Figure 3: Budget Level Relative to Value Potential Figure 4: Priorities to Impact Financial Performance
16%
27%
21%
36% Figure 5: Lead Generation Management Practices Figure 6: Lead Generation Effectiveness
Figure 7: Lead Generation Effectiveness Compared to 2008
Figure 8: Expected Growth for Lead Generation Marketers Figure 9: Economic Impact Based on Expected Growth Figure 10: Lead Generation Effectiveness and Expected Growth Figure 11: Use of Marketing ROI / Profitability Metrics – B2B Lead Gen vs. All Marketers Figure 12: Lead Gen Marketing Effectiveness – Users of ROI Metrics vs. Traditional Metrics Figure 13: Lead Generation Management – Users of ROI Metrics vs. Traditional Metrics Figure 14: Lead Generation Practices Based on Effectiveness Figure 15: Comparison of Economic Downturn Impact by Lead Generation Management Effectiveness Figure 16: Budgets Relative to Profit Potential Based on Effectiveness
% with Budget Below Value Potential
Total More Effective Org's Less Effective Org's
Generating new lead volume 38% 25% 64%
Generating quality leads 43% 33% 63%
Nurturing stalled leads 48% 48% 60%
Improving sales conversion rates 37% 25% 56%
Conditioning leads to improve the
39% 31% 49% average value per closed customer
Decreasing the time from new lead to
37% 34% 46% sale close for shorter sales cycles Figure 17: Marketing Operations Comparisons Based on Effectiveness Figure 18: Marketing Budget Alignment by Effectiveness Relative to the Competition Figure 19: Marketing Operations Based on Budget Alignment Figure 20: Integrated Marketing by Company Size Figure 21: Improving Performance by Company Size
Figure 22: Budget Alignment by Company Size
Figure 23: Region Figure 24: Company Size Based on Annual Revenue