Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 97

IS-CAAD

International Seminar on Computer Aided Analysis and Design

Performance Based Design


and Push-over Analysis of Buildings
Workshop Note

Pushover Analysis Using ETABS and SAP2000

Pushover Analysis
Using ETABS and SAP2000
June 18-19, Manila, Philippines
For

Association of Structural Engineers Philippines

By

Naveed Anwar
Asian Center for Engineering Computations and Software
Asian Institute of Technology
In Association with

Computers and Structures Inc., Berkeley, California, USA

Acknowledgements

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Some of the material presented in these


notes is based on following sources:
Class notes by Prof. Worsak Kanok-Nukulchai
Seminar notes from Computers and Structures
Incorporated, USA
Notes from various workshops conducted by
Naveed Anwar
SAP2000 User and Technical Manuals
ETABS User and Technical Manuals
ATC40, Applied Technology Council, USA
FEMA-273, Federal Emergency Management
Agency, USA

Asian Center For Engineering Computations and Software

Pushover Analysis Using ETABS and SAP2000

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Objectives
Introduce the basic Modeling and Analysis
Concepts
To provide an understanding of Static
Nonlinear Pushover Analysis for Seismic
Performance
To demonstrate the application of Pushover
Analysis for buildings using ETABS and
SAP2000 and to provide a comparison

Modeling and Analysis

Asian Center For Engineering Computations and Software

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Pushover Analysis Using ETABS and SAP2000

Structural System Analysis Model


STRUCTURE
RESPONSES

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

EXCITATION
Loads
Vibrations
Settlements
Thermal Changes

Asian Center For Engineering Computations and Software

Displacements
Strains
Stress
Stress Resultants

pv

Structural
Model

Pushover Analysis Using ETABS and SAP2000

Analysis of Structures
xx yy zz
+
+
+ pvx = 0
x
y
z
Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

pv

Real Structure is governed by


Partial Differential Equations of
various order
Direct solution is only possible for:
Simple geometry
Simple Boundary
Simple Loading.

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

The Need for Modeling


A - Real Structure cannot be Analyzed:
It can only be Load Tested to determine
response
B - We can only analyze a Model of the
Structure
C - We therefore need tools to Model the
Structure and to Analyze the Model

Asian Center For Engineering Computations and Software

Pushover Analysis Using ETABS and SAP2000

Finite Element Method: The Analysis Tool

Finite Element Analysis


(FEA)

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

A discretized solution to a
continuum problem using FEM

Finite Element Method (FEM)


A numerical procedure for solving
(partial) differential equations
associated with field problems, with
an accuracy acceptable to
engineers

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Continuum to Discrete Model

pv
3D-CONTINUM
MODEL

CONTINUOUS MODEL
OF STRUCTURE

(Governed by partial (Governed by either


differential equations) partial or total differential
equations)

Asian Center For Engineering Computations and Software

DISCRETE MODEL
OF STRUCTURE

(Governed by algebraic
equations)

Pushover Analysis Using ETABS and SAP2000

From Classical to FEM Solution


Equilibrium

Actual Structure

Structural Model

xx yy zz
+
+
+ p =0
x y z vx
Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

FEM

Assumptions

Classical

Kr = R

Stress-Strain Law
Compatibility

Partial
Differential
Equations

Algebraic
Equations
_

dV = pvt udV + pst uds


v

(Principle of Virtual Work)

K = Stiffness
r = Response
R = Loads

Simplified Structural System


Deformations (D)

Loads (F)

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Fv

F=KD

Asian Center For Engineering Computations and Software

Pushover Analysis Using ETABS and SAP2000

The Analysis System


STRUCTURE

RESPONSES

EXCITATION

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

pv

Static
Dynamic

Elastic
Inelastic

Linear
Nonlinear

Eight types of equilibrium equations are possible!

The Equilibrium Equations


1. Linear-Static

Elastic

Ku = F

2. Linear-Dynamic

Elastic

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Mu&&(t ) + Cu& (t ) + Ku (t ) = F (t )

3. Nonlinear - Static Elastic OR Inelastic


Ku + FNL = F

4. Nonlinear-Dynamic
OR
Mu&&(t ) + Cu& (t ) + Ku(t ) + F (t ) NL = FElastic
(t )
Inelastic

Asian Center For Engineering Computations and Software

Pushover Analysis Using ETABS and SAP2000

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Basic Analysis Types


Excitation

Structure

Response

Basic Analysis Type

Static

Elastic

Linear

Linear-Elastic-Static Analysis

Static

Elastic

Nonlinear

Nonlinear-Elastic-Static Analysis

Static

Inelastic

Linear

Linear-Inelastic-Static Analysis

Static

Inelastic

Nonlinear

Nonlinear-Inelastic-Static Analysis

Dynamic

Elastic

Linear

Linear-Elastic-Dynamic Analysis

Dynamic

Elastic

Nonlinear

Nonlinear-Elastic-Dynamic Analysis

Dynamic

Inelastic

Linear

Linear-Inelastic-Dynamic Analysis

Dynamic

Inelastic

Nonlinear

Nonlinear-Inelastic-Dynamic Analysis

Analysis Type

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

The type of Analysis to be carried out depends


on the Structural System
The Type of Excitation (Loads)
The Type Structure (Material and
Geometry)
The Type Response

Asian Center For Engineering Computations and Software

Pushover Analysis Using ETABS and SAP2000

Some More Solution Types

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Non-linear Analysis

P-Delta Analysis
Buckling Analysis
Static Pushover Analysis
Fast Non-Linear Analysis (FNA)
Large Displacement Analysis

Dynamic Analysis
Free Vibration and Modal Analysis
Response Spectrum Analysis
Steady State Dynamic Analysis

Static Vs Dynamic
Static Excitation

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

When the Excitation (Load) does not vary rapidly with


Time
When the Load can be assumed to be applied
Slowly

Dynamic Excitation
When the Excitation varies rapidly with Time
When the Inertial Force becomes significant

Most Real Excitation are Dynamic but are


consideredQuasi Static
Most Dynamic Excitation can be converted to
Equivalent Static Loads

Asian Center For Engineering Computations and Software

Pushover Analysis Using ETABS and SAP2000

Elastic Vs Inelastic
Elastic Material
Follows the same path during loading and unloading
and returns to initial state of deformation, stress,
strain etc. after removal of load/ excitation

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Inelastic Material
Does not follow the same path during loading and
unloading and may not returns to initial state of
deformation, stress, strain etc. after removal of load/
excitation

Most materials exhibit both, elastic and inelastic


behavior depending upon level of loading.

