Running Head: MATTEL SAFETY

Case Study: Mattel and Toy Safety

Betty Senesac
BUS250: Corporate and Social Responsibility
Instructor: Yamile Bandera
July 29th, 2013

MATTEL SAFETY

2
Case Study: Mattel and Toy Safety

While reading the Mattel and Toy Safety case it demonstrated to America what quality
we need an organization to be and that is legitimate. Mattel was thought to have been an errand
model when it came to security and quality, yet it did not and the prime sample was the quality
and subsequently the wellbeing of its toys. In 2007, the corporate reviewed numerous of their
toys ordinarily. The toys were reviewed as a consequence of there being a detection of lead
inside the paint and furthermore had magnet issues, while Mattel Iraqi National Congress was
responsible for appropriating the toys; Chinese fabricators were responsible for the issues with
the toys.
When I start to talk about a couple of the issues that happened all through the perusing of
this case I might want to display a little foundation on Mattel Iraqi National Congress. The
Mattel business began in 1945. Not till 1960 however did it turn into a publically summoned
organization. By the center 2000's Mattel was estimated at a whole of $592 million dollars. As
the greater part apprehended Mattel it is the heading organization once it includes style, handling
and pushing of generally kids' toys. Mattel utilizes around 30,000 specialists while the corporate
offers numerous elective stocks in extra than one hundred fifty nations. Mattel has many
alternative toys that embrace a number of the bestselling and preferred toys over the years like
Barbie, Hot Wheels, box and Yankee lady. Indeed, with the issues that happened with the toy
review Mattel was perpetually considered a responsible organization. They achieved a high name
with the vast majority of the customers of their stock. Mattel was even distinguished by Forbes
magazine in one of their issues as a prime one hundred generally reliable U.S. firm and
furthermore was a distinguished organization for being one of the one hundred Best organization

MATTEL SAFETY

voters by oscilloscope magazine. This shows what sensible organization Mattel has been and in
this manner the admiration that they gain from their shoppers.
As a few firms did Mattel dead set to source a huge divide of its generating. This had
turned into a generally loved call for consequently a few enormous firms, inside the late 2000's
around 6/5th of Mattel's toys had ended up plant made in China, to voyage together with the
mills in China they moreover had processing plants in cities like, Indonesia, Malaysia,
Philippines and Singapore. Truly 1/2 the income for Mattel had returned from the toys that were
industrial facility made outside USA. Though they were assembling toys in diverse nations,
Mattel also contracted the gathering of their stock to in regards to fifty Chinese firms.
Proportionally some of the aforementioned firms then subcontracted the get together to
distinctive subcontractors. A lot of easier to handle whereas not pain their sales goals within the
long-standing time.
In 1997, Mattel finished up improving an in profundity implicit rule. They are known as
the implicit rules "Global Processing Principles". The code that they made was pertinent not
exclusively to Mattel industrial facilities however yet its subcontractors and suppliers. It in the
beginning focused on improving the working conditions at their manufacturing plants. Mattel
also tried to search out somehow to verify their item quality and wellbeing. This could be
somehow to stay security with not exclusively their customers however also their own particular
laborers. They would have been wise to be primed to support a prime quality security of its
stock. They did everything that they could to be positive each item was a secure toy. They tried
every last bit of its stock that were production line made in China at its offices. Practically the
sum of their stock got an extraordinary weigh in their labs. (Lawrence & Weber, 2011) They
tried to be positive that every toy that went out of their mills was protected and had been

MATTEL SAFETY

generally tested. They made positive that every builder needed to get paint from a Mattel ensured
supplier exclusively. Provided that a foreman did not meet these guidelines then the agreement
they had endorsed might be voided and Mattel might recognize somewhere else to voyage with
its business.
In spite of the fact that they took numerous steps to be positive their security and nature
of toys, Mattel still did not uphold the standard and wellbeing of its toys. In 2007 alone, Mattel
needed to shape 5 recalls of its toys that they had conveyed to stores. The recalls finish up
including around twenty one million toys. It had been discovered that practically the sum of the
aforementioned toys that were reviewed had been made in China. The toys that were reviewed
had 2 fundamental issues: There was a detection of lead paint in toys that is totally risky for
health and may reason genuine health issues if reached with. In the USA, lead paints zone unit
restricted and not permitted in toys. Also, it had been owing to crudely planned magnets. The
effective magnets could be encased by children and will bring about health issues and even
death.
Because of these issues with their toys Mattel reviewed a significant number of their toys.
Mattel put the fault on the Chinese organizations for these issues inside the toys. Having
enduring recalls of toys utterly lessened the benefactor trust of Mattel and its toys. Be that as it
may not exclusively did it since an issue with Mattel's toys however moreover distinctive toys
that were made in China start to be addressed. Mattel did attempt and watch that that the
customers knew they were doing everything potential to work out the issues with the toys and
were advancing to do everything in their energy to verify that each one of their toys were an
amazing item. To higher expedite their customer, World Health Organization is that the most
critical, Mattel gave a stock of the reviewed stock on its site and to even higher help they opened

