Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
By using the content information, students will explain the roles and responsibilities of a
cyber community citizen.
By using the content information, students will evaluate which web sites are appropriate
references and which are not.
Using the content information, students will outline a list of criteria that should be
examined to determine if a webpage is useful, safe and appropriate for its intended use.
Part II: Learner Analysis
Introduction
The learners in this 8th grade Film and Animation class at H.E. McCracken Middle school in
Bluffton, South Carolina are made up of a diverse group of students. The ages for this group of
students are 13- 15. The total number of students is 25, 17 boys and 8 girls. This class consists of
the following: African-American: 3 males, 2 females; Hispanic: 4 males, 4 females; Caucasian: 9
males, 2 females; Asian: 1 male. Only 12% of the students have IEP (Individual Education Plan)
or are ESOL (English for Speakers of Other Languages) students. This information about the
students came from several different resources from the collaborative teacher. The Beaufort
County District adopted Powerschool to equip teachers with knowledge of the students, such as
gender, age and race. Teachers are given documents containing IEP and ESOL plans from the
special needs and ESOL teachers.
Entry Characteristics:
Technology prerequisite skill & knowledge:
Krisann Johnson 2
Collaborative Unit on Digital Citizenship
Morrison, Ross, Kemp Model
Prior Experience:
The percentages of the student that have completed or are currently taking the course or
technology courses are 100%. There, they have gained skills to navigate through computer
databases and create internet-based activities.
Common errors made by beginner learners:
Potential Misconceptions:
Using technology in the classroom is only for the technology base courses.
Krisann Johnson 3
Collaborative Unit on Digital Citizenship
Morrison, Ross, Kemp Model
Met
50%
Not Met
Krisann Johnson 4
Collaborative Unit on Digital Citizenship
Morrison, Ross, Kemp Model
Task Analysis Outline: Cyber Community Citizenship Unit
Lesson 1
Lesson 2
Krisann Johnson 5
Collaborative Unit on Digital Citizenship
Morrison, Ross, Kemp Model
Lesson 3
Krisann Johnson 6
Collaborative Unit on Digital Citizenship
Morrison, Ross, Kemp Model
2C. To evaluate a website resource.
Terminal Objective 3: Using the content information, students will outline a list of criteria that
should be examined to determine if a webpage is useful, safe and appropriate for its intended use.
Enabling Objectives:
3A. To determine the elements for evaluating internet resources.
3B. To answer questions over the Cyber Community Citizenship Unit through a quiz.
3C. To develop a poster presenting a list of criteria that should be examined to determine if a
webpage is useful, safe and appropriate.
Classification of Instructional Objectives:
Performance
Content
Fact
Concept
Principles
Procedure
Interpersonal
Attitude
Recall
1, 2, 1A, 2A, 1B, 2B
Application
3A
2C
3, 3B, 3C
1C, 3A
1, 2, 3
ISTE Standards
Facilitate and inspire student learning and
creativity- Teachers use their knowledge of
subject matter, teaching and learning, and
technology to facilitate experiences that
advance students learning, creativity, and
innovation in both face-to-face and virtual
environments.
Design and develop digital age learning
experiences and assessments- Teachers design,
develop, and evaluate authentic learning
experiences and assessments incorporating
contemporary tools and resources to maximize
content learning in context and to develop the
Krisann Johnson 7
Collaborative Unit on Digital Citizenship
Morrison, Ross, Kemp Model
knowledge, skills, and attitudes identified in
the Standards.
Promote and model digital citizenship and
responsibility- Teachers understand local and
global societal issues and responsibilities in an
evolving digital culture and exhibit legal and
ethical behavior in their professional practices.
1, 2, 3
Part V
Instructional Strategies
Lesson 1:
Through discussion and
presentation, students will
take notes and discuss the
meaning of cyber community.
Students will create examples
of internet use. Discussion
will be conducted through
Todays Meet. Presentations
will be displayed through a
YouTube video. Students will
read online resources
concerning digital citizenship.
Goals
Brainstorm a
list of at least
6 different
roles and
responsibiliti
es of a cyber
community
citizen.
Lesson 2:
Through discussion and
presentation, students will
take notes and discuss
website evaluation.
Discussion will be conducted
through Todays Meet.
Presentations will be
displayed through a YouTube
video. Students will read
online resources concerning
evaluating websites. By using
the Website Evaluation tool
worksheet, students will
evaluate the Killer Bees are
Coming! Webpage.
