Column IV of Tablet 1 of the (Subserie "Summa amelu ina¥u marga”, 2 (2) subserie ("Chapter") of ‘the (Super)serie: "Summa amélu mubba’u umma ukél” (of which the following & the seventh tablet). came BAMSIO (Here wed as a basic text) BAMSI3 BAMSIM STT279 obviously a student's practice tablet containing excerpts from “Summa amelu SirmuiSu marga’ (tablet 2) and ”S. am@lu Mitsu marga” (Tablet 1) in their proto- cancnical form, Ex*eni Gurus” GIG-at “ini mms! Kosi Gieat ena’ GURUS u™™ KESIKTL man-nu dali “taSoppér® "itinguenétu’ SA Kite %GRSmMAR ina pricka tohepi ina Su-ka “texpo-til’ GURUS u_KPSIKIL ina SAG-KIMES*-Si-mi’_ ti ta-gar_IGI GURUS u_KESIKIL tbab"heuf’ TUs"-EN INIM-INIM.MA® IGLIGhGA-A-KAM °Db.DO-BT Su-Br ‘DiLtAM® ‘EN ama inria igi 1tke gigee beanger ina ® Sé-mece® * Sanaeru? ieziegamema ina “ini LU“ sivimeme" i8-taskan® amta ‘stdata® inria igi “loka gigge’ baenger “ieee ANE ruqutt igisigigs’ gigga beanger £ and if marssoc! ti" siim-me™ i8-taskan” it Di anata 2°86 LO“ Swati ina’ sit *do-at! a” “igi-bi ‘been’ -sthstt “Tomslwbi nitoanise érgig — TEHNES® “10 Sut ina ra-ma-ni-St margeis Hak i” obi tureani dnami*key igiinmaansun 2 M6 DU “diol! “murs su 4MnV iemumand! £ iene B actéca® gazi®™—"lamama" Su t'me-ti f hesi-i’ “has heti qt! ml “tugttus abzuta u'menis‘e 2° Si-pal apsii ima” *ifgi Toke" “amenikes’ 2 ini “eemen1i m-ins-ma" [Poem * 10° su-kn gan’ igi 10‘baxa’ Su-taggeni-ta [4aaaif ina * $u-84" K0-t' “nin “a-me-tim” ina lorba’ -te8 [imigli-1t3a" sted igibdita’™ baraan’® [gd-a-jri® 84 "ein? Soome-tim® udeduepu ina ieninSit litetangi® INIMEINIMEMA “IGEIGEGAAKAM™footnotes in, D: 1GL |? B: ef-li|[° D: -ma |" D: omits [f° =D: o-Sapspar [| D: ehigequeniteds |° D inserts © D omits | D erasure [f° D: tof up| D omits? © D omits |[~ After a division line D writes out in full the brief ritual instruction refered to; its Jacunous text covering four short lines, three at the bottom of the obverse and one at: the top of the reverse, is duplicated by Ms.C,L1 in a largaly preserved state. Squeezed into a single line the full text. of the ritual there oocurs at its proper place in the Ninerite Recension of "5. amelu tau marga. After a smnall gap, which can be restored from D as follows: DO-DUsBI SIG S[As SIG BABBAR/Gh..f C cantimes: 01. ri NUNU 7 u 7 KAKES KES e-ma KES EN S1D-nu ina SAGKPMESD:"8) KéSma That as 6 © D:ANane|[* Ds 1n4||™ Ds és | Ds sémemu in D the separate portions ofthe incantation, i.e, the Sumerian clauses along with their Akladian renderings, are nile off from each other by iyision lines ay studes [["" D:20 gig ~ D: ubtd | D inserts: Sd-a-ru tzi-gam-ma ina é-ni LO sim-mu iS-tarhan || cf. 9 © Domits ||" D omits ||° omitted in B and D, which set out the Sunerian and AKledian versions fone to a line |[* D: tna | De én |[/ D omits |? Bs «ma |" D: sioreru ||" Ue 9-22 largely missing in Cl he dt ||" D: 1G1|° D: lag pi {copy:RAD)-til over 2 lines eeRE oa replaced by 11° in B |[° D: Sueu |[* B erroneously: -de- [[* D: 1GF/-8¢ || % Dz dale 1 replaced by 10 in B ||~ D omits |[° present in D; B omits, of |" of. 6 |] 12 “~ Danits 13“ Danits* B: Yoaba M4 * D: 4a ||" 9 || D omits |["* B: Suea-tus ||" Dz GIG- 150“ D: al Neg g4/al-ktima ||" D: u ||P cf 9 ||" Ds -€ [7° flajuumfe... missing in D |’ B: a |[° cf 9° 17 “largely missing in D ||* De bi || Dz ume!mnit! |[* cf. 9°, present in D || De rth | cé 6 camé |[* D: ste "De bn ' D: fll’ 1: bamdlucte ||! Dz =i ||" cf. O° D: sa|P D omits fF Ds Sus D: ita, LO | Ds pom | cf. 6 |? U. 9.22 largely missing in B n° De LEI Daas 0 : 8 tls GIG-MES | D tas the subscripts followed by a therapeutical prescription set out over three short Jines at the bottam of its reverse, thus being its final text. portion. Tt reads: DUDUBI GAZI SHG;-Sal SUD | EN an-né-te 784 ana UGU S1D-ma | LA-ma ina-ah