angela stark - episode 199

7 min
http://www.usmarshals.gov/judicial/

Judicial Security
The United States Marshals Service, Judicial Security Division (JSD), is committed to the protection of
the judicial process by ensuring the safe and secure conduct of judicial proceedings and protecting
federal judges, jurors and other members of the federal judiciary. This mission is accomplished by
anticipating and deterring threats to the judiciary, and the continuous development and employment of
innovative protective techniques. The JSD is organized into two program areas, Judicial Operations and
Judicial Services.

Judicial Operations is a collection of national programs, led by a Deputy Assistant Director who has
oversight of the National Center for Judicial Security, the Office of Protective Operations, the Office of
Protective Intelligence and the Office of Management and Administration. Working together through
resource and information sharing, these missions intertwine to create a synergy intended to ensure
effective security of judicial officials, USMS personnel, and the visiting public. Judicial Operations utilizes
a national network of operational personnel (Deputy U.S. Marshals) and support staff to effectively
manage personal and facility security programs around the globe.

Office of Protective Intelligence

The Office of Protective Intelligence (OPI) is comprised of Senior Inspectors, Intelligence Research
Specialists, and Investigative Analysts that provide guidance, coordination, and recommendations in the
behavior based approach to protective investigations initiated by district personnel responsible for
investigating threats and inappropriate communications directed at the judiciary, U.S. Attorneys, and other
court officers. OPI supports the protective mission of the USMS by collecting, analyzing, and
disseminating information and protective intelligence, both classified and unclassified, in the form of
information bulletins, alert notices, protective intelligence briefs, threat assessments, and foreign travel
briefings. OPI also supports the protective mission by managing the intake function for all USMS
Protective Investigations and providing analysis and quality control on all new threat and inappropriate
communications cases. In addition, OPI provides a 24/7 response capability through the Threat
Management Center and facilitates information sharing within the USMS and with other state, local, and
federal law enforcement and intelligence agencies. In fiscal year 2012, 1,370 threats and inappropriate
communications against USMS protectees were investigated, analyzed, and assessed to determine the
levels of risk and potential for danger.

1 | Page

Office of Protective Operations

The Office of Protective Operations (OPO) provides guidance and support to district offices and
Judicial Security Inspectors (JSIs) conducting high threat proceedings and protective responses. OPO
also provides supervision, support and guidance for protective details for the Justices of the U.S.
Supreme Court, all members of the federal judiciary, to include U.S. Tax Court and other high-level
government dignitaries, including the Director of the Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP), the
Deputy Attorney General, U.S. Attorneys and Assistant U.S. Attorneys. On any given day, the USMS is
responsible for safeguarding more than 2,200 sitting judges, and approximately 10,000 other court
officials at over 400 court facilities throughout the United States and its territories. In fiscal year 2012,
1,370 threats/inappropriate communications against USMS protectees were investigated, analyzed, and
assessed some of which resulted in around-the-clock protective details.
On a daily basis, USMS personnel assigned to the Office of Protective Operations deploy state-of-the-art
protective techniques, equipment, and counter-measures. These skills and abilities are deployed in a
proactive manner, but can assure rapid, thorough, and safe responses to almost any emergency situation,
including a terrorist attack and natural disasters. Additionally, these skills and abilities allow for
unobtrusive surveillance and protection during routine judicial security operations.
National Center for Judicial Security
The USMS established the National Center for Judicial Security (NCJS) in fiscal year 2008. The goal of
the NCJS is to provide educational, operational, and technical functionality to its customers, which include
municipal, city, county, state, Federal, and international jurisdictions, in the areas of security operations of
their respective court systems and the protection of members of the judiciary and extended court family.
Office of Management and Administration
The Office of Management and Administration (OMA) serves as the center of expertise within the
Judicial Security Division (JSD) to essentially manage the business processes of JSD by providing
guidance and assistance to JSD staff to ensure that program areas meet directives from the JSD
Assistant Director.

The OMA staff coordinates the majority of the personnel, budget, finance, procurement, employee
development and training initiatives, property accountability, fleet management, special projects,
congressional and departmental correspondence, audit and inspection functions, strategic planning,
records management, information technology, data systems, and other related business functions.

Judicial Services is a national program in the Judicial Security Division led by a Deputy Assistant Director
that has oversight for programs funded by the Administrative Office of the United States Courts (AOUSC)
court security appropriation. The funding provides for the Court Security Officer (CSO) program, security
equipment and systems for space occupied by the judiciary and for U.S. Marshals Service employees to
administer the daily functions. The Judicial Services is separated into four oversight areas: the Office of
Court Security is responsible for the daily operations and personnel management of the CSO program,

2 | Page

the Office of Security Contracts performs the daily contract responsibilities with the private contractors
and the district Contract Officer Technical Representatives, the Office of Security Systems is responsible
for all security and monitoring systems for judicial space, and the Office of Financial Management &
Administration has the daily oversight responsibility of a $420 million budget.

