0 оценок0% нашли этот документ полезным (0 голосов)
101 просмотров16 страниц
This document discusses mainstreaming and inclusion in social studies classrooms. It begins by examining the legal foundations of inclusion, including the Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975 and the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, which require that students with disabilities receive education in the least restrictive environment. It also discusses how standards like the Common Core and from the National Council for the Social Studies influence social studies instruction. The document then explores practical modifications for the inclusive classroom, such as textbook adaptations, memory strategies, and assistive technology. Overall, the document outlines how laws, standards, and modifications can support an inclusive social studies education for all students.
This document discusses mainstreaming and inclusion in social studies classrooms. It begins by examining the legal foundations of inclusion, including the Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975 and the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, which require that students with disabilities receive education in the least restrictive environment. It also discusses how standards like the Common Core and from the National Council for the Social Studies influence social studies instruction. The document then explores practical modifications for the inclusive classroom, such as textbook adaptations, memory strategies, and assistive technology. Overall, the document outlines how laws, standards, and modifications can support an inclusive social studies education for all students.
This document discusses mainstreaming and inclusion in social studies classrooms. It begins by examining the legal foundations of inclusion, including the Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975 and the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, which require that students with disabilities receive education in the least restrictive environment. It also discusses how standards like the Common Core and from the National Council for the Social Studies influence social studies instruction. The document then explores practical modifications for the inclusive classroom, such as textbook adaptations, memory strategies, and assistive technology. Overall, the document outlines how laws, standards, and modifications can support an inclusive social studies education for all students.
An Examination of Mainstreaming and Inclusion in Social Studies Instruction Kyle McLellan University of Phoenix
THE INCLUSIVE SOCIAL STUDIES CLASSROOM
2 Introduction Throughout this class we have seen the increasing importance of mainstreaming and inclusion in classrooms. Cultivating an inclusive classroom can be a difficult task but ultimately is beneficial for everyone involved if done correctly. The methods of inclusion can no doubt vary from subject to subject, so it is important to ensure that teachers understand what works best for their content area. This paper will focus on mainstreaming and inclusion in the social studies classroom. Social studies can be quite unique. In no other subject do you see so many disciplines crossing paths. Social studies are a naturally inclusive topic. Thus, it is only appropriate that the social studies classroom should itself be inclusive. In order to better understand how mainstreaming and inclusion have come to play a role in the social studies classroom we will look at several factors. First, we will examine the legal foundations of inclusion and the area of social studies. Next, next we will look at the role social studies and special education curriculum standards play in instruction. Once we understand these underpinnings we will then look at the practical application of these elements. To do this, we will discuss how assistive/adaptive technology and other content modifications can be used effectively in the social studies classroom; contemplate the benefits and barriers of inclusive instruction; and outline the role
THE INCLUSIVE SOCIAL STUDIES CLASSROOM
3 educators and families play in the process. Overall, this paper will seek to understand the legal and theoretical foundations behind mainstreaming and inclusion in the social studies classroom and then examine the practical everyday application of these elements. Legal Foundations of Inclusion in Social Studies As with most aspects of mainstreaming and inclusion in education today, the basis of inclusion in the social studies classroom stems back to the 1975 Education for All Handicapped Children Act. This act built upon Section 504 of the Vocational Rehabilitation Act of 1973, which prevented excluding or segregating an individual with a disability constituted discrimination (Aron & Loprest, 2012, p. 99). While the Rehabilitation Act dealt with organizations receiving public funding, the 1975 Education for All Handicapped Children Act dealt specifically with public school settings stated, "all children, from 3 to 21 years of age, regardless of type or severity of disability, are entitled to a free, appropriate public education" (Mastropieri & Scruggs, p. 1213). The act was based on 6 major principles: zero rejection, nondiscriminatory testing, free and appropriate education, least restrictive environment, due process, and parent participation (Mastropieri & Scruggs, p. 13-14). The 1997 and 2004 updates to the act, which was renamed the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, provided more specific
