Robles 1

Robles, Oscar
Professor Beadle
English 115
September 17, 2015
The Traverse of Gender
With Are we Facing a Genderless Future by Kantrowitz and Women, Men and
Society by Rezzetti that felicitate the idea that gender roles in our future are changing now as
they are stemming to a scene of equality. Gender Roles as a whole tends to conflict with equality
as it perceives a certain sex to a specific action. Thus when explaining the two texts we get to the
certain aspects that within Are We Facing a Genderless Future and Women, Men, and
Society tend to cover and elaborate to the perspective that we as a society tend to see the gender
roles as a system of restrictions. Realistically, we should break away from this broad idea and
aim towards a simplistic point of view that we as a whole could become a union that does not
judge the other sex based on how they act and look. The idea of gender roles supplementing our
point of view thus can be acted upon my reality, because it can conjoin with how much I believe
and how it can be acted in my everyday life as it creates a faade of what is right and wrong.
Thus, acting upon society is an idea of roles that gender is affiliated to, but truly the texts can be
analyzed and they address a point of view that tells us that, we must maintain the idea that we
can all be equal in the eyes of the many even if their actions do not align with the norm.
The actions that seem to persist within the two transverse texts are that of the obstacles
that are presented to the certain people that have the identity of a different sex that society does
not seem to understand and accept. With this adaptive mindsets being accretive of some ideas
this new idea of gender problems seem to gender to the struggle that began a generation ago for
gay and lesbian rights archiving the idea that a constant struggle continues to emerge as the idea

Robles 2
of what is gender(Kantrowitz). The supported facts to this idea can be addressed in the essay by
renzetti that says That parents associate their childs sex with specific personality and
behavioral traits ensuring that others identify their childs sex correctly addressing the
conflicting idea that their children must be that specific sex that the parents want them to be. The
real struggle can thus be seen and a sense of repression can be conclude that the parents do not
want their sons and daughters to be different from what they want. Thus, these two ideas behind
gender acceptance examine the fluidity of how people really propose on how to challenge and
accept gender as a whole and that in the end there must be a big fight to challenge gender as a
whole idea so it can be accepted. Examined in both texts are the perspectives of the writers that
seem to address their views of gender being a problem that seems to be a challenge in the eyes of
society because we cannot tend to accept what we dont believe. Therefore, the actions examined
in the texts seem to really represent the pinnacle idea that we must learn to accept people and
ideas that we do not understand as this will help us as a whole to love and fell loved because
gender is only an idea and we must learn to change ideas we dont understand.
The authors of both texts write their ideas to examine why people do what they do to
represent their gender, as thou are gender was a matter of an idea we tend to change our ideas on
how we act and believe. Within the text of Are we facing a Genderless future we tend to
examine that with a change of language could help usher in a new era, in which a persons
gender could be expressed or experienced as male, female or between thus expressing the idea
of acceptance to even the idea that occurs to us as between. This idea expressed by Kantrowitz in
the paper seems to directly attribute the idea that we must all tend to accept how we must act and
that we as a whole should learn to accept the ideas that bare behind gender differences. In the
text of Rezentti the idea that Gender stereotypes are such a taken for granted part of our

Robles 3
everyday lives that we often discriminate on the basis of sex without intestinally trying this
setting the idea that we discriminate on the basis on how we grew up not by how we think. The
transition ideas tend to conflict with the certain norm of how we should act and co-exist in
society compared to our other selves on how we should look and talk. Thus, the perspective of
the authors tends to change to suite the perspective of what is right in the eyes of them and then
tends to suit the biases of gender identity.
Tending to be the common idea associated with the varying truths behind what gender
roles in society aim to be associated with a baring idea of a mystic truth of what we should look
like and how our actions tend to result in our outcome. Thus, the idea of the authors acting to
represent the idea of how we should look and act seems to truly represent the philosophy of what
is originated behind what is right and wrong. However, truly the ideas that seem to originate
from these same contrast act a source to represent the many shifting dilemmas that are originated
from the vast category of gender perspectives. Thru the lends of the authors perspective of the
different elements associated with the many problems that seem to originate from the usage of
vast elaborating ideas on what gender should look like and how it should be taught to look like.
The vast experiences that are proclaimed in the texts by the authors seem to also follow
some of the perspective that I have to see and overcome as a result of the gender difference that
seem to spawn in our society. With the usage of sex change being used within the society that I
live in and with the drifting idea that the advent of sex-change surgery, there were always
people who felt they didnt fit into either gender creates in illumination in the form that people
grew up in the right mind but the wrong body.(Kantrowitz) Creating new ways for them to think
within the different and variating ideas on what was right and what seemed to be a shifting idea
that resulted in a diffracting biased towards the people. Thus the involvement of the idea that sex

Robles 4
change seems to effect on what my norm of what a woman and what a man seems to change on
how they act to know how they think because I cannot understand what a person may be even if
that person changed their sex. Thus affecting what ideas are on certain ideas, and changing the
judgement perspective of what is right thus creating an association of a right and wrong. Again
another ideas seem to be expressed in our society and that seems to be Toys for girls still
resolved around the themes of domesticity and motherhood, while boys focused on action and
adventure creating a norm and consisting with the norm of gender roles (Rezetti). Thus
explaining that the actions of the people of this norm that we still perceive has not changed yet as
the people still act and follow this idea. Lacking a greater identity that the people still follow the
idea that correspond to the betterment of society with the many corresponding shifting ideas that
act on people.
In Conclusion to the essay the main point that can be taken out of this is that our society
creates a faade of what is right and wrong in the eyes of the many and for the ones that do not
conform to the norm of what society says are rejected and baffled on. As a vivid idea of what is
right and wrong the texts Are we facing a Genderless Future by Kantrowitz and Women,
Men, and Society by Renzetti, both authors come together to implicate the idea of gender
restrictions that affect our society as a whole. To these supplements of gender roles, we tend to
understand that they cannot be changed and it affects how people tend to express their emotions
in society. With us being able, to change what we perceive as our reality, there is a possibility
that as a whole our society would be more connected granting us with the right to have a
genderless future. To make this possible I say we must act upon what the future generations
perceive to be real about our genders and that we can teach them to become less biased, thus
learning to love everything they thought was wrong.

Robles 5

Work Cited
1. Groner, Rachael, and John F. O'Hara. "From Women, Men, and Society."
Composing Gender. Boston: Bedford, n.d. 76-84. Print.
2. Kantrowitz, Barbara, and John F. O'Hara. "Are We Facing a Genderless
Future?" Composing Gender: A Bedford Spotlight Reader. Boston:
Bedford/St. Martin's, 2014. 68-71. Print.