Verizon Services Corp. et al v. Vonage Holdings Corp. et al Doc.

550
Case 1:06-cv-00682-CMH-BRP Document 550 Filed 04/12/2007 Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Alexandria Division

______________________________
VERIZON SERVICES CORP., )
ET AL., )
Plaintiffs, )
V. ) Civil Action No. 1:06cv682
)
VONAGE HOLDINGS CORP., )
ET AL., )
Defendants. )
______________________________)
VONAGE HOLDINGS CORP., )
ET AL., )
)
Counterclaim-Plaintiffs, )
V. )
)
VERIZON SERVICES CORP., )
ET AL., )
)
Counterclaim-Defendants. )
______________________________)

ORDER

On March 13, 2007, this Court entered judgment in favor of

the Plaintiffs, Verizon Services Corp., Verizon Laboratories Inc.

and Verizon Communications, Inc., and against the Defendants,

Vonage Holdings Corp. and Vonage America, Inc., following a trial

by jury in which claim 20 of the ‘711 patent, claim 27 of the

‘574 patent, and claims 1 and 6-8 of the ‘880 patent were found

to be infringed, corresponding to Counts 3,4, and 7 of Verizon’s

Amended Complaint.

On March 21, 2007, this Court dismissed with prejudice

Counts 5 and 6 of Verizon’s Amended Complaint, and Counts V, VI,

Dockets.Justia.com
 Case 1:06-cv-00682-CMH-BRP Document 550 Filed 04/12/2007 Page 2 of 2

XII, XIII, XVII and XVIII of Vonage’s Amended Counterclaim

concerning the ‘304 and ‘062 patents.

This Court hereby enters judgment in favor of the

Defendants, Vonage Holdings Corp. and Vonage America, Inc., and

against the Plaintiffs, Verizon Services Corp., Verizon

Laboratories, Inc. and Verizon Communications, Inc., following

the trial by jury in which claims 1 and 2 of the ‘275 patent and

claims 1 and 2 of the ‘869 patent were found not to be infringed,

corresponding to Counterclaim Counts I and II of Defendants’

Answer to the Amended Complaint and Counterclaims, and hereby

declares that Vonage does not infringe the ‘275 and ‘869 patents

literally or under the doctrine of equivalents.

This Court DISMISSES with prejudice all remaining claims and

counterclaims in this action.

/s/

______________________________
CLAUDE M. HILTON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Alexandria, Virginia
April 12 , 2007