As a closure, students will
create 2 questions to ask
oneself when evaluating
website resource. Assignment
will be completed through a
discussion on Todays Meet.
Evaluate a
website
using the
content
information.
Lesson 3:
Discussion assignment will
be completed through a
Identify an
appropriate
lesson plan
Objectives
Terminal Objective 1: By using
the content information, students
will explain the roles and
responsibilities of a cyber
community citizen.
1A. To identify the meaning of
cyber community citizenship.
1B. To identify the legal, social
and ethical issues in technology.
1C. To outline the roles and
responsibilities of a citizen in a
cyber community.
UDL
Learners are given a
choice to respond to
discussion board which
optimizes individual
responses and autonomy
(students will choose
write about thoughts of
the roles and
responsibilities of a cyber
community citizen).
Learners are given the
opportunity to work at
own pace by using
technology (students will
read, listen, and view the
instructions).
Learners are given a
choice to respond which
optimizes individual
choice and autonomy
(students will choose to
answer the discussion
question).
Assessments
Formative Assessment:
Learners will create list of
the roles and
responsibilities of a cyber
community citizen. This
assessment will be graded
through a checklist.
Formative Assessment:
By using the Website
Evaluation tool worksheet,
students will evaluate the
Killer Bees are Coming!
Webpage. This assignment
will be graded for
accuracy.
Formative Assessment:
Through a quiz, students
answer questions
Krisann Johnson 8
Collaborative Unit on Digital Citizenship
Morrison, Ross, Kemp Model
discussion on Todays Meet.
Through a quiz, students
answer questions concerning
the unit content information.
Individually, students will use
Web 2.0 tool Smore to create
a digital poster presenting the
list of criteria that should be
examined to determine if a
webpage is useful, safe and
appropriate.
As a closure, students will be
asked to generalize the
meaning of being a citizen of
the cyber community.
Assignment will be
completed through a
discussion on Todays Meet.
for students
to create an
infographic.
The assessments that I have created are performance based assessments. Students will be able to
generate ideas and display desirable thoughts. They will view and read the instructions and be
able to perform it to the task. At the end of the unit, students should be able to demonstrate what
they have learned.
Lesson 1: Roles and Responsibilities of a Cyber Community Citizen
Terminal Objective 1: By using the content information, students will explain the roles and
responsibilities of a cyber community citizen.
1A. To identify the meaning of cyber community citizenship.
1B. To identify the legal, social and ethical issues in technology.
1C. To outline the roles and responsibilities of a citizen in a cyber community.
Assessment: Learners will create list of the roles and responsibilities of a cyber community
citizen. This assessment will be graded through a checklist.
UDL Principles: The checklist will provide differentiation in multiple means of expressions by
optimizing individual choice and autonomy. Multiple means of representations of instructions
will be given to learners in need. An online text and audio instructions will be permitted for
review. Learners may review and revisit any of these instructions at any time. Participants will
be able to take ownership in their assignment by given the opportunity to work at own pace.
Lesson 2: Evaluating Website Information
Terminal Objective 2: By using the content information, students will evaluate which web sites
are appropriate references and which are not.
Krisann Johnson 9
Collaborative Unit on Digital Citizenship
Morrison, Ross, Kemp Model
2A. To identify the need of guidelines for selecting website in the cyber community.
2B. To identify the elements of evaluating a website resource.
2C. To evaluate a website resource.
Assessment: By using the Website Evaluation tool worksheet, students will evaluate the Killer
Bees are Coming! webpage. This assignment will be graded for accuracy.
UDL Principles: The checklist will provide differentiation in multiple means of expressions by
optimizing individual choice and autonomy. Participants will be able to display desirable
information and use creativity. Multiple means of representations of instructions will be given to
learners in need. An online text and audio instructions will be permitted for review. Learners may
review and revisit any of these instructions at any time. Participants will be able to take
ownership in their assignment by given the opportunity to work at own pace.
Lesson 3: Applying Cyber Community Citizenship
Terminal Objective 3: Using the content information, students will outline a list of criteria that
should be examined to determine if a webpage is useful, safe and appropriate for its intended use.
3A. To determine the elements for evaluating internet resources.
3B. To answer questions over the Cyber Community Citizenship Unit through a quiz.
3C. To develop a poster presenting a list of criteria that should be examined to determine if a
webpage is useful, safe and appropriate.
Assessment: Through a quiz, students answer questions concerning the unit content information.
This assignment will be graded for accuracy.
