a FL33 ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY OR GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY (UNDER FAMILY CODE, +7400 17405. rok Us cas eae aes “ | Prop golar bse ony KAREN BOWERMAN, 4 4419 COLLEGE AVE MMIZAUG 21 BM 8:20 VISALIA, CA 83277 ‘TELEPHONE NUMBER: 209-534-7781 FAX NO. «COUNTY OF STANISLAUS [ATTORNEY FOR (nae) INPRO FER oy__HEATHER GRASSER OFF SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF STANISLAUS. STREETADORESS: 11001 STREET MAILING ADDRESS: PO BOX 1098 CCITYAND 218 CODE: MODESTO, CA 95359, BRANCH NAME: PETITIONERIPLANTIFF: GREGORY BOWERMAN CASE NUMBER: 455 922 RESFONDENT/DEFENOANT: KAREN BOWERMAN OTHER PARENTIPARTY: Gt applicable provide} = ies HEARING DATE: August 21,2012 HEARING TIME: 890 - 900 4M PROOF OF PERSONAL SERVICE DEPT 4 1 lam at least 18 years ol, nol party Io is action, and nota prolecied person lisled in any of the orders 2. Person Served (name): MICHAEL A. GOSS 3. | served copies ofthe following documents (epaciy) DECLARATIVE RESPONSE TO MOTION for CUSTODY MODIFICATION DECLARATIVE RESPONSE TO MOTION for ELISOR/ SHORT SALE 4By personally tivering copies tothe person served, as follows’ Date: August 21,2012 Time: 3:90 PM ©. Aadress: 1119 Twelfth Street, Modesto, CA 95355 5. tam & _X__ not a registered Caltfomia process server 4. __ exempt trom registration under Business & Profession Code b. ___ a registered Caloris process server ©. __a employee or independent contractor of a & _____ a Calitornia shen or marshal! ‘registered Calitrnia process server 66. My name, adoress, and telephone, and, it applicable, county of registration and number (speci), ‘Michael Yenigues, 820 N. Willis Steet, Vissi, CA 98277 - 850-207-7255 7. X_1 cactare under penalty of perjury under the laws ofthe State of California thatthe foregoing is true and correct 8 __1am a California sheri or marshall and in cori that the foragoing is rue and vorrect DATE: AUGUST, 20, 2012, Ll YENI (1 VPP PRINT NAME OF PERSON WHO SERVED THE PAPERS) PROOF OF PERSONAL SERVICEFL-320 ‘STOREY OR PARTY NTHGUT ATTORNEY fam Sas Rnb GOOG ] FoR COURT IRE onT ] | Karen Bowerman | 1419 College Ave Visalia, CA 93277 ‘TELEPHONE no 209-534-7794 FAXNO (Opn EMAIL ADORESS (Onions: Kdownesbowerman@ yahoo.com Se ‘street aooress: 800 Eleventh Street | ‘awinc aboress: Post Office Box 1098 i | crv moze cove: Modesto CA 95953 | es | PETITIONERIPLAINTIFF: GREGORY BOWERMAN. RESPONDENTIDEFENDANT: KAREN BOWERMAN OTHER PARTY: RESPONSIVE DECLARATION TO REQUEST FOR ORDER fon HEARING DATE: TIME: DEPARTMENT OR ROOM. desl o22 8-21-2012 8:30 - 9:00 AM 14 | 1. [7] cap custopy 2. [1 I consent to the order requested. b. [£7 | do not consent to the order requested, but ‘consent to the following order: Court orders custody of minors be increased from 72% to 100% for Respondent with sole legal and CHILD VISITATION (PARENTING TIME) a. | consent to the order requested, b. [#1 | do not consent to the order requested, but ‘consent to the following order: Potioner shall be restricted from any visitation with the children Pending the results of the psychological evaluations of the Petitioner and minor children as ordered. 3. C2] cHiLo support 2, C) I consent to the order requested. b. £21 | consent to guideline support. ¢ CJ Ido not consent to the order requested, but | ‘consent to the following order: (1) FJ Guideline 2 2) other (speci): oult orders that currrent child support be adjusted to accurately reflect guideline for two minors ane Cour ordered custody percentage. All differences between support payments smn shal be eit Sue shall be Paid retroactively per Attachment S.A current and future Povronts shall be electronic to Respondent's account. +. [21 spousal or PARTNER SUPPORT 2. [J | consent o the order requested ». [1] 1 do not consent to the order requested, | consent to the following order: Court orders that spousal support be adjusted to accurately reflect guideline. All differences between equhort amount payments received and due shall be paid retroactively per Attachment 2. All current and future payments shall be electronic to Respondent's account "Space cower RESPONSIVE DECLARATION TO REQUEST FOR ORDER FUSzo Rey 25FL-320 PETITIONER PLAINTIFF GREGORY BOWERMAN CASE NNER 1 RESPONDENT/DEFENDANT: KAREN BOWERMAN 455 922 OTHER PARTY: 5. (J ATTORNEY'S FEES AND Costs 2. 1 I consent to the order requested. ©. [1] 1 do not consent to the order requested. © (1 Loonsent tothe following order: 6. (77 PROPERTY RESTRAINT 2. 1] | consentto the order requested. ©. J Ido not consent to the order requested, © £1 Teonsent tothe following order: 7.) PROPERTY conTROL a ‘ consent to the order requested ». [J Ido not consent to the order requested. & [7] I eonsent to the following order: 8. (J OTHER RELIEF 2, [1 I consent tothe order requested. ©. [1] 1o not consent to the order requested. & [1 I consent to the following order: 8. [2] SUPPORTING INFORMATION Contained inthe atsched declaration. (You may use Attached Dectaration (orm MC-031) fortis Purpose). | ROTES To fespond dames velnceretaing oars reqesied he Rogues’ Tovar EOTiSas VOSS Prevention) [em 2-100) you must use the Answer o Temporary Restraining Order (Domestic Vience Pevonten) Goon akon | ects under penalty of pejuy under th ave ofthe Sate of Califia that he fregcing anda tachment are ue and coven Date:8- 16-2012 aren Bowerman » (TYPE OR PRINT Nae) (@GNATURE OF DECLARANT) FeSO Rev hay 5212) RESPONSIVE DECLARATION TO REQUEST FOR ORDER ounzaz‘SHORT TITLE: CASE NUMBER: Declarative Response - Custody Modification 455 922 ‘ATTACHMENT (Number): 7 As the primary caretaker of the minor children it is my responsibility to provide a safe and healthy environment for them. I have leased a new residence to move the children to Visalia to ensure they are a safe distance from Greg and will no longer be exposed to his masturbation ad- diction and chronic manipulations and sadism. I also fear for my personal safety from Greg as well and need to avoid any further physical attacks and verbal abuse. I am requesting that my custody percentage be increased from 72% to 100% effective immediately. I further request that the court immediately order the Petitioner (Greg Bowerman) and my two minor daughters re- ceive a psychological evaluation to determine their mental well being and possible effects of witnessing and enduring their father’s masturbation addiction and violent pornography habit. Response to Order to Modify Custody 1. I submitted a 45 day notice of move via text on June 18th, 2012, to Greg because I was moving to Visalia. Notice was documented via Certified Mail Exhibit G: Copy of letter verifying June 18th text notification and certified letter delivery confirmation. *Note: Petitioner has claimed that he did not receive certified letter until July 13th 2012. Exhibit G clearly shows the certified letter was sent on June 27th, 2012 with a deliv- ery time of June 28th, 2012. Petitioner chose to delay pick up of the letter until July 13th, 2012. 2. Imoved because I fear for my safety and the well being of my children and I need to be far enough way from Greg that he can no longer attempt to enter my residence, regularly intim (if the item that this Attachment concems is made under Page 1 of 24 penalty of perjury, all statements in this Attachment are made under penalty of perjury.) Form Approved for Optional Use Judicial Council of California MC-025 [Rev. July 1, 2009] MC-025 ATTACHMENT to Declarative Response‘SHORT TITLE: CASE NUMBER: Declarative Response - Custody Modification 455 922 ATTACHMENT (Number): 1 date me and physically attack me, My prior attorney Paul Fromson charged me for submitting a request for a restraining order based on the documentation below but informed me the order was not granted by the court. *Note: Please find attached Exhibit A: Modesto Police Department - CAD Response Report# MP12009175 - Dated 2/17/2012 RE: Petitioner attempted forced violent entry to respondent's domicile Exhibit B: Modesto Police Department Domestic Violence Report - Case#12-35678 On 4/29/2012 RE: Petitioner attacked respondent inside her car and caused injury Exhibit C: Warrant Stanislaus County/Superior Court Minute Order - Case# 1441903 on 07/03/2012 Respondent was present at criminal hearing for Petitioner on Domestic Violence Charge Exhibit D: Office of the District Attomey Stanislaus County - Case MPD 1235678 on 05/09/2012 RE: Notification to respondent of Victim Services Program Exhibit E: Doctor’s Medical Center - Emergency Treatment Discharge Report - 05/01/2012 (if the item that this Attachment concerns is made under Page 2 of 24 penalty of perjury, all statements in this Attachment are ‘made under penalty of perjury.) Form Approved for Optional Use Judicial Council of California MC-025 [Rev. July 1, 2009] MC-025 ATTACHMENT to Declarative ResponseDeclarative Response - Custody Modification 455 922 ATTACHMENT (Number): 1 SHORT TITLE: CASE NUMBER: | RE: Contusion, Upper Extremity, Neck Sprain/Strain injuries from attack by Petitioner 3. The children’s lifetime home in Modesto is being sold by their father (per the order served to me) and as the primary caretaker I am creating a new, safe and stable home environ- ment for them in Visalia 4. Both children were changing Modesto schools this year so itis the right time to enroll them in school in Visalia with minimal impact 5. Relevant background information below on safety concems for myself and my children Specific argument by respondent regarding school enrollment for children I moved to Visalia after providing Greg with 45 day notice right after the last economic hearing on June 18, 2012 at which I did not receive the corrective adjustment to my support Payments so they are consistent with the court ordered temporary guideline support. It was im- mediately evident that I would not be able to continue paying legal fees, rent, utilities, food, clothing, living expenses and medical bills for myself and children I was also gravely concerned for my personal safety in regard to Greg’s aggression and attacks on me and the well being of my children, On Friday, Aug 3rd my previous attorney, Paul Fromson notified me that there was an emergency order prohibiting me from enrolling my daughters in school outside of Stanislaus (If the item that this Attachment concems is made under Page 3 of 24 penalty of perjury, all statements in this Attachment are made under penalty of perjury.) Form Approved for Optional Use Judicial Council of California MC-025 [Rev. July 1, 2009] MC-025 ATTACHMENT to Declarative ResponseSHORT TITLE: CASE NUMBER Declarative Response - Custody Modification 455 922 ATTACHMENT (Number): 1 County pending a hearing on Aug 7th. At the time of the notification I had already relocated my residence to Visalia California. As the court designated Primary Caretaker for my two minor daughters I felt it would be cruel and detrimental to enroll them in school in Stanislas County for the two weeks pending the hearing to