MATTEL SAFETY

a toll free number that shoppers inquiries concerning the assurance of its toys could be replied.
They also resolved to distribute a page advertisement in generally heading daily papers and
trusted that this may guarantee customers that they had beyond any doubt systems that might
bring about the social control of value and wellbeing once it came to Mattel merchandise.
Mattel did everything in their energy to call attention to that they minded and required to
patch correct. They made numerous thorough methodologies to verify the prime quality and
wellbeing of their stock. Inside the past Mattel had been distinguished for his or her strict interior
control of each and every single toy and were considered going to be an undertaking model once
it came to wellbeing and nature of its stock. Still Mattel impacted the Chinese organizations for
the issues with the toys being reviewed. However inside the long-standing time Mattel neglected
to respond in an exceedingly responsible and ethical way once it went to the security and nature
of their toys. They had much of the time not met the government regulations that had been
placed on the wellbeing of toys. There had been a few issues that went out with their toys having
traces of lead inside the paint all through the handling of the toys. They neglected to follow up on
these issues and rather ran ahead with the get together of the aforementioned unsafe toys.
The CPSC or Certified Product Safety Commission is responsible for perception the
insurance of with respect to 5,000 completely diverse stocks. This stock grips toys and propose
what the guidelines should be for each item that they control. The greater part of the
organizations may as well suit every standard that is set by CPSC. The CPSC moreover assesses
screens, prosecutes and even fines those firms that resolved to not follow the establishments of
CPSC. There is a unit of a couple of nexus decisions of the CPSC that grip the regulation that
"organizations might as well report a defect/recall inside twenty four hours of revelation". This
might be wherever Mattel made a huge error. On June 8th, 2007 the essential potential site of

MATTEL SAFETY

lead paint tainting was uncovered in one of Mattel's toys. Yet Mattel did not report this downside
to CPSC inside the twenty four hours that was estimated to happen in accordance with the
decisions that where set. On Gregorian timetable month twenty six, Mattel then resolved to
document a full review report with CPSC that was the point at which the focus throughout which
they were hypothesized to. (Wisner, n.d.) Mattel had postponed bringing up the matter to CPSC
more than a month and that was too long.
Mattel as opposed to facing the matter ASAP set the accused less than ideal the Chinese
creators. I surmise that this activity was exploitative. They impacted the producer's approach
after any evidence had been gathered in regards to what absolutely happened. They just
essentially neglected to capture definitely what to do once this item rolled out. Because of this
activity the CEO of Mattel resolved to publically apologize for his or her activities on TV and on
its site. They offered sorts of recompense for the harms that had jumped out at anybody. Still
indeed, with this appropriate activity had Mattel acted straightaway on the issue dependably the
recalls of the toys this apparently may have forestalled any further issues. The very first thing
that Mattel should have done is to determine that the standard strategies were emulated. Mattel
did but facilitate the contractors build facilities that were approach higher than standards. They
must have had no issues after the testing to distinctive offices since they were still concerned on
the whole factories.
I suppose an extensive downside was that Mattel was not making an exceptional showing
reconnoitering their subcontractors. I accept that they had a feeling that they comprehended what
they had let them know to attempt to and accepted that it had been a straightforward work to
finalize. In any case it was discovered that the subcontractors utilized the lead paint regardless of
the possibility that it had been not permitted by CPSC. Still the audit offices passed those toys

