Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
and the
Educ. 290
Rebekah Dahlin
OBJECTIVES
You will be able to:
Identify the expectations the State
of Idaho has for Teachers
Identify and understand the ten
Idaho Core Standards
Get more familiar with the
Framework for Teaching Evaluation
and learn how it is used
Understand the differences between
unsatisfactory, basic, proficient and
distinguished expectations for a
teacher
Knowledge of
Subject Matter
The teacher
understands the
central concepts, tools
of inquiry, and
structure of the
discipline taught, and
creates learning
experiences that make
these aspects of
subject matter
meaningful for
students.
Knowledge of
Human
Development and
Learning
The teacher
understands how
students learn and
develop, and provides
opportunities that
support their
intellectual, social
and personal
development.
The teacher
understands and uses
a variety of
instructional
strategies to
encourage students'
development of
critical thinking,
problem solving, and
performance skills.
The teacher
understands
individual and group
motivation and
behavior and creates
a learning
environment that
encourages positive
social interaction,
active engagement in
learning, and selfmotivation.
Communication
Skills
Professional
Commitment and
Responsibility
The teacher is a
reflective practitioner
who demonstrates a
commitment to
professional
standards and is
continuously engaged
in purposeful
mentoring of the art
and science of
teaching.
Partnerships
The teacher interacts
in a professional,
effective manner with
colleagues, parents,
and other members
of the community to
support students'
learning and well
being.
4a Reflecting on Teaching
4b Maintaining Accurate Records
4c Communicating with Families
4d Participating in a Professional
Community
4e Growing and Developing Professionally
4f Showing Professionalism
Frameworks
Danielson Domain
1
Planning and
Preparation
Danielson Domain
2
The Classroom
Environment
Idaho Teaching
Standards
Standard 1: Knowledge of
Subject Matter
Standard 2: Knowledge of
Human Development and
Learning
Standard 7: Instructional
Planning Skills
Standard 5: Classroom
Motivation and Management Skills
Danielson Domain
3
Instruction and
Assessment
Standard 3: Adapting
Instruction for Individual Needs
Standard 4: Multiple
Instructional Strategies
Standard 6: Communication
Skills
Standard 8: Assessment of
Student Learning
Danielson Domain
4
Standard 9: Professional
Domain 2d:
Managing
Student
Behavior
Failing
Level 1
Needs
Improvement
Level 2
Proficient
Level 3
Distinguished
Level 4
The teacher
negatively
influences learning
by neglecting to
communicate
expectations for
student behavior or
creates a classroom
climate that is
socially,
emotionally, and
physically unsafe.
There is either no
written or verbal
process to address
student misconduct,
or a process exists
but is neither
communicated nor
enforced. Response
to student
misbehavior is nonexistent and
negatively impacts
student learning.
The teacher
establishes minimal
expectations for
student behavior or
a classroom climate
that is socially,
emotionally, and
physically safe. A
written or verbal
process to address
student misconduct
is communicated,
but is loosely
monitored and
enforced. Response
to student
misbehavior is either
delayed or disrupts
the quality of
student learning.
The teacher
enforces a
specific process to
address any
student
misconduct and
maintains a
classroom climate
that is socially,
emotionally, and
physically safe.
Responses to
student
misbehavior are
prompt with
modest impact on
student learning.
The classroom
environment is
conducive to
student learning.
The teachers
well-established
procedures for
students to selfmonitor their own
classroom
behavior are
evident and
responses to
student
misbehavior are
immediate with
negligible impact
on student
learning. Students
re-direct
questionable
behaviors from
peers and openly
flourish in a
learning
environment that
is socially,
emotionally, and
physically safe.
Domain
2d:
Managing
Student
Behavior
There is no
evidence of any
assertive
discipline plan or
plan of action to
address student
misconduct even
though half of
the students are
texting their
friends.
Students are
rude to one
another with no
repercussions
from the teacher.
Students are
running around
the room
throwing paper
balls at one
another while the
teacher just
continues on with
her lesson.
Needs
Improvement
Level 2
The teachers
assertive
discipline plan is
posted on the
wall, but is
seldom followed
by the teacher.
The teacher has
a delayed
response to
addressing
outward
disrespect
between two
students.
The teacher
repeatedly asks
students to
quiet down, but
they often
ignore him.
Satisfactory
Level 3
The teacher asks
students to
reiterate the
behavior
expectations for
each segment of
the learning
experience before
transitioning to that
activity (e.g., Turn
to your partner and
think-pair-share the
strategies we have
found to be the
most effective in a
literacy circle.)
The teacher has a
clearly defined 3Step Assertive
Discipline Plan for
dealing with
disruptive behavior
and monitors it
closely.
As the teacher
moves closer to a
Distinguished
Level 4
During a
student
presentation,
one student
comments,
Come on
everyone. Lets
listen to
Kevins
speech.
A student
reminds
another
student of the
campus rule
about bringing
cell phones to
class.
The teacher
requests that a
student see
him after class
as a way of
avoiding a
confrontation
CONCLUSION
The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards that the
State of Idaho expects all of their highly qualified teachers
to possess. New teachers are expected to demonstrate they
know and understand them before their initial certification.
The Danielson Framework for Teaching Evaluation Method is
an additional component that the State and some
administrators use when they are evaluating the
effectiveness of an educators instruction.
The Framework Method is composed of 4 Domains that are
thought to be essential components of teaching: Planning
and Preparation, Classroom Environment, Instruction, and
Professional Responsibilities
The Idaho Core Teaching Standards and the Frameworks
Evaluation Method both align to each other and to the
INTASC.
The Danielson Framework Method evaluates and scores
teachers using the following terms: failing, needs
improvement , proficient and distinguished.
Sources:
"Danielson Group The Framework."Danielson Group
The
Framework Comments. Web. 21 Feb. 2015.
<http://danielsongroup.org/framework/>
"Idaho Core Teacher Standards: How Do You Measure
Up?"Webpages.uidaho.edu. Web. 21 Feb. 2015.
<http://www.webpages.uidaho.edu/fcsed/FCS471/Id
ahoCoreStandards.pdf>
InTASC Model Core Teaching Standards: A Resource for
State
Dialogue. Washington, D.C.: Council of Chief State
School Officers, 2011. Print.
Loticonnection.com. LoTi, 1 Jan. 2014. Web. 21 Feb.
2015.
<http://loticonnection.cachefly.net/global_document
s/HDTE-WDescriptors.pdf>.
http://galleryhip.com/office-backgrounds-clipart.html
Images:
http://lifeinsynergy.com/a-few-thoughts-2/
http://stacycarpenterportfolio.wikispaces.com/Danielson%27s+
Framework+for+Teaching