Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 43

()

..,
, ,

, 1 2014. . ,
, .
: ; ; ; ; .

Battle for the Law of Real Security:


The Third Step in Reforming Russian
Pledge Law
2

R.S. Bevzenko,
Ph.D. in Law, Professor of the Russian School of Private Law,
Partner of Pepeliaev Group Law Firm
1


 ,
. , ,
.

T his article was developed in conjunction with the EBRD, which has been involved in the reform of
Russian law of secured transactions. However, the opinions and interpretations expressed in the
articles remain the authors sole ones.

()
9

The paper is dealing with the last reform of the Russian pledge law that was entered
into force on July 1, 2014. It contains the analysis of the routes and sources of the
reform, particularly their liaison with the previous legislation and case law. The author
examines the possible difficulties of interpretation and application of the new pledge law
which the economic actors may face with and offers the ways for their resolution.
Keywords: real security; pledge; mortgage; hypothec; charge; lien; foreclosure.

;
, .
.
1
1.
, . 90- ( 29
1992. 2872-I ( 1992.)) (1995.),
, : ( 1992.
1994.) ,
. , (1996., , 1992 . de facto ). : ,
- ( , ), 2008., ,
:
, . (
30 2008. 306-
1

 . ( ): . . .: . . , 1895. .16.

2 2015 15
10

), .
: , - (
6 2011. 405-
( 405-)).
,
, ( 23
2009. 58 ,
17 2011. 10
( 10)), : . , : -
. , ( , 2008.) , . (
2014. 21 2013. 367- ( ) ),
?
, ,
.

, , : , ,
,
, ,
.
,
( , .) -
. , , .
: -

()
11

( )
(
, , .);
, ,
,
, ,
. , , , ,
( )
, , .
( ,
), .
, , ,
16 1998. 102- ( ) ( ).
,
, ( ) .
, , .
, , .
, ,
, ,
. ,
,
.
2.
. , , . ,
, .. .

2 2015 15
12

,
.
, . . , -
,
.
, .
, , . , ( , ), , ,
, ; 1. ,
(, , ) (
), . , , .
, .
. , , , 100;
. , , 150.
. , , , , ,
, . ( ) : ,
;
, .
, , : .
1


 , - (, , ) , ,
, ,
.

()
13

20
. , , : , , , ,
, ( ).

, . ,
1994. , , 1964., . ,
1964. ,
, 1922. ,
( ) , - ; , (
)1.
, , , .
( ), .
. 20.4 , ,
.
. , , . ,
. 20.4
( . ).
, , , 3 . 23 . ,
,
(. .1 .334, .334.1, .2 .335, 335.1, 336, 339.1
( ) .. ).

( )
(.2 .334 .2 .341 ), , 1


 . : .., .. . .: - .
-, 1965. .1920.

2 2015 15
14

, ,
, ..
, ( ), ( ) ,
.
, , , 1.
, . , (.1
.334.1 ). ,
( ;
.5 .488 ) (
; .1 .587
).

. .5 .334 , , , , .
, .
, , , . ... . , ,
, .
, . 2
.174.1 .
; . :
, ? ,
1


 -: - , .
() () .

()
15

, ? ,
. ,
: , , .
; , . ,
.5 .334 , , , , , .
( ) ( ) ( ());
, ( , ..)). . , ,
. , .
, ,
, . , ( ,
). ,
, , .
,
.
, ( , , ) ,
. , , , ,
( ) .
, , , , , (). , .2 .174.1 (, ,
, , ,
).
. , ( .2

2 2015 15
16

.335 ) ,
, ( , ,
), .
,
( ) ( . ).
3. ,
3 . 23 ,
, .
, , ,
. , 3 . 23 -,
1 , , 2 , - .
3 . 23 - 1992.
1992. . , 1992. ;
1998.1
,
1992. de facto ,
1992.
. , , 1992.,
, , .
, , 1992. , , . , , 2000- .
1992., ( de facto
1


 . .1 15 1998. 26 , .

()
17

, !)1.

1992.
1992. ( ,
, ) 1992. , , 1992. 1 2014.

. .4 .334 (
. 20.4 , ), .
, , , 2. - .