determine custody and school enrollment issues. School in Visalia was not scheduled to start so I saw no problem in that the kids would not be missing any school. I specifically de- termined to let the girls avoid starting school in Modesto and making friends for two weeks and then leaving to attend school in Visalia where I now live. On Wednesday Aug. 8th, Greg's visitation day with the children and the day after school started in Stanislaus County, Greg enrolled and sent my two Daughters to school in Stanislaus County without informing, discussing nor seeking permission from me as the Primary Caretaker. Because he sent the kids to school they were unavailable for pick up by me at the designated 2:00 PM exchange time on Thursday per the custody order. In fact, Greg kept the children for the remainder of the week and continued sending them to school. Further, the children were extremely confused and upset that they didn’t understand why they were now attending school in Modesto and whether they would now have to leave in a cou- ple weeks and attend school in Visalia. When | informed them that their father was not author- ized nor given permission by me to enroll them in school in Modesto I could tell it created anxi (If the item that this Attachment concems is made under Page 4 of 24 penalty of perjury, all statements in this Attachment are made under penalty of perjury.) Form Approved for Optional Use Judicial Council of California MC-025 [Rev. July 1, 2009] MC-025, ATTACHMENT to Declarative Response‘SHORT TITLE: CASE NUMBER: Declarative Response - Custody Modification 455 922 ‘ATTACHMENT (Number): 1 éty and frustration in them. When I indicated that they would in fact not be going back to school in Modesto they were angry with me. Per Mike Goss’s letter to my previous attorney (Paul Fromson) dated Aug 9th, 2012 Mr. Goss told my attorney to inform me that my children MUST attend school where the father had enrolled them pending the next custody hearing. There is no such order made by the court - yet another attempt by opposing counsel to impose unilateral control and intimidate the Respondent. Please see Exhibit T Attached - Letter from Mike Goss to Paul Fromson 8 - 7 - 2012 The following is clear: Mr. Goss is attempting to create “precedence” that the girls are currently attending school in Modesto and will argue at the hearing that they should remain in school in Modesto. I find Mr. Goss’s strategy unethical and contrary to the written orders and implied intent of the court custody order for the following reasons: Mr. Goss’s strategy actively encourages parental alienation by encouraging his client to enroll the minors in school after the Primary Caretaker has informed the children that they will not be attending school until the court makes a determination. Their mother has 72% custody and has relocated to Visalia and has remained in full compliance with the existing custody order and all other orders of the court. Mr. Goss’s strategy of creating precedence of having the girls enrolled in school by their father is in direct violation of the custody order in that he enrolled them unilaterally without noti (if the item that this Attachment concerns is made under Page 5 of 24 penalty of perjury, all statements in this Attachment are made under penalty of perjury.) Form Approved for Optional Use Judicial Council of California MC-025 [Rev. July 1, 2009] MC-025 ATTACHMENT to Declarative Response‘SHORT TITLE: CASE NUMBER: Declarative Response - Custody Modification 455 922 ATTACHMENT (Number): 1 fication, discussion nor permission of the primary caretaker. The father willfully and purposely disobeyed the custody order in regard to returning the children on Thursday at 2:00 PM. Mr. Goss’ strategy of creating precedence is based on direct and willful violation of the Custody Or- der and circumvention of the court’s existing ruling on custody issues. Please find record of Greg's willful failure to deliver the girls back to the Primary Caretaker at the time designated by the existing custody order. See Attachments listed below: Exhibit Q - Online Report Violation of Custody Order 7/28/2012 - Case ID: 41132.9282 Exhibit R - Online Report Violation of Custody Order 8/9/2012 - Case ID: 41132.9441 Exhibit S - Online Report Violation of Custody Order 8/11/2012 - Case ID: 41132.9081 Because I will not actively participate in creating anxiety and angst for my children by making them the victims of Mr. Goss’s strategy of creating Parental Alienation, I have allowed ‘them to stay with their father until the hearing so they can continue to go to school. I will not take them out of school only to have him send them back during his visitation day and get caught in Mr. Goss’s cruel trap that amounts to child abuse. And this means that Mr. Goss’s strategy has now completely undermined the courts ruling and intent of making me the primary caretaker with 72% custody in as much as the children are now attending school in a town in which their (if the item that this Attachment concerns is made under Page 6 of 24 penalty of perjury, all statements in this Attachment are made under penalty of perjury.) Form Approved for Optional Use Judicial Council of California MC-025 [Rev. July 1, 2009] MC-025 ATTACHMENT to Declarative ResponseSHORT TITLE: CASE NUMBER: Declarative Response - Custody Modification 455 922 ‘ATTACHMENT (Number): 1 Primary Caretaker does not live AND living with their father for the majority of the two weeks awaiting the hearing. I have specifically allowed them to attend to avoid confusing and hurting the children by insi ing to abide by the court's ruling. Wise King Solomon would recognize this as the “splitting the baby” conundrum, Regarding sadistic and controlling behaviors in the marriage: Tentered into the marriage with Greg Bowerman at 25. I had dated Greg off an on since I was 20 years old. Prior to our marriage, Greg performed acts of sexual related bondage and con- trol on me at least a dozen times. These acts included instructing me to strip naked at his direc- tion, allowing him to blindfold me an tie me up with extremely detailed knotting. Once bound and blindfolded Greg walked me outside and hung me from a tree limb or post by draping my bound hands across the limb or the post. I hung naked and exposed outside for 5 to 6 hours cry- ing and begging for him to cut me down. On other occasions Greg bound me to a chair and posi- tioned me in front a television screen - when he removed the blindfold a movie of bondage and sexual torture was playing. Greg never discussed, explained nor apologized for these incidents. Two weeks after the first incident I lost my ability to speak and was committed to a mental health facility in Fresno, California for one month. The medical personnel indicated my speech loss was due to emotional trauma, I never explained what had happened with Greg, only that I ‘was sad about the end of my short 9 month marriage prior to meeting Greg. (If the item that this Attachment concems is made under Page7 of 24 Penalty of perjury, all statements in this Attachment are made under penalty of perjury.) Form Approved for Optional Use Judicial Council of California MC-025 [Rev. July 1, 2009] MC-025 ATTACHMENT to Declarative ResponseSHORT TITLE: CASE NUMBER: Declarative Response - Custody Modification 455 922 ATTACHMENT (Number): 1 ‘Through counseling and research I am now aware that Greg's abusive treatment ofme carly in the relationship is consistent with methodologies of creating relationship roles based on dominance and control and is referred to as ritualistic abuse. For a period of atleast one month following these incidents I stopped seeing Greg. I was confused and disturbed by the incidents and by Greg's demeanor during them - there was no in- timacy, no physical contact nor communication during the incidents. As a20 Year old girliifelta bit intimidated as Greg was 13 years my senior and a practicing medical doctor. Greg eventually convinced me to continue the relationship and we married when I was 25 years old. Leading up ‘0 our marriage I attended pre-marital counseling with Greg. The counselor was adamant that I should not marry Greg because she felt he was dangerous (Lynette Phippen - LCMC - PHD). It is clear to me that {lacked judgement and a sense of self preservation. It is also clear to me that I missed clear signs indicating the type of person I was marrying and that our marriage would be defined by incidents of extreme cruelty, deprivation of pleasure and the incessant impact of sa- distic and controlling behaviors by my husband. Masturbation Addiction - Sexual Torture & Bondage Pornography From the onset of our marriage Greg acquired and viewed movies and magazines with sex- val bondage and torture content. While it was disturbing that Greg was using bondage and sexual ‘orture pomograph, i realized that was his choice. What was initially distressful and painful to (ifthe item that this Attachment concems is made under Page 8 of 24 penalty of perjury, all statements in this Attachment are ‘made under penalty of perjury.) Form Approved for Optional Use Judicial Council of California MC-025 [Rev. July 1, 2009] MC-025 ATTACHMENT to Declarative ResponseSHORT TITLE: CASE NUMBER: Declarative Response - Custody Modification 455 922 ATTACHMENT (Number): 1 ‘me is that he also refused to show affection or intimacy toward me and used deprivation of nor- mal marriage sexual relations as a form of torture and control of me. I felt quite abandoned in the ‘marriage both emotionally and physically. Eventually i was most concemed with the exposure of Our children to Greg's addiction to masturbation and exhibitionism, _ Greg's use of pomography containing sexual bondage and torture continued throughout the marriage and became the source of increasing contention as Greg repeatedly refused to make sure he viewed the extreme pornography in private areas of our home to ensure our children were ‘ot exposed to his intense masturbation. Greg would masturbate vigorously while viewing the Sexual bondage and torture pornography on computers located in the kitchen, family room area ‘and on his cell phone in our daughter's bathroom and in the car in the driveway or parked along ‘the cutb in view of neighbors. (Contact witness Carrie Chantos) This disregard for our children Jed to many intense arguments where I insisted he seek help for his addiction to masturbation and exhibitionism. At my continued insistence, i compelled Greg to attend couple's counseling with a Psychologist regarding his masturbation addiction and pornography habit with bondage and sex- ual torture, At counseling Greg would fall asleep, not show up to some sessions and refuse to Participate, (Dr. Olson - Modesto, CA). Dr. Olson referred Greg to another therapist for Goal Set- ting counseling to assist Greg with setting attainable goals to overcome his masturbation, sexual bondage and torture pomography addiction, The