Tugas

Audit
Energi

Pertanyaan 1

Solusi
Menghitung efisiensi fan static sebelum
instalasi ESP
Calculate the new impeller diameter if the
impeller is trimmed, that would result in a
reduction in fan efficiency of 5%
Calculate the new RPM that would result in
a fan efficiency of 60%
Determine which of the two options is
more energy efficient

Menghitung Efisiensi Static

Fan Sebelum Instalasi ESP
1. Power input pada shaft fan
=power motor x efisiensi
=120 x 0.86
=103.2 kW
2. Efisiensi fan static
= Flow x Pressure developed across fan
102 x Power required at fan shaft
= 90 x
80
102 x 103.2
= 0.68 = 68%

Calculate the new impeller

diameter if the impeller is
trimmed, that would result in a
reduction in fan efficiency of 5%
New fan static efficiency = 68% - 5% = 63%
1.
2. New static pressure across the fan
= total static pressure-static pressure
across bag filter + static pressure acorss
ESP
= 80 65 + 20
= 35 mm WC
3. New flow rate Q
= original flow rate x increase
= 90 /s x 1.2
= 108 /s

4.Static pressure at a flow rate of 90 /s with ESP

installed (H2)
Q1/Q2 =(H1/H2)
108/90 = (35/H2)
H2 = 32 mm
5. Power required at the fan shaft
Fan static efficiency = Flow x Pressure developed across fan
102 x Power required at fan shaft
0.63 = ( 90 x 32 ) / (102 x Power developed at fan shaft )
Power developed at fan shaft = 44. 8 kW

6. New impeler diameter (D2)

D2 = x D1
=
= 53 mm

Calculate the new RPM that

would result in a fan
efficiency of 60%
1. Power required at fan shaft
Fan static efficiency = Flow x Pressure developed across
fan
102 x Power required at fan shaft
0.60 = 90 x 32 / 102 X Power required at fan shaft
Power required at fan shaft = 47 kW

2. New RPM (N2)

(N1/N2) =
N2 = x N1
=
= 769 RPM

Determine which of the two

options is more energy
efficient
Power required by impeller trimming = 44.8 kW
Power required by reducing RPM = 47 kW
Therefore impeller trimming is the more energy
efficient option.

calculate the operation efficiency

=

Q*H*g
3600 * P * eff motor

0,31191
5

31%

Explain what would be the best solution to obtain the required flow rate variation
didapat effisiensi sebesar
31%
untuk variasi flow 500 m3/h sampai 700
m3/h

opsi yang paling optional menggunakan variable speed drive (VSD) karena flow rate (Q) is proportional to the
rotating speed (N)

Calculate the power savings if the options suggested under question 2 would reduce the
flow rate of the pump is 550 m/h

Relationship flow rate Q and RPM: Q1/Q2= N1/N2

Relationship power P and RPM: P1/P2= (N1/N2)^3

diketahui
Q1 =

550

Q2 dari desain =

800

N1 =

1020,9375

N2 =

1485

P1 = 51.99 Kw
P2 =

160

N1 =

1020,938

N2 =

1485

power yang didapat 51.99 Kw

power saving 160 Kw - 51.99 = 108.01 kw