THE INCLUSIVE SOCIAL STUDIES CLASSROOM
4 guidelines to improve students with disabilities access to general education classrooms. The 2004 amendments specifically dealt with: content of Individual Education Programs (IEPs) and IEP meetings, research-based practices, accommodations and alternative assessments, disciplinary procedures, identification of learning disabilities, early intervention funding, and special education teacher licensure (Mastropieri & Scruggs, 2000, p. 10). All of these guidelines have had a dramatic impact upon creating and shaping inclusive social studies classrooms. The addition of the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) of 2001 also has had several important implications for students with disabilities in the general education classroom. The law requires that all children in grades 3-8 be tested by state-developed tests in reading and math (Mastropieri & Scruggs, 2000, p. 14-15). Although there are no direct social studies testing standards included in the law, the focus on testing, especially with regards to reading, has had an impact upon social studies instruction. While literacy has always been an important element in social studies instruction, the testing mandates have resulted in school districts placing more importance on literacy instruction within the social studies classroom. As Marcee M. Steele points out in her article Teaching Social Studies to High School Students with Learning Problems, the passage of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments in 1997 and 2004 and the No
THE INCLUSIVE SOCIAL STUDIES CLASSROOM
5 Child Left Behind Act in 2001 increased the numbers of students with mild disabilities that are served in general education classes rather than in separate special education settings (Steele, 2007, p. 59). With this in mind let us now consider the way in which the current social studies standards and the disabilities legislation interact in the inclusive social studies classroom. Current Standards In addition to the laws laid out by the IDEA and NCLB laws, we also see standards placed upon social studies by the new Common Core implementation in many states and organizations such as the National Council for the Social Studies (NCSS). Maines standards are based on the Common Core State Standard (CCSS); these relate to understanding various cultures, eras, and major enduring themes specifically with regards to 5 areas: 1. Applications of Social Studies Processes, Knowledge and Skills 2. Civics and Government 3. Economics 4. Geography 5. History (CCSS, 2007, p. 3). In addition to these Common Core State Standards, the National Council for the Social Studies has a set of thematic and disciplinary
THE INCLUSIVE SOCIAL STUDIES CLASSROOM
6 standard, which are not mandated, but serve as the basis for social studies standards in many school districts throughout the country. The ten NCSS Thematic Standards are:
Culture and Cultural Diversity
Time, Continuity, and Change
People, Places, and Environments
Individual Development and Identity
Individuals, Groups, and Institutions
Power, Authority, and Governance
Production, Distribution, and Consumption
Science, Technology, and Society
Global Connections
Civic Ideals and Practices
In addition to these ten standards, NCSS also has five Disciplinary
Standards: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
History Geography Civics and Government Economics Psychology
(NCSS, 2002, p. 3).
As you can see, both the CCSS and the NCSS standards have a lot in common. The only difference in the five disciplinary standards and the CCSS is that the former contains, Applications of Social Studies
THE INCLUSIVE SOCIAL STUDIES CLASSROOM
7 Processes, Knowledge and Skills and the later includes Psychology. It could be argued that the applications standard in the CCSS falls in line with the various thematic standards set forth in the NCSS. In order to meet the standards laid out by the CCSS and NCSS in an inclusive classroom, social studies teachers must use a variety of modifications and technology in order to accommodate students with special needs. Having now examined much of the theoretical and legislative framework for inclusive social studies classrooms, let us seek to discuss some of the practical ways social studies teachers can modify their curriculum to meet students differing needs. Modifications and Technology The inclusive social studies classroom must be prepared to deal with all kinds of disabilities. In any given class there is the potential for a variety of different learning problems to be present including: ADD and ADHD, low-level reading skills, low level writing skills, processing problems, memory disorders, spoken language problems, organizational issues, and behavioral and social deficits. Modifications for these various learning disabilities can include textbook modifications, writing modifications, memory strategies, organizational strategies, and active involvement (Steele, 2007, p. 60-62). Let us now look at some specific ways that these modifications can be applied.
