials, time, and

transitions during lesson.

Satisfactory

PAGE 6: Professional Communication

3/4

Mid-Term Evaluation by University Director of Student Teaching: Site 2 (rev.

2011)

SurveyMonkey

Q13: Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas
below.
Appropriate/accurate written communication with
students.

No Opportunity to Observe

Appropriate/accurate verbal and non-verbal

communication with students.

Satisfactory

Encourages reluctant students; plans for special

needs.

Satisfactory

PAGE 7: Professional and Ethical Behavior

Q14: Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas
below.
Plans and directs activities of classroom assistants
including paraprofessionals, volunteers, and tutor.

Satisfactory

Modifies performance based on personal and

professional critiques.

Satisfactory

Demonstrates flexibility.

Above Average

Demonstrates initiative in planning, management, and

professional interactions.

Above Average

Maintains confidentiality.

Outstanding

Demonstrates effective collaboration in one-to-one and

small group interactions.

Satisfactory

Fosters trust in relationships with students, families,

and colleagues.

Satisfactory

Receives and responds to constructive feedback.

Above Average

Q15: Comments on teacher candidate's effectiveness of overall instruction, use of developmentally

appropriate strategies, ability to lead the class, professionalism, attitudes, and demeanor throughout
the period of observation:
Allison has grown in her confidence as an educator. She is doing well in her second placement. She is
developing solid lesson plans and provides meaningful instruction. Her students have been engaged in
learning during my observations. Allison demonstrates professional dress and demeanor at all times. She has
a no-nonsense, yet even-tempered attitude with the students.

4/4