therapist indicated that Greg's addiction would (if the item that this Attachment concerns is made under Page @ of 24 penalty of perjury, all statements in this Attachment are made under penalty of perjury.) Form Approved for Optional Use Judicial Council of California MC-025 [Rev. July 1, 2009] MC-025 ATTACHMENT to Declarative ResponseSHORT TITLE: CASE NUMBER Declarative Response - Custody Modification 455 922 ATTACHMENT (Number): 1 ‘be very difficult to overcome because of Greg's long history of gratification through watching thers endure pain and or be controlied in sexual bondage and torture pornography. Specifically, the therapist instructed Greg and I that if Greg could not overcome his constant need to view Sexual bondage and torture pomography on his mobile phone - that I should take his phone away, hide it and then sit down and talk calmly with Greg about his addiction, “Note; Please see attached Exhibit F of Greg's Journal indicating his description of masturba- tion as his "favorite activity in the whole world" Unfortunately, when Greg realized i had his phone he aggressively confronted me demand- ing I give him his phone. I repeated the therapist's instructions that we needed to talk and discuss the sexual torture and bondage pomography on his phone. Greg then threw me on the ground, sat on me, bounced up and down on my chest and put a pillow over my face. He would remove the pillow to ask me where the phone was. I finally told Greg the phone was in my truck. Then Greg dragged me out of the house by one arm across the brick walk way to my truck and told me to ‘get the phone out. He grabbed my neck and shoved me into the truck. I retrieved the phone and he grabbed it then went to his car and sped off. After this episode I determined that a divorce would be the only way to protect my children and myself. Unfortunately, I told Greg I was considering a divorce if he could not ensure his ad (if the item that this Attachment concems is made under Page 10 of 24 penalty of perjury, all statements in this Attachment are made under penalty of perjury.) Form Approved for Optional Use Judicial Council of California MC-025 [Rev. July 1, 2009] MC-025 ATTACHMENT to Declarative Response‘SHORT TITLE: CASE NUMBER: Declarative Response - Custody Modification 455 922 ATTACHMENT (Number): 1 diction to sexual torture and bondage pornography would not lead to anymore exposure of our children to his masturbation and exhibitionism. I also indicated that he must stop his physical and emotional abuse against me. One of Greg's personal Journal excerpts indicates Greg's strategy for pre-emptive strikes against potential enemies: July 19, 1986 - Regarding "getting" people: "Poor self image makes me feel people are out to get me, so I try to get them first" See Exhibit U Attached From this point forward Greg became increasingly hostile toward me and also started tak- ing equity loans out against our home. He also became increasingly detached, distance and secre- tive. He changed banks and opened accounts with only his name on it. Both the physical and emotional abuse increased over the next three years but to maintain the relationship until he could execute his divorce strategy - he would craft in depth "sorry" notes after administering Punishments and abuse. *Note: Please see "sorry notes" attached - Exhibits H, I, J Greg’s behavioral impacts on the children _ Both my eldest son by Greg, William, who is now 18 and my eldest daughter by Greg, Olivia, 14, have reported to me instances where they have encountered Greg masturbating in ‘common areas of the home, (If the item that this Attachment concems is made under Page 11 of 24 penalty of perjury, all statements in this Attachment are made under penalty of perjury.) Form Approved for Optional Use Judicial Council of California MC-025 [Rev. July 1, 2009] MC-025 ATTACHMENT to Declarative ResponseSHORT TITLE: CASE NUMBER: Declarative Response - Custody Modification 455 922 ATTACHMENT (Number): 1 _ William reported to me three years ago when he was approximately 15 year that he had walked _into the Kitchen/Family room area and encountered Greg viewing pomography on the computer _and masturbating. Approximately six months later I accidentally encountered William mastur- _bating to pomography on his computer and indicated my concems with the impact on developing healthy views towards women. I told him to speak to his father for guidance. Later, William ‘told me his father said he should continue to view pornography and masturbate as it was normal and healthy. Olivia reported to me approximately one year ago, after the divorce proceedings began, that she had gotten up in the middle of the night and proceeded toward the kitchen to get a drink of water. As she entered the family room / kitchen area she froze as she encountered Greg sitting _at the computer masturbating. She looked at Greg for several moments in a state of shock and confusion. Greg then looked up and shouted repeatedly for Olivia to go bed as she started crying and yelling that she just wanted a drink of water. Greg yelled at her until she went back to bed without getting the drink of water, Particularly significant is that ee meeting with the Court Mediator, Kim Mallock, for Custody issues on November 9th, 2011 - approximately one pra paieafin myles — (if the item that this Attachment concerns is made under Page 12 of 24 penalty of perjury, all statements in this Attachment are ‘made under penalty of perjury.) Form Approved for Optional Use Judicial Council of California MC-025 [Rev. July 1, 2009] MC-025 ATTACHMENT to Declarative ResponseCASE NUMBER 455 922 SHORT TITLE: Declarative Response - Custody Modification ATTACHMENT (Number): 1 F "fuses to consider the impact of his deviant behavior on the children. _ Elizabeth, my youngest daughter - 9 years old - has informed me that Greg showers with obit int etn en ay aig ss # tg e house to at one - that it is family business. Elizabeth now complains to me Using probation as sadistic control tool In Feb. 2009, while on a family trip in the car in Monterey California, I was discussing with Greg the fact that I had once again encountered him masturbating in the family room of our home. | indicated that i was increasingly concerned that the children were exposed to his mastur- bation and our relationship in general was based on his continued emotional torture and control of me through deprivation of pleasure and physical intimacy. I emphasized to Greg that I did not, ‘want myself or my children subjected to violent pornography and he indicated that he in fact had been subjected to pornography at a young age in his childhood home. At this point I indicated I ‘wanted to go home. He responded by calling me a cheater and punching me in the leg several times from his position in the driver’ seat. I had severe bruising from his attack. See Attached Exhibit K - Photo of leg bruising (if the item thet this Attachment concems is made under Page 13 of 24 penalty of perjury, all statements in this Attachment are made under penalty of perjury.) Form Approved for Optional Use Judicial Council of California MC-025 [Rev. July 1, 2008] MC-025, ATTACHMENT to Declarative ResponseSHORT TITLE: CASE NUMBER: Declarative Response - Custody Modification 455 922 ‘ATTACHMENT (Number): 1 Based on this incident, the police were called and we were interviewed. I wanted the inci- dent to pass so I claimed nothing had happened. However, the police wanted to interview my children because they thought I was protecting Greg and there were pronounced bruises on my leg. I told the police I would rather go to jail than have my children interrogated. The police took me to Jail and charged me with seven various counts. All of the count were fairly erroneous and were dropped with only a single charge of "interruption of a communication device”. The perti- nent outcome of this incident is that it left me with a a three year probation which I discovered Greg was going to wield as a potent control mechanism over me and further deploy as a compo- nent of his own divorce strategy. Over the next three years Greg would antagonize me by becoming increasingly blatant and exhibitionist with his masturbation behaviors to instigate a response from me. When I would confront him and plead for him to at least be discreet to protect the children from being exposed to him he would act indifferent. When I further indicated that he should leave the home he would become confrontational and then pull out his phone as if he were going to call the police and look at me threateningly. He made it clear that I was on probation and if he called the police and claimed I was being violent they would believe him and take me to jail immediately. This sadis- tic control behavior escalated to include incidents when Greg would deliberately punch me in the (if the item that this Attachment concerns is made under Page 14 of 24 penalty of perjury, all statements in this Attachment are ‘made under penalty of perjury.) Form Approved for Optional Use Judicial Council of Califomia MC-025 (Rev. July 1, 2009] MC-025 ATTACHMENT to Declarative ResponseSHORT TITLE: CASE NUMBET Declarative Response ‘ATTACHMENT (Number): 1 face and then immediately deny he did it. If I showed any response or inclination to argue with hhim about it he would pull out his phone as if he were going to call the police. Hiding Cervical Cancer results In approximately October 2010 I had a PAP Smear test administered and then waited for the results. ApproximatelyJune 2011 I discovered letters from the medical clinic regarding my PAP smear results hidden underneath the seat of Greg's car. The letters were opened and it ap- peared Greg had read them. The letters were dated November 2010 and indicated a positive re- sult for pre-cancer cells. Greg never indicated that he had removed this notification from the mail nor that he had read them nor that the test results indicated that I required immediate treatment to avoid Cervical Cancer. When I confronted Greg about the letters he had no response. I called the clinic and they tested me with another positive PAP Smear followed by a minor biopsy. The re- sults of both were positive and a Cone Biopsy was scheduled as it became clear that I had been informed of my condition too late to avoid the onset of pervasive pre-cancer cells. Using Divoree Procedure as Abuse and Sadism Tool The day of my Cone Biopsy I was waiting for Greg to drive me to the hospital. He was late and i looked outside and saw him masturbating with his phone sitting in his car on the curb. After the Cone Biopsy I was picked up by my friend Hope and I stayed at her house that night (if the item that this Attachment concems is made under Page 15 of 24 penalty of perjury, all statements in this Attachment are ‘made under penalty of perjury.) Form Approved for Optional Use Judicial Council of California MC-025 [Rev. July 1, 2009] MC-025, ATTACHMENT to