, .
,
,
. (,
( ) ;
1


 , :
1992., , ,
, ,
. (., , .15 10).


 , , , , , . , ,
.2 .3 ( , , ).
, , , ,
(., , .4 23
2012. 14 ,
).
,
: , ,
.

2 2015 15
18

, .) , , . , .
.
. , .. 3 . 23 .

. ( , , , ,
, , ) , , 1 2014. .
:
, ,
?
,
,
( .4 .334 )
,
.
. - lex
specialis , , . , ,

3 . 23 . lex specialis, ... !
lex specialis?
, , , , . ,
, , - , -
. , ,
, 19961997 . , 2014. ,
. ...

()
19

,

(, , lex specialis1): lex
posterior derogat priori. 3 . 23 , , , . , ,
. ,
.
4. .

.335 , , ,
, 2, , ,

.
. , ,
(, , ). ,
, , (,
),
(, - ,
). ,
, , . ( 1


 lex posteriori lex specialis , (.: Kieninger E.-M., Linhart K.
German Report // European Review of Private Law. 2012. Vol. 20. Issue 1. P. 109110; Lindroos A.
Addressing Norm Conflicts in aFragmented Legal System: The Doctrine of Lex Specialis // Nordic
Journal of International Law. 2005. Vol. 74. P. 27, 41). ,
.


 , (. ).

2 2015 15
20

) :

, , . , (
- ,
), ,
, . ,
,
.
,
, , , .
.

. , ;
.
,
. , , , .
, . ,
: . , , , ,
1.
( )
, , ,

 : ,
, ; , .

()
21

, , .
, ,
( ),
. , de facto
.
.
, ,
(

).
(, ) ,
- . , .
, , 1.
1 2014.
,
. , , ,
- .
,
,
,
.
.335
, ,
1


 , , ,
. . , , , , ,
; ,
. , contra legem ,

( 13 2011. 4408/11),
, .

2 2015 15
22

- .364367
, , .
?
, , , .
,
, . ,
.
,
, , - ..,
, , ,
, -.
,

1, :
.
( , ,
) , . , , , , ,
, , (, .).
, ,
, -, .
, 2.
1



,
,
, ; , , : ,
, , .

 . ,
, ,
: , (, , , , ). , -

()
23

. , , ; . ,
, . : ( ) ,
? ,
, , , 1, .. .
. , , , :
, , - . , , -, ?
, , ? ? ,
,
? , , ?2
, ,
, , (
; 18
). , ,
, : , , .
 .


 . , : (.13 10).
.335 .1 .367
, , : . , ( , ) ,
( ) (
18 2011. 6977/11; 13 2011.
39-11-5; .37 12 2012. 42; . : .. :
12 2012. 42 ,
23 2012. 14 , . .: , 2013).
,
.

2 2015 15
24


.364367 , . ,
, , , : ,
. : 1) ( , ),
; 2) ,
, ,
.
, .335
, , .. , ,
1.
, , , - , ?

.
-, :
.
.5 .488
, ,
, , ,
-.
(, , ) . , ,
1


 , ,
(, , , ) , .
, ,
;
( , , ..) , ,
, .

()
25


: , , , - , , , , . , ,
,
( )
.
-, ,
, (, ), . , (
),
1. ,
, .
-,
, , . (
), , ,
. ,
, . , , -, ( )
.
, ,
,
. . , ,
( ,
), ,
.
. , , , , .
: , , ,
, ( ), - , , .
1

 , probatio diabolica.

2 2015 15
26

, .
, - , (, ,
..), .
, . , 2011
2012 . ,
1 , , 2.
5. :

, () . , .339
, , .
, , ,
.
, : .43 6 8 1
1996. , ( 6/8)
, [] , , , , , ,
, 3.
1


 26 2011 . 2763/11, 7 2012 .
16513/11.

 6 2011. 9555/11.


 10 (.13) , : () ,
.

()
27

, : .339
,
. , , ,
,
- , . .43 6/8
.1 .339 :
, , , ,
- - .
, , ; ,
. ,
- , () ,
,
, .
, , , ,
, . ,
.
,
,
. , ,
, , ( ),
- ( ), , (
,
1), .
, , ,
.
.
1


 , .

