Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Date: 02/05/15
Grade Level: 7
Content Area:
Language Arts
Write arguments to support claims with clear reasons and relevant evidence. (CCSS: W.7.1)
Introduce claim(s), acknowledge alternate or opposing claims*, and organize the reasons and evidence
logically. (CCSS: W.7.1a)
Given a claim and evidence, my group can formulate convincing reasons why our evidence supports our
claims.
2.
Given color-coded sentence strips, my group can write an organized stop-light style paragraph that argues
our claim.
I can:
1.
I can formulate convincing reasons why our evidence supports our claim.
2.
I can contribute sentences to an organized stop-light style paragraph that argues our claim.
This means:
Our group will produce an organized stop-light style paragraph on sentence strips that includes a topic sentence, at
least two sentences about evidence, at least two sentences about reasoning, and a concluding sentence that all
argue our claim.
List of Assessments: (Write the number of the learning target associated with each assessment)
1.
Informal Formative: I will casually look over each students handout to see that they have highlighted two
pieces of evidence and recorded their groups reasoning.
2.
Informal Summative: At the end of class, one student from each group will read their completed
paragraphs out loud to the class. Ms. Ramirez and I will verbally discuss the strengths and weakness of
each paragraph. Then, we will decide which paragraph was most convincing.
Page 1
(Passing Period) Teacher: Move desks into two groups of six Label groups with signs
boys and girls Have handouts on front table Pull up directions on Smartboard
Students: Follow directions on Smartboard to grab a handout, sit down, and scan the
handout [Other]
(Announcements, 5 m) Teacher: Direct students to the directions on Smartboard
Answer any questions Listen to announcements
Students: Follow directions on Smartboard Listen to announcements [Other]
(Anticipatory set, 1 m) Teacher: Set the stage Encourage student engagement
Students: Listen Engage when asked to respond [Teacher input]
(Directions part 1, 1 m) Teacher: Go over directions on Smartboard to choose two
convincing pieces of evidence and record reasoning with your group Answer questions
Students: Listen to directions Ask an questions [Teacher input]
Page 2
Closure
Those actions or statements by a teacher that are
designed to bring a lesson presentation to an
appropriate conclusion. Used to help students bring
things together in their own minds, to make sense
out of what has just been taught. Any Questions?
No. OK, lets move on is not closure. Closure is used:
To cue students to the fact that they have
arrived at an important point in the lesson or
the end of a lesson.
To help organize student learning
To help form a coherent picture and to consolidate.
(Work time part 1, 10 m) Teacher: Sit in with groups Keep students on task Answer
any questions Informal formative assessment
Students: Read evidence Pick two best pieces with group, highlight those pieces
Discuss reasoning Record reasoning on handout Ask any questions if needed
[Unguided group practice]
(Directions part 2, 1 m) Teacher: Go over directions on the Smartboard about writing a
collaborative paragraph Show and handout color-coded sentence strips Answer any
questions
Students: Listen to directions Ask questions [Teacher input/modeling]
(Work time part 2, 15 m) Teacher: Check in with students Guide students Keep
students on task Answer questions Instruct quick working students to create
additional evidence and reasoning sentences
Students: Work together to write a paragraph on sentence strips with claim, evidence,
and reasoning Organize paragraph in correct order on the back table Create
additional evidence and reasoning pairs if time allows [Unguided group practice]
(Wrap up, 5 m) Teacher: Select volunteers to read their groups paragraph Provide
verbal feedback on each paragraph Informal summative assessment Select most
convincing argument to solve the mystery
Students: Volunteers read paragraphs Other students listen All students listen to
verbal feedback Everyone celebrate their hard work [Teacher input]
(Closure, 2 m) Teacher: Overviews key points
Students: Listen [Teacher input]
Key points:
You need evidence and reasoning to convince people your claim is correct.
Stop-light paragraphs can be used to organize your arguments effectively.
Some arguments are more convincing than others because of (list reason(s)
why the winning group won)
Ultimately, you all helped solve this mystery through teamwork.
Thank you for your work today.
Page 3
To modify: I can provide sentence strips with sentence starters such as First, Ally and
This shows she ate the sandwich because to struggling students.
To extend: I can have advanced students create sentences that acknowledge and refute
evidence supporting the opposite claim.
1. Informal Formative: I will casually look over each students handout to see that they
have highlighted two pieces of evidence and recorded their groups reasoning. I will
specifically check that their reasoning is written in a complete, coherent sentence.
2. Informal Summative: At the end of class, one student from each group will read their
completed paragraphs out loud to the class. Ms. Ramirez and I will verbally discuss
the strengths and weakness of each paragraph. Then, we will decide which
paragraph was most convincing informally based upon organization, quantity of
support, and quality of support. The goal is satisfactory in all categories.
Excellent
Satisfactory
Minimal
Organization
Paragraph follows
the stop-light
formula and
includes
appropriate
transition words.
Paragraph follows
the stop-light
formula, but does
not include
appropriate
transition words.
Quantity
Paragraph
addresses more
than two pieces of
evidence with
reasoning.
Paragraph
addresses two
pieces of evidence
with reasoning.
Paragraph
addresses less than
two pieces of
evidence with
reasoning.
Quality
Reasoning
describes why the
evidence supports
the claim in fully
coherent
sentences.
Reasoning
describes why the
evidence supports
the claim, but is
not conveyed with
perfect grammar.
Reasoning is
incoherent and
does not describe
why the evidence
supports the claim.
Page 4
2. What changes, omissions, or additions to the lesson would you make if you were to
teach again?
a. I would have each student create a sentence for evidence and sentence for
reasoning to be assessed individually. This holds each student personally
accountable for participating and would allow me to asses work on an
individual basis.
b. I might create a similar lesson that is entirely individual to follow this lesson.
Students can ease into the process as a group and then practice the skills on
their own.
c. I would make time for students to assess each others work on a rubric so that
they themselves can evaluate what makes a convincing argument.
d. I did not include questioning strategies in this lesson. I could integrate
questioning strategies by asking students how people convince them of things.
Do organization, quantity of evidence, and eloquence matter?
3. What do you envision for the next lesson? (Continued practice, reteach content, etc.)
a. I would work on continued practice where students argue a claim individually,
peer edit, and revise their work. This way, students can work on the more
technical skills because they have demonstrated understanding of the main
ideas. Eventually, this could lead into a longer essay.
Page 5