Declarative ResponseSHORT TITLI CASE NUMBER: Declarative Response - Custody Modification 455 922 ‘ATTACHMENT (Number): 1 July 6th 2011. Incidentally, the Attachment to Declaration of the Restraining Order, states that I attacked Greg at our residence on the evening of July 6th which is impossible and incorrect. On July 7th I was recovering at home. I was heavily sedated, i had fresh stitches from the surgery (Cone Biopsy) the previous day and I was bleeding. In this condition | encountered Greg mastur- bating and viewing violent pornography in the family room of the house while the children were home. I asked Greg to leave the house and he refused. Greg then told me to leave but I could not as I was heavily sedated and bleeding. Then he grabbed me by both hands and twisted them. He refused to let go and I bit him. He was encouraging me to bite him which he indicated would give him an excuse to call the police. While continuing to hold me by both hands he forced me to the ground which was excruciating and debilitating from the pain of the Cone Biopsy. Greg often grabbed my wrists and twisted them because he knew I was recovering from a a recent surgery to treat carpal tunnel syndrome in both wrists. Once he forced me to the ground he sat on my chest (Greg is over 300 LBS). At this time we were in the entry way by the front door and I bit Greg again but he would not get off of me. At that time I reached out and grabbed an umbrella that was laying on the floor in the entry way and began to hit Greg with it and telling him to get off. I be- lieve this is the incident that he attempted to represent in his declaration for a restraining order and that he mistakenly claimed it occurred on July 6th instead of July 7th. (If the item that this Attachment concems is made under Page 16 of 24 penalty of perjury, all statements in this Attachment are made under penalty of perjury.) Form Approved for Optional Use Judicial Council of California MC-025 [Rev. July 1, 2008] MC-025 ATTACHMENT to Declarative ResponseSHORT TITLE: CASE NUMBER: Declarative Response - Custody Modification 455 922 ‘ATTACHMENT (Number): 1 Seven days after the Cone Biopsy I was still recovering at home. I was in pain and still bleeding, additionally, I was suffering from a badder infection. At approximately 4 AM Greg in- sisted I take 2 Zanax and 2 Hydrocodone. At approximately 8AM Greg came into the bedroom and insisted I meet a visitor at the front door. I said I could not. Greg then informed me I had flowers at the door for me. I again said I could not go to the door. Immediately thereafter a strange man entered my bedroom while I was heavily sedated and still bleeding from my prior surgery with nothing covering my lower extremities. The man produced a document and indi- cated I was being served divorce papers which included a restraining order with five minutes to leave stipulation. I was escorted out of the house by the police with a suitcase and directed to my car and I drove away while under the influence of Zanax and Hydrocodone while still bleeding. Greg stood in the comer of my room during the entire process with a look on his face similar to ‘what encountered when I would discover him masturbating to violent pornography in common areas of the house. ‘Two days after the five minute kick out from my home and separation from my children, I received the results of the Cone Biopsy indicating I had cancer and required surgery to remove my cervix, ovaries and uterus. That day Greg also allowed me a five minute visit with my chil- dren and said I would not be allowed to see them again for six weeks. Greg also prohibited me (if the item that this Attachment concems is made under Page 17 of 24 penalty of perjury, all statements in this Attachment are made under penalty of perjury.) Form Approved for Optional Use Judicial Council of California MC-025 [Rev. July 1, 2009] MC-025 ATTACHMENT to Declarative ResponseSHOAT TITLE: CASE NUMBER: Declarative Response - Custody Modification 455 922 ATTACHMENT (Number): 1 from retrieving any belongings from the house and refused to give me any money for substi- nence. At this point I was completely demoralized, shattered and hopeless. Later that day I drove to Visalia and attempted suicide. I was rescued by my parents after they were contacted by my adult son in Florida who was worried about me. I was in recovery for one week after being released from Kaweah Delta Hospital in Visalia approximately July 20, 2011. ‘Two weeks after my surgery to remove my cervix, uterus and ovaries to avoid cancer com- plications, I developed severe and painful vaginal sores. These were immediately diagnosed as Herpes Simplex 1. I was shocked as I had only had sexual relations that included oral sex with Greg. The doctors educated me that the stress of the surgery had led to the outbreak but that the Herpes had been present since it was contracted through oral sex with a partner who had the Herpes Simplex 1 cold sore at some time. | immediately asked Greg and he said that he was in fact aware that he had Herpes Simplex 1. Further, as a medical doctor he was aware that the disease was transmitted via oral sex and that he was aware that he had informed me that he had the disease but that it could not possibly be transmitted to me - even knowing he had performed oral sex on me and understanding the potential harm he may have inflicted upon me without my knowledge. Greg accepted responsibility and paid for the first two prescriptions of Valtrex, a drug that controls the outbreak of the disease. Later, Greg informed me that his attorney warned (if the item that this Attachment concerns is made under Page 18 of 24 penalty of perjury, all statements in this Attachment are made under penalty of perjury.) Form Approved for Optional Use Judicial Council of California MC-025 [Rev. July 1, 2009] MC-025, ATTACHMENT to Declarative ResponseSHORT TITLE: CASE NUMBER: Declarative Response - Custody Modification 455 922 ‘ATTACHMENT (Number): 1 him of his exposure to a civil suit and he should discontinue demonstrating any financial respon- sibility for purchasing the prescriptions. During the course of the divorce proceedings over the last year there have been a number of maneuverings and incidents based on actions by Greg and his attomey Mike Goss that have been cruel, demeaning and procedurally unusual in the unilateral nature of the negative impacts on me. Specifically i have endured the following strategic actions to diminish my financial re- sources and peace of mind: 1. was removed from my house at the onset of the divorce with a highly unusual "S min- ute to leave" restraining order that was not supported by any police report or medical report. It was complete hearsay and contained falsehoods and fabrications. In fact, I had a large bruise on one side of my face at this time from Greg striking me during the incident where he took the cell phone from me. See Attachment Exhibit L - Photo of bruise on cheek 2. I was recovering from a biopsy and restricted to bed rest and heavy pain medication. I ‘was not given access to any community resources, money nor personal assets from the house. Greg specifically chose the moment to have the divorce and "5 minute to leave" order served. 3. Thad no time and no resourees to engage legal counsel and as such was forced to attend the first hearing of my divorce with no legal representation. Many important aspects of (if the item that this Attachment concems is made under Page 19 of 24 penalty of perjury, all statements in this Attachment are made under penalty of perjury.) Form Approved for Optional Use Judicial Council of California MC-025 [Rev. July 1, 2009] MC-025 ATTACHMENT to Declarative ResponseSHORT TITLE: CASE NUMBER: Declarative Response - Custody Modification 455 922 ‘ATTACHMENT (Number): 1 my divorce case that should have been filed on behalf at this initial hearing were not and it has adversely affected the disposition of my case. 4. I specifically requested money from Mike Goss to hire legal representation prior to the first hearing and he refused. From the kick out from my home on July 13th, 2012 through my hysterectomy surgery on October 12, 2012 and for eight weeks of recovery from major invasive surgery thereafter, dates upon which I was in court for important matters in my divorce, I was under Doctor's care including prescribed doses of antibiotics, narcotic pain killers, valium for stress and Xanax for anxiety. 5. The divorce strategy employed by Mr. Goss and Greg is exactly the one he described to me when I had a 22 minute pre-engagement conference with him one year prior to Greg hiring him - only he is executing it on me rather than Greg because | felt it was too aggressive and un- ethical and decided against hiring him. I don't know why he has been allowed to represent Greg in light of the obvious conflict of interest. Especially since I was not able to hire any divorce at- tomey I contacted in Modesto, Stockton or Merced because my husband had spent the last two years contacting all of them to create a conflict of interest that precluded them from representing. me once I contacted them. Equitable application of the law would have Mr. Goss removed from representing Greg - OR - allow me to use one of the competent local divorce attomney’s that are currently afraid of the conflict of interest issue to which Mr. Goss appears to be immune. (if the item that this Attachment concerns is made under Page 20 of 24 penalty of perjury, all statements in this Attachment are made under penalty of perjury.) Form Approved for Optional Use Judicial Council of California MC-025 [Rev. July 1, 2009] MC-025 ATTACHMENT to Declarative ResponseSHORT TITLE: CASE NUMBER: Declarative Response - Custody Modification 455 922 ATTACHMENT (Number): 7 7. Mr. Goss’s strategy of sending my Attomey a letter on August 7, 2012 indicating that theElisor issue for the short sale of the community residence would in fact be decided in the Peti- tioner’s favor PRIOR to the continued hearing on August 21, 2012. The letter referenced Family Code 1100-1103 and the online listing of Modesto Family Court Tentative Rulings. Clearly an- other intimidation and attempt to unilaterally impose opposing counsel's will around the findings and orders of the court. Please see Exhibit T attached Continued Abuse Most recently on April 28th, 2012 Greg continued his physical abuse and sadistic terror | tactics by attacking me in my vehicle while I was picking up my daughter Olivia atthe family "_Scatching me, He egein ston my chest and then puthis entre body weight on my chest 01 (if the item that this Attachment concems is made under Page 21 of 24 penalty of perjury, all statements in this Attachment are ‘made under penalty of perjury.) Form Approved for Optional Use Judicial Council of California MC-025 [Rev. July 1, 2009] MC-025 ATTACHMENT to Declarative Response‘SHORT TITLE: CASE NUMBER: Declarative Response - Custody