Individually, students will use Web 2.0 tool Smore to create a digital poster presenting the list of
criteria that should be examined to determine if a webpage is useful, safe and appropriate. This
assessment will be graded through a rubric.
UDL Principles: The rubric will provide differentiation in multiple means of expressions by
optimizing individual choice and autonomy. Multiple means of representations of instructions
will be given to learners in need. An online text and audio instructions will be permitted for
review. Learners may review and revisit any of these instructions at any time. Participants will
be able to take ownership in their assignment by given the opportunity to work at own pace.
Assessment Examples
Objective 1 Assessment:
Krisann Johnson 10
Collaborative Unit on Digital Citizenship
Morrison, Ross, Kemp Model
Directions: Through a Padlet wall, students will brainstorm a list of at least 6 different roles and
responsibilities of a cyber community citizen.
Objective 1: Checklist
Participation
Roles of a Cyber
Community
Citizen
Responsibilities
of a Cyber
Community
Citizen
Displayed insightful
explanation of the
roles and
responsibilities
Wall was well
organized and
displayed 3 roles.
Displayed
explanation of the
roles and
responsibilities
Displayed 3 roles.
Displayed
explanation is
missing 1 element
Displayed 2 roles.
Displayed
explanation is
missing 2 or more
elements
Displayed 0-1 role.
Displayed 3
responsibilities.
Displayed 2
responsibilities.
Displayed 0-1
responsibility.
Objective 2 Assessment:
By using the Website Evaluation tool worksheet, students will evaluate the Killer Bees are
Coming! webpage. This assignment will be graded for accuracy.
Website topic or name:
URL: http://
Section 1: Ease of Use
1. Y/ N Is use of the webpage free of charge?
2. Y/ N Does the page load quickly?
3. Y/ N Is the page layout easy to read?
4. Y/ N Do the links work?
5. Y/ N Are the directions about how to use the website easy to understand?
Section 2: Source
6. Y/ N Does the information appear to be true- can it be backed up or proven with a print
source or another website?
7. Y/ N Is it clear who is sponsoring the website?
8. Y/ N Does the page contains information about the author or sponsors qualification?
9. Y/ N Is the authors name listed on the page with a contact address or phone number?
10. Y/ N Is there a publication date, date of update, or both?
Section 3: Appropriate and Safety
11. Y/ N Can you view the contents of the webpage without giving out personal information
Krisann Johnson 11
Collaborative Unit on Digital Citizenship
Morrison, Ross, Kemp Model
such as name, email, address, age, etc.?
12. Y/ N Is it clear why the sponsor is providing the site?
13. Y/ N Is the website content appropriate for your age group?
14. Y/ N Can you understand the websites information/content?
15. Y/ N Is it free of advertising, or contain few advertisements?
Rate the Website: Tally the Yes and No answers in each section.
Recommended- Rates a Yes to all questions. Note: No evaluation tool can be 100% reliable
whether a website is completely useful, safe, and appropriate for its intended use. However, sites
that rate all yes answering using this tool are probably reliable and appropriate.
Be Cautious- Rates a No to questions in section 1 and 2. Note: Questions that rate several
no answers in section 1 and 2 indicate that the website is poorly developed and may be
unreliable and inappropriate.
Not Recommended- Rates a No to questions in Section 3. Note: Questions that any No
answers in section 3 indicate that the website is poorly developed, and be unreliable and unsafe.
Please add additional comments or considerations:
Krisann Johnson 12
Collaborative Unit on Digital Citizenship
Morrison, Ross, Kemp Model
Website topic or name: Killer Bees are Coming!
URL: http:// C:\Documents\iSafe\8th Grade - Cyber Community Citizenship\Gr8_Cyber
Community Citizenship\Gr8 Cyber Community Citizenship Webactivity\Open Webpage
Activity.html
Section 1: Ease of Use
1. Y/ N Is use of the webpage free of charge?
2. Y/ N Does the page load quickly?
3. Y/ N Is the page layout easy to read?
4. Y/ N Do the links work?
5. Y/ N Are the directions about how to use the website easy to understand?
Section 2: Source
6. Y/ N Does the information appear to be true- can it be backed up or proven with a print
source or another website?
7. Y/ N Is it clear who is sponsoring the website?
8. Y/ N Does the page contains information about the author or sponsors qualification?
9. Y/ N Is the authors name listed on the page with a contact address or phone number?
10. Y/ N Is there a publication date, date of update, or both?
Section 3: Appropriate and Safety
11. Y/ N Can you view the contents of the webpage without giving out personal information
such as name, email, address, age, etc.?
