Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Year Group 7B
Learning Intentions
Location / Setting
Whole class
Peer lead groups
1.
Role play scenarios
2.
Who wants to be a Millionaire:
Cyber Safety quiz
3.
Match the cards case studies
Choice: Group or individual presentations
INTRODUCTION
Establishing prior knowledge. Tuning in activity. Focus
questioning
MAIN BODY
Guiding Inquiry and Practise
Assessment Criteria: Assessment AS Learning
Hands on activities
5min
10min
Group discussions
A.
Stranger Danger
CONCLUSION
Sharing, Explaining and Reviewing Inquiry
Share time. Student reflection. What do they now know?
Assessment Criteria: Assessment OF Learning
Summary
20mins
Make Internet Safety Presentations
Ideas:
Poster
Cartoon
Role play
Case study cards
On the street
Rules: Say No
talk with adults about what you are doing on the Internet,
websites that you visit and have an agreement with your
parents or guardian about how you use the Internet
Get away
Tell someone
At home
Never open your door to strangers
Same rules apply to Internet
Tell a parent or adult if someone you dont know, a stranger, tries to talk to
you online
B.
Appropriate Websites
D.
Have adults approve someone before you talk with them on the Internet
If someone asks to meet you tell adult immediately
Never arrange a face-to-face meeting with someone you met online
Cyber safety
Cyber security
Anti-bullying
I had the students develop their knowledge through hands on activities, I wanted to
keep this informal and fun so they wouldnt see it as work.
I noted that I too felt much more comfortable in this approach and I didnt feel as
nervous as the previous class.
As the students began to research I walked around assisting them and answering
any questions they had.
Using the strategy of scaffolding I then attempted to facilitate and ask open ended
questions developing their knowledge further.
I noted that even though I had given the students less explicit instructions than the
previous class, they were able to stick to the task with greater ease and at most
times were completely engaged.
I also noted that this particular class were able to come up with some really amazing
creative ideas for the presentation part of the assessment, what was equally more
impressive was they had not needed to research any examples as the prior class
had done.
The students will also have next weeks class to complete their presentations, which
I will then mark out of ten and give them written feedback.
Date ________________
Date
I decided that for this presentation I would give the students both verbal and written feedback, this way I could further explain why they received their particular mark, but it would be more
about the students understanding how they could make their presentations even more appealing to reach their intended audience in the future.
It was evident that the content of the unit was understood by all of the students which were the main aim of the assessment.
On reflection, I found it very interesting that I struggled with giving marks to students which surprised me. I could see students compare and get upset about their number. Im unsure if this is
a reflection of me not wanting to upset students or I feel that sometimes the number is a big statement and it does not always reflect the understanding of content or the amount of work they
put in. This is the secondary reasoning behind me feeling that I needed to deeper explain their feedback verbally and in written format.