BEFORE THE SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL

MUMBAI
Date of Decision: 01.07.2015
Appeal No. 125 of 2013
Prime Broking Company (India) Limited
7th Floor, Ashford Centre,
Shankarrao Naram Marg,
Opp. Peninsula Corporate Park,
Lower Patel,
Mumbai- 400 013

Appellant

Versus
1. National Stock Exchange of India Limited
Exchange Plaza,
Bandra-Kurla Complex,
Bandra (East),
Mumbai- 400 051
2. National Securities Clearing Corporation Limited
Exchange Plaza,
Bandra-Kurla Complex,
Bandra (East),
Mumbai-400 051

Respondents

Mr. Zal Andhyarujina, Advocate with Mr. Neerav Merchant, Mr. Tejesh
Chitlangi and Mr. Nitesh Tiwari, Advocates, i/b I.C. Legal for the
Appellant.
Mr. Rafique Dada, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sachin Chandrana,
Advocate and Mr. Pritvish Shetty, Advocate i/b Manilal Kher Ambalal
& Co. for Respondent Nos. 1 & 2.
WITH
Appeal No. 177 of 2013
Prime Broking Company (India) Limited
7th Floor, Ashford Centre,
Shankarrao Naram Marg,
Opp. Peninsula Corporate Park,
Lower Patel,
Mumbai- 400 013
Versus
1. National Stock Exchange of India Limited
Exchange Plaza,
Bandra-Kurla Complex,
Bandra (East),
Mumbai- 400 051

Appellant

2. National Securities Clearing Corporation Limited

Exchange Plaza,
Bandra-Kurla Complex,
Bandra (East),
Mumbai-400 051
3. Dolat Capital Markets Pvt. Ltd.
20, Rajabahadur Mansion,
1st Floor, Ambalal Doshi Marg, Fort,
Mumbai- 400 001

Respondents

Mr. Zal Andhyarujina, Advocate with Mr. Neerav Merchant, Mr. Tejesh
Chitlangi and Mr. Nitesh Tiwari, Advocates, i/b I.C. Legal for the
Appellant.
Mr. Rafique Dada, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sachin Chandrana,
Advocate and Mr. Pritvish Shetty, Advocate i/b Manilal Kher Ambalal
& Co. for Respondent Nos. 1 & 2.
None for Respondent No. 3
CORAM: Justice J.P. Devadhar, Presiding Officer
Jog Singh, Member
Per: Justice J.P. Devadhar
1.

Counsel for the appellant on instruction states that in view of the

fact that the Portfolio Management Service clients on whose behalf the
appellant has filed these two appeals have lodged their claims with the
respondents, appellant be permitted to withdraw these two appeals.
2.

Accordingly, both these appeals are allowed to be withdrawn with

no order as to costs.

Sd/Justice J.P. Devadhar

Presiding Officer

Sd/Jog Singh
Member
01.07.2015
Prepared & Compared By: PK