Scribd Logo
Загрузить

Добро пожаловать в Scribd!

  • Imbong V Ochoa

    Загружено:

    SOPHIA AMOR
    20 просмотров2 страницы
    The petitioner claimed that the RH Law infringes on the powers of local government units to deliver basic services. However, the court ruled that local autonomy is not absolute and the national government can implement national priority programs through local governments. The RH Law is a valid national program that local governments must help implement, even if it involves basic services, since it is funded by the national government under the General Appropriations Act.

    Исходное описание:

    case

    Оригинальное название

    Imbong v Ochoa

    Авторское право

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Доступные форматы

    PDF, TXT или читайте онлайн в Scribd

    Этот документ был вам полезен?

    Это неприемлемый материал?

    Пожаловаться на этот документ
    The petitioner claimed that the RH Law infringes on the powers of local government units to deliver basic services. However, the court ruled that local autonomy is not absolute and the national government can implement national priority programs through local governments. The RH Law is a valid national program that local governments must help implement, even if it involves basic services, since it is funded by the national government under the General Appropriations Act.

    Авторское право:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Скачайте в формате PDF, TXT или читайте онлайн в Scribd
    Отметить как неприемлемый контент
    20 просмотров2 страницы

    Imbong V Ochoa

    Загружено:

    SOPHIA AMOR
    The petitioner claimed that the RH Law infringes on the powers of local government units to deliver basic services. However, the court ruled that local autonomy is not absolute and the national government can implement national priority programs through local governments. The RH Law is a valid national program that local governments must help implement, even if it involves basic services, since it is funded by the national government under the General Appropriations Act.

    Авторское право:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Скачайте в формате PDF, TXT или читайте онлайн в Scribd
    Отметить как неприемлемый контент
    из 2

    IMBONG V OCHOA

    GR 204819
    April 8, 2014
    Leave 2 spaces
    Facts:
    The petitioner contends that RH Law infringes the powers devolved to local government units
    specifically under Section 17 of the Local Government Code of 1990 regarding the duties and functions
    pertaining to the delivery of basic services and facilities vested upon the LGUs.

    Issue:
    Whether or not the RH Law violates the principle of autonomy of Local Government Units

    Ruling:
    No. Local Autonomy is not absolute. The national government still has the say when it comes to
    national priority programs which the local government is called upon to implement. There is an exception in
    section 17 involving nationally funded programs, projects and facilities. The said express reservation of power by
    the national government is that unless an LGU is particularly designated as the implementing agency, it has no
    power over a program for which funding has been provided by the national government under GAA even if the
    program involves the delivery of basic services within the jurisdiction of LGUs.

    Вам также может понравиться