Office of Court Security

The Office of Court Security (OCS) has primary responsibility for ensuring that the CSOs protect the
judiciary and court family as well as thousands of jurors, attorneys and visitors entering court facilities
across the nation. The OCS determines resource needs and develops and enhances program operations
and contract requirements for the CSOs. The OCS also provides day-to-day operational guidance to U.S.
Marshals Service senior management officials in each district office.

Currently, more than 5,000 CSOs with certified law enforcement experience are deployed at more than
400 court facilities in the United States and its territories. All CSOs are required to pass a comprehensive
screening process to ensure that specific background, physical, medical and weapons qualifications
standards are met.

Office of Security Contracts

The Office of Security Contracts provides acquisition support to the Judicial Security Division primarily
in the area of court security. This office is responsible for the full range of acquisition functions for security
services, equipment, systems and maintenance.

The bulk of acquisitions performed in this office is related to the CSO Program. Contracts are awarded to
each of the twelve Judicial Circuits for court security services to be performed in all 94 Judicial Districts.
An interagency agreement between the AOUSC provides funding and contracting authority for the CSO
security services. The estimated annual value of all 12 CSO contracts is approximately $330 million.

The second major contracting function of OSC is the support of the Office of Security Systems which is
responsible for the physical security of the U.S. Courts through the installation and maintenance of
security equipment and systems. The OSC has established a nationwide contract for installation of new
equipment and security systems in renovated and newly constructed facilities.

3 | Page

The third area of contracting support provided by OSC is in the Home Intrusion Detection System (HIDS)
Program through the Office of Courthouse Management. Under the HIDS Program, commercial available
home alarm systems and centralized monitoring are procured for Federal Judicial participants residents.

OSC provides contractual support for other services, supplies and equipment related to the overall
operation of JSD. These are primarily delivery orders (against GSA Schedule), purchase orders and credit
card purchases. Most of the funding used in contracts for OSC is AOUSC related funding.

Office of Security Systems

The Office of Security Systems (OSS) is responsible for all aspects of electronic and physical security
system budgeting, design, installation, construction, maintenance and service for the Federal judiciary.
OSS facilitates security planning with all court offices, security committees and other Federal agencies,
for a comprehensive and coordinated security approach.

OSS is responsible for security equipment at nearly 900 court facilities throughout the United States and
its territories. The OSS Physical Security Program is one of the largest centrally managed physical
security programs in the Federal government. Other Federal, state and local agencies look to OSS for
managerial and technical guidance. The OSS has developed internationally recognized standards for
courthouse public lobby design, and leads in the application of new CCTV, access control and IDS alarm
technologies for the courthouse environment.

Office of Financial Management and Administration

The Office of Financial Management and Administration (OFMA) is responsible for all budget and
financial aspects for the efficient and effective operation of the Judicial Facility Security Program (JFSP)
and has daily oversight responsibility of a $420,000,000 budget in FY 2012. OFMA is also responsible for
the Judicial Services administrative functions, including those related to human resources, property
tracking, procurement and website management. The USMS receives an annual funding transfer from the
Administrative Office of the United States Courts (AOUSC) for the purpose of implementing a court
security program at Federal courthouses throughout the country. This funding, designated as the 0930
appropriation is utilized to:

Award and monitor contracts for over 5,000 court security officers (CSOs) nationwide;

Provide for the installation and maintenance of security equipment, and construction of physical
security measures, in facilities occupied by Judicial Branch entities; and

Cover a portion of the USMS expenses to administer JFSP.

4 | Page

17 CPS is a state agency but federal agent working within a state agency... because it takes
money from the federal government funds...But the governor has control over everything In his
state including federal agents He can tell federal agents to stop And they have to listen

What chance does anyone have going up against a federal agents in a federal court?

5 | Page

18

6 | Page

18. Be wary of these state agencies because they're often federal agents because of their
funding
If you are private club you don't have to follow federal rules but if you accept federal money you
accept their rules.. Private club can have it just an all girls only but if you start accepting federal
money your private club is no longer and now we have to let in everybody they can't
discriminate now because you're operating under federal law

claim of conusance : you have me in the wrong jurisdiction

7 | Page

22 Demanding that they respect that they are article 3 judges tonight this is a common law land
I don't like working in a common-law land As common law judges I'm going to have to ask for
their oath of office To be filed into the case and it be continued I'm going to go after their bond
the file a claim .

They might call a paper terrorism saying that you're interfering with the proper function of
government but to stand your ground this is a legitimate process... show it out its listed in all
there acts that common law exist..

32 When two people enter into a contract they both get an original copy of the contract. if that
the conflict between the two parties and it goes before a judge and one of the parties does not
want the contract in front of the judge and wanted to remain private they do not have to bring or
show the contract. you better bring your copy...

