Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 4
Digital & Collaborative Learning in Context Assessment 1 - Rubric - November 2015 Intake 1

Digital & Collaborative Learning in Context

Assessment 1 - Rubric - November 2015 Intake

1

1 The Mind Lab by Unitec | Assessment Rubrics | November 2015

The Mind Lab by Unitec | Assessment Rubrics | November 2015

DCL1 Title: Identify, justify and plan a digital and collaborative learning innovation applied to a specific area of your practice.

Either individually, or in groups of two or three, create a cohesive video presentation where you critically reflect on your practice and propose and justify a plan to address an area for improvement.

An innovation can be a combination of many types of tool, the ways you use them, new collaborative practice(s) etc.

Remember to consider the perspectives of different stakeholders.

Assessment breakdown 20% Identify and analyse the area for improvement based on a critical reflection of your practice 30% Explain and justify what you hope to achieve by addressing this issue, using supporting evidence (e.g. research literature, policies/guidelines, current practice, quantitative/qualitative data etc.) 30% Propose a plan for a digital and collaborative innovation and explain how it addresses the identified area for improvement 10% Use and present suitably referenced source material, including peer reviewed journals 10% Deliver and present content effectively, considering structure, narrative and language

Individual Submission

Video presentation of 6-8 minutes in duration

Group Submission (optional)

Video presentation or 10-12 minutes in duration

Assessment Criteria 80% Self + 20% Peer Evaluation

Fill in the Self and Peer Evaluation Form after you have submitted your assignment

Weighting 50%

Due date Monday 30th November 2015, 5.00pm

2

2 The Mind Lab by Unitec | Assessment Rubrics | November 2015

The Mind Lab by Unitec | Assessment Rubrics | November 2015

  Meets Minimum Meets or Exceeds Expectations (Multistructural) 60% - 74% Meets or Exceeds Expectations
 

Meets Minimum

Meets or Exceeds Expectations (Multistructural) 60% - 74%

Meets or Exceeds Expectations (Relational)

Exceeds Expectations (Extended Abstract)

Weigh-

Below Expectations

Expectations

(Unistructural)

ting

DCL 1 - November 2015 Intake

(Prestructural) < 50%

50%-59%

75% - 89%

90% - 100%

%

Identify and analyse the area for improvement based on a critical reflection of your practice

Area for improvement not identified / No reflection on practice

Area for improvement discussed and related to reflection on practice

Area for improvement analyzed and related to more than one aspect of practice

Area for improvement analyzed and informed by a critique of relevant aspects of practice

Area for improvement evaluated against a critique of relevant aspects of practice and generalizability to theory / wider practice

20%

Grade range:

0-9

10-11

12-14

15-17

18-20

 

Explain and justify what you hope to achieve by addressing this issue, sing supporting evidence (e.g. research literature, policies/guidelines, current practice, quantitative/ qualitative data etc.)

No explanation of desired outcome provided / No justification provided / No evidence produced

Explanation and justification of desired outcome provided and related to some supporting evidence

Desired outcome and justifications analyzed and related to more than one source of evidence

Relevant evidence from more than one source informs the choice / design and the justification of the desired outcome

The desired outcome and justification is critiqued, defended and related to best practice on the strength of evidence from wide variety of relevant sources

30%

Grade range:

0-14

15-17

18-21

22-26

27-30

 

Continues on the next slide

3

3 The Mind Lab by Unitec | Assessment Rubrics | November 2015

The Mind Lab by Unitec | Assessment Rubrics | November 2015

 

No plan proposed / no explanation of relevance to area for improvement

A plan is proposed and is related to the area for improvement

A

plan is discussed and

An analysis of the

A

plan is critiqued

 

Propose a plan for a digital and collaborative innovation and explain how it addresses the identified area for improvement

is

related to the area

plan relates characteristics to specific requirements identified in the area for improvement

against requirements

for improvement on the basis of the intended outcome

and alternatives

identified in the area for

30%

improvement

Grade range:

0-14

15-17

 

18-21

22-26

 

27-30

 
 

Inadequate

Adequate

Good list of references, cited and discussed

Well integrated and constructed references, cited and debated

Comprehensive

 

Use and present suitably referenced source material, including peer reviewed journals

referencing,

referencing,

referencing, integrated

insufficient

sources identified

 

in

a reflective manner

10%

sources and

and cited

 
 

citation

 

Grade range:

0-4

5

 

6-7

8-9

 

10

 
 

Poorly structured

Adequate presentation quality (telling / reciting)

Presentation that

A well argued presentation with a narrative structure

An original and creative presentation displaying

 

Deliver and present content effectively, considering structure, narrative and language

presentation of

describes and

disconnected

combines themes, with

a

reflective narrative

10%

information

a

narrative structure

that relates themes together

structure

Grade range:

0-4

5

 

6-7

8-9

 

10

 

4

4 The Mind Lab by Unitec | Assessment Rubrics | November 2015

The Mind Lab by Unitec | Assessment Rubrics | November 2015