2 2015 15
28

, .1 .339 [], , ,
, . - , , , .
, .
?
.
-, , . . ,
,
, ___ ____ ___________
201_., (),
,
.
-, .339
, , ( ). , , ,
___ ____ ___________201_. (
) , ___, ___ ______, ,

- , . , ,
, ,
.
-,
,
( ) (
).
, , ,
:

()
29

, ,
, , ,
, ,
, ,
,
() ( .2 .339 ). ,
: , (, , (, ))
. , . ,
, .
,
, , , , , ,
.
.1 .1 .352 ? , ,
( ),
(.4 .367 ). ,
.
, , ( -
).


, () .
6. : .


, .
, ,
, -

2 2015 15
30

. ,
.2 .339 ,
, 1.

, . , ,
, ()
; .
,
, . .
, ,
, .. ( ) .
,
, , ,
: (. .357 ).
. , , ,
(.2 .357 ).
, , ,
. ,
; .352 , 2.
floating charge ( ), . .
1


 1 2015. (.2 .3 21 2013.
367-).


 , : ,
.

()
31

-,
, , . : .
-, , . ,
(fixed
charge), , ,
.
:
1.
, , , ( )
,
, . , ,
2;
, . ,
.
, ,
, , ; - .
, , , ,
, , -. , 3 ,
.. ,
1


 . floating charge, : Btter M. Recognition of English Fixed and
Floating Charges in German Insolvency Proceedings under the New European Regulation on Insolvency
Proceedings // Journal of Corporate Law Studies. 2002. Vol. 2. P. 213; Ferran E. Floating Charges:
The Nature of the Security // The Cambridge Law Journal. 1988. Vol. 47. Issue 2; Pennington R.R.
The Genesis of the Floating Charge // The Modern Law Review. Vol. 23. Issue 6; Worthington S.
Floating Charges: An Alternative Theory // The Cambridge Law Journal. 1994. Vol. 53. Issue 1.

 . .


 , . ,
.

2 2015 15
32

. , , , , , ,
(, , ) - . ,
, . , , , . ,
- ,
. , ,
, ,
, ,
, .
, ,
-,
1.
, , , ,
, (, , ..(. )).
, ( ..), , , . , ,

, .
, , ,
.
:
, , ,
, ,
.

; .
.
1


 , , (. .25 10
).

()
33

,
. . , .2 .334

. : , .
.
, : , - ( ).
. , , ;
.
,
( , ) . (, .),
, ,
, ,
. , (. .2 .334, .2 .345 ).
, ,

.
( ) ,
, .
.5 .345
: , , , ,
() .
,

, .
,
,
. , . , ,

2 2015 15
34

, . ( , )
. .
, , , , :
( ;
;
; , ),

(
.), ex officio. ,
(, , , ).
. , .2 .345
:
.
,
(.64 69), , -
,
, .
,
. , : -,

; -, ,
, , ,
.
.2 .345 , , , ,
. , ;
, .

()
35

7. , :

,
. , ,
, , ,
, , .
, , .
, ,
,
: , . , , , .
,
(, erga omnes, ..
), : , .
( , , ) ,
, .
,
, , ..
.

.
(, , ) . ,
, , ; , ,
: , ( ). , , . ,
,
,
,
, .

2 2015 15
36

; , , (, ..),
. , .
, , .
?
. , .. ,
, , . ,
,
.

. ,
. ( )
, ,
, . , 1.

- , - 1) 2)
, .
, . ,
, ,
..
3 . 23 339.1, . ?
, (, ,
, ) .

 , , , , ,
, . ,
: , , .

()
37

(, ) ,
: , . . ( !)
.2 .8.1 .
, .
-, (), (. .11 ),
, 1.
-,
;
2.
-, , ( , ..); .
-, , ;
.
, ,
, , .
, .339.1 3 (, ) (.3 .339.1). , 1


 , (
405-), , ..
. , , ,
, , .


 , ,
. .21 8 1998. 14-
,
; , .


 ,
. , .

