0 оценок0% нашли этот документ полезным (0 голосов)
7 просмотров2 страницы
This project addresses CEC standards 1-7: learner development and individual learning differences, learning environments, curricular content knowledge, assessment, instruction planning strategies, and Collaboration. While my knowledge of Curricular Content Knowledge hasn't grown immensely, my ability to present it in multiple fashions has.
This project addresses CEC standards 1-7: learner development and individual learning differences, learning environments, curricular content knowledge, assessment, instruction planning strategies, and Collaboration. While my knowledge of Curricular Content Knowledge hasn't grown immensely, my ability to present it in multiple fashions has.
This project addresses CEC standards 1-7: learner development and individual learning differences, learning environments, curricular content knowledge, assessment, instruction planning strategies, and Collaboration. While my knowledge of Curricular Content Knowledge hasn't grown immensely, my ability to present it in multiple fashions has.
The Evidence of Student Learning project is one which
encompasses the student teachers ability to use all of her teaching skills and knowledge to create a mini-unit consisting of several interactive lessons and to implement unique assessments to gauge student learning and mastery of specific content goals. The project begins with a pre-assessment to identify student prior knowledge of an assigned topic, which leads to the actual instruction with formative assessments, and concludes with a post-assessment to gauge student learning. Appropriate analysis of the data collected is also required, as well as self-reflection to identify the teachers ability to evaluate her own strengths and areas of needed improvement. This project addresses CEC standards 1-7: Learner Development and Individual Learning Differences, Learning Environments, Curricular Content Knowledge, Assessment, Instructional Planning Strategies, Professional Learning and Ethical Practice, and Collaboration. While completing this project, I gained knowledge of learner development and individual learning differences (standard 1). I gained the most knowledge in this by identifying different strategies to present the assessed information. A proficient teacher knows that all students do not acquire knowledge in the same way and that teaching strategies must be adjusted to accommodate for learning styles. I also gained knowledge of learning environments (standard 2) while completing this project. I am fortunate this year to have my own science classroom (in years past I have floated into other teachers rooms) and this has helped me to create a learning environment focused on Environmental Science, the content I teach. Additionally, we have six computer stations around the room, which also helps to create an environment in which we can implement technology usage, another way to create an engaging environment. While my knowledge of curricular content (standard 3) hasnt grown immensely, my ability to present it in multiple fashions has. For one of the lessons in the mini-unit, I used a new exploration activity about adaptations, which helped me to present adaptations in a different, more engaging way than I have in the past. As the students still readily recall this activity and identify what they learned from this activity, I think this adequately shows proficiency in curricular content knowledge. I also gained knowledge of assessment strategies (standard 4) while completing this project. I dont always take time to complete pre- and post- assessment during regular instruction (usually due to time constraints), but this project has reminded me of the benefits of
pre- and post-assessment, as well as how the formative assessment
can help me adjust the next days lesson, especially when the formative assessment is submitted electronically, allowing for immediate feedback to the students. By purposely grouping lessons together as a mini-unit, I was able to gain knowledge regarding instructional planning and strategies (standard 5). This enabled me to frequently tie in previous lessons to my instruction, enabling the students to more readily see the big picture or why we are learning a specific skill. Professional learning and ethical practice (standard 6) is demonstrated through my ability to adhere to specific students accommodations mandated by the IEP. By specifically identifying which students required a scribe, I was able to plan my formative assessments accordingly, as well as knowing which students may be best served by handing in a group worksheet instead of an individual worksheet. Collaboration (standard 7) is addressed in my working relationships with both my mentor teacher at my high school, who frequently let me bounce ideas about instructional techniques and classroom management ideas and in my co-planning with a general educator that I co-teach with. We completed similar activities in our co-taught class, so I was able to gauge what should be modified for my self-contained classes based on the results of the co-taught instruction. My students will be positively affected by my increased awareness of the CEC standards in several ways. By acknowledging different learning styles and learning development, I have been actively trying to discover new ways to present curricular content to my classes to help all of the students gain access to the curriculum. By frequently addressing assessments, I will be able to create more individualized lessons to teach the students what they need to know, not spending time on information they already know. Finally, by keeping open lines of communication and collaborating, I will be able to share my observations of what other teachers can do to help specific students, increasing academic success across all content areas.