Linear Vs Nonlinear
Linearity
The response is directly proportional to excitation
(Deflection doubles if load is doubled)

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Non-Linearity
The response is not directly proportional to
excitation
(deflection may become 4 times if load is doubled)

Non-linear response may be produced by:


Geometric Effects (Geometric non-linearity)
Material Effects (Material non-linearity)
Both

Asian Center For Engineering Computations and Software

10

Pushover Analysis Using ETABS and SAP2000

Elastic Vs Inelastic
Elastic Material
Follows the same path during loading and unloading and
returns to initial state of deformation, stress, strain etc. after
removal of load/ excitation

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Inelastic Material
Does not follow the same path during loading and
unloading and may not returns to initial state of
deformation, stress, strain etc. after removal of load/
excitation

Most materials exhibit both, elastic and inelastic


behavior depending upon level of loading.

Linear Vs Nonlinear
Linearity
The response is directly proportional to excitation
(Deflection doubles if load is doubled)

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Non-Linearity
The response is not directly proportional to
excitation
(deflection may become 4 times if load is doubled)

Non-linear response may be produced by:


Geometric Effects (Geometric non-linearity)
Material Effects (Material non-linearity)
Both

Asian Center For Engineering Computations and Software

11

Pushover Analysis Using ETABS and SAP2000

Action

Linear-Elastic

Linear-Inelastic

Deformation
Action

Deformation

Action

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Action

Elasticity and Linearity

Nonlinear-Inelastic

Nonlinear-Elastic

Deformation

Deformation

Linear and Nonlinear


Linear, Static and Dynamic

Ku = F
Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

FNL

M u&&( t ) + C u& ( t ) + Ku ( t ) = F ( t )

Ku = F

Nonlinear, Static and Dynamic

Ku - FNL = F

Ku + FNL = F
u

Mu&&(t ) + Cu&(t ) + Ku(t ) + F (t ) NL = F (t )

Non Linear Equilibrium

Asian Center For Engineering Computations and Software

12

Pushover Analysis Using ETABS and SAP2000

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

The Seven Degrees of Freedom


The General Beam
Element may have
7 degrees of
freedom
The seventh
degree is Warping
Warping is out-of
plane distortion of
the beam crosssection

ry
uy
y

u x rx
x
z
uz
rz
wz

Each section on a beam


member can have seven
Degrees Of Freedom
(DOF) with respect to its
local axis.

The Complete DOF Picture


uz Axial deformation Axial strain Axial stress
ux Shear deformation Shear strain Shear stress

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

uy Shear deformation Shear strain Shear stress


rz Torsion Shear strain Shear stress
ry Curvature Axial strain Axial stress
rx Curvature Axial strain Axial stress
wz Warping Axial strain Axial stress

Asian Center For Engineering Computations and Software

13

Pushover Analysis Using ETABS and SAP2000

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

What is Stiffness ?
In structural terms, stiffness
may be defined as
Resistance to Deformation
So for each type of
deformation, there is a
corresponding stiffness
Stiffness can be considered
or evaluated at various levels
Stiffness is also the
constant in the ActionDeformation Relationship

For Linear Response

uF
Ku = F
K=

F
u

The Structure Stiffness


Material Stiffness

Cross-section Geometry

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Section Stiffness

Member Geometry
Member Stiffness

Structure Geometry
Structure Stiffness

Asian Center For Engineering Computations and Software

14

Pushover Analysis Using ETABS and SAP2000

The Matrices in FEM


Global Nodal Deformations
T-Matrix
Global-Local Cords.

Element Nodal Deformations


Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

N-Matrix
Shape Functions

Deformation in Element Space


B-Matrix
Strain-Deforrmation

Strain In Element Space


D-Matrix
Stress-Strain

Stress in Element Space

Methods of Dynamic Analysis


For Both Linear and Non-Linear Systems
Step-by-Step Integration
Use of Mode Superposition with Eigen or LoadDependent Ritz Vector for FNA
Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

For Linear Systems Only


Transformation of frequency domain and FFT
Method
Response Spectrum Method CQC - SRSS

Asian Center For Engineering Computations and Software

15

Pushover Analysis Using ETABS and SAP2000

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Step by Step Solution Method


Form Effective Stiffness Matrix
Solve Set of Dynamic Equilibrium Equations
for Displacement at Each Time Step
For Non-Linear Problems Calculate Member
Forces for Each Time Step and Iterate for
Equilibrium Brute Force Method

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Mode Superposition Method


Generate Orthogonal Dependent Vectors and
Frequencies
Form Uncoupled Modal Equations and Solve
Using Exact Method for Each Time Increment
Recover Nodal Displacement as a Function
of Time
Calculate Member Forces as a Function of
Time

Asian Center For Engineering Computations and Software

16

Pushover Analysis Using ETABS and SAP2000

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Load Dependent Ritz Vector


Approximately Three Times Faster than the
Calculation of Exact Eigen Vectors
Results in Improved Accuracy using a
Smaller Number of LDR Vector
Computer Storage Requirements are
Reduced
Can be Used for Non-Linear analysis to
Capture Local Static Response

Dynamic Response of Beam

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

100 Pounds

10 @ 12" = 120"

Force

Asian Center For Engineering Computations and Software

Time

17

Pushover Analysis Using ETABS and SAP2000

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Pushover Analysis

One Dimensional Static Loads


No Energy Dissipation
Inertia Forces Not Considered
Defined One Failure Mode
Higher Mode Effects Neglected