MATTEL SAFETY

and much more dreadful Mattel acknowledged the toys while not saying anything. Regardless of
the fact that it is a small amount of toys that territory unit imperfect even one single toy being
flawed is savage. An infant may place that toy in their mouth and sniff some of the paint that
may prompt intense health issues and even death.
In 2006, Mattel reviewed toys owing to an equal LED paint issues and in Gregorian
timetable month 2006, the toys were reviewed toys owing to magnet issue. (Wisner, n.d.)
Because of the aforementioned issues in 2001, Mattel finish up accepting a heavy fine of $1.1
million for not yielding with CPSC. Essentially on the grounds that a conglomeration gets the
matter in time and is prepared to incite a review in time does not mean the issue is finalized.
They lose numerous customers though they alter the issue and supply recompense. People
essentially do not feel safe once it includes one thing like this event. I believe that the Mattel
Company should have discovered how to structure a great deal of mindfulness once it includes
the toy recalls and watch that every single deficient toy was supplanted. A few people do not
understand the review or essentially do not listen to the review and the toy did not come. This
might be not worthy and is that the authority of Mattel to shape positive the perceived every
single one.
A solitary organization cannot and is not completely responsible for youngsters being
exposed to unsafe toys. There are a number of constantly distinctive gatherings yet World Health
Organization should be ordered at least to a degree responsible. Mattel was in all likelihood the
premier responsible as a consequence of they did not keep the whole quality and security of its
toys. Moreover they were those World Health Organization helped the foremen in building the
audit office together with the outsourcing of testing to industrial facilities. There is more blame
placed on the builders World Health Organization then subcontracted the undertaking to diverse

MATTEL SAFETY

gatherings. These subcontractors dead set to voyage against what the establishments were and
utilized LED based for the most part paint anyways. They exclusively required inciting the
undertaking done shabbier as an aftereffect of that implied more money. Headed based chiefly
paint could be a ton shabbier than diverse paints. Since it was skim inside the case the Chinese
foreman early light-weight Industrial resolved to subcontract their artwork work to Chinese
Company regarded as Hong Li locale lawyer. They finally dead set to utilize LED paint instead
of paint furnished by early light-weight Industrial. When the parts were fulfilled early lightweight then didn't check the toys that had been made for LED. This might be the reason the
Chinese builders were almost on fault as Mattel might have been. (Lawrence & Weber,
2011)I accept to little accuse has become places the CPSC. Theyd an avocation to inspect and
screen every last toy to verify the assurance of remote toys and in the event that they weren't
protected they needed to require instantaneous activity against the organizations World Health
Organization dead set not suits the regulation. An alternate one small issue was the precise reality
that the CPSC was completely undermanned and underfunded. They simply neglected to have
the infers that to stay track of every single organization and every single product. This is the
reason I craving CPSC furthermore should have had accuse put them. They need a commitment
to shape positive each toy is protected and ready to be utilized. The flop of each one around these
firms is that the sole explanation for why on why such an enormous measure of youngsters were
put in harm.
There were numerous recalls by toy creators all through the years 2006-07 and since of
the climbing amounts of recollects consciousness was in the long run made by the media. They
felt that they'd an authority to the supporter to place out copartner caution. The stakeholders
needed to search out new courses in which exposure to shape positive that security was the

MATTEL SAFETY

essential issue to be dealt with. However a few stakeholders had completely diverse sentiments
on the recalls. Some felt like they may stop and things might get dealt with on its own while
others though' the issues might continue getting more terrible. Some felt that an expansive
downside was that the testing by the toy firms was simply not acquiring the assignment done.
They at long last resolved to send their whole item testing out for alternate gathering testing
necessities. The CPSC dead set to favor the third gathering testing as a consequence of they felt
like this may then bring about the higher security of kids' toys. (CPSC proclamation, 2011) to run
the whole time with this Congress then passed the supporter Product Safety Improvement Act.
The CPSC was moreover required to shape positive that any and each one remote item was
nearly checked. It basically was to prevent the deficient item from only getting into USA and
was somehow to structure positive that any damaged sensible was rapidly appropriated of. It had
been in our own particular approach to watch the assurance of the stock and accordingly the
customers.
To a considerable degree the most paramount issue for adoration or cash is defensive
children|our youngsters|our kids} from unsafe toys that may reason damage to the heath of any
youngster. Its one thing that needs the most extreme consideration. To determine the government
must recognize a great deal of routes in which to air prime of finding blemished toys. They need
to act rapidly and place a stop to that before it ever kicks off. Being proactive is extremely
imperative as a consequence of they'll as of recently anticipate that what's advancing will happen
and have a thought as of recently in situ. The economy is dynamical almost a day and imports
from China zone unit expanding and adapting into a considerable measure of common.it is
essential to claim a thought in situ accordingly provided that one thing will catch through the
import retail it to you will rapidly be place to cohort fulfill and carried forethought of with none