2 2015 15
38

; (, ) ,
. ( ) ,
() .
( ) :
1.
: . ,
, , -. ,
,
-
. ( ), .
, , :
, ? 2
1


 , , , (Uniform Commercial Code (UCC)) (filing system), ,
, ,
, . ,
financial statement
(Hamwijk D. Public Filing with Regard to Non-Possessory Security Rights in Tangible Assets as Contemplated by the DCFR: Of No Benefit to Unsecured (Trade) Creditors // European Review of Private
Law. 2011. Vol. 19. Issue 5. P. 613614). , : , , (Montague W. Uniform Commercial Codes Article 9: When Filing is
Not Required to Perfect aSecurity Interest // Kentucky Law Journal. 19631964. Vol. 52. P. 422).

( , , ).
(effectiveness)
(Draft Common Frame of Reference ( DCFR)).


 , (.. ) (Antragsprinzip)
(Vliet
L. van. The German Grundschuld // Edinburgh Law Review. 2012. Vol. 16. Issue 2. P. 150 ( : http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract_id=2071814)).

()
39

,
, : .4 .339.1 []
, ,
. , ,
, . ,
, ,
, . , , , , , , ,
.
. .1 (. 11 1993. 4462-I) ( ); 1.
,
.
, ( , ) , , , .
, ,
, , , , , .

( .103.2 ). , , .
.
: 2. ,
1


 , ,
, .

 : http://reestr-zalogov.ru.

2 2015 15
40

,

(.103.7).
, ,
. , .
, ,
.
,
: ( ) ().
(VIN)1,
- 2. ( , ,
)
; ,
.
,
,
. . , 3.
.
.4 .339.1 : ,
1


 ,
. , ,
, .


 . , (,
..); , , ,
, , , ,
, . , .


 ( , )
(, , , ). , , : , , , , ..
.

()
41

, , ,
, . .10 .342.1
: , ,
4 339.1 , , ,
, , ,
,
, , .
.
(, )
, : , , ,
, ,
( .4
.339.1 ). , .
, .

, . ,
( ). ,
( ) ,
, ,
. ,
.

, .2 .1 .352 :
,
, .
,
.

2 2015 15
42

,
1. .25
10 , .
2. ,
, .
.25 10
, , , .. . , ,
,
,
, , .
.302
. , .302
, .
.25 10. ( ) ,
. , . ( , , 3)
(
) , .

, , 1


 10 2007. 1107-12, 12 2011. 74-11-4, 20 2012. 16-11-24, 9 2012. 18-12-39.


 20 2007. 215--, 15 2008. 323--, 15
2010. 942--, 22 2012. 498--, 22 2014. 754-, 5
2014. 1142-.


 , . , .. (.:
..
// : , / . . .. .. . .: , 2010. .130150).

()
43

: , ,

, .
8. :

,

.
,
.
( (. )), ( ).
, , (, ), , , :
.
()
.
50 , 80, : 40. (
,
50, 30.)
: .

, ;
.
, pro rata ,
( .
). , , . ,

2 2015 15
44

, . ,

.
, ,
.
,
, , (
, )
( ).
(.13 15 30 2014. 214-
, .201.9
26 2002. 127-
()). , ,
(, ,
), pro rata, .. .
, , . , , 100 , 50 ,
. .
, . , , 100, . ,
, , , 50. .387
, 1/2 . , . 80. :
?
,
40, ..
pro rata. -

()
45

, , -, : ,
(, , , ,
). , , ( 80 + 50 = 130
100), 10.
, , , pro rata, . .335 ,
, ( )
.
: , , . , ,
, -
, ( )1.
. (
.1 .335.1 ). , . , ,
,
.
. ,
, , . , ,
, 1


 . .30 12 2012. 42
, :
.
, (, ..). ,
,
.

2 2015 15
46

- . (
, , ,
)
, , .

, .
,

(.2 .342.1 ). , , (.6 .342.1
). ,
.
9.
.


, .

: , .
, , 1, , .
?
(.1 .349
), (.1 .348 ).
, , (. .1 .348 ). ,

 , ,
: , .

()
47

,
( ). , , - (,
.). , ,
.
, , ..
.
,
, . , ,
( .1 .349 ).
.1 .349
: ,
, . , , .
(.3 .1 ),
1.
( )
: .2 .348 - ,
, 5% , .
, , .
,
1


 . .(4) .IX. 7:103 ( ( ) , , )
.(1) .IX. 7:112 DCFR ( ).