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Fast Non-Linear Analysis


Evaluate LDR Vectors with Non-Linear
Elements Removed and Dummy Elements
Added for Stability
Solve All Modal Equations with Non-Linear
Forces on the Right Hand Side
Use Exact Integration within Each Time Step
Force and Energy Equilibrium are Satisfied at
Each Time Step by Iteration

Asian Center For Engineering Computations and Software

18

Pushover Analysis Using ETABS and SAP2000

Fast Non-Linear Analysis

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

The FNA Method is Designed for Static and


Dynamic Analysis of Non-Linear Structures
with a Limited Number of Pre-Defined NonLinear Elements

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Base Isolation

Asian Center For Engineering Computations and Software

19

Pushover Analysis Using ETABS and SAP2000

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Building Impact

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Dampers

Asian Center For Engineering Computations and Software

20

Pushover Analysis Using ETABS and SAP2000

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Gaps and Joints

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Hinges

Asian Center For Engineering Computations and Software

21

Pushover Analysis Using ETABS and SAP2000

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Dampers

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Linear Viscous Damping


Does not Exist in Normal Structures and
Foundations
5 or 10 Percent modal Damping Values are
Often Used to Justify Energy Dissipation Due
to Non-Linear Effects
If Energy Dissipation Devices are Used Then
1 Percent Modal Damping should be Used for
the Elastic Part of the Structure

Asian Center For Engineering Computations and Software

22

Pushover Analysis Using ETABS and SAP2000

Non-Linear Equilibrium Equations

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Ma + Cv + Ku + FN = F
Where Ma + Cv + Ku = F FN
Fn= The Global Node Loads due to the
Forces in the Non-Linear Elements

Non-Linear Equilibrium Equations

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Ma + Cv + [K + kE ]u = F FN + kEu
Where
Ke= The Effective Linear Stiffness of the
Non-Linear Element are of Arbitrary Values
for Zero Damping

Asian Center For Engineering Computations and Software

23

Pushover Analysis Using ETABS and SAP2000

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Uplift

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Non Linear Static Analysis

Asian Center For Engineering Computations and Software

24

Pushover Analysis Using ETABS and SAP2000

Structure Types
Cable Structures
Cable Nets
Cable Stayed

Bar Structures
Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

2D/3D Trusses
2D/3D Frames, Grids

Surface Structures
Plate, Shell
In-Plane, Plane Stress

Solid Structures

Global Modeling of Structural Geometry

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

(a) Real Structure

(b) Solid Model

(c) 3D Plate-Frame

(d) 3D Frame

(f) Grid-Plate

(e) 2D Frame
Fig. 1 Various Ways to Model a Real Struture

Asian Center For Engineering Computations and Software

25

Pushover Analysis Using ETABS and SAP2000

Some Sample Finite Elements

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Truss and Beam Elements (1D,2D,3D)

Plane Stress, Plane Strain, Axisymmetric, Plate and Shell Elements (2D,3D)

Brick Elements

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

The Modal Analysis

Asian Center For Engineering Computations and Software

26

Pushover Analysis Using ETABS and SAP2000

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

The Modal Analysis


The modal analysis determines the inherent natural
frequencies of vibration
Each natural frequency is related to a time period
and a mode shape
Time Period is the time it takes to complete one
cycle of vibration
The Mode Shape is normalized deformation pattern
The number of Modes is typically equal to the
number of Degrees of Freedom
The Time Period and Mode Shapes are inherent
properties of the structure and do not depend on the
applied loads

Free Vibration Analysis


Definition
Natural vibration of a structure released from initial condition and
subjected to no external load or damping

Main governing equation -Eigenvalue Problem

[M ] u

+ [c ] u + [K
t
t

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

] {u }t

{P }t

Solution gives
Natural Frequencies
Associated mode shapes
An insight into the dynamic behavior and response of the structure

Asian Center For Engineering Computations and Software

27

Pushover Analysis Using ETABS and SAP2000

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

The Modal Analysis


The Modal Analysis should be run before
applying loads any other analysis to check
the model and to understand the response of
the structure
Modal analysis is precursor to most types of
analysis including Response Spectrum, Time
History, Push-over analysis etc.
Modal analysis is a useful tool even if full
Dynamic Analysis is not performed
Modal analysis easy to run and is a fun to
watch the animations

Application of Modal Analysis

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

The Time Period and Mode Shapes, together


with animation immediately exhibit the
strengths and weaknesses of the structure
Modal analysis can be used to check the
accuracy of the structural model
The Time Period should be within reasonable
range, (Ex: 0.1 x number of stories seconds)
The disconnected members are identified
Local modes are identified that may need
suppression

Asian Center For Engineering Computations and Software

28

Pushover Analysis Using ETABS and SAP2000

Application of Modal Analysis

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

The symmetry of the structure can be


determined
For doubly symmetrical buildings, generally the
first two modes are translational and third mode
is rotational
If first mode is rotational, the structural is unsymmetrical

The resonance with the applied loads or


excitation can be avoided
The natural frequency of the structure should not
be close to excitation frequency

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Model Creation Tools

Defining Individual Nodes and Elements


Using Graphical Modeling Tools
Using Numerical Generation
Using Mathematical Generation
Using Copy and Replication
Using Subdivision and Meshing
Using Geometric Extrusions
Using Parametric Structures

Asian Center For Engineering Computations and Software

29

Pushover Analysis Using ETABS and SAP2000

Graphic Object Modeling

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Use basic Geometric Entities to create FE


Models
Simple Graphic Objects

Point Object
Line Object
Area Object
Brick Object

Represents Node
Represents 1D Elements
Represents 2D Elements
Represents 3D Elements

Graphic Objects can be used to represent


geometry, boundary and loads
SAP2000, ETABS and SAFE use the concept
of Graphic Objects

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Modeling Objects and Finite Elements


Structural Members are representation of
actual structural components
Finite Elements are discretized
representation of Structural Members
The concept of Graphic Objects can be used
to represent both, the Structural Members as
well as Finite Elements
In ETABS, the Graphic Objects representing
the Structural Members are automatically
divided into Finite Elements for analysis and
then back to structural members for result
interpretation

