Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Lesson Plan
Unit Working Title: Characters as People
Unit Big Idea (Concept/Theme): The Role of the Individual in Society
Unit Primary Skill focus: Reading and Writing Character
Week 3 of 3; Plan #8 of 9; [90 mins.]
Plan type: Full-Detail
Content Requirement Satisfied: Reading Experience
Unit Learning Objectives (numbered), followed by specific lesson objectives
(lettered) being taught in this lesson:
SWBAT:
Cognitive (know/understand):
1. The roles of character in a story, what makes up a character, and how good
characters are formed.
2. All characters consist of dialogue and detail.
3. Nonconformity is a vital part of democracy.
4. Relatable characters can ground unfamiliar or imaginative context in writing.
5. Characters often create tension in a text through opposition to societal forces.
a. Leonard Meads character in The Pedestrian exemplifies this tension.
6. The perspective or point of view of a text influences the way we interpret
character.
AFFECTIVE (to feel/value) & NON-COGNITIVE
7. Value their individuality and differences from others.
8. Respect individual opinions that differ from theirs.
a. Viewpoints that differ from ones own are no less valid and should be given
equal opportunity.
PERFORMATIVE (to do)
9.
2.
duration of the activity. The restriction on the snapshot is only that the snapshot must
show the characters actions or reactions in response to a policy, law, rule, or other kind
of guideline that they find unfair, but that most people do not. Students will be
encouraged to reflect on Harrison Bergeron, The Pedestrian, The Lottery, and The Secret
Life of Walter Mitty for the snapshot. I will provide a list of suggestions for the context of
the guidelines on the projector as students work:
A bosss work guideline/policy?
A school policy?
A new/old law that is unfair to your character?
Police/authorities being unfair to your character due to a guideline/law/policy?
Other citizens being unfair to your character due to a guideline/law/policy?
Repercussions of a lifestyle choice of your characters that doesnt fit the majority?
During this time I will circulate and conference with students on their writing.
Methods of Assessment:
[How will you know if the intended learning occurred?] List all methods of assessment
used in this lesson or which are related to this lesson and come in a future lesson. After
each assessment, indicate in brackets the number(s) and letter(s) of the unit objective and
the related lesson objectives that the assessment is evaluating.
Diagnostic:
1. Students will complete anticipation guides before reading the text. (Objectives 8a, 10;
SoL 6.6 b; CCSS SL.6.1.C)
Formative:
1. Students will participate in small-group debates in pairs, taking turns arguing and
rebutting arguments related to the role of the individual in challenging society.
(Objectives 3, 5a, 8a, 9a; SoL 6.6b; CCSS SL.6.1.C)
2. Students will craft a character snapshot depicting a characters
reaction/actions/response to being marginalized or victimized by societal
standards. (Objectives 3, 5a, 9a, 10, 11; SoL 6.7f; CCSS W.6.3.D)
Differentiated Instruction to accommodate one or more of my profiled students:
(This is where you identify specific aspects of this lesson which have been differentiated
in order to address the needs of one or more of your profiled studentsidentify them by
name)
Getting shy students engaged in the active process of debating is my key point of
differentiation here, hence my inclusion of Naomi in my model (similar things could be
done with other shy students). Creating a tone where its alright to be wrong in the
classroom can open up students to making mistakes and taking risks. I will keep these
points in mind as I circulate and listen to student debates, and I expect to often intervene
in them when they dont seem to be going as planned.
Materials Needed:
Access to projector
Copies of text
Copies of Anticipation Guide
Student Character Creation Sheets
Printer Paper
Extra pens/pencils
Student laptops