Modification 455 922 ATTACHMENT (Number): 1 fair and misapplied tax burdens. Exhibit M Attached - Diane Bowerman Divorce Case No. 131539 Excerpts from Greg's Journals Greg gave me a number of his personal journals during our marriage at my request so I could better understand his issues and also to help in making our communication better to com- pliment my optimism that our couples therapy would be successful. I made copies of pages of the journals but have since lost track of the originals. They are quite chilling and insightful into Greg's anger and resentment toward his ex wife, himself and people he feels may be superior to him. ‘They were very convincing to me that need physical, geographic space for myself and my children to be safe from Greg's pathology as described by him: 1. September 23, 1986 - Regarding Ex-wife Diane: "I don't miss Diane much but I think about revenge a lot; revenge and Jake [Jake is Diane’ son] Please See Attached Exhibit N - Journal Entry 2. September 4th, 1984 - Regarding Ex-wife Diane: "I'm real angry too and its mostly be- ing expressed in violent fantasies about Di (Diane) who called back after I told her I wanted my stuff back to threaten she would use the incident with Jacob's [Jake] spanking to damage my ca- reer if ] caused her trouble over the possessions." Please See Attached Exhibit O (if the item that this Attachment concems is made under Page 23 of 24 penalty of perjury, all statements in this Attachment are made under penalty of perjury.) Form Approved for Optional Use Judicial Council of Califomia MC-025 [Rev. July 1, 2009] MC-025 ATTACHMENT to Declarative ResponseSHORT TITLE: CASE NUMBER: Declarative Response - Custody Modification 455 922 ‘ATTACHMENT (Number): 1 3, January 12, 1983 - Regarding Ex-wife Diane and sexual fantasies of her as a little girl: "Got to thinking of all my fantasies of Diane & my reluctance to commit them to writing makes me - I've thought about pulling her panties over arms then neck and shaving her, exposing her to ‘me in public, spanking her while pulling her hair "catching" her as a stranger burglarizing my house and tying her up to teach a lesson. Playing that she is a little girl making her pleasure me ‘with other women outdoors in the hot tub across a chair standing up.. Ah, yes." Please See At- tached Exhibit P (if the item that this Attachment concems is made under Page 24 of 24 penalty of perjury, all statements in this Attachment are made under penalty of perjury.) Form Approved for Optional Use Judicial Council of California MC-026 [Rev. July 1, 2009] MC-025 ATTACHMENT to Declarative ResponseSHORT TITLE: CASE NUMBER: Declarative Response - Child Custody 455 922 ATTACHMENT (Number):2 Psychological Evaluations for Petitioner and Minor Children In addition to granting 100% physical and legal custody to the Respondent - Mother - Wife - (Karen Bowerman), it is requested that the court restrict visitation and any unsupervised contact between the Petitioner - Father - Husband (Greg Bowerman) and either minor child, Olivia Bow- erman age 14 and Elizabeth Bowerman age 9, until both the father and minor children have re- ceived comprehensive psychological evaluations and the results have been delivered to the court. Specifically, the father should be evaluated in regard to his masturbation addiction, exhibitionism and violent history of lashing out physically, engaging emotional abuse methodologies and ad- ministering of ritualistic sexual abuse techniques designed to establish dominance and control relationship roles. Specifically, the minor children should be evaluated for evidence of physical and mental abuse, emotional trauma, exposure to pornography, exposure to adult male sexual anatomy and any signs of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. Evaluation should be administered by a licensed clinical psychologist with credentials and exper- tise in juvenile mental health. The choice of psychologist by the mother with approval of the court. (if the item that this Attachment concerns is made under Page 1 of 1 penalty of perjury, all statements in this Attachment are made under penalty of perjury.) Form Approved for Optional Use Judicial Council of California MC-025 [Rev. July 1, 2009] MC-025 ATTACHMENT to Judicial Council Form‘SHORT TITLE: CASE NUMBER Declarative Response - Custody Modification 455 922 ATTACHMENT (Number): 3 Child Support and Spousal Support - Petitioner omits support reduction request The Petitioner's Motion to Modify Custody curiously does not request a motion to modify sup- port. Normally, if the petitioner was requesting a greater percentage of physical custody and to become the Primary Caretaker, it would follow that there would be a request to reduce the amount the Petitioner pay’ in child support relative to the requested change in custody percent- age. The fact that there is no request to modify support would indicate that the Petitioner is aware that he is not currently paying the correct amount of child support per the existing order and does not want to bring attention to that issue as he would not be expecting to reduce the required payment by increasing his custody percentage because his current payments are already too low. Existing Child Support & Spousal Support Error The existing court order indicates I should be receiving guideline support. See Exhibit V - Order to Show Cause - SEPT 9, 2012 Per the current order, guideline support should be calculated according to the following factors that were accurate at the time the order was made: Petitioner Income: $40,000.00 Number of Minors: 2 Percentage Custody: 10% I would like to receive the amount as ordered by the court and receive the difference retroac- tively for incorrect amounts I have received to date. I would like to receive my payments elec- tronically since the Petitioner regularly refuses to make the payments to me in a timely manner and uses them as a means to control me and make me request the payments repeatedly - extend- ing the cycle of abuse and control as he did in the marriage. (if the item that this Attachment concems is made under Page 1 of2 ‘penalty of perjury, all statements in this Attachment are made under penalty of perjury.) Form Approved for Optional Use Judicial Council of California MC-025 [Rev. July 1, 2009] MC-025 ATTACHMENT to Declarative ResponseSHORT TITLE: CASE NUMBER: Declarative Response - Custody Modification 455 922 ATTACHMENT (Number): 3 Actual Current Child and Spousal Support Factors Since the court date of the existing order, both the physical custody percentage numbers have changed and the Petitioner’s income statement has been updated to reflect income he had previ- ously neglected to report. Current Petitioner Income: $40,000.00 per month Current Respondent Physical Custody: 72% ‘Number of Minors: 2 Guideline Child and Spousal Support due with 100% Respondent Custody Order In the case the court orders the respondent to maintain 100% physical and sole legal custody of the minors, the support factors will be as follows: Current Petitioner Income: $70,000.00 per month, Current Respondent Physical Custody: 100% ‘Number of Minors: 2 (if the item that this Attachment concems is made under Page 2 of2 penalty of perjury, all statements in this Attachment are ‘made under penalty of perjury.) Form Approved for Optional Use Judicial Council of California MC-025 [Rev. July 1, 2008] MC-025 ATTACHMENT to Declarative ResponseY A " CAD Response Report ‘Sequence # : MP120320439 Response Type Case Number Call Anewored 415F FIGHT-FAMILY MP12009175 02/01/2012 23:29:82 Created Diepatched Terminated 02/01/2012 23:31:53 02/01/2012 23:36:47 02/02/2012 00:: [Response Type: 415F FIGHT-FAMILY [Primary Unit [Assisting as MM66 - HOKE,JACK Response lonigin Pon Disposition 4G Code MB62- BRANDVOLD,BENJAMIN ifort Validated Address +Trae———— IRP Location ICommon Place Ice oa Dispatch Lzone M237 Group : MP61 bHouse A : Pluses Municipality: MO IStreet Name: GEER Sate: suffix Zip Code 95354 [Street Type: CT X: -120.9956846777, (Cross Streets: GEER GROVE Y 37.6537314674 Rider’ 673 GEER CT, MO (GEER AVEIGROVE AVE) (MapBook:42/A3) Callers Date/Time ‘Caller Name Ascress Phone 02/01/2012 23:29:52 KAREN (209) 534- BEACH,CHRIS/ FD01 BOWERMAN TIN Address History Date/Time Address ‘Agent / Workstation 02/01/2012 673 GEER CT, MO (GEER AVE/GROVE AVE) BEACH,CHRIS / FDO1 23:31:53:497 (MapBook:42/A3) Person tof ] lLast Name: BOWERMAN First GREGORY Midéle | Name Name: | | 638333799257997319 27/2012 https://172.28.128.154/CADAbstractserver/Report.aspx?0iToes Fee, T ts,10 yo} oto | it:80 co/so i too | KOs xa] 9997 Tiasad dovd | Suid aavis | GI/7aL NOILYNIESHG “ON ‘aaoK | ‘oN gor stusseeteneeesessesseesssesenssaesenss ee ods XL zee stageeeeensnecsssscnzeassuaeneanesesss Too"d O6e SNOTLDSNNOD TVISOd @ts0LL8602 61:80 et0z/e0/E0 Group 673 Municipality: MO GEER State : Zip Code: 95354 cr x ~120,9956846777 GEER GROVE Y 37,65373 14674 673 GEER CT, MO (GEER AVE/GROVE AVE) (MapBook:42/A3) Galler Ratertine Galler Name Adarass Phone — Agant Workstation 02/01/2012 23:29:52 KAREN (209) $34-BEACH,CHRIS/ FD01 BOWERMAN TI. Asicirens History DateTime Adress Agent / Workstation 02/01/2012 673 GEER CT, MO (GEER AVE/GROVE AVE) BEACH,CHRIS /FDO1 23:31:53:497 (MapBook:42/A3) : BOWERMAN https://172.28.128.154/CADAbstractserver/Report.aspx70id= 638333799257997319 2/17/2012suaric DoB soc: involvement :RESPONSIBLE DL State: CA DL Number: |Address: 933 CAROLYN AVE, Phone: MODESTO RRece Wat Gender: M Hair Color Weight Height Eye Color JAgent: HITI.HAL Creation : 02/01/2012 23:38:15:183 ote [Person 2 of 4 Last Name: BOWERMAN First KAREN Midéle Neme Name : Sufix DoB soc involvement : RESPONSIBLE DL cA DL State ‘Number lAddress: 673 GEER CT, MODESTO Phone: Race wat Gender: F Hair Color Weight Height Bye Color : JAgent: BRANDVOLD,BENJAMIN Creation :02/022012 00:20:59:020 INote [Person sora lLast Name: BOWERMAN Fist OLIVIA Middle Name Name: [suri : DOB: soc involvement : WITNESS DL CA DL State: Namber JAddress: 673 GEER CT, MODESTO Phone: IRace WHI Gender: F Hair | Color Weight Height Eye | Color | JAgent: BRANDVOLD,BENSAMIN Creation :02/02/2012 00:22:13:333 fore a [Person 4of4 Lest Name: BOWERMAN Fist ELIZABETH Midéle Name Name [suftix Dos soc | involvement : MENTIONED DL CA DL State Number |Address: 673 GEER CT, MODESTO Phone: Race WEI Gender: F Hair I https://172.28.128.154/CAD Abstractserver/Report.aspx70id=1638333799257997319 2172012Fage 3 Color Weight Height Eye Color lagen: BRANDVOLD.BENIAMmY Creation 02/092012 I 00:28 [Note Modifications DetefTime —Atibute Value Agent / Workstato 02/01/2012 Response Notes =." JEXHUSB: BEACH,CHRIS /FDOI 23:31:50:463 GREG BOWERMAN :39 OSPITAL SCRUBS {YING TO FO! WAY INTO THE RESD! IVED IN A NRPHAS A STRAINING AGAINST THE SUBJ 02/01/2012 Response Notes RESPHAS A VIOLENT —_BEACH,CHRIS / FDO! 23:32:12:357 HISTORY AND RAS ‘IN THE PAST 02/01/2012 Response Notes BOLD COOLEY, TIFFANY / PDO2 23:32:41:520 02/01/2012 Response