Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 2

MEd FIRST/JOINT MARKER FORM

Student ID
2014201052

Submitted to
deadline
Yes

Days Late
None

Plagiarism noted:
No

Programme:
MEd

Module:
EDU502

Assignment: #1
Lesson Plan Evaluation

Assignment Submission
Date: Nov 1st, 2015

Marked by Module Coordinator:


Dr. Sufian A. Forawi

Date:

Second Marker:

Date:

1: Grade Awarded & Overall Comment


No
Description
KNOWLEDGE AND UNDERSTANDING
Identification of key issues within research area under discussion within the assignment
Significant background reading to demonstrate a sound historical and contemporary perspective
on the subject relevant to the assignment. Clear evidence to demonstrate a strong
understanding of the current knowledge and debates relevant to the assignment. A clear
demonstration of current knowledge of core/central concepts relevant to the assignment.
Clear and strong evidence of critical appreciation of the sources used.
2
Awareness of different perspectives within the research domain within the assignment
Explicit identification of different schools of thought within the research domain and how this is
related and relevant to the assignment. Clear identification of significant themes that recur
and of areas of dissonance between studies/ authors/domains within the overall field.
Attention drawn to the level of consistency evident within the theories and accounts of
leading authors / researchers and commentators. An understanding of the chronology of
ideas and practices and where appropriate challenges to prevailing views highlighted.
SELECTION AND COVERAGE OF MATERIAL
3
Identification of relevant theoretical knowledge to investigate research area of interest
within the assignment
Integration and synthesis of accounts of published authors; extrapolation from theory to explain
educational practises and/or to generate further hypotheses; attention to the ways in which
theoretical arguments and / or research findings have been or could be used to inform practice.
4
Critical analysis of the sources or evidence bases of the research within the assignment
Depth of background reading with attention to the critical evaluation of the reliability of
evidence; independent critical evaluation of the validity of claims made; quality of
evidence to support claims; attention to features of research design such as sampling,
methods of data collection and analysis; evidence of active endeavours to control for
confirmatory bias.
STRUCTURE & PRESENTATION
5
Suitability of the format used to present work within the assignment
Structure and coherence of the arguments presented in the assignment. Appropriate use of
relevant evidence (primary and secondary sources and materials) to support and illustrate
the arguments made. Appropriate evidence of independent research (if pertinent to the
task). Comprehensive examination of the subject of the assignment. Exclusion of irrelevant
material. Correct and comprehensive citation of all sources in the recognised format for the
Faculty of Education at the BUiD. Clearly and legibly written. Within agreed word limit.
Accurate and consistent use of referencing in text, bibliography; appropriate presentation of
figures, tables, appendices, etc. as well as all compositional features.
Overall Mark and Grade

Mark (letter grade)

Overall Agreed
Mark (letter grade
& weight)
A (72%)

Comments (First or jointly First & Second Markers):


Provided a very good lesson plan evaluation report. You presented adequate description of the
main components, introduction, and objectives. Content, and strategies. Evaluation of some
corresponding components was appropriate. In particular, you critically discussed the objective
and content (skills) sections. Yet, additional discussion of materials, strategies (explicitlynot just
approach) may be needed. Also, use appropriate terminology (e.g. assessment and not
evaluation). Enough references were used and utilized. Overall, report is very good.

Second or Third Marker Comments (If needed):

2:

General Academic Skills

1. Scholarly conventions
Accurate and consistent use of referencing/bibliography in the text
Appropriate presentation of figures, tables, etc
Appropriate presentation of and reference to data in appendices

Acceptable?
Yes
NA
Yes

2. Presentation
Word count included and within the acceptable range
Format, - layout, size of type, etc as per instructions
Spelling, grammar, punctuation and typing
General presentation

Acceptable?
Yes
Yes
Yes
Very good

Action Points:
Seek a tutorial
Proof read your
referencing,
work carefully
3.

Consult the guidance on academic referencing in the


assignment handbook

Other Take ASU workshops, e.g. lit review,

Any other comments:

CONFIRMATION
I confirm I have blind marked this assignment using the assessment rubric and the
University Grading System

Nov 1st, 2015


First Marker Signature
Date
_________________________________________
Second Marker Signature

__________________________________
Date

Вам также может понравиться