THE INCLUSIVE SOCIAL STUDIES CLASSROOM
8 Firstly, let us start with the use of social studies textbooks. Since textbooks often serve as the basis of much social studies instruction, it is important that teachers show their students how to use them properly. This means making students aware of text organization and structure in order to boost comprehension. Furthermore, teaching students how to highlight, outline, and create study guides can help them to more easily access information presented in textbooks. Furthermore, textbook adaptations may prove necessary for students with reading disabilities. These adaptations could include: audio texts, enlarged print and brail versions, and simplified and modified text (Mastropieri & Scruggs, 2000, p. 387). In addition to textbook instruction, inclusive social studies teacher should provide their students with content-enhancement devices to increase recall and comprehension. These can include: graphic organizers, diagrams, visual-spatial displays, study guides, time lines, concept maps, and mnemonics. After assigned readings, comprehension can be reinforced with reviews and summaries of readings, peer practice, and extra help (Mastropieri & Scruggs, 2000, p. 387). Teachers can also greatly enhance the effectiveness of textbooks by providing interesting, informative, and interactive supplementary material. Technological advances and the prevalence of the Internet in todays classrooms can provide a fantastic tool for finding and incorporating supplementary materials in your lesson
THE INCLUSIVE SOCIAL STUDIES CLASSROOM
9 plans. Let us look at some of the ways technology can be used in the inclusive social studies classroom setting. The potential of technology such as smartboards, iPads, and laptops in social studies classrooms is just now beginning to be realized. Multimedia presentations can really bring material to life. Moreover, the incorporation of audio, video, and interactive material can bolter the comprehension of students with reading and writing disabilities. The use of iPads, especially, can be helpful to students on the autism spectrum. According to the Autism Spectrum Disorder Foundation (ASDF), iPads offer portability and flexibility that a traditional PC or laptop cannot provide since it utilizes a touchscreen, the iPad is more accessible for children who have learning or coordination difficulties (ASDF, 2012). The use of assistive technologies can also be useful for a group of students this report has not, as of yet, discussed very much those with physical disabilities. In addition to students with specific learning disabilities or behavioral issues, IDEA also applies to the accessibility of schools to students with physical handicaps. In order for schools to accommodate students with physical disabilities, certain steps must be taken. These include: providing hallways and aisles wide enough to accommodate wheel chairs and other handicapped mobility, as well as making sure that instructional materials are modified so that they are easily
THE INCLUSIVE SOCIAL STUDIES CLASSROOM
10 viewable for these children and all physical materials necessary are easily accessible (Mastropieri & Scruggs, 2000, p. 85). Moreover, assistive technology such as speakers or hearing aids for students with hearing impairments, voice to text for students with physical handicaps and writing issues, and audio and brail texts for those with visual disabilities are all necessary elements of an inclusive classroom (Mastropieri & Scriggs, 2000, p. 100). With so many different modifications and adaptations necessary for students with learning, behavioral, and physical disabilities it can be challenging to have an inclusive classroom, however, if done correctly it can benefit everyone. In the next section, we will examine some of the benefits and barriers to mainstreaming and inclusion. Benefits and Barriers While inclusion is a good thing to have in any general education classroom, the fact that social studies is such an inclusive field of study it is only appropriate that the social studies classroom should be an inclusive environment. By promoting an inclusive classroom a social studies teacher is instilling students with the same acceptance and respect of others, that social studies as a subject should be encouraging. Furthermore, the inclusive classroom allows students to learn from each other in a way that makes them more appreciative of everyones differences and contributions. Through the use of peer
THE INCLUSIVE SOCIAL STUDIES CLASSROOM
11 assistance, peer tutoring, and cooperative learning techniques, this kind of inclusive setting can be encouraged (Mastropieri & Scruggs, 2000, p. 196). This being said, there are certainly challenges and barriers to creating this type of inclusive classroom. One difficulty can be ensuring that all learners are adequately challenge from the students with learning disabilities to the gifted and talented students and all those in between. However, Mastropieri points out that the use of cooperative learning can be effective in accomplishing this goal. Using cooperative methods students with a variety of disabilities were shown to perform better than in a non-inclusive environment (Mastropieri & Scrugss, 2000, p. 195). Moreover, high achieving students are able to achieve greater depths of knowledge by tutoring their peers in social studies, allowing them master the material in a way they would not otherwise. A further barrier to an inclusive classroom is peer acceptance and encouragement. Special needs students can experience a great stigma. It can be a delicate task to attempt to include students with special needs in a way that their needs are met but they do not feel singled out. Again the use of the strategies of collaborative learning, peer assistance, and peer tutoring can be good for this. Especially if these elements are incorporated in to the class, one example would be having regular peer-tutoring sessions in which students switch off