Notes RESPHAS HISFOOTIN _ BEACH,CHRIS /FDO1 23:32:47:557 ‘THE DOOR AND WILL NOT LET THE RP CLOSE THE FRONT DOOR 02/01/2012 Response Notes RESP IS THERE TO PICK UP BEACH,CHRIS / FDO! 23:33:40:810 'HIS KIDS : STS ITS HIS NIGHT BUT HE 1S ON DUTY AT MEMORIAL ICAL CENTER AND. {OULD BE THERE INSTEAD OF AT THE RPS 02/01/2012 Response Notes FISTRYINGTOGET BEACH,CHRIS/FDO1 23:34:53:357 02/01/2012 __ Response Notes RPSTS SHE IS VERY BEACH,CHRIS / FD01 (23:35:14:373 SCARED DUE TO HIS VIOLENT HISTORY ae PAST 02/01/2012 Response Notes RESP CLEAR UTL HITLHANNAH / PDO3 23:36:47:347 hups://1 72.28.128.154/CAD Abstractserver/Report.aspx20id=1638333799257997319 2117/2012o212012 23:36:50:607 0201/2012 23:36.55:937 02/01/2012 23:37:23:060 02/01/2012 23:44:46:507 02/01/2012 23:44:46:757 02/02/2012 (00:07:37:987 02/02/2012 (00:19:18:500 02/02/2012 00:27:26:277 0202/2012 00:31:30:110 Unit Statuses Unit Statuses Response Notes Unit Statuses Unit Statuses Case Number Response Notes Unit Statuses Response Notes MB62 - Enroute MM66 - Enroute FOUND ID WITH FIRST OF GREGORY. CLR VLD NP ‘MB62 - On Scene MM66 - On Scene ‘MP12009175 C4 MM66 - Cleared UPON ARRIVAL 1 CONTACTED THE RP AND HER ESTRANGED HUSBAND BOTH STANDING AT THE DOOR ‘THE THE RP'S RESD WHICH LEADS FROM THE CARPORT INTO THE ENCLOSED PATIO. GREGORY WAS STANDING WITH HIS FOOT IN THE DOOR KEEPING IT OPEN. ‘THE RP WAS ON THE OTHER SIDE AND THEY WERE ARGUING. THE RP REFUSED TO LET HIM IN. PARTIES WERE SEPARATED. RP STATED HER OLDEST DAUGHTER OLIVIA WAS ON THE LAPTOP TONIGHT AND THE RP DID NOT APPROVE OF THE WAY HER, DAUGHTER WAS. CONDUCTING HERSELF WHILE ON THE LAPTOP. A FIGHT ENSUED BETWEEN OLIVIA AND THE RP. OLIVIA HIT HER MOTHER AND BIT HER ON THE HAND DURING THE FIGHT. OLIVIA RAN TO ANOTHER ROOM AND CALLED HER FATHER, GREGORY WHO RESPONDED FROM HIS. WORK. ACCORDING TO GREGORY, HIS DAUGHTER MADE IT SOUND AS BRANDVOLD,BENIAMIN/ MDCO46 HOKEJACK / MDC003 HITLHANNAH / PDO3 BRANDVOLD,BENJAMIN / Mpco46 HOKEJACK / MDC003, BRANDVOLD,BENIAMIN/ MDC046 COOLEY, TIFFANY / PDO2 HOKEJACK / MDC003 BRANDVOLD,BENJAMIN / MDCo4s 1 72.28, 128.1 54/CAD Abstractserver/Report.aspx?0id=1638333799257997319 27/201222/2012 00:32:15:143 Disposition Code THOUGH SHE WAS GETTING PHYSICALLY ABUSED BY HER MOTHER. RP STATED GREGORY OPENED THE UNLOCKED PATIO DOOR AND CONFRONTED HER ON THE OTHER SIDE, HE DID PUT HIS HANDS ON HER, HOWEVER SHE STATED THERE WAS NO INTENT TO HURT HER, ONLY TO PUSH PAST HER TO GET TO HIS DAUGHTERS. OLIVIA WAS CONTACTED AND ADMITTED TO EXAGERATING THE STORY TO HER FATHER ON THE PHONE. SHE WAS COUNSELED AND GREGORY TOOK THE KIDS FOR THE REST OF THE, NIGHT WHICH FALLS WITHIN THE SIGNED COURT ORDER. NEG CRIME NFA. ec BRANDVOLD.BENJAMIN / MDCO46SATII OS e B “” (rod B 12-356%® MODESTO POLICE DEPARTMENT DOMESTIC VIOLENCE REPORT 600 Tenth Street Modesto, CA 95354 wT HB NAN 2e - Oomesrzc BATTaY meeyra Tb) Faz rece nee Seo i es. S ware Paseo. Caer" Saari Hie TW Tm Sra oo aT ee eas STN, RST ME | Eeowoemurnmre Bower MAN , KAREN | Regoeyce sone Pea om Moore. esas [RRCERO. GIS GEER CT | Osi 'S8T" aban cone Tasthess move | CaN TEES me a Peay. cA 8 [ost rar low | [esemxenooneis enone See be | | anes aOR = mos ee | Toren rears = a | | Bousernan, GREG PAUL tay og EAT Joo fa ena Oe crm (asf) $29- 190 eaves oe nen to a cA S+ig | 200 | R2w | 6RN |somns oncom gue LETHALITY FACTORS 7] oom | inne coumectneietigaton, acer tently en oft olny ak ces Check the coresondng Hock) an sive cies | ‘panaon nie arabe. | Onno | co cus pResewrin Te Hote on AccEESiBLE ToTHE SUSPECT 1 eusrecr is BAO (SUMAN, CANT HAVE YOU.NO ONE CANE mess | 5 SUSECTHAS USED On MIREATENED TO USE WEAPON ~ B evsescrraerens TK. BA PATTIES HAO ARECENT SEPARATION OR THREATENED SEPAAATON ©) SUSOECT CONTEMPLATED. THREATENED, OR ATTEMPTED SURDE aewm {0 susrecratuses acovcn om sone oF cme 1 usrecr Use nitaA. onuGs on ABUSES LEAL DRUGS THREATENED TOW GnLoREN | = $8 INCREASE IN FREQUENCY OR SEVERITY OF VIOLENCE (© SUSPECT VIOLENT TOWARD CHILDREN . oue | 0 ssPeCTIS MOLENTINroBLC HAS HUURED OR LED PETS 1 susncor wes DESTROYED CHERISHED PERSONAL TES “AS FORGED CTI TO HAVE SEX “EN VCTALO NOT fonea_ | © SUSPECTIS JEALOUS OF ATTEMPTS TO CONTROL PLATNERS OALY sommes (© SUSPECT HAS RECTED WOLENCE TOWARDS PREGNANT PARTIE mya] © SUSPECT HAS ACCUSED THE VICTOM OF WIDE TY HATING) ictus comment erect Cieao Sesser (G-CUTTINGINSTRUMENT Ol HANDGUN, 1D SUSPECT HAS RECENTLY LOST 408 OR STATUS 1 COMMUNITY ‘Peonumel 12, PERSONAL (Hands, Fists, Fest) BLUNT OBJECT 2 LONG GUN emt FIREARM - Type Unknown 1 Porson @ EXRLOSYE MOTHER WRESTLED crema | ner mn eC Dre DE SORENSTE same 2 Ce | MOREE SREOE Ra Ree Poa DDB: [esse osresmon © uouDED Oren 1D SUSPENDED PENGING FURTHER DEOPMATION Sai Secoronuraense Beshormen Bec Ml arama arma Tem gear loci | awe ROR lense Fos YL, wre coves [1+29-12/e300 fp SE TBE eer | xace ESTO POLI F MODESTO POLICE DEPARTMENT DOMESTIC VIOLENCE REPORT fro 3 B 12-2567 Pil WW TNESSES PRESENT DURING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE? : oO vEs* ad No FAN STATEMENT(S) TAKEN? ves: INO CHILOREN PRESENT DURING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE? yes: FINO *IE"YES", DESCRIBE INNNARRATIVE | LES LBtsg=emauriase POSTEIOR None: visas: ave ANTERIOR Gone VISABLE ID ancry O THREATEN IS aroLocenic Ocompvaint oF Pain JO crvine Garuises) O FEARFUL Daasrasions) ID HYSTERICAL manor curs cau Quaceran Darran Orrac IO ipRATIONAL Qeoncussions) rie scene ea PERSE DRAW ON u ‘uGRaM's) THE I LOCATION OF ANY UY mums HOSPITAL REFUSED HEIGHT: S— ag wecHT: 4S MEDICAL TREATMENT: NONE = GEMT © WILL SEEK OWN FIRST AID RENDE © PATIENT SIGNED RELEASE FOR MEDICAL RECORDS TELEPHONE OR PAGER NUMBER: ‘TRANSPORTED BY: (NAME) HOSPITAL NAME(S) OF TREATING PHYSICIANNURSE- ADMITTED? G YES NO ALCOHOLICONTROLLED SUBSTANCE ABUSE AT TIME OF INCIDENT: © ALCOHOL 9 CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE (DETAIL WHAT AND HOW USED IN NARRATIVE) Leese antares O} POSTEIOR none m@ victim CHa ANTERIOR None [DQ ancry THREATENING ID apovoceric Q.COMPLAINT OF PAIN cern Sonus : JO FearFuL QIABRASION(S; cae iverenica = Sumen cost cast Otacenaron) steno Sree \ 10 IRRATIONAL concussions) ee anemvous Gres some ae ve F { Somes exrtan \ acl Q TEE maroT eae | ees, oe WEIGHT: €—15 WEIGHT: D5 MEDICAL TREATMENT: i! NONE = CGLEMT =O WILL SEEKOWN FIRSTAIDRENDERED HOSPITAL 0 REFUSED 2 PATIENT SIGNED RELEASE FOR MEDICAL RECORDS ——_TELEPHONE OR PAGER NUMBER: TRANSPORTED BY: (NAME) HOSPITAL: NAME(S) OF TREATING PHYSICIANNURSE: ADMITTED? O YES _G NO ALCOHOLICONTROLLED SUBSTANCE ABUSE AT TIME OF INCIDENT: © ALCOHOL © CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE (DETAIL WHAT AND HOW USED IN NARRATIVE) PERS shes ke eee Cena sk eee [MARK ALL THAT APPLY: PRIOR HISTORY OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE? BYES No {gone a bee ened | PRIOR HISTORY OF VIOLENCE DOCt oD? ATYES =QNO Eeowsmans _Deuancate nnn pnseror moncoems 30/2 acumen | OFORMER ConserrANTS J PARENT OF CHILD FROM RELATIONSHIP| DATE(S)_ = (CASE NUMBER(S) LENGTH OF RELATIONSHIP: _21O. ears won InvesTigaTING AGENCY owes gD | DATE RELATIONSHIP ENDED wr arrucanis:ne MODESTO POLICE DEPARTMENT DOMESTIC VIOLENCE REPORT [OLDS NAME Bow LEVEE | CHILDS NAN CHILDS RANE | a Arowocwes 0 teaRruucRYiNG © aPoLooees O TEARFUUCATIG 2 AroLocies O TEARFUUCAYING | Qarao — Oursterca 67-98 | Garraio — a wsTERCAL QAFRAD HYSTERICAL | Boa mearens Scam O mmesrenns cam trREATEWNG | Durser GQ nenvous vse O wenvous Durser nervous | SUSPECTIS PaneNT 2B suseecris ramet 3 suseccrie anes UST INTERPRETERS IN WITNESS BOX yes) nO. ‘MPD VICTIM'S BROCHURE WAS PROVIDED AND EXPLAINED PER 13704) victm = ves Af no [DYES BNO _vicTin CONFIDENTIALITY WAS EXPLAINED AND THE FORMS: EYES D NO. PRWATE PERSON'S ARREST VIAS EXPLANED TO VIET F (F ve5 ATWO sve vicr REQUESTED TO GE TAKEN TOANOTHE [Oa 137016) PC JP Ye WO A G01 was SUED DESCR ENG OUTSTANDING WEAO LANGUAGE: SUSPECT YES ff wo LANGUAGE: DESCRIBE ALL PHOTOGRAPHS 1S VcTM NOTATION TORU COUMETEDANO GENTS surmams os poo TaN pa || Runes $a fo FTA wmeromoweovere | ites Bes oe —______| ENE Ges go FYE RENO chm stanosy PROCESS ExaneD (28s Roars REYES GINO PRIOR GALLS TO THIS ADDRESS - 15750 FC | Css Benen EPOISSUED? PO SERVED? BYES pee: Yes - ALL TERMS Examen EXPIRES ON: No - ATLaRGEsE?O At No suoce REASON PROTECTIVE ORDERS? aves aK 1 current O eres | B vermarscene B susrecr ar eoene | 8 entonen scone courts 8 Speer She rom was vionm staawaLen? IFA ACTOR. DETAIL FOLLOWING QUESTIONS IN NARRATWVE: | 2 oesonse names | rwesene aie oes 2 METHOD - 1 HANDS 2 HANDS? | aed | SYMPTOMS IDENTIFIED: > THROWN AGAINST WALL FLOOR, BED. ETC? | | 2 wctemew Giseex Pan HOWLONG DD STRANGLE: eres 0 OrrcanTY amuse 3 avril rmeemonnecn Dua |G susecr Q_SORE THROAT ‘STRANGULATION? & messes {UGH HEADED OR HEAR RUSH 2 PRIOR ACTS OF STRANGULATION? eeceeee 1 SoRATON Maras ‘> LOCATION OF 8 DURING STRANGULATION (2EHIND, 8 Stone FAINTING OR UNCONSCIOUSNESS ‘STRADDUNG, TC)" Sreoeos (@ RASPY voice ‘2 VICTIFS THOUGHTS OURING STRANGULATION? | Dpoeneetereines) © NAUSEA OR VONTING DO VC TRY TO PRY Ss HANDS AMY? cera pnonssrom © DeFECATED OR URNATED G seevermonness | eaweecteae s uses Bee eres eae eee PARAMEDICS AT SCENE? YES 0 NO INVESTIGATING OFFICER'S) WILL, WITH PROBABLE CAUSE | G Psowce neranco accounT OF metaent FS ORE er aa |S cesar cere arscoe | 9 FREARDES MPOUNDED FOR SAFETY? CL YES § NO | | jms PROPERTY RECORD RECEIPT ISSUCO? YES fre] auaresyrine |s/00N PRoaaTION FOR ov? aves Ban243(e) (1) PC Page 1 of 3 12-35678 SOURCE OF ACTIVITY On 04-28-22, at approximately 2356 hours, I was dispatched investigate a family disturbance. The RP reported ‘th occurred prior and the responsible was her husband, Greg BOWERMAN, whom! she parated from. The RP wanted a domestic violence report Tt had occurred on Carolyn Aven OBSERVATIONS I contacted BOWERMAN at her residence at 67 in Modesto lowing is a summary of her sta told me that she and (8) Gregory BOWERMAN have beer twenty years. They separated on 07-13-11. They do in common. Karen told me on 04-28-12 she was sui in the afternoon. She stated her that they could go for a limousine £ they went shoot. Prior to the photo shoot Karen stated she rec message from Gregory asking her if she was going nildren for the limousine ride. Karen advised me weekend ‘the children are supposed to be with Gregory, howe reed to allow them to go to this photo shoot. Karen stated she went to Gregory’s residence at $933 Carol Avenue. She stated at first she stayed in her vehicle and whe her daughter came out, ‘shé told her to hurry, because she was in a rush, Karen stated her daughter was taking a long time, so she walked up to the front door. She stated that the door was open. Karen looked down and saw a bunch of mail. Karen noticed that three of the envelopes had her name on them. She bent down and picked up those envelopes. Karen told me she did not go inside floor in front the front doo: her back to her vehicle. and the mail was just o: Karen then took this mai! While looking at the mail, her