2 2015 15
48

, ; ,
: , ..

, (. .2
.348 : , ,
).
, , ,
12 (.3 .348
). , .

( )
,
(.4 .349 ), , , (.5 .349 ).
(
), (.6 .349 ).
( ),
,
, . ,
, ,
(..
) 1.
1


 , , , (. 10
2012. 15085/11).

()
49

, , ( ) .
, ,
,
(.7 .349 ).
, (.3 .349 ):
) , ,
1;
) , ,
;
)
, ,
.
, . , , .
, , , , , , .
References
Bevzenko R.S. Pravovye pozitsii Vyshchego Arbitrazhnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii po voprosam poruchitelstva ibankovskoi garantii: Kommentarii kPostanovleniyam Plenuma Vyshchego Arbitrazhnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 12 iyulya 2012 g.
No.42 Onekotorykh voprosakh razresheniya sporov, svyazannykh sporuchitelstvom
iot 23 marta 2012 g. No.14 Ob otdelnykh voprosakh praktiki razresheniya sporov,
svyazannykh sosparivaniem bankovskikh garantii [Bevzenko R.S. Precedents of the
1


 :
.

2 2015 15
50

Supreme Commercial Court of the Russian Federation in the Law of Personal Security
(Suretyship and Guaranty): Comments on the Plenary Session Decisions of the SCC RF
No.42 On the Selected Questions of the Suretyship Cases and No.14 On the Selected
Questions of the Banking Guaranties Cases] (in Russian). M., 2013.
Btter M. Recognition of English Fixed and Floating Charges in German Insolvency Proceedings under the New European Regulation on Insolvency Proceedings// Journal of Corporate Law Studies. 2002. Vol.2. P.213.
Ferran E. Floating Charges: The Nature of the Security// The Cambridge Law
Journal. 1988. Vol.47. Issue 2.
Hamwijk D. Public Filing with Regard to Non-Possessory Security Rights in Tangible Assets as Contemplated by the DCFR: Of No Benefit to Unsecured (Trade)
Creditors// European Review of Private Law. 2011. Vol.19. Issue 5.
Ioffe O.S., Tolstoy Yu.K. Novyi Grazhdanskii kodeks RSFSR [New Civil Code of
the RSFSR] (in Russian). Leningrad, 1965.
Kieninger E.-M., Linhart K. German Report // European Review of Private Law.
2012. Vol.20. Issue 1.
Kohler J. Shekspir stochki zreniya prava (Sheilok iGamlet): Per. snem. [Kohler J.
Shakespeare from the Jurisprudence Standpoint (Shylock and Hamlet): Translated
from German] (in Russian). St. Petersburg, 1895.
Lindroos A. Addressing Norm Conflicts in aFragmented Legal System: The Doctrine of Lex Specialis// Nordic Journal of International Law. 2005. Vol.74. P.27.
Makovskaya A.A. Dobrosovestnost uchastnikov zalogovogo pravootnosheniya
iraspredelenie riskov mezhdu nimi [Makovskaya A.A. Good Faith in the Pledge Law
and the Distribution of Risks] (in Russian)// Main Issues of Private Law: Collection
of Articles to the Anniversary of Dr. habil., Prof. Alexander L. Makovsky/ V.V.
Vitryansky, E.A. Sukhanov (eds.). M., 2010.
Montague W. Uniform Commercial Codes Article 9: When Filing is Not Required
to Perfect aSecurity Interest// Kentucky Law Journal. 19631964. Vol.52. P.422.
Pennington R.R. The Genesis of the Floating Charge// The Modern Law Review.
Vol.23. Issue 6.
Vliet L. van. The German Grundschuld// Edinburgh Law Review. 2012. Vol.16.
Issue 2 (available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract_id=2071814).
Worthington S. Floating Charges: An Alternative Theory// The Cambridge Law
Journal. 1994. Vol.53. Issue 1.
Information about the author
Bevzenko R.S. (Moscow) Ph.D. in Law, Professor of the Russian School of
Private Law, Partner of Pepeliaev Group Law Firm (103132, Moscow, Ilyinka st., 8,
bldg. 2; e-mail: rbevzenko@gmail.com).