Universidad Nacional

Centro de Investigacin y Docencia en Educacin

Divisin de Educologa- Sistema de Estudios de Posgrado
Maestra en Educacin con nfasis en el Aprendizaje del Ingls
Evaluacin en el Aprendizaje del Ingls
Facilitadora: Cindy Rodrguez Soto

Name: ___Juan Pablo Amador_________ Date. June 8th,2015 . Obt. Pts 28/ __24___ %10/___8.5__ Grade 100/__85_____

Assessment of an Administered Tests

General Instructions. The pedagogical intention of the present assignment is to analyze our own practice based on the concepts and theories
discussed and studied in class and in the readings. The following analysis is then based on the first two readings done so far and on the Cornerstones
of Assessment as studied in class. The general idea is to choose test you have previously administered (Written test) and to analyze it critically to
identify strengths and areas for improvement. Use the following rubric as guidelines to go over the details that will be checked. Please send the
document following this format in the filename: Yourname.Lastname.assigment1. Do not include a cover letter, just make sure the heading has
your name on it.
Rubric instructions: The following rubric will be used to grade your assignment and also to guide you through the assignment requirements. After
reading your assignment, the facilitator will assign a level of completion to each criterion. Each level of completion is described at the bottom, so that
you understand what the facilitator means with a developing or accomplished. Please take some time to read the descriptors and the criterion. The
facilitator will also add comments when necessary.

Assessment of an Administered Tests Rubric

Needs
Further
improvement

All the sections of the test were analyzed. Both positives and areas for
improvement (both when possible) were highlighted.
Each piece of feedback provided was explained in terms of the theory
provided. Participant used the concepts as presented in class and on the
readings.
Participant highlighted within the text itself (using Word comments or any
kind of strategy) the positives and the areas for improvement.
Participant wrote a feedback letter (at least a page) to her/himself
explaining what was found (both positives and areas for improvement) in
the test.
In the feedback letter, participant gave at least two examples of how two
of the areas for improvement can be enhanced.
The feedback letter highlighted positives and areas for improvement in
general, using 2-3 positives and 2-3 areas for improvement from the ones
highlighted on the test as examples to reinforce the general feedback
provided in the letter
Language used was appropriate, using accurate punctuation, spelling and
mechanics in general, plus the use of suitable vocabulary and register.

Developin
g

Accomplishe
d

Exemplary

Comments

The listening part was not

analyzed
I noticed that you mentioned
the some of the concepts
but you did not
development them much.

You can work on the

feedback letter by giving it a
more letter-like format.
It could have been more
specific and provide actual
examples

Exemplary: It means that the corresponding criterion was evident and/or well developed. Participant demonstrates mastery and understanding of the criterion requested.
4pts
Accomplished: It means that the criterion was well developed but the is room for improvement. Participant demonstrates good understanding of the criterion requested.
There might be something missing and not fully developed but it did not compromise the quality of the assignment. 3pts
Developing: Participant demonstrated understanding of the criterion by developing it, however it is somewhat incomplete or needs improvement. Participant
demonstrates to be moving forward in her/his learning process but further support and deeper development or completeness is required. Participant may want to double
check notes, readings; or ask for further explanations/support from peers or facilitator. 2pts

Needs further improvement: It means there was a modest development or presence of the corresponding criterion. Participant may want to double read assigned
readings. Student may want to consider double-checking notes and requesting for the support of peers and facilitator. The criterion needs more development and
analysis, or needs to be entirely stated. 1pt.