1

Georgia Southern University

Higher Education Administration Program
Assessment #1
Rubric: Portfolio

End of Program

Student Name: Sarah Schanck

Evaluator: Self Evaluation
Program Learning Outcome
Rating
1. Candidate is able to
demonstrate the ability to
reflect on program participation
by compiling an introduction.

Eagle ID:______________________
Date: November 15, 2015

Does Not Meet Expectations

1
Candidate provides fragmented
or incomplete reflection on
program participation.

Meets Expectations
2
Candidate provides proficient
analysis of program
participation.

Candidate provides fragmented

or incomplete report of
participation in program
activities.

Candidate can clearly and

succinctly incorporate program
participation within the context
of overall program activities
and requirements.

Exceeds Expectations
3
All aspects of Meets
Expectations proficiency in this
Learning Outcome are
demonstrated, plus the
following:
Interconnections between
program participation and
program activities are clearly
articulated.

Candidate provides a welldeveloped reflection on

program participation
2. Candidate is able to
document participation in
program assessment by
inclusion of key assessments in
the Portfolio.

Candidate fails to include the

three key assessments (Selfreflection, Professional
Development Plan, and
Historical Monograph) in the
Portfolio.

Candidate presents the three

key assessments in the
Portfolio.
Key assessments are clearly and
logically presented within the
context of the Portfolio.

All aspects of Meets

Expectations proficiency in the
Learning Outcome are
demonstrated, plus the
following:
Candidate demonstrates the
interconnections between the
key assessments and other
elements of the program.

Points Earned
Comments:
3.
I have
narrated my
decision to
matriculate as
well as how
this has
formed my
praxis as a
higher
education
practitioner.
Comments:
3.
I have
included work
samples from
every class,
not just key
assessments.
Reflections
show synthesis
of program
standards.

3. Candidate is able to identify,

develop and articulate a plan to
correct any reported or
perceived deficiencies and to
improve any incomplete or
underdeveloped skills
demonstrated in the Portfolio.

4. Candidate is able to
demonstrate program
completion by developing and
writing a summary.

Candidate fails to identify any

reported deficiencies.
Candidate fails to identify any
incomplete or underdeveloped
skills.

Candidate clearly identifies

reported professional
deficiencies.
Candidate identifies incomplete
or underdeveloped skills.

Candidate fails to articulate a

plan for improvement.

Candidate presents a logical

plan for improvement of skills
that were identified during
program participation.

Candidate fails to present

sufficient examples of program
participation.

Candidate presents a Portfolio

that contains numerous
examples of work completed
during program matriculation.

Summary is fragmented or
incomplete.
Summary does not contain all
the specified elements.
Summary is not clearly written
or needs editing

Candidate presents a Portfolio

that contains examples of multimedia presentation.
Candidate includes all specified
elements of the summary.

All aspects of Meet

Expectations proficiency in this
Learning Outcome are
demonstrated, plus the
following:
Candidate us able to
demonstrate the
interconnectedness of the plan
for improvement and
candidates participation in the
key assessments.

All aspects of Meets

Expectations proficiency in this
Learning Outcome are
demonstrated, plus the
following:
Candidate is able to
demonstrate an understanding
of the program activities and
the candidates assessment of
the benefits of program
participation.

Summary is clearly written and

demonstrates candidates
writing ability.
Rating Scale:
Score
Rating
4
Does not Meet Expectations
5-7
Does not Meet Expectations
8-10
Meets Expectations
11-12
Exceeds Expectations

Grade
65
75
85
95

Overall Rubric Score out of 3

_____3_____

Comments:
3.
I had a 4.0
GPA and
professors did
not report and
deficiencies.
Program
participation
has allowed
me to fill skill
gaps as will
continued
professional
development.
Comments:
3.
Through
Introduction
and standards
reflection, I
am able to
synthesize
knowledge
gained
through
program
participation.