THE INCLUSIVE SOCIAL STUDIES CLASSROOM
12 between being the teacher and the student. By using methods that encourage student integration while reinforcing knowledge and helping students with special needs the barriers to an inclusive classroom can be overcome. However, it is important to understand that everyone must play a role in inclusion from the administration, to the teachers, to the support staff, to the students and their families. In the next section we will look at the role of educators and families. Roles of Educators and Families In the inclusive social studies classroom both educators and families play a role. Let us first examine the responsibilities of the social studies teacher. Social studies teachers, like any other general education teacher has certain responsibilities with regards to their students with special needs. These responsibilities with regards to the classroom is to:
Provide day-to-day instruction
Identify possible special needs Member of the pre-referral assistance team Communication link with colleagues Member of multidisciplinary team that writes IEP Liaison to parents (Friend & Bursuck, 2006, p.35)
With regards to communication among the other education staff their
responsibilities include:
THE INCLUSIVE SOCIAL STUDIES CLASSROOM
13
Maintain an open line of communication with the special
education teachers about necessary accommodations for
students receiving special services
Make clear the expectations, role, and function of the
paraprofessional assigned to a general classroom
Provide feedback to paraprofessionals about job performance
Finally, with regards to parents the inclusive social studies teacher
must:
Meet with students families during parent/teacher conferences
Keep parents informed childs participation and progress in their
class Attend IEP meetings as needed (McLellan, 2014, p. 2-3)
Just as the social studies teacher has certain roles and
responsibilities so, too, does the students family. Parent involvement in their childs education is important; this is especially the case for parents of children with special needs. A parent should be proactive in advocating for their children and make sure to get in touch with their childs educators early in the year to make it clear to them the goals and modifications laid out in their childs IEP plan. This way a teacher can know what to expect. A students family must also be sure that they maintain this dialogue with their childs teachers throughout the school year and keep themselves apprized of the good and bad developments taking place with their child. Finally, parents must work to aid their children and reinforce the instruction and strategies for overcoming their disabilities that they learn at school.
THE INCLUSIVE SOCIAL STUDIES CLASSROOM
14 Conclusion In this report we have sought to understand the legal and theoretical framework of mainstreaming and inclusion within the social studies classroom, then build upon that by discussing the practical application of these elements. We began by examining the legal foundations for educating students with disabilities, looking at IDEA and NCLB and their impact upon the social studies classroom. From there we moved on to Common Core State Standards and National Council for the Social Studies Standards and how they effect the way in which a social studies teacher must set up an inclusive classroom. Once we established these theoretical underpinnings we moved on to the practical aspects of this policy. We looked at modifications and technology that can be applied to the social studies classrooms. Next we addressed the benefits and barriers of inclusion. Finally, we discussed the roles and responsibilities of both educators and families in creating an inclusive classroom. Ultimately, we saw that establishing an inclusive classroom requires a great deal of modifications and strategies to do well. Overall, we determined that despite the challenges to creating an inclusive classroom, in the end, it benefits everyone involved.
THE INCLUSIVE SOCIAL STUDIES CLASSROOM
15 References Aron, L., & Loprest, P. Disability and The Education System. The Future of Children, 22, 97-122. Retrieved June 30, 2014, from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ968439.pdf Autism Spectrum Disorder Foundation. (2012). Why the iPad Is Such a Helpful Learning Tool for Children with Autism. Schererville, IN. Retrieved August 3, 2014 from http://www.myasdf.org/site/media-center/articles/why-the-ipad-is-such-a-helpfullearning-tool-for-children-with-autism/ Common Core State Standards. (2007). Maine Learning Results Social Studies. Retrieved July 13, 2014, from http://www.maine.gov/doe/socialstudies/documents/ss102207.pdf Friend, M., & Bursuck, W. D. (2006). Including Students with Special Needs: A Practical Guide for Classroom Teachers. Mastropieri, M. A., & Scruggs, T. E. (2000). The Inclusive Classroom: Strategies for Effective Instruction. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Merrill. McLellan, K. (2014). Communication Activity: Roles of General Education Teachers, and Paraprofessionals in the Education of Students with Special Needs. National Council for the Social Studies. (2002). National Standards for Social Studies Teachers. Silver Spring, MD. Retrieved July 20,
THE INCLUSIVE SOCIAL STUDIES CLASSROOM
16 2014 from http://downloads.ncss.org/NCSSTeacherStandardsVol1rev2004.pdf Steele, M.M. (2007). Teaching Social Studies to High School Students with Learning Problems. Social Studies, 98(2), 59.