12. Y/ N Is it clear why the sponsor is providing the site?
13. Y/ N Is the website content appropriate for your age group?
14. Y/ N Can you understand the websites information/content?
15. Y/ N Is it free of advertising, or contain few advertisements?
Rate the Website: Tally the Yes and No answers in each section.
Recommended- Rates a Yes to all questions. Note: No evaluation tool can be 100% reliable
whether a website is completely useful, safe, and appropriate for its intended use. However, sites
that rate all yes answering using this tool are probably reliable and appropriate.
Be Cautious- Rates a No to questions in section 1 and 2. Note: Questions that rate several
no answers in section 1 and 2 indicate that the website is poorly developed and may be
unreliable and inappropriate.
Not Recommended- Rates a No to questions in Section 3. Note: Questions that any No
answers in section 3 indicate that the website is poorly developed, and be unreliable and unsafe.
Krisann Johnson 13
Collaborative Unit on Digital Citizenship
Morrison, Ross, Kemp Model
Please add additional comments or considerations:
Objective 3 Assessment:
Directions: Through a quiz, students answer questions concerning the unit content information.
This assignment will be graded for accuracy.
Individually, students will use Web 2.0 tool Smore to create a digital poster presenting the list of
criteria that should be examined to determine if a webpage is useful, safe and appropriate. This
assessment will be graded through a rubric.
Objective 3: Quiz
Questions
1. Should you have a different password for every website you use regularly?
A. Yes, especially for banking, and personal information.
B. No, you should stick with one password
2.
Is it good to download from the internet?
A. Only with the programs iTunes or Napster should you download.
B.Yes, because it gives you free stuff and theres a limited chance that you would get caught.
3. Is it okay to add a video that your friend took of you online?
A.
Only if its really funny
B. If you get the permission of all the people filmed in the video then its alright.
A.
B.
A.
B.
Krisann Johnson 14
Collaborative Unit on Digital Citizenship
Morrison, Ross, Kemp Model
8.
What is a fire wall?
A. A wall designed to prevent the spread of fire.
B.Is a computer program that helps protect your computer from hackers, viruses and worms.
9.
A.
B.
Is spam dangerous?
YES
NO
10.
A.
B.
A.
B.
Krisann Johnson 15
Collaborative Unit on Digital Citizenship
Morrison, Ross, Kemp Model
B.Is a computer program that helps protect your computer from hackers, viruses and worms.
9.
Is spam dangerous?
YES
A.
B.
NO
10.
A.
B.
Objective 3: Rubric
CATEGORY
Required
Elements
All required
elements are
included on the
poster.
Several required
elements were
missing.
Attractiveness
The poster is
exceptionally
attractive in terms of
design, layout, and
neatness.
The poster is
attractive in terms of
design, layout and
neatness.
The poster is
acceptably attractive
though it may be a
bit messy.
The poster is
distractingly messy
or very poorly
designed. It is not
attractive.
Content Accuracy
At least 7 accurate
facts are displayed
on the poster.
Graphics Relevance
Part VI
Instructional Sequence
Graphics do not
relate to the topic
OR several
borrowed graphics
do not have a source
citation.
Sequenc
e
1
Krisann Johnson 16
Collaborative Unit on Digital Citizenship
Morrison, Ross, Kemp Model
Description
Objectiv
e
Introduction of the Cyber Community Citizenship unit. Discussion and
1
content presentation will be conducted.
Create list of the roles and responsibilities of a cyber community
citizen.
Introduction of methods for evaluating websites. Discussion and content
presentation will be conducted.
Evaluate the Killer Bees are Coming! Webpage using the given
evaluation.
Unit content quiz.
Create a digital poster displaying the criteria for evaluating websites.
Conclude with a unit evaluation.
1
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
This sequence builds on a task expertise order. The participants will advance through the
instructions as the instructional designer plans in their building. This sequence allows
participants to have opportunities to examine the formations of recipes and define techniques for
cooking. The tasks will be complete in a procedural manner. Participants will have opportunities
for examining and evaluating their infographics through readings and discussions. Lastly,
learners will have the opportunity to self-generate activities. By completing the activities at own
pace, they will be able to advance when they have completed mastery.
Krisann Johnson 17
Collaborative Unit on Digital Citizenship
Morrison, Ross, Kemp Model
UDL: Learners are given a choice to respond to discussion board which optimizes individual
responses and autonomy (Morrison, Ross, Kalman & Kemp, 2013).
