STRUCTURE FOR OWN! TIONAL Fig. 2.1. ORGANS Levee of Responabiy af Teena Lg 2. —_| ok emt ey ri Pelcy and Review ‘Chief of Design Organization] 3- LF cai a "Prof check Consultant a es ‘Quay “Resources Tak Material [ Senices Landscape] { Otier Special Sym || MagerCHuman | Mazagee | Exgieer(ue || Engineer || Arete” | sate, Exar || 000) Highway — | Geo eany Save Erginer | Tecnica Envioaner, T T —— Tosudag ——_Inlaing Treading inching ——_‘Inhing evens Moncey pone nen ens ¥. Wicd of 1 Tranng “ais Cheating, |! Samaieczaion, ! Graiing Promegon, |! Sewenes, Sopot, {! Conpure Consition {! werts ‘aos, ‘Eleni | San, Sips rene War ‘erieion | improving Tener foes, |] Sip, JobKnowidge, | f doeumens Poon Greet Designs cond Fang iia {1} The organigram inate the eval of responsi in four rows. The nes of raprtng for execution of work ord resporstty for gual ate shown By fl ines and ‘routes The works val Intoractons are noted by colts ines. 2) For G-, 0-3, Out Classes the responsibly shown in each tox need separate group cf personne wth groip head. (3) Tha eganirams esic. Amend suisiy depending on class of A requires'Re-sP:s7-2000 | Fig. 2.2. QA ORGANIZATION FOR CONSTRUCTION (OWNERICONSULTANT) | Level of Reapenstiy | ‘Department Head (Engineering) 1 +] reat yo | LL | Head of QA in HO | | 2 ne ay | f Polley and ee “ Regional/Special Project 7 Gai a =] = f a [es tnsineer Site] [Panning ‘Constrction | [== ‘Conzract, ence Maoniereg || Engi sey Quantity, | | Minagement L Engineer (Stperviton se Enger —JUL__ll | “approval of ens A on racers Docume Conta i £ Supervision Chasing Acceptance (1) The ergsnigram indcstes levels of responsibilty of four rows. The nes of reporting fr execution of work ane fespensbiy for qulty are shoun by ful nes and arcowiteade The weriony coer 'nracions are indeates by doted ines, The deciions cencemingfelave poties an cfeencee between equal levels seo be taken a higher lve of espansibig (2) For G-2, 0-3. O-4 QA Ciasses responsiy shown in ea Box Moss separate group of personne wath group nee (2) The oxganigram is basic. Amand sutably depending on QA cass reauies (4) Gx Engineer at Love ¢ also report to RagionalSpeca Project head 16bce 1Re-sP:87-2000 Fig.2.3. QA ORGANIZATION FOR CONSTRUCTION (CONTRACTORS) Levee of Responsibility MANAGEMENT (TOM Poy Over Responsibly oF Proje) ‘Manaaeneat Represctve (HO-QA Cal inplemetaton of ‘Qully Poy ad Review ReginaliSpeil Proj Hed ¥ r 3 aera Pres Enger 2 es | SS SE 2 (ee |e eee ee] ee | Ss ; eee | ee |] ges eey || 3 = (1) The orgeigram indicates evs of responsi in our ows. The lines of poring for exesuton of Work ane respensbity fr quay are enon oy ul nee and arowheacs. Working level nlractons ‘Se indicaed by dated toes, The ceoisors concerning rlave preiles, and sbout erences between equal avle ao tobe taken a igh love of esponebiy. (2) Por.04 G4 GA Classes, the reepontbiles shawn in each box need separstegroun of personnel win gaup eas (9) The ergangram I base, canbe ater osu specific requirements, ”osesraom 21724. Main pect of sets which iat he ql ofa oad ae highlighted bean, acnuiry Project preparation (Dats oosecten, seecton of sulle opens, project toca Design andawinge MAIN ASPECTS AFFECTING QUALITY D Adequacy and accuracy of ea, and surveys ncucng ‘atrial survey) abit of datasource and oer. 1 Solutions bases on codes an prstoes, tng ne cenur for rlevantiocelsnd past oxperince i) Docurenstionofllaemetves conser 1) Reviw before fnkzaton 1) Dotaied Design Base Report i) Detaled desir documsntaten snd cross checking Ii) Reviewforconstuctebity and aval ointended constuction expertise 1) Inteatrevew beter fraeston or proof checking Drawings indicat avalabty of approved brow area, quai, olsbe water sours and lace for isposa of unt mates. The dsion assur o us90@ ofthe above ta be ler, but not tobe made rmondotry. 