Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 2

(HC) Raul Maldonado v. Scribner Doc.

11

Case 1:07-cv-01076-OWW-DLB Document 11 Filed 01/02/2008 Page 1 of 2

1
2
3
4
5
6
7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10 RAUL JOSEPH MALDONADO, ) 1:07-cv-01076-OWW-DLB-HC
)
11 Petitioner, ) ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
) RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 4)
12 v. )
) ORDER DISMISSING PETITION
13 SCRIBNER, ) FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
)
14 Respondent. ) ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO
) ENTER JUDGMENT
15
16 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a
17 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.
18 On August 2, 2007, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and a
19 Recommendation that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be
20 DISMISSED, and the Clerk of Court be directed to enter judgment.
21 These Findings and Recommendation were served on all parties and
22 contained notice that any objections were to be filed within
23 fifteen (15) days from the date of service of that order. On
24 August 20, 2007 and October 15, 2007, respectively, Petitioner
25 filed a motion to extend time. On September 14, 2007 and October
26 10, 2007, respectively, the court granted Petitioner an additional
27 thirty (30) days within which to respond. On November 26, 2007,
28 Petitioner filed objections to the Findings and Recommendation.

Dockets.Justia.com
Case 1:07-cv-01076-OWW-DLB Document 11 Filed 01/02/2008 Page 2 of 2

1 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636


2 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of the case.
3 Having carefully reviewed the entire file, including Petitioner's
4 objections, the Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge's
5 Findings and Recommendation are supported by the record and proper
6 analysis. Petitioner's objections present no grounds for
7 questioning the Magistrate Judge's analysis.
8 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
9 1. The Findings and Recommendation, filed August 2, 2007,
10 are ADOPTED IN FULL;
11 2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED; and,
12 3. The Clerk of Court enter judgment.
13 IT IS SO ORDERED.
14 Dated: January 2, 2008 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger
emm0d6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28