driver's side car door suddenly opened by Gregory. She told me Gregory didn’t anything, he just grabbed for the mail in her hand. Karen tried to pull away and Gregory got on top of her into the vehicle. Karen stated Gregory had one hand on the back of her head and was Pushing her neck down towards the center console. The other hand was trying to grab the mail. She stated that Gregory was hurting her, so she told me she bit his left arm near his biceps. she stated Gregory then tried to grab her purse and camera that were in the backseat. After a few moments of wrestling around, Karen stated she was able to get Gregory out of the vehicle and drive away. Karen told me she drove around the corner and then ed a girlfriend of hers. P:\reports\2012\12035678. jh.doc gw Officer J. Hoke 11233LTTE DS TT I a NS EG a Oe EE 243 (e) (1) PC Page 2 of 3 12-35678 few moments, Karen after speaking with her girlfriend for a not report this decided to go on to the photo shoot. she incident until 2206 hours, She told me it occurred at approximately 1 s While talking with Xazen she showed me a very snail scratch on her right wrist are Gregory pushing She also complained of neck paii ead down 2 she believed that Gregory was et. I walked to the area she poi located + in his vehicle. He advised me that was his for che children and he was following is @ summary of his statement Gregory told me that although thi kend was children, he stated that Karen had promised then ride. Gregory agreed to allow the daughters could go on this approximately 1630 hours Karen came to his residence his daughters. At one point Gregory stated his daugh advieed him that Karen had gone up to the front door 4; taken some mail from inside the house. Gregory walked oi ren’s vehicle where she was seated. He opened the vehicle and asked. for his mail back. He told me she had the mail in f. of her and he reached for it. He told me he got a hold of it, however, she pulled away, which pulled him into the vehicle on top of her. He stated while they were wrestling for the mail, she bit his left arm on the inner biceps. At this point he showed me a bruise on his left inner biceps from the bite marks. Gregory told me at one point he reached for Karen's purse in the backseat in an attempt to distract her and get her to let go of his ma Gregory told me he was unable to retrieve his’ mail and she eventually drove off. I spoke to Gregory and Karen’s daughter, Olivia BOWERMAN. Oli stated that while her mom was there to pick her up, she saw her step into the house and grab sone mail. she stated she told father about this and he went outside te confront her. Olivia stated she stayed inside and did not see what happened after that. She told me that her father Gregory later advised her that his glasses fell off in Karen’s vehicle. She told me that she retrieved the glasses and she would return them to her father at a later time. I spoke with Karen, who advised me she did want to press charges. She later signed the citizen's. arrest line on the face sheet of this report. P:\reports\2012\12035678. jh.doc gw Officer J. Hoke 11233243 (e) (1) PC Page 3 of 3 ARREST. Gregory Paul BOWERMAN (DOB 12-24-52) arrest for 243(e) (1 estic battery, Gregory BOWERMAN was released on MED C: EVIDENCE: Photograpl both parties’ injuries CASE DISPOSITION: Cleared by arrest. P:\reports\2012\12035678. jh.doc ow was placed under itation #0995467 were taken. Officer J. Hoke 12-35678 11233EE TE oS S GSAT i=, Se ee oe Bie I & Pizsscte eS Ter SOE Cover copyCITING OFF / AGENCY. Nature of Hearing EMOSSSNE ORDER [TT ont SS STATUS eB con Detndart supgaa 88 Bert. —__ Be ae asia Pavone li Be Prob. Of OF 117 Det. any: Det ZF present“ NOT present custody © other case She. Ohad MERE — Re. C Apps INTERP Lae Parole Dhol by Of cart nlerOEj ot/ Non-Car. 5 Swor/Oath on fie "> 5 © ppl. CO beyond time Of cert. interp/OBj. to Non-cert, ‘tip to Comm/Pro Tem = EDRVTe STIME WAIVED © t0¥6 10 DAYS TOLLED 5 Good Cause to Con't. = Ab Waiver = PC 877 Waiver 1 NEXT APPEARANCE DATE: TIME: AM /PM DEPT: Det. ordered to appesr / exer tive ee OTHER APPEARANCE DATED TIME: AMT PM DEPT: pet. ordered te, appear / excy aerate peas OTHER APPEARANCE DATE. [Eee ial rar na a er er as wt © Dot. ordered to appear / exeu Case #. VOP re allowed O Waiver °0 TIME NOT WAIVED ~ er. of Unevail SCoumeciae 18 be Set for VOR anaes Faas (Deny 5 Counseling met Sonor Ae Tet eat 20, CLWI 3051 “CT Ore epanShs enorme Report Brapot SSet. sim 23 “Ore = vac 5 TPS 5 Prob. Moat Traits — et vm 1 aM Pog DA 19 FILE BY NEXT DATE =e CLAM [OR AFF. ARREST WARRANT Bret prereneeses CCP 70.6 TEE REIS sudge ARREST WAR ESS Sareea rays Eee No slepe. matier confimmed/set for JT PX / PP L&M / Contested VOP. = MRM SDaysesta, Mets). a Line eet nee Motion of 2 Court Prob. 5 Defense & Cont Stuth. inv. 5 ada’ dso. BESS ste#* 5 Object 5 No oppose Motion is © Granted O Denied & Continued i Droppe Cour eppts SPD OCF IO GF IG, ‘D Advised purs Pc ger, © Advised purs Farot Def. Co. declares contict. 5 Disco. Tenderea Subs. in 28 Det. Co, Ci Lodged 2 Filed Oi Twe name as charge Time Estimate is discharged relieved S Infor. © Dise. Stip amended on face to reiect ra ihe itt S avsed of I immig. Ris given and could mean in deporiation, exclusion or denial of naturalization ON tena! ahs per Watson 23565 VC Cie vos Sten Provable C1 Det. enters a plea of mi Gury SOLO CONTENDERE NOT GUILTY ‘cr NOT GUILTY SAWS bea earth So ae, West Cas a lesser included / rated ofonee To oe SST SUSE Sn Hate Waiver entered ve Gass Cts) "Bol has vase CONTENDERE, Coun finds Defandani GUILTY o cis) = Court finds Def. eee 2 Viol. of prob. DROPPED '88 made an intsligens Was teely end voluntarily made; and Doenies 5 Priors Enh. P / Refusal Alleg, Si Complaint / information ODet. moves ee Formal Ar. Waived 5 Det. Angra Waiver of hie rights; plea ls a factual basic Retusal Ales, the plea OEpn, CLIMH CL Oto det. CTS 5p. OCASE/ Cys) BAL. DISM. /10J /ISE. O for pre-pies / Sent. Rpt. C ind. Sent. Ta ge Sititslénies VOP_ SCout finds. 5 Prob Caves cera’ NOT in VOP (a8 aleged SNe VOF for pasa For FTA ati} Cour / Jalon Pit / Prop $6 Counseling / Comm. Senice /Lavivh Ge, oss. cont. sub. panties Pay Restution — Obay al laws Se '0¥ide cur icnange of adress Ee eee by ment Deterred O pur. Po1000 1 Pend: Deaeee Completion Pie Ramin, Foe $hort ENROLLMENT Det dame CSM OFel t© dmg Ot sm 5 Granted as to Ci(s) Ser acimt reinvest. —_ mos. 5 Re-tol for Del var Pet: det / Prop 38 / Drug Ct/ MH Gn contin fempgaS2 2 Prob J BRS / MH for enty ime SENTENCING / PRIS “8 ORDER Oe aSl Waived c= Sonencing GCC re “US ORDERED: PROB. IS/ REWaINe (0b. to prepare 1203 Enroll in. wn © Contd te Show Proof / Denied / Fejecteg foo got FrO 36 / Drug Cea er seca ay fees Yor tral Ti fo ew law vio OPC 100090 §__ Cf Completion C Contact treatment provide Stoo ——— ine. / deleted terminated Blea of GUILTYINOLO set asice preaseacises out Dstendan’ for next anpoeronce Se SST ctor(s) / VRC / CON GRANTED DENIED © REV. REP / Other DO TERM BB Ree & Concirs D supmirg ep MOD. CTERM, CExTENDED 4S Per Pet waives S65-day nla CiDet. is sentenced tig Prison — 4. sentenced pur. to 1170(N)5) el. Lamia al Smiths ra. suspended post oace ‘supervision F conctiohaegaton of Sentence susp Det, Lameean A EORMAL (INFORMAL probation feria seneg of ——___ years Ci monthe tha coer’, Pb /Post a eupns. imposed area “Hes tis Gee. As @ condlion precedent to bent TlsGasc {© probation: f. shall serve e term of hrs/days Ces Dee to 8 Total Days: NCR days suspended 5 Pend. Drug Ct. / Prob, t awerdes Sy Pu’ aay gcodmork tie coi "AMP MT Senders sev: ul 0 detertice ete 3 5 7h D Prob. boon ender TOO Jal OPC 1 Sept ae evan ten fob. 2 BOC i Revenue Hecoven Er oe ig te $50 ‘payable through Revenue Recovery ——— CTS. Fine sven, ich $100 forhwith ——__Securiy Fes o§ o D stayed unt BPO TOR BT PO toe oy SPO 1488.07 Aamin. Seen oS SESGG ssean gee, PC 12021 / Pc 206 11 Der guerre cree EGE est Retest at Pub, Heatin by oe eOHOY 3 lab Fee. wipen. assess. $195.00 oS 119727 Drug Ed. Fee $180.00 S70 als Estee S—__'5 7308.5 tne ict restitution [EC 1202 4(E), i SD emmmmmmmmmme NPE RIS oven wenn 1368 PC 3051 Wi PROCEEDING. 1 PROS: azremaln 0 SUSP. TO REIN RET oe oe Lie 12688) / Wi 2051” CO Ret to BRST De for mace ONE? for exam & me UMC SERS! ‘ent Comp. Restor PRRSES, Bal Court finds Det.“ Incompat SBOE Del A Cour finds Nar 4 mit to DNATesting pursuant with a aaa Pursuant GO 76373, Prob. Revenue Recovery 30 trans. To DBC / banks he waives ret. 10 dooter art 20%wal Lae Be Rok ae remeln SUS. OREN RE CPO 1386 / Pee Ci Ret. to BHRS /Dr(g) Fel for meg ONREF for exam & rt CLVMRC "CI DBHC for Rrpatent Cor) fic Frog. Including meds. (SO wans. To DBC [back fo Gal irasrg Tete; ava Cou tinds Det. CIncompst / Bevel biscbes oes, es: waives rel. to docior and ary ineg., all parties stp to oro mimimrnemasie tn Del ala uncer prow. of W 3051 L Det. comme CE Pex gre Patton for a max term of Fe sor” PIOW: EEE Geese BENCH WABH ANG eepetLcourt / OF tev © Coos cause netne at OR /'prob. [S75 tee for FTA BENCH WARRANT ISSUED, day/night service Rel seqra' "MOO = Exoneraied 5 Reduced / increased to § Be Nore Rebel , O Pay 850 admin. fer BIW clayed BIW RECALLED SOS Cone SC issued Sur leter to issue mempmmmecsCts 2 Dropped fom cal, B/W remains cut © Do not cake ae ot ball applied toward fine._Ci ARREST WARR. See Se ee Saas = Rigeister pursuant to H&S 11590 / PC 290 / PC 457.1 / PC BRAD © DO NOT crive unless pro DONOT: 5 Contact 5 ans o ey Marass, molest irks, harm, phone, stalk, saul. disturb the peace of eve mnt ane yards of the residence / empioyment of. Dalleged victim = except for peacetul / lawful chile Wi leon O USE / POSSESS: alcohol S drugaldiug paraph. De Taney ei lace where alcoh. is soid © Shall M apown users. &i Submit your person, home, & vehicle io seach son Te aleon at Didhugs/drug paraph. = stolen property > ‘cEmer. Med. fee $__ tiend Semen A tet lal cha perlylicsnsed and insured. jeacly weapons —__ Hrs. community service, DAA NA mestings: times per week. 5 Show proof te atiend. at each court hearing Wy set eran (eseted on CBall SOR Probetion C Parole Dlecherged Cine o PC 1820 ecvises © Ball curenty set at $ SCONE SERS a Ei Det. remanded to the custody of tro shart! for celvary to CDV! OCOWF DCRC GiAlascadere Oe mese 5 DEF. REPORT NOW / WITHIN / BY. days Cof Release to io serve original sert./ VO. OBUT NOT BEFORE Rev, Recov. a ‘Surrender date of 3 Hearing stil pending, DO NOT TRANSPORT TO CDCR ——___—is VACATED. "A PD JAIL CF 1CF ll D.CO. DEF PROB BHAS REVREC L1 L2 MH INT M.CA CA Doc cre cons REP BOND REPTRVv OFFICE OF THE Birgit Fladager District Attorney DISTRICT ATTORNEY Assit Dita Mtomey Stanislaus County Chick Denuy Distrie: tomers 852.12° Street, Suite 300 Aim Gey ‘Modest, CA 95558 Mailing: P.O. Phone ‘Dave Haris x 443, Modesto, CA 95353 109} 525-5550” Fax: (208) 558-4046 May 09, 2012 Karen Bowerman 673 Geer Ct Modesto, CA 95354 RE: # MPD 1235678 Dear Karen, ___ This office has received informati Modesto Police Department