0 оценок0% нашли этот документ полезным (0 голосов)
4 просмотров1 страница
Trump and Carson, as before Ross Perot, do not really aspire to the presidency as shown by their expressions; they are stimulants of an outdated electoral system; they prefer the stagnation more than the country's progress. All other candidates both Republicans and Democrats are institutionalized.
Trump and Carson, as before Ross Perot, do not really aspire to the presidency as shown by their expressions; they are stimulants of an outdated electoral system; they prefer the stagnation more than the country's progress. All other candidates both Republicans and Democrats are institutionalized.
Trump and Carson, as before Ross Perot, do not really aspire to the presidency as shown by their expressions; they are stimulants of an outdated electoral system; they prefer the stagnation more than the country's progress. All other candidates both Republicans and Democrats are institutionalized.
Trump and Carson, as before Ross Perot, do not really
aspire to the presidency as shown by their expressions; they are stimulants of an outdated electoral system; they prefer the stagnation more than the country's progress. All other candidates both Republicans and Democrats are institutionalized, meaning that they respond to particular interests of large companies and not the interests of the US. The most vivid example was Hillary Clinton when she voted in Congress in favor of the Iraq war, in favor of the arms industry; and then when it suited her, by politicking, she repented. This country needs those who are farsighted, not repentant; besides, she impresses as a policy machine more than a person who feels for the country. The emails are pure distraction, although whether or not they had implications; what matters are the interests of the country and it is not about distributing wealth; this is to achieve a stable and sustainable economy.