MATTEL SAFETY

10

extreme occurrence. This empowers them to essentially take away faulty item from business.
Moreover the CPSC should place a thought in situ that empowers examination into firms to
determine that an unambiguous standard is administered. This can constrain the organizations to
finally suit all the decisions that are made. Provided that they are doing not suits these principles
then a fine can happen work they in the end endeavor to tolerate by being equipped to place the
greater part of the standards to figure and enabling them is basically as vital as having the
regulation in situ. Also I accept that each regulation must be assessed every day to determine that
each regulation is adequate and doesn't might like any progressions added to that. This can yield
the CPSC to changelessly be dependent upon code with the principles and may keep them one
stage ahead in any appreciation times.
I also accept that toy firms and consequently the fabricators of the toys became primed to
higher accomplish their testing and survey methodology. In the event that they higher their
techniques this could expedite to higher determine that the sum of the stock zone unit safe and
harmless. This is the reason I yearning hosting a third gathering testing organization could be a
far superior arrange as a consequence of they simply don't have any association with the
corporate whose item is almost always tried. They are doing not fondle forced to talk once there's
an issue with an item.
As firms have started to source a great deal of preparing into outside nations there has
ended up bounty a ton of inclusion of global stakeholders. Occasionally the vast majority of the
remote nations could have completely diverse approaches in situ then what we've got inside the
USA. Having a customary in an exceedingly remote nation could likewise be troublesome
because of this. Its occasionally troublesome to bring about equal tenets we've got simply since
its a quite completely diverse nation. They sometimes don't appear to be as strict as we have a

MATTEL SAFETY

11

tendency to region unit once it includes their rules manufacturers in China zone unit yielding
with Chinese government's tenets and what they need place in situ. They we tend tore intrusive
proportionate issues we had here for a couple of years. Theyre making an endeavor to search out
courses in which to higher enable their tenets and to instigate stricter with their principles. With
the collaboration of either side controllers will attempt and boycott destructive and hazardous
customer stock to every spot inside the planet. This can simply expedite to stay away from any
downside with blemished stock inside the planet. Provided that such stock cannot be
oversubscribed anywhere, they're less conceivable to be mill made.
In the wake of viewing of these parts that territory unit being vie I longing the chief
indispensable part is vie by oldsters. They need the ability to place a stop to the present by
simply not looking for stock that they capture inside the past could have had an issue. Oldsters
territory unit sensible enough to grasp that there region unit potential inquiries of wellbeing with
toys which every so often they'll be hazardous though they are doing not appear to be their.
Oldsters should pick toys that suit the age, capacity and investment of the children. you are
attempting and get toys that you essentially secure youngsters won't be prepared to place in their
mouth for stress of them swallowing a piece. This could be the reason each organization puts on
a case what ages territory unit fitting for each toy. They so will watch that {that every|that every}
child is sheltered once it includes what toy is almost always carried into every home. Oldsters
assume the most significant part as a consequence of their {the client|the buyer|the patron}
keeping in mind not a customer there's simply no might like for the stock.
In conclusion the assurance and health issue of the Mattel toys could be essentially are
anticipated if Mattel and their foremen that they utilized accompanied the best possible testing
and audit systems that were made. The CPSC, that had the authority regarding making positive

MATTEL SAFETY

12

that there was a security of customer stock, didn't hinder these stock from getting into the
business sector as a consequence of they only neglected to have the required instruments to
attempt to along these lines. yet Mattel assumed ownership and declaring numerous recalls,
indeed, giving payment they simply neglected to act inside the right way and neglected to
perceive act rapidly enough to structure positive the matter was basically taken forethought of if
Mattel had acted straight I craving this downside might are essentially preventable.

MATTEL SAFETY

13
References

CPSC Press Release (2011). CPSC Adopts Testing Requirements for Children's Toys.
Retrieved from: http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/07/22/idUS189627+22-Jul2011+PRN20110722
CPSC (2011). U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission: Strategic Plan (2011-2016).
Retrieved from: http://www.cpsc.gov/cpscpub/pubs/reports/2011strategic.pdf
Lawrence, A. T. & Weber, J. (2011). Business and society (13th ed.).
New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin
No Author. How Can We Protect our Children From Harmful Toys?
Retrieved from: http://www.tomkileylaw.com/library/safe-childrens-toys-attorneythomas-m-kiley-andover-ma.html
WisnerJ. D. (n.d.). The Chinese Made Toy Recalls at Mattel, Inc.
Retrieved from: http://faculty.unlv.edu/wisnerj/mba720_files/Mattel_case2.pdf