that on 04/28/2012 you were the victim of domestic violence. | am enclosing an informational brochure regarding the Victim Services Program, and brochures about Marsy's Law and the rights of victims. Please keep the brochures for reference in the event you, a family member, or friend may need assistance in the future The Victim Services Program may be able to help you with unpaid medical bills, counseling expenses and lost wages, depending on the circumstances. Please review the information regarding eligibility. If you meet any of the criteria to file a claim for financial reimbursement or assistance, or if | can assist you in any other way, please call me at (209) 525-5541 Very truly yours, BIRGIT FLADAGER District Attorney Galena Gilstrap Victim Services Program RESSen RN: 000849600, Doctors Medical Center - Modesto, CA 1441 Fiorida Ave Modesto, CA 95350 209-578-1211 Discharge Instructions for: Bowerman, Karen L Arrival Date: Tuesday, May 01, 2042 Thank you for choosing Doctors Medical Center - Modesto, CA for your care today. The exemination and treatment you have reoeived in the Emergency Department today have been rendered on en emergency basis only and gre not intended to be a substitute for an effort to provide complete me: care. You should contact your follow-up physician as it is important that you let him or her check y report any new of remaining problems since itis impossible to recognize and treat ali elements © injury oF iliness in a sirigle emergency care center visit. = Care provided by: Attending Physician: BARANDICA, ROSEF MD Diagnosi Cervical Sprain; Upper Arm Contusion DISCHARGE INSTRUCTIONS | iy IN/STRAIN patel FOLLOW UP INSTRUCTIONS | PRESCRIPTIONS |Private Physician [Motrin |_When: As needed [vicodin SPECIAL NOTES None a cee | X-RAYS and LAB TESTS: If you had x-rays today they were read by the emergency physician, Your x-rays will also be read by e radiologist within 24 hours. f you bed @ culture done it wil lake 24 to 72 hours to ge! the results. ff there is» change in the x-ray diagnosis or e postive cutture, we wil ‘conic! you. Please verlfy your current phone nuraber prior o discharge at the check out cesk. MEDICATIONS: Fi ifyou received's presctiion foc medication(s) today, iti imporani that wheh you fil this you let the phenmacist know al the other ‘madicaffons thal you ere on and any allergies you might bave. itis elso imporiant thei you notify your follow-up physician ofall your ‘medications induding the prescriptions you may receive todey Patient Copybear iced “dadWoDesTO MAIN POST OFFICE WOESTO, Californie 953509998 peace ates CERTIFIED MAIL, RECEIPT Tee ey TODESTO C8 #5350 24. Boweringn 3 Ca, j i i +e 2 2 fa | 1 | IBE | [hae S| baz ue Ss dae | ee laa g nm), BH) ay ae R ey aii Mo =e bee [el aq € SS | 2 Wiles oat lnc eudalf oS HE Macnee nae Pest A : adune 25, 2012 Dear Greg, On June 18th | texted you NOTICE that | would be moving to Visalia. The lease on my house is up in August. This letter is te decument that | have adhered te the court have planned | in a manner that will allow all of us sto atl aspects of th: this period. — Regards, Karenrs 05/03/2012 18:85 2096770019 POSTAL CONNECTIONS 230 P.001 sossegetancsnscesensueenenscsacssssie® nee ‘TX REPORT see seeeeusceesesenssoessnessaaenenseseees JOB NO. MODE NO. START TIME | PAGE RESULT ae EX] 001 (05/03 isisa {001 OK 00°18 | 2677 3845865‘Tue Ritz-CarLTOn® Hate Moos Bst 4 | lol lo Chey J) Kiel rn Keren bi bith de, or were In our Alef Fr srel & far dy. Ste Leo ond i oad pi TPs doe P omadh oflanan beatae ae f Sind fal si dem 4 AAT Kini) T oicn len Bing SE Sah, ONE MIRAMONTES POINT ROAD, HALF MOON BAY. CALIFORNIA 94019 « (650) 7FT A. wee SD mad SY Cb we TE 20m / BOP coop ol de Gas oe, pte of angen A ath bE Tt Gack 2, abe ID. aie Le Tblid pe ee Fld MOTE bane Dok onid TE Yond f. DAT coed Son Cred = werdon ESET? T bd vu 0 Sth, OG ) r 1 Ord ED bathn ucze Tenge were Be fr fos. oe reakpd i HT T Pon o phn F Laing G oddless he loi 7 Ded od “ta o—7 4 bel Tut. We yer Cte heteh re : ond DD aad Ee FF oy ae ae impor” Elizabem po ica with eu we. we oe poe beeen Qo 2 ~. BOK ore x Rad Kes howTHE Riz-CARLTON® Hats Mose Bat aK 4 ’ Kor couples seen | ALR Cee stusaed Jon 4 pal Were mre, } : a com ere thin Ly ATG b. } ord aomhers LET Pid cack Keren, Em oo your LI la heim, ew Da fh, onl GOT ie i wif a Sab an oe mated 3, omy ances DL cperuncedh a VW) a 12-7000 + FAX (650 (ONE MIRAMONTES POINT ROAD, HALF MOON BAY, CALIFORNIA 94019 + (65, ae Gea sd peas a / oe Rreef oud od 2 if The gor preteen aed saben Kets f gn" oe an oT co “ Ce ly yOu Sf) jEXHIBIT s K an Siete ESne ae Bente dae te i= " ewModesto Police Department 600 10th Street Modesto,CA 95354 http://www.modestopolice.com Report Type: Online Report Type: Violation of a Custody Order Case i ai132.8282 8/11/2012 10:16:37 PM. Bowerman Karen © Middle: Address: 1419 College Ave Gity: Visalia ‘State: CA 93277 kdownesbowerman@yahoo.com DOB: 4/11/1966 Age: 46 Sex: F Home Phone: 209 534-7791 york Phone: 209 634-7791 GFE Violation of a Custody Order Address: 933 Carolyn Ave Date of ate of rize/20%2- 7129/2012 Time of 6g, f Tame Of 6:0 PM - 11:59 AM tim Location: Premis? Residence - single family dwelling Detatis: Children not made available until Sunday Father, Greg Bowerman refused via text to return both minor daughters, Elizabeth and Olivia from visitation at 6:00 PM on Saturday as stipulated in the custody order. ‘This report reprezents an electronic entry of inforr reviewed before becoming an official record. Hf ad contacted directy, Adgnional copies of this repé Name:Bowerman,kKaren 9 1D: 41432.9282 ion to the Modesto Police Department. ional Information is required or information is in question, you wil b .an be received by contacting the police department at Each cas bbe ir ‘Date:8/11/2012 10:16:37 PM Form Rev 10.1.7jl ——- GER Motesto Police Department Report Type: Online Report 600 10th Street Grime Type: Violation of ¢ Custody Order Modesto,CA 95354 ID: 41132,9444 http:/iwww.modestopolice.com Report Date: 8/11/2012 10:39:28 PM Address: 933 Carolyn Ave Date of rine: 8/9/2012. si9/z012 Time of 5. Grae: 220 PM - 8:0 PM Residence - single family dwelling Father Greg Bowerman refused via text to return minor daughters Elizabeth and Olivia after visitation at 2:00 PM Thursday per the custody order. Girls were not made available until after 8:00 PM Thursday. This report represents an electronic entry of information to the Mode Police Department, Each case will be individually feviewed before becoming an official recotd, If additional information is requied or infocmation is in question, you will be contacted directly. Additional coples of this report can be received by contecting the police department directly. Bowerman,Karen Date:8/1 1/2012 10:39:28 PM Form Rev 10.1.7———eee RS Modesto Police Department Online Report 600 10th Street Violation of a Custody Order - Modesto,CA 95354 Saae if 22 http:/iwww.modestopolice.com pos case: 81/2012 9:47:38 PM Bowerman 4i1114966 «Karen 46 an Ru White 673 Geer Ct Home Phone 209-534-7791 Modesto ty 2095347791 cA + 94354 | kdownesbowerman@yahoo.com Violation of a Custody Order 933 Carolyn Ave 8/11/2042- 8/11/2012 Grime: ie Sr 6:0 PM - 12:0 AM Vi Location: Premise type: Crime Husband, Greg Bowerman, refused via text to return our daughters after Delails: as stipulated in the custody order. Residence - single family dwelling ‘This report sepresenis en eiecironic entry of information to the Modesto Police Depsstment, Each cate will be individually reviewed hefare pecoming 8h official record. Mf edition informetion 18 renuires oF information is in question, 1 wil be contacted directly Additions! copies of this repos can be mcelved by contacting the police dere ately e Name:Bowerman, Karen Date:8/11/2012 9:47:38 PM Cage iD: 44432.908+ Form Rev 10.1.7GOSS & GOSS A Professional Law Corporation Michael A. Goss* 1119 Twelfth Street Mark A. Goss E XHI BIT Modesto, California 95354 ae a < v ae *Cenitied Specialist in Family Law, ale Telephone: (209) 576-1871 California Board of Legal Specialization ae Feesimile: (209) $77-8676 Email: mike@goss-w.com mark Qgose-awcom Website: www gossandgoslav com VIA U.S, MAIL AND E-MAIL Paul D. Fromson, Esq. TENENBAUM, LAMPE & FROMSON Attomeys at Law 2005 “O” Street Merced, CA 95340 Re: — Marriage of Bowerman Dear Mr. Fromson: Please find enclosed a copy of the Minute Order continuing both of this morning’s hearings to Tuesday, August 21, 2012, at 8:30 a.m. and 9:00 a.m, in Department gin ease _ your information a copy of the 's tentative ruling which indicates that the Court is pre to grant my elisor motio: p of service reference in the Court’s tentative ruling was, in fact, he Court on August 2™ and presumably will make its way to the file prior to the August As indicated to you this morning and insomuch as youare still Karen’s attorney oe y it to her immediate attention that the minor daughters must attend school pending the diation hearing on August 21%, Olivia is enrolled at Roosevelt Junior High School and Elizabeth i ‘ood Elementary School. Today was their first day of school and it is my understanding from Dr. Bowerman that Karen refused to take them to school this morning. The girls were returned by my client to Karen’s custody late yesterday evening at which time he reminded your client that today was the first day of school. Any assistance you can provide, would be greatly appreciated.Paul D. Fromson, Esq. August 7, 2012 Page Two Lastly, I will forward you the two e-mails [received today from Melissa Chiangi who is the parties’ realtor for the Carolyn residence. If you could kindly forward or provide this information to Karen, I would be most appreciative. Thank you for your anticipated courtesy and cooperation in this matter. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, MAGit ere encl ce: Gregory Bowerman, M.D. (w/ encl, via mail and e-mail)_ SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF MONTEREY ‘The People of the State of California, | Plaintif | Hon. Thomas W. Wills Clerk: Linda Chavez vs. | csr | Recording No. 13916 Bowerman, Karen Lisa, | Defendant | | Gase No. MS274386A Minutes: Courtroom 6 April 8, 2040 | Charges: 4: PC273.5(@) [inflict Corporal Injury On Spouse/Cohabitant] MISD. Dismissal 2: PC243(e) [Battery Against Spouse/Cohabitating Partner] MISD. Dismissal 3: PC243(e) [Battery Against Spouse/Cohabitating Partner] MISD. Dismissal | 4: PC273a(b) [Cause Or Permit Cruelty To A Child] MISD. Dismissal 5: PCS91.5 [Interference with a Wireless - Communication] MISD. Conviction: Nolo Plea Nature of proceedings: Review Hearing. Deputy District Attorey Claire Borges appeared. Defendant eppeared without Counsel. Proof of completion of classes has been filed, ‘The court orders that the Protective Order issued on Wednesday, July 29, 2009 restraining Karen Bowerman, listing as protected person(s) Gregory Bowerman is terminated forthwith.// Last saved on: April 12, 2010 at 4:39 PM Page 1 of 1