Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
ID
17670
17516
17154
17274
Due Date
: 18 August 2015
TABLE OF CONTENTS
No.
Title
Page
10
Results
12
Discussion
26
Conclusions
27
References
27
Governing Equations
3. Continuity Equation
= distributed resistance
( + ) 2
=
2
= rotational speed
r= distance from axis of rotation
4. Energy equation
Simulation Method
1. Open COMSOL.
2. Add study Stationary.
3. Add Physics.
a) Non-isothermal
4. Add materials - water to all boundaries.
5. Draw the geometry according to individual values.
6. In Non-Isothermal flow:
a. Add inlet with To=298 K and v=1.11 m/min.
b. Add outlet at boundary.
c. Add heat flux at circles.
7. Compute study.
8. Add study group to build.
a. Temperature profile and velocity field streamline in 2D.
b. Temperature and Velocity profile in revolve-3D (225o).
c. Isosurface plot for temperature.
d. Temperature distribution at different z position.
9. Do a trial and error between heat transfer coefficient and exit temperature.
10. Plot graph.
a. Trial and error process to determine heat transfer coefficient.
b. Relationship between heat transfer coefficient and T2.
17274
17154
17516
17670
17274
For the value of X = 0.11m, Y = 0.156m, at T2 = 111C and v1 = 0.11m/min, the heat transfer
coefficient, h = 104.
17154
10
For the value of X = 0.16m, Y = 0.128m, at T2 = 111C and v1 = 0.11m/min, the heat transfer
coefficient, h = 71.75.
17516
For the value of X = 0.21m, Y = 0.128m, at T2 = 111C and v1 = 0.11m/min, the heat transfer
coefficient, h = 75
17670
11
Results
ID: 17154; X = 0.11m, Y = 0.156m, T2=111OC, v1=0.11m/min
13
14
Optimum Point
15
16
17
140
Averaged Outlet T2
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Optimum Chart
100
90
T Average Outlet T2
80
70
60
50
40
Optimum Point
30
20
10
0
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
18
19
20
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
0
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
21
100
Optimum Chart
90
T_avg_outlet-T2
80
70
60
50
40
Optimum Point
30
20
10
0
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
22
23
24
Optimum Point
25
Discussion
From the figure of temperature profile and velocity field streamline in 2D, we can observe that
the inlet temperature is approximately 300K and increases up to 500K when it passes through the
heating coil. Maximum temperature is obtained near the heat flux generation region which is the
heating coil. As a much finer mesh is generated in that region, temperature profile is accurately
predicted.
From the velocity profile in revolve 3D, we can observe that the velocity is zero when
approaching the wall due to the no slip condition principle. Maximum velocity is obtained at the
center of the inlet which is 2x10-3 m/s. Velocity is obtained near the inlet and it gradually
decreased due to the fluctuations in the geometry. After achieving a uniform flow, the velocity
raised and headed to a high velocity near the outlet.
From the figure of outlet surface temperature, it can be observed that the temperature is
maximum at the center of the outlet which is 430 K while lowest near the wall which is 370 K.
The same observation can be made from the isosurface plot for temperature.
From the graph of average outlet T2 vs Heat transfer coefficient, we can observe that the
temperature is gradually increasing with the increase of heat transfer coefficient. From the trial
and error process, we can conclude that the optimum heat transfer coefficient is 104 W/m2K.
From the calculations performed, the flow regime is said to be laminar flow. Hence, the velocity
throughout the domain is between 0 to 1 m/s. With respect to the flow, the velocity is zero near
the walls which follows the no slip condition.
26
Conclusion
When we compare the three different types of x (in meter) which is 0.11, 0.16, 0.21 given
to us to build the heat exchanger, we found that increase in the length of x (in meter) results in
decrease of overall temperature of the heat exchanger. This can be seen on the surface
temperature profile in results part. Moreover, decrease in x value, makes the velocity streamline
flows easily, shown on the Streamline Velocity field. In addition, the outlet temperature surface
shows higher temperature when x value (in meter) is greater.
Furthermore, when we look at the temperature distribution curve for all the three x
values, we can see that x = 0.11 gives a more consistent curve with less oscillations compare to
the other two values. This shows that the heat exchanger with x = 0.11 has a more stable
temperature distribution compared to the other two.
References
27