Asian Center For Engineering Computations and Software

30

Pushover Analysis Using ETABS and SAP2000

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Design Methods and Concepts

From Loads to Stresses

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Applied Loads

Building Analysis

Member Actions

Cross-section Actions

Material Stress/Strain

Asian Center For Engineering Computations and Software

From Strains to Response

The Response and Design


Material Response

Section Response

Member Response

Building Response

Load Capacity

31

Pushover Analysis Using ETABS and SAP2000

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

From Serviceability to Performance

From Serviceability to Performance

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Satisfying one design level does not ensure


that other design levels will be satisfied
Serviceability design only ensures that
deflections and vibrations etc. for service loads
are within limits but says nothing about strength
Strength design ensures that a certain factor of
safety against overload is available within a
member or a cross-section but says nothing
about what happens if load exceeds design level
Performance design ensures that structure as a
whole reaches a specified demand level.
Performance design can include, both service and
strength design levels

Asian Center For Engineering Computations and Software

32

Pushover Analysis Using ETABS and SAP2000

From Serviceability to Performance

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

The entire response of structure or a


member can be determined, in an
integrated manner from the ActionDeformation Curve
A Serviceability
B Cracking Limit
C Strength Limit
D Failure Limit

The Cross-section Response


Material Stress-Strain Curves
Cross-section Dimensions

Performance

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Given P value

Given Moments

Given Axial Load

P-M Curve

M-M Curve

Moment-Curvature Curves

Moment for Given Curvature


Curvature for Given Moment
Yield Moment
Stiffness
Ductility

Moment for Given Load


Load for Given Moment
Capacity Ratio

Asian Center For Engineering Computations and Software

Strength

Capacity
Interaction Surface

Given Moment Direction

Mx for Given My
My for Given Mx
Capacity Ratio

33

Pushover Analysis Using ETABS and SAP2000

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Original Cross-sections

Plain concrete shape

Compact Built-up steel


section

Reinforced concrete section

Composite section

Compact Hot-rolled steel shape

Reinforced concrete,
composite section

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Sections After Strengthening

Asian Center For Engineering Computations and Software

34

Pushover Analysis Using ETABS and SAP2000

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Capacity
Interaction Surface
P

My

Mx

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

P-M and M-M Interaction Curves

Asian Center For Engineering Computations and Software

35

Pushover Analysis Using ETABS and SAP2000

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

The Moment Curvature Curve

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Cross-section Stresses

Asian Center For Engineering Computations and Software

36

Pushover Analysis Using ETABS and SAP2000

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Strength and Performance


In Strength Design, every member and every
cross-section must satisfy strength equation
Even if all members and sections are
designed for strength, the structure may not
perform well in case of overload
In Performance Based Design, only a few
members on the critical load path need to
perform well for the structure to perform well
Therefore for strengthening of structures, we
may only need to strengthen members or
section in the critical load path

Members on Critical Load Path

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

In Performance Based Design, only a few


members on the critical load path need to
perform well for the structure to perform well
Therefore for strengthening of structures, we
may only need to strengthen members or
section in the critical load path

Asian Center For Engineering Computations and Software

37

Pushover Analysis Using ETABS and SAP2000

What Effects Serviceability?


Anything that reduces cracking
The presence of appropriate amount of
reinforcement at appropriate locations

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Anything that increases stiffness


Reasonable sizes and proportions of member
cross-sections

Anything that reduces Creep/ Shrinkage


Presence of compressive reinforcement

Anything that improves Durability


High strength concrete
Proper cver and protection of rebars

What Effects Strength?


The basic Material Strength

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Concrete crushing strength


Reinforcement yield strength

The Cross-section Dimensions


The amount of Rebars
The framing conditions

Asian Center For Engineering Computations and Software

38

Pushover Analysis Using ETABS and SAP2000

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

What Effects Performance?


Performance is generally of concern for
lateral loads such as earthquake and wind
The main factor that effects performance is
the Ductility of the members on the critical
load path
In frame structures, the design of the joints
between columns and beams is critical
The performance of shear walls if great
importance for lateral load demands

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Ductility can be
defined as the ratio
of deformation and a
given stage to the
maximum
deformation
capacity
Normally ductility is
measured from the
deformation at design
strength to the
maximum
deformation at failure

Asian Center For Engineering Computations and Software

Load

Ductility Definition and Usage

Yield/ Design
Strength

Dy

Du

Deformation
Ductility = Dy / Du

39

Pushover Analysis Using ETABS and SAP2000

What Effects Ductility!


The most important factor effecting ductility
of reinforced concrete cross-section is the
confinement of concrete

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Amount of confinement steel


Shape of confinement steel

Other factors include:

Presence of Axial Load


Stress-strain curve of rebars
Amount of rebars in tension
Amount of rebars in compression
The shape of cross-section

Action Deformation Curves

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Relationship between action and


corresponding deformation
These relationships can be obtained at
several levels

The Structural Level:


Load - Deflection
The Member Level:
Moment - Rotation
The Cross-section Level: Moment - Curvature
The Material Level :
Stress-Strain

The Action-Deformation curves show the


entire response of the structure, member,
cross-section or material

Asian Center For Engineering Computations and Software

40

Pushover Analysis Using ETABS and SAP2000

How to Get Action-Deformation Curves


By actual measurements
Apply load, measure deflection
Apply load, measure stress and strain

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

By computations
Use material models, cross-section dimensions to
get Moment-Curvature Curves

By combination of measurement and


computations
Calibrate computation models with actual
measurements
Some parameters obtained by measurement and
some by computations

The Moment Curvature Curve

Asian Center For Engineering Computations and Software

41

Pushover Analysis Using ETABS and SAP2000

The Moment-Curvature Curve

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Probably the most important action-deformation


curve for beams, columns, shear walls and
consequently for building structures
Significant information can be obtained from
Moment Curvature Curve to compute:

