Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 2

Reverse Outline - WP1 Revised

Paragraph

Initial Submission

Final, Revised Submission

#1
(Thesis
Statement)

Each of these news


outlets offer information on
the subject in an unbiased
article; while holding the
same general conventions
and rhetoric, these articles
also differ a little in style
and information

Each outlet covers the story in an


unbiased piece while utilizing the same
general rhetoric and conventions to
construct the article; yet their style of
writing and information slightly differ
from one another

#2

The first articles rhetorical


features, style of writing,
use of evidence, and the
physical conventions of
the article

All three articles tone, context, length,


and how they make them part of their
genre

#3

The second articles


All three articles style and how they
rhetorical features, style of differ, yet still have the same general
writing, use of evidence,
style
and the physical
conventions of the article

#4

Surface level features


exhibited in the articles,
and their
similarities/dissimilarities

Use of evidence in the articles, and its


purpose in the article in regards to the
reader and genres

#5

Surface level features


exhibited in the articles,
and their
similarities/dissimilarities

The conventions of the three pieces in


regards to their physical aspects that
make them news articles

#6

Why genre is important


and beneficial to
know/study

The surface level features they have in


common, the type of thinking they
used, and the similarities/dissimilarities

#7

Why genre is important to learn and its


potential benefits to everyone

#8

Summarization of my argument/point I

made, pieces from the same genre can


belong to the same genre, slightly
differ, and still accomplish the same
thing

When I was revising my original WP1 I made two major changes, one being structural
and one being contextual. In regards to the structure of it, I took Zacks advice and changed the
format from Source 1, Source 2, Source 3, to Idea 1, Idea 2, Idea 3. This made my argument a
lot clearer and easy to understand, and shortened the paragraphs so they werent too much to
take on at once. I think this was an effective choice, the ideas come across better and the paper
transitions more smoothly. For the contextual changes, I condensed my ideas down and tried to
incorporate more of my own voice. I tried to minimize the quotations after every idea I
presented, and build upon the evidence I already had. Finally, I think the changes I made in my
WP1 were effective and made my paper that of a better quality.