(PS) Sakamoto v. US Office of Personnel Management Doc.

Case 2:06-cv-01215-GEB-DAD Document 6 Filed 06/20/2006 Page 1 of 2

8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 ROSEANNE SAKAMOTO, No. CIV.S-06-1215 GEB DAD PS

12 Plaintiff,

13 v. ORDER

14 U.S. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL

MANAGEMENT,
15
Defendant.
16
__________________________/
17

18 Plaintiff initiated this action by filing her complaint in

19 the United States District Court for the Northern District of

20 California on April 24, 2006. The case was transferred to this

21 district on June 5, 2006, United States District Judge Claudia Wilken

22 having issued the transfer order sua sponte on May 17, 2006.

23 On June 8, 2006, plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed a

24 notice of motion and motion for summary judgment. However, defendant

25 has yet to file an answer or otherwise make an appearance in this

26 action. The initial status (pretrial scheduling) conference is set

Dockets.Justia.com
 Case 2:06-cv-01215-GEB-DAD Document 6 Filed 06/20/2006 Page 2 of 2

1 for October 6, 2006, and there has not been an adequate opportunity

2 for discovery.

3 Accordingly, plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is

4 HEREBY DENIED without prejudice as premature. Following the

5 appearance of the defendant in this action and the completion of the

6 initial scheduling conference the motion may be re-filed,

7 incorporating be reference any arguments presented in the recently

8 filed motion, and properly noticed for hearing.

9 DATED: June 20, 2006.

10

11

12

13

14 DAD:th
DDad1\orders.prose\sakamoto1215.msj.deny
15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26