Yield Point
Failure Point
Ductility
Stiffness
Crack Width
Rotation
Deflection
Strain

What is Curvature

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

In geometry, it is rate
of change of rotation
In structural behavior,
Curvature is related to
Moment
For a cross-section
undergoing flexural
deformation, it can
computed as the ratio
of the strain to the
depth of neutral axis

Asian Center For Engineering Computations and Software

Curvature = e / C (radian / unit length)

42

Pushover Analysis Using ETABS and SAP2000

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

How to Read M-Phi Curve

Outputs from M-Phi Curve

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

2 -Failure Point

Asian Center For Engineering Computations and Software

1 -Yield Point

3 - Ductility =

y
u

43

Pushover Analysis Using ETABS and SAP2000

Outputs from M-Phi Curve


4 - Stiffness of the Section at given M and Phi

M
EI
M
EI =

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

5 - Slope of the section at given Moment


b

M
dx
EI
a

Outputs from M-Phi Curve


6 - Deflection of the section at given Moment

M
= x dx
EI
a
Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

7 - Strain at given Moment

= c

c = distance from the NA to


the point where strain is
required

Asian Center For Engineering Computations and Software

44

Pushover Analysis Using ETABS and SAP2000

Outputs from M-Phi Curve


8 - Crack Width at given crack spacing

W = s X

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

W = yX

9 - Crack Spacing at given crack width


W
X=

X=

W
y

Outputs from M-Phi Curve - Summary


Plot M-Phi Curve

EI =

Determine curvature
at known moment

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Determine Flexural
Stiffness (EI)

EI

M
=
x dx
EI
a
b

Determine Deflection

= c

dx

Determine Slope

X =

Determine Strain

W = sX

Asian Center For Engineering Computations and Software

Determine Crack
Spacing/Width

45

Pushover Analysis Using ETABS and SAP2000

Outputs from M-Phi Curve - Example


For M=600 Phi = 0.00006
From M-Phi Diagram

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

EI =

EI=600x12/0.00006
EI=1.2E8 k-in^2

Slope at Mid Span


b

M
dx
EI
a
=600x7.5x144/1.2E8

=0.0054 rad

Outputs from M-Phi Curve - Example


Deflection at Mid Span

M
= x dx
EI
a
Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

=600x7.5x144x15x12/(6x1.2E8)
=0.162 in

Strain in Steel

= c
M = 600 k-ft, y=16
=0.00006x16
=0.00096

Asian Center For Engineering Computations and Software

46

Pushover Analysis Using ETABS and SAP2000

Outputs from M-Phi Curve - Example


Crack Width
Assuming crack spacing of 18 in

Specified Crack Spacing = X

W = s X

NA

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

=0.00096 x 18
=0.01728 in

Crack Spacing

Rebar Centroid

Assuming crack width of 0.02 in

X=

=0.02/0.00096
=20.8 in

M-Phi Curve and Ductility


Effect of Axial Load
Effect of Compression Steel
Effect of Confinement Model
Effect of Confinement Shape

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Asian Center For Engineering Computations and Software

47

Pushover Analysis Using ETABS and SAP2000

Axial Load and Ductility


Effect of Axial Load on Ductility
700
600
500

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

400

Axial Load =0
300

Axial Load =0.2Pu

200

Axial Load =0.4Pu

100

Axial Load =0.6Pu


Axial Load =0.8Pu

0
-0.0002

0.0000
-100

0.0002

0.0004

0.0006

0.0008

0.0010

0.0012

0.0014

0.0016

0.0018

C ur v a t ur e ( r a d/ i n)

Compression Steel and Ductility


Effects of Compression Rebars on Ductility
700
600
500
400
300

a: Duct ilit y Rat io =2.65


b: Duct ilit y Rat io =3.32

200

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

c: Duct ilit y Rat io =4.68


d: Duct ilit y Rat io =9.25

100
0
-0.0005

0.0000

0.0005

0.0010

0.0015

0.0020

0.0025

0.0030

0.0035

0.0040

-100

Asian Center For Engineering Computations and Software

C ur v a t ur e ( r a d/ i n)

48

Pushover Analysis Using ETABS and SAP2000

Confinement Model and Ductility


Effect of Concrete Confinement Model on Ductility of Cross-Section
350

300

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Moment (kip-ft)

250

200

Whitney Rectangle
Mander Circular Confined

150

Mander Pipe Filled


100

50

0
0

0.001

0.002

0.003

0.004

0.005

0.006

Curvature (rad/in)

Confinement Steel and Ductility


Effect of Confinement Steel Spacing on Ductility
160
140

Moment (kip-ft)

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

120

100

Spacing = 3in
80

Spacing = 6 in

60

Spacing = 12 in

40

20
0
-0.0005

0.0000

0.0005

0.0010

0.0015

0.0020

0.0025

-20

Asian Center For Engineering Computations and Software

Curvature (in/rad)

49

Pushover Analysis Using ETABS and SAP2000

Confinement Shape and Ductility


Effect of Confinement Shape on Ductility
350

300

250

200

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

150

100

M ander Rectangular Confined


M ander Circular Confined

50

Whitney Rect angle

0
(0. 0010)

0. 0000

0. 0010

0. 0020

0. 0030

0. 0040

0. 0050

0. 0060

0. 0070

-50
C ur vat ur e ( r ad/ i n)

Introducing

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Pushover Analysis

Asian Center For Engineering Computations and Software

50

Pushover Analysis Using ETABS and SAP2000

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

The Pushover Analysis


An alternate method of analysis for carrying
out the Performance Based Design
Pushover analysis is carried out after the
Linear Analysis has been done and
Serviceability and Strength design has been
completed
Pushover analysis is most suitable for
determining the performance, specially for
lateral loads such as Earthquake or even
wind

Why Pushover Analysis

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Buildings do not respond as linearly elastic


systems during strong ground shaking
Improve Understanding of Building Behavior
- More accurate prediction of global
displacement
- More realistic prediction of earthquake demand
on individual components and elements
- More reliable identification of bad actors