Generative Strategy: Through a Padlet wall, students will brainstorm a list of at least 6 different
roles and responsibilities of a cyber community citizen. They will receive feedback by
comparing their answers to other participants and expert responses.
Lesson 2: Evaluating Website Information
Terminal Objective 2: By using the content information, students will evaluate which web sites
are appropriate references and which are not.
2A. To identify the need of guidelines for selecting website in the cyber community.
2B. To identify the elements of evaluating a website resource.
2C. To evaluate a website resource.
Assessment: By using the Website Evaluation tool worksheet, students will evaluate the Killer
Bees are Coming! webpage. This assignment will be graded for accuracy
Initial Presentation: As a warm-up, students will answer the following question, Why do we
need guidelines in selecting websites in the cyber community? Assignment will be completed
through a discussion on Todays Meet.
UDL: Learners are given the opportunity to work at own pace and use technology tools by
choice (Kerr, 2011).
Generative Strategy: By using the Website Evaluation tool worksheet, students will evaluate the
Killer Bees are Coming! Webpage.
Lesson 3: Applying Cyber Community Citizenship
Terminal Objective 3: Using the content information, students will outline a list of criteria that
should be examined to determine if a webpage is useful, safe and appropriate for its intended use.
3A. To determine the elements for evaluating internet resources.
3B. To answer questions over the Cyber Community Citizenship Unit through a quiz.
3C. To develop a poster presenting a list of criteria that should be examined to determine if a
webpage is useful, safe and appropriate.
Assessment: Through a quiz, students answer questions concerning the unit content information.
This assignment will be graded for accuracy.
Krisann Johnson 18
Collaborative Unit on Digital Citizenship
Morrison, Ross, Kemp Model
Initial Strategy: As a warm-up review, students will answer the following question, What are the
elements for evaluating internet resources. Assignment will be completed through a discussion
on Todays Meet.
UDL: Learners are given the opportunity to work at own pace and use technology tools by
choice (Fadde, 2007).
Generative Strategy: Through a quiz, students answer questions concerning the unit content
information. Individually, students will use Web 2.0 tool Smore to create a digital poster
presenting the list of criteria that should be examined to determine if a webpage is useful, safe
and appropriate.
Reference List
Fadde, P. (2007). Instructional design for advanced learners: training recognition skills to hasten
expertise. Association for Educational Communications and Technology, 359-376.
Kerr, S. (2011). Tips, tools, and techniques for teaching in the online high school classroom.
TechTrends, 55(1), 28-30.
Morrison, G., Ross, S., Kalman, H., & Kemp, J. (2013). Designing effective instruction. (7 ed.).
Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
Part VII
The learners and subject matter expert will have a chance to assess the instructional designer and
design. The formative evaluation will be conducted and collected through an online course
evaluation. Students complete the survey in a multiple choice and short answer format. The SME
will complete an online module answering interview questions. The SME will serve as the
evaluator on the content and format. The SME for this assignment will be a co-worker in the
same school district as me. She serve as a Film and Animation teacher at H.E. McCracken
Middle School. All participants will examine each instruction and allow suggestions for
improvement.
Learners Formative Evaluation
Date:
(Student) Course Title and Grade:
How long have you been teaching in this school?
Krisann Johnson 19
Collaborative Unit on Digital Citizenship
Morrison, Ross, Kemp Model
o
o
o
o
o
1 year or less
1-3 years
3-5 years
6-10 years
11 years or longer
Krisann Johnson 20
Collaborative Unit on Digital Citizenship
Morrison, Ross, Kemp Model
o No
What would you change?
The review of the learners and SME is based upon performance and instructional design of the
objectives, content, and assignments throughout the lessons. Based on results from the survey,
Krisann Johnson 21
Collaborative Unit on Digital Citizenship
Morrison, Ross, Kemp Model
comments and concerns were captured and noted on the master design instructions. As the
instructional designer, I will collect all these notes and form a personal evaluation to improve
future instructions. I will look at the data using qualitative analysis to see what the impressions
of the students and the SME have of the program. Reviewing the responses will allow me to
analyze strengths and weaknesses of instructions. Based on these findings, I would change and
strengthen the designated instructions. I will read and review the comments from the students
and SME considering any suggests that were made for future instructions.
Reference
Cyber Citizenship Quiz. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.proprofs.com/quiz-school/story.php?
title=cyber-citizenship-quiz_7
ISafe. (2015). Retrieved from http://www.isafe.org/