1) Provision ct ects for crying out inepacton, ‘maintenance ar repatstrenahening. 1) Standarsised goeracorions ofconractincucing enforcesbecefoct bly causes, procedures for decison making, bull mechanism fr settemant ot putes, apscopritefaneial conden and reasonable peyment sched. 1) Standardised deta echnical specifeatons 1) Stpustion oft ype ane capocty of esenta quementinbeused 8b Organization and Managementot ‘SupplestCooc cf ensrstin (he, cone, aprat emulsion, et) 1) Provision nd evalabityofrequied facie a te. 9 Stipulations wih regard te project organisation of ‘enitator ae elas te project mansgemant orpaiaton ofthe oanes, juan fr preparston of OA manual ‘W)Stpulton for submission of completo report thal supporting documanteana"as~bult drawegs 9) Managements Qaiy Poy 1) Quali and experincod tetra wrk ore and ceployment of vanes superisorsinarimen inadequt srongth 1) Preparation of Qualty Assurance Manvalnclsing eovsen er quai ud 1 Moblistonofadequateesourcesinducingsutable pent and equipment Continuous planning evew andcarecive acon 1 Aequte Francia inptinluing cash-ow and ane ranagement ip Prequticaton of st-contractorssupples 1) Natori specications isting siplstion of. tess and sccetanceeecten crtoia, 1) Quatty assurance plan ceting docuent special stress on vacesbaty 1) Adequate stiuation regarding workmanship. 1) Drawings and oer documns giving design tet. 1 Eneuting aden supervision and quafy ssurance 1 Inspection and quatty suvelanceEh Res572000| \ Deployment proper and adequate pant ang \9 Relevant te covered in (0) (E) above 9) Manogemens Qulty Paley | G.Moragement and Organization | 3 Project pactie QA ian OwnerstConeutant 5) Project erganlzaton cluding deployment of competent perenne iv Eneug edequsie supersin anc qusity urvelance 1 Provision for quality xEri DF boo wesesraa0 SECTION 3 QUALITY ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS OF DIFFERENT CLASSES OF QUALITY 34. General ‘This scien contains cetated qudeinescicating requirement of aiferentcsses of us orroad prolects. The slecton of cass for project i iacussod in Secton 2. The requrements of qualey corel ‘ad lve (degree) ontal are gvenin Table 3.1 uncer sk sub-reads as folows: (1) ProjectPrepratin @)—Desgnand Drawings 8) Conracual Aspects (6) Construction Organzatens 8) Materas © Wormanship Aspects of jel preparation as wells design a drawings have been covered rey, snd re ‘nseatvect he cone approach, However, Ine especs ofconsiuctn acting quay arecoverdin este: et. 32, Project-Specific QA Plan ‘The conlents ofthe tabi provide broad checks of various atts fer atypicaload project. LISA 25 indicated is not o be considered complete. It may be madied Io Sut ny specie poject requreneny spectcation, Bssed on ths tale and QA cass chosen in accordance with Section 2 detale ‘projec: spactc! quali assurance plan shallbe prepared, Al relevant factors must be conscered in deta before Sint choosing te veal quay asswrance cass for parila poet even fr prer actives win i 72 Projact sal aking ito account the consistancy ofthe QA requirement fr allriicl eonpenors ofthe ro, Such GA plan's normaly prepared by te one rby const agency and when prepared by the lotr, tis scrutinized and approved by the Owner or he Consutars tote project. The QA pan shall be current inthe form of Qk Manual. The QA planranva so prepared shoud fam par of he contact agroeert. ‘Alypcal A plan for constuction actos is lustatd in Satin 4, 2| Reses72000 | 33. Implementation | Imolemeniston of quay assurance plan maybe cared outby the flowing methods: (0) tet conta bythe constuction agency (@) Biter contol ether bythe annars aby the tied pat inspection agency. ‘The choice of agency for enforcement of quaty assurance lan shoud preferably be spet out the tender documentsbse 1Re-sP:57-2000 ‘TABLE 3.1. QUALITY ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS * st | tem | NominatQA } NomsiGA } Wigh@A | Extra High A No, ot o2 a a4 PROJECT PREPARATION 1.1. | Adequacy and | Datacolecton | Data cotecton | Data colecton | Asin 23 but wih retabiy of data | trom piary | fem pimary | though specialised local sources [toca eourees. | specialised | agencies using ttrougnin | Eherin- | agencies; cross | sopisteates rouse statt [house or other | checking | metnods agencies | trough i> house agencies verteston | Verfeaten | Vetifcation and | Verification and and ‘ane certicaion by_| ceifeaton by certfoaon at | ceticaton by | external agency | extemal agency tecalievel | soriorivelor wthintne | ean ove organization | within the cexgaization 12, [arsjetms | Preect Avinc-s,out |Asina.zbut | OAsystens and and repared and | independent |ndependont | documentation ‘documentaton | approved | checkingand | cheching _| prepared ans folowing aX | review twough | theugh an [checked ty tysterss and | aseparatnin- | extemal agency | exes! Inhouse | rouse unt Independent verfication ‘agency | Noe: ~The Quaity Assurance requremens sted are minimum fr genera suston: The user has to maciy to st hither contract specication. 23'Rc:sP:87-2000 st fam | Nominaiaa | Nema | Hignan | exe High aA No, ot o2 as os 13. | Toposretica! | Mopping. | Ssmeas.a-t, | Mapping and | Same as 03 suney longitudinal | but 10 per | crowing ‘atgnment, | eantchecking_ | prepartion by ‘eval byinneuse | specialises monuments by |sstinot | gency. 100 par Insrousestatt_|connscted with | cant check by i tne proect — | micro aw Constants cack by ne house taf ct connected wih ne rect ‘suroy Menust | Moresceurate | Escronic | Same as 3. For equpment | equipments, | equipments, | stance large reece ke, 20 ‘ke, 1 second | measuring | soil ures may second | theodotte, | equpments, | be considered. ‘heodoites | autolovels, | utotevels, ete. | Use of computer umpyleves, | ot. sutably | sutaly ied dating iain tableor | caratee | catbrated. Use | ocammended ‘as sutabe, of compute iy aed dating calbratea recommended 24\RO:sP-s7-2000 8. tam Nomina | Nemaan | vignas | exierigh oA, Ne a az os os DESIGN AND DRAWINGS: 2a, [ Owenzalon | Ownsin- [Same as 0 | Earl Exemal houseand | put srganizaion | Semesion but Veriton by | independent | wih approved ne twee tough | crecking | GAayatam for | Seeking a Sseparaterm | frougnin- | ereckegand | revewby poot rouse house or” | review neck gency who Separtment | extemal ec eemnea having oeney stabishes OA procedures TBTDIEGS | Can be Based | Con be based | Prost epectc | Samo os a8. 22 [Meengusiral |on" "” Spies | onypee, | emmys rate | Profiles, cross: | Sesign "win | eign ut | s. pre sections) | Smenamenis o | checkedy | executlon stage cover variation | extemal” | by extemal agency. To | agency sok actual ‘andere roe ‘Ganbabased | Conte bese | Project pectic | sameas QS ‘ranepe and | or ypial | ontyplea jer series | Gesnwin | design but Aamenamentsto | Ileal over variation | chockes by (eyRoa ‘ane based Project pectic | Sama ae 3 fursture | Sates ‘raninge made design wits preexecuton nots to cover Sage oy “ariation ‘neal goney 25ie-sP-s7-2000 12. Quality Audits Quality ‘AUDIT PROGRAMME eo Poncrions. | [rensomenro | [ruqumcyro |[~neromme | [coamecrive srsmews, | | newemnmes | | “sebecneo 70 ‘neTIONS 0 raccenunes rrocepunes || ‘BE AGREED TOBE AUDITED PROCESS AND PRODUCT AUDIT eres, pocuwenTsavo | [pocess | [ eNDeropvcr eccrine RECORDS vor ‘avo INSTRUCTION + t y + DUCEMENTATION pocumentarion | [pocumevarion | | pocamenrarion “AND REPORTING TANDREPORTING | | "ANDREPORTING. || AND REPORTING Notes + Prepare auait schedule -distbute to sections. + Issue aut notiicaton + Prepare auait checklist prior to aut © Conduct aust + Complete aud repor. + Complete non conformance and corrective action report. + Monitor compliance to audit recommendations + Close non-conformity report