Reduce Impact and Cost of Seismic Retrofit


- Less conservative acceptance criteria
- Less extensive construction

Advance the State of the Practice

Asian Center For Engineering Computations and Software

51

Pushover Analysis Using ETABS and SAP2000

Performance Based Design - Basics


Design is based not on Ultimate
Strength but rather on Expected
Performance

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Basic Ultimate Strength does not tell us


what will be performance of the structure at
Ultimate Capacity

Performance Based Design Levels

Fully Operational
Operational
Life Safe
Near Collapse
Collapse

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Pushover Spectrum

Asian Center For Engineering Computations and Software

52

Pushover Analysis Using ETABS and SAP2000

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Pushover Demand Curves

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Earthquake Push on Building

Asian Center For Engineering Computations and Software

53

Pushover Analysis Using ETABS and SAP2000

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

The Pushover Curve

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Pushover Capacity Curves

Asian Center For Engineering Computations and Software

54

Pushover Analysis Using ETABS and SAP2000

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Demand Vs Capacity

Non-linearity in Pushover
Material nonlinearity at discrete, user-defined hinges
in frame/line elements.
1. Material nonlinearity in the link elements.

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Gap (compression only), hook (tension only), uniaxial


plasticity base isolators (biaxial plasticity and biaxial
friction/pendulum)..

2. Geometric nonlinearity in all elements.


Only P-delta effects
P-delta effects plus large displacements

3. Staged (sequential) construction.


Members can be added or removed in a sequence of stages
during each analysis case.

Asian Center For Engineering Computations and Software

55

Pushover Analysis Using ETABS and SAP2000

Important Considerations

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Nonlinear analysis takes time and patience


Each nonlinear problem is different
Start simple and build up gradually.
Run linear static loads and modal analysis
first
Add hinges gradually beginning with the
areas where you expect the most nonlinearity.
Perform initial analyses without geometric
non-linearity. Add P-delta effects, and large
deformations, much later.

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Important Considerations
Mathematically, static nonlinear analysis
does not always guarantee a unique solution.
Small changes in properties or loading can
cause large changes in nonlinear response.
It is Important to consider many different
loading cases, and sensitivity studies on the
effect of varying the properties of the
structure
Nonlinear analysis takes time and patience.
Dont Rush it or Push to Hard

Asian Center For Engineering Computations and Software

56

Pushover Analysis Using ETABS and SAP2000

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Procedure for Pushover Analysis


Create a model just like for any other analysis.
Define the static load cases, if any, needed for use in
the static nonlinear analysis (Define > Static Load
Cases).
Define any other static and dynamic analysis cases
that may be needed for steel or concrete design of
frame elements.
Define hinge properties, if any (Define > Frame
Nonlinear Hinge Properties).
Assign hinge properties, if any, to frame/line
elements (Assign > Frame/Line > Frame Nonlinear
Hinges).
Define nonlinear link properties, if any (Define > Link
Properties).

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Procedure for Pushover Analysis


Assign link properties, if any, to frame/line elements
(Assign > Frame/Line > Link Properties).
Run the basic linear and dynamic analyses (Analyze
> Run).
Perform concrete design/steel design so that
reinforcing steel/ section is determined for
concrete/steel hinge if properties are based on
default values to be computed by the program.
For staged construction, define groups that
represent the various completed stages of
construction.
Define the static nonlinear load cases (Define >
Static Nonlinear/Pushover Cases).

Asian Center For Engineering Computations and Software

57

Pushover Analysis Using ETABS and SAP2000

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Procedure for Pushover Analysis


Run the static nonlinear analysis (Analyze >
Run Static Nonlinear Analysis).
Review the static nonlinear results (Display >
Show Static Pushover Curve), (Display >
Show Deformed Shape), (Display > Show
Member Forces/Stress Diagram), and (File >
Print Tables > Analysis Output).
Perform any design checks that utilize static
nonlinear cases.
Revise the model as necessary and repeat.

Performance Based Design


and

Pushover Analysis
Technical Background
By:

Iqbal Suharwardy, PhD, S.E


Director Development
Computers and Structures Inc., Berkeley, USA

Asian Center For Engineering Computations and Software

58

Pushover Analysis Using ETABS and SAP2000

Performance Check for Structures


Purpose

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

How will a structure perform when subjected to a


give level of earthquake?
Definition of Structural Performance
Definition of Earthquake Level
Determination of performance level

Performance Check for Structures


Process
Recently released guidelines for Seismic
Rehabilitation of Buildings:

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

ATC-40
ATC-33 (FEMA 273 and 274)

SEAOC Vision 2000 Framework

Asian Center For Engineering Computations and Software

59

Pushover Analysis Using ETABS and SAP2000

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Types of Performance Checks


Linear Static Analysis
Linear Dynamic Analysis
Non Linear Static Analysis (Pushover
Analysis)
Non Linear Dynamic Analysis

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Performance Check Using Pushover

Asian Center For Engineering Computations and Software

60

Pushover Analysis Using ETABS and SAP2000

Steps in Performance Check

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Construct Pushover Curve


Select Earthquake Level to check
Select Performance Level to check
Select acceptance criteria for each
Performance Level
Verify Acceptance
ATC-40 Method
ATC-33 Method

Constructing Pushover Curve


Define Structural Model
Elements
Strength-Deformation properties

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Define Loads
Gravity
Lateral Load Patterns

Select Control Displacements or Drifts


Perform Pushover Analysis

Asian Center For Engineering Computations and Software

61

Pushover Analysis Using ETABS and SAP2000

Pushover Modeling (Elements)

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Types

Truss Yielding and Buckling


3D Beam Major direction Flexural and Shear Hinging
3D Column P-M-M Interaction and shear Hinging
Panel Zone Shear Yielding
In-Fill Panel Shear Failure
Shear Wall P-M-Shear Interaction!
Spring for foundation modeling

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Pushover Modeling (Properties)

Asian Center For Engineering Computations and Software

62

Pushover Analysis Using ETABS and SAP2000

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Pushover Modeling (Beam Element)

