0 оценок0% нашли этот документ полезным (0 голосов)
13 просмотров1 страница
This document provides assessment feedback for a student on their Foundation Degree in Creative Sound Design. It evaluates their performance on 8 criteria related to their independent project on a scale from Excellent to Fail. An overall comment is provided on strengths and areas for improvement. A grade within the A+ to F- range is given based on the student's demonstration of the learning outcomes and their level of achievement or performance. The grade is subject to ratification and the student is informed if they need to complete retrieval arrangements.
This document provides assessment feedback for a student on their Foundation Degree in Creative Sound Design. It evaluates their performance on 8 criteria related to their independent project on a scale from Excellent to Fail. An overall comment is provided on strengths and areas for improvement. A grade within the A+ to F- range is given based on the student's demonstration of the learning outcomes and their level of achievement or performance. The grade is subject to ratification and the student is informed if they need to complete retrieval arrangements.
Авторское право:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Доступные форматы
Скачайте в формате DOC, PDF, TXT или читайте онлайн в Scribd
This document provides assessment feedback for a student on their Foundation Degree in Creative Sound Design. It evaluates their performance on 8 criteria related to their independent project on a scale from Excellent to Fail. An overall comment is provided on strengths and areas for improvement. A grade within the A+ to F- range is given based on the student's demonstration of the learning outcomes and their level of achievement or performance. The grade is subject to ratification and the student is informed if they need to complete retrieval arrangements.
Авторское право:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Доступные форматы
Скачайте в формате DOC, PDF, TXT или читайте онлайн в Scribd
Foundation Degree (Arts) Creative Sound Programme Level 2 Design Project Title Project Value Unit Title Contextual Studies 2 Unit Code CSD202/FDC202 Project Leader Unit Leader
Assessment Criteria Indicative Grading
Excellent V Good Good Satisfactory Basic Fail N/A Presentation 1 The degree to which they have displayed knowledge and understanding of their chosen topic; (LO1) 2 Reflection on new areas and how they how they are related to practical work based knowledge; (LO2) 3 Organisation of ideas and the ability to relate them verbally to a group using appropriate supporting visual/audio materials. (LO5) Independent Project 4 Their ability to articulate their findings and conclusions in a structured and well-argued report; (LO5) 5 Their ability to demonstrate a sound understanding of the salient issues involved in the chosen area of study; (LO1, LO2) 6 Their ability to relate academic knowledge to the work based application of practical skills; (LO6) 7 Their ability to relate their personal practice to the area chosen for independent study; (LO3) 8 Evidence of the development of a plan and the ability to deliver work within a timeframe. (LO4) Note 1 - Unless specified in the Project Brief it is assumed that all assessment criteria are equally weighted
Overall comment including strengths and areas for improvement
Grade Banding Brief Grade Descriptor
A+ 90-100 High Excellent all round work or outstanding A 80-89 Medium performance Grade (where appropriate) A- 70-79 Low B+ 67-69 High High level achievement or very good level of B 64-66 Medium performance B- 60-63 Low C+ 57-59 High Good level of achievement or proficient C 54-56 Medium performance C- 50-53 Low D+ 47-49 High Satisfactory level of achievement or competent D 44-46 Medium performance D- 40-43 Low E 35-39 Marginal Elementary achievement or basic level of Note 2 - All summative grades are subject to ratification by the Examination Board Pass performance F+ 30-34 Marginal Does not achieve the learning outcomes but Fail may be some element of understanding or Please contact your Unit Leader about retrieval Assessor(s) Name: competence arrangements (where appropriate) F < 30 Fail No evidence of achievement or competence F- > 10 Poor Fail 0 0 no submission or special circumstances