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Pushover Modeling (Column Element)

Asian Center For Engineering Computations and Software

63

Pushover Analysis Using ETABS and SAP2000

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Pushover Modeling (Column Element)

Pushover Modeling (Loads)


Start with Gravity Loads
Dead Load
Same Portion of Live Load

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Select Lateral Load Patterns

Uniform
Code Static Lateral Load Distribution
First Mode
Combination of Modes

Asian Center For Engineering Computations and Software

64

Pushover Analysis Using ETABS and SAP2000

Pushover Analysis (Control)


Force Controlled Analysis
Deformation Controlled Analysis
Roof Displacement
Generalized Displacement Definitions
Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Story Drift

Limit of Analysis
Instability Loss of Gravity Load Carry Capacity
Excessive Distortions

Pushover Analysis (Solution Schemes)


Event by Event Strategies
Manual

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Newton-Raphson Type Strategies


Constant Stiffness iteration
Tangent Stiffness iteraton

Problem of Degradation of Strength


Ritz Method (Reduced Space) Strategies

Asian Center For Engineering Computations and Software

65

Pushover Analysis Using ETABS and SAP2000

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Pushover Analysis (Results)

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Use of Pushover Curve (ATC-40)

Construct Capacity Spectrum


Estimation of Equivalent Damping
Determine Demand Spectrum
Determine Performance Point
Verify Acceptance

Asian Center For Engineering Computations and Software

66

Pushover Analysis Using ETABS and SAP2000

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Use of Pushover Curve (ATC-40)

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Use of Pushover Curve (ATC-40)

Asian Center For Engineering Computations and Software

67

Pushover Analysis Using ETABS and SAP2000

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Use of Pushover Curve (ATC-40)

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Use of Pushover Curve (ATC-40)

Asian Center For Engineering Computations and Software

68

Pushover Analysis Using ETABS and SAP2000

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Use of Pushover Curve (ATC-40)

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Use of Pushover Curve (ATC-40)

Asian Center For Engineering Computations and Software

69

Pushover Analysis Using ETABS and SAP2000

Use of Pushover Curve (FEMA-273)


(Displacement Coefficient Method)

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Estimate Target Displacement


Verify Acceptance

Use of Pushover Curve (FEMA-273)


Estimation of Target Displacement
Estimate effective elastic stiffness , Ke
Estimate post yield stiffness, Ks
Estimate effective fundamental period, Te
Calculate target roof displacement

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Asian Center For Engineering Computations and Software

70

Pushover Analysis Using ETABS and SAP2000

Use of Pushover Curve (FEMA-273)


Estimation of Target Displacement
Co, Relates spectral to roof displacement
C1, Modifier for inelastic displacement
C2, Modifier for hysteresis loop shape
C3, Modifier for second order effects

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

SAP2000/ETABS Pushover Options

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Full 3D implementation
Single Model for

Linear Static Analysis


Linear Response Spectrum Analysis
Linear Time History Analysis
Non Linear Time History Analysis
Non Linear Static Pushover Analysis
Steel and Concrete Design

Asian Center For Engineering Computations and Software

71

Pushover Analysis Using ETABS and SAP2000

SAP2000/ETABS Pushover Options

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Generally Follows ATC-40 and FEMA-273


Available Pushover Element Types

Truss Yielding and Buckling


3D Beam Major direction Flexural and Shear Hinging
3D Column P-M-M Interaction and shear Hinging
Shell, Solids, etc (Considered Linear)
Panel Zone (later)
Shear Wall (Later)
Non-Linear Spring (Later)

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

SAP2000/ETABS Pushover Options

Asian Center For Engineering Computations and Software

72

Pushover Analysis Using ETABS and SAP2000

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

SAP2000/ETABS Pushover Options

SAP2000/ETABS Pushover Options


Strength Deformation and P-M-M curves
can be calculated by program for:

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Steel beams (FEMA-273)


Steel columns (FEMA-273)
Shear Hinges in EBF Links (FEMA-273)
Concrete Beams (ATC-40)
Concrete Columns (ATC-40)
Shear hinge in Coupling Beams (ATC-40)

Asian Center For Engineering Computations and Software

73

Pushover Analysis Using ETABS and SAP2000

SAP2000/ETABS Pushover Options


Gravity Load Analysis

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Nodal Loads
Element Loads
Load Controlled Analysis

Pushover Analysis
Starts from Gravity loads
Nodal Load Patterns (User, Modal, Mass)
Multi-Step Displacement or Drift Controlled

SAP2000/ETABS Pushover Options

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Available Results for each step of Loading

Base Shear
Element Forces
Section Forces
Joint Displacement
Drifts
Element hinge Deformations
Limit Points reached

Asian Center For Engineering Computations and Software

74

Pushover Analysis Using ETABS and SAP2000

SAP2000/ETABS Pushover Options

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Pushover Curve Post-Processing (ACT-40)

Conversion to Capacity Spectrum


Calculation of Effective Period (per step)
Calculation of Effective Damping (per step)
Calculation of Demand Spectrum (per step)
Location of Performance Point
Limit Points (acceptable criteria) reached

SAP2000/ETABS Pushover Options


Visual Display for Each Step
Deformed Shape
Member Force Diagrams
Hinge Locations and Stages

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Graphs

Base Shear VS Roof Displacement


Capacity Curves
Demand Curves
Demand Spectra at different Damping
Effective Period Lines

Asian Center For Engineering Computations and Software

75

Pushover Analysis Using ETABS and SAP2000

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Examples

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Example 1

Asian Center For Engineering Computations and Software

76

Pushover Analysis Using ETABS and SAP2000

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Base Shear Vs Displacement

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Capacity Spectrum

Asian Center For Engineering Computations and Software

77

Pushover Analysis Using ETABS and SAP2000

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Example 2

Example 2

Desired Behavior

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

2100

Asian Center For Engineering Computations and Software

1700
1000

0.1

0.6

0.8

Measured Axial Displacement at Joint 2


(in)

78

Pushover Analysis Using ETABS and SAP2000

Find Column E
Determine Column E to
give Appropriate Initial
Stiffness:

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Column

PL
= (1700 *12*12)/(24*24*0.1)
A
E=

= 4250 Ksi

Find Column Deflection


Determine Elastic Column
Lengthening when loading
from 1700 to 2100 K:

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Column
= [(2100-1700) *12*12)]/(24*24*4250)
PL
=
= 0.0235 in

AE

Asian Center For Engineering Computations and Software

79

Pushover Analysis Using ETABS and SAP2000

Find Column Deflection


Determine Elastic Column
Lengthening when loading
from 2100 to 1000 K:

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Column
= [(2100-1000) *12*12)]/(24*24*4250)
PL

=
= 0.0647 in

AE

Find Column Deflection

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Determine Elastic
Column Lengthening
when loading from 1000
to 0 K:
Column

PL

=
= 1000 *12*12)/(24*24*4250)
AE
= 0.0588 in

Asian Center For Engineering Computations and Software

80

Pushover Analysis Using ETABS and SAP2000

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Find Hinge Properties

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Hinge Properties

Asian Center For Engineering Computations and Software

81

Pushover Analysis Using ETABS and SAP2000

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Pushover Curve

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Example 3

Asian Center For Engineering Computations and Software

82

Pushover Analysis Using ETABS and SAP2000

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Example 3

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Example 3

Asian Center For Engineering Computations and Software

83

Pushover Analysis Using ETABS and SAP2000

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

With W12x190 Brace

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

With W8x10 Brace

Asian Center For Engineering Computations and Software

84

Pushover Analysis Using ETABS and SAP2000

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Conversion to ADRS Spectra


ATC-40

Response Spectrum Conversion

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Acceleration-Displacement Response
Spectra (ADRS)
Every Point on a Response Spectrum curve
has a unique

Spectral Acceleration, Sa
Spectral Velocity, Sv
Spectral Displacement, Sd
Time, T

Asian Center For Engineering Computations and Software

85

Pushover Analysis Using ETABS and SAP2000

Response Spectrum Conversion


For Each value or Sai and Ti determine the
value of Sdi using the equation
2

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

T
S di = i 2 S ai g
4

Spectral Acceleration and Displacement at


period Ti are given by

S ai g =

2
Sv
Ti

S di =

Ti
Sv
2

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Capacity Spectrum Conversion


Capacity Spectrum from Capacity or
Pushover Curve
Point by Point conversion to first mode
spectral coordinates

on capacity curves are converted


to
Sai and Sdi on capacity
Vicorresponding
and roof
spectrum using:

S ai =

Vi
W

Asian Center For Engineering Computations and Software

S di =

roof

(PF
1

1, roof

86

Pushover Analysis Using ETABS and SAP2000

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Moment Hinge Properties


Using M-Fi Curve

Procedure
Plot M-Fi curve for cross-section
Estimate EI value from M-Fi Curve using the
following equation
M
EI
M
EI =

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Calculate Rotations from Curvature using:


b

Asian Center For Engineering Computations and Software

M
dx
EI

87

Pushover Analysis Using ETABS and SAP2000

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Example
Reinforced Concrete
Beam-Column CrossSection
24x24
Reinforced with 12 #9
bars
Length is 12 ft

Example

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

370

0.00028

Asian Center For Engineering Computations and Software

88

Pushover Analysis Using ETABS and SAP2000

Example

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

EI =

So EI = 370/0.00028 = 1321428.6
b
M
M
= Ip
= dx
EI
EI
a
So = 0.00336 rad
Find for other Moment Values and input in
Hinge Property

Considerations

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Keep moment Constant over hinge length


when integrating or integrate over the whole
member length with actual moment diagram
Only one value of EI at Yield is sufficient
Ip = h/2

Asian Center For Engineering Computations and Software

89

Pushover Analysis Using ETABS and SAP2000

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Comparisons of
SAP2000 and ETABS

SAP2000 vs ETABS
SAP2000
General Purpose FEA
Software

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Classic Finite Element


Software
Steel, and Concrete Frame
Element Design
Shear Wall Design Not
Supported
Fewer Automated Meshing
Options
Does not Support
Composite Design

Asian Center For Engineering Computations and Software

ETABS
Specialized FEA Software
for Building analysis and
design
Fully Object based Modeling
and Design
Steel, concrete, composite
Frame Element design
Supports Shear wall design
Full and practical auto
meshing options
Supports Composite Design

90

Pushover Analysis Using ETABS and SAP2000

SAP2000 vs ETABS
SAP2000

ETABS

General output related to


nodes and elements is
reported

Floor wise representation of


results such as story drift,
floor mass participation,
story shear, etc.

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

General Report (text files)


Professional Report
Powerful load cases,
combinations, envelopes,
multiple case, etc.
Cables, Dampers, and NL
Links and Hinges

Relatively less ability to


handle load combinations
Only Nonlinear links and
Hinges

SAP2000 vs ETABS
SAP2000
Supports Solid Elements

Does not support solid


elements
Powerful grid system
definition and editing

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Relatively low versatility


for defining and editing
grid systems

ETABS

Asian Center For Engineering Computations and Software

91

Pushover Analysis Using ETABS and SAP2000

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

ETABS Pushover

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

ETABS Pushover

Asian Center For Engineering Computations and Software

92

Pushover Analysis Using ETABS and SAP2000

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

ETABS Pushover

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

SAP2000 Pushover

Asian Center For Engineering Computations and Software

93

Pushover Analysis Using ETABS and SAP2000

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

SAP2000 Pushover

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

SAP2000 Pushover

Asian Center For Engineering Computations and Software

94

Pushover Analysis Using ETABS and SAP2000

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

SAP2000 Pushover

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

SAP2000 Pushover

Asian Center For Engineering Computations and Software

95

Pushover Analysis, ACECOMS, AIT

Pushover Analysis Using ETABS and SAP2000

Asian Center For Engineering Computations and Software

96

Вам также может понравиться