33 There is no law that says you have to file in a federal court and follow federal procedures Of
Civil Procedure ..Those procedures are created by a branch of the government By the Supreme
Court of the United States . that's a branch of government and as a man we stand above them
because we created them .. We didn't swear and take an oath the United States of America

34 The court don't like to admit their position.. because if they are saying we are interfering
with the proper function of government then there a public courthouse not a private
organization... It was private all they could say is its harassment .
Does the government we have rights if the private organization where are the horizon that not
possible to terrorize them.. Government Cant have the best of both worlds

39 When someone's trying to drag you into an Administrative Court you open up your own
common law court and say someone is trying to Drag you into an Administrative Court and they
are also trying to administrate your property without right
People in the cold world had. Navigations on the man has right so they have no right to take
your property
8 | Page

40 whoever's trying to indict you .You ask you have any right to do what you're doing?
They better say no because they only have a duties and privileges Can Be changed modified
Rewritten Recodified...

41 As we are self governing entities when they are sending paperwork to us it is paper terrorism
and they are interfering with The proper function of your self governance.12 jurors in your
neighborhood that's terrorism because the judge is not going to help you in that matter.

9 | Page

51 kl orders

10 | P a g e

11 | P a g e

A writ of sequestration is a prejudgment process which orders the seizure or attachment of

property to be maintained in the custody of the U.S. Marshal or other designated official, under
court order and supervision, until the court determines otherwise.

12 | P a g e

13 | P a g e

Please court orders to have the fact I must be signed and sealed .
It is the order of court:
that the STATE OF ALABAMAs Court Case,
stylized as: JU-2001-51832 is to be made known to
the world as, Void from the beginning, and all of it subsequent
orders are to have no force of operation

51 If after 21 days no one has answered your claims they should signed sealed and stencils
orders for you and if the magistrate hasn't that's when you can demand that they put their oath
of office into the case file..The employees are not bonded but the officers are ..

52 If they give you a hard time about 5 for filling your orders after their 21 days and no ones
responding to your claim ...The next step is to prove that they are an article three judge..Here's
where the money order comes into play Right now to the federal court not the United States
district court..

53 Paying with a personal check allows you to easily verify for yourself who's endorse the back
of it ...If they cash the check where is my trial by jury...

55 1 they're going to have to admit That the government and that I'm interfering with the proper
function of Of government ..If that's true they can be held to the Constitution

2 If its a private corporations and they can't say I'm interfering with the proper function of
government And all I can be charged with harassment .And my defense is that is I paid my
money to a government court not to a private Court. did that private organization steal money
from the government pretty bad

14 | P a g e

58 pauper has no rights.So if you're trying to not pay for the court fees they're going to force
you to come in as a pauper do not come in as a pauper as pauper has no rights.

59 After its all said and done you can go oh my gosh I just realized that the courts are free to the
people please send me the $350 back...

106 i a man by my will move this case Through this federal court By way of right secured and
protected To a man by the Bill of Rights United States Constitution Articles 1,7,9 and 10 and by
the common law of the land

extras

[Cf.Personal liberty, or the Right to enjoyment of life and liberty, is one of the fundamental or
natural Rights, which has been protected by its inclusion as a guarantee in the various
constitutions, which is not derived from, or dependent on, the U.S. Constitution, which may not
be submitted to a vote and may not depend on the outcome of an election. It is one of the most
sacred and valuable Rights, as sacred as the Right to private property...and is regarded as
inalienable." 16 C.J.S., Constitutional Law, Sect.202, p.987.]

http://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F2/230/486/232145/

[Cf."Execution of process and the performance of duty by constituted officers must not be
thwarted. But these agents, servants of a Government and a society whose existence and
strength comes from these constitutional safeguards, are serving law when they respect, not
override, these guarantees. The claim and exercise of a constitutional right cannot thus be
converted into a crime." Miller vs. U.S., 230 F. 486, 489. ]

https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/319/105/
Murdock v. Pennsylvania 319 U.S. 105 (1943)

15 | P a g e

A State may not impose a charge for the enjoyment of a right granted by the Federal
Constitution.

http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/384/436.html
http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/384/436.html#sthash.T0UV9Ebd.dpuf

MIRANDA v. ARIZONA, (1966)

-Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or
legislation which would abrogate them. - See more at:
-The prosecution may not use statements, whether exculpatory or inculpatory, stemming from
questioning initiated by law enforcement officers after a person has been taken into custody or
otherwise deprived of his freedom of action in any significant way, unless it demonstrates the
use of procedural safeguards effective to secure the Fifth Amendment's privilege against selfincrimination

https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/445/622/case.html
Owen v. City of Independence, 445 U.S. 622 (1980)
"There is nothing in the character of a municipal corporation which entitles it to an immunity
from liability for such malfeasances as private corporations or individuals would be liable for in a
civil action. A municipal corporation is liable to the same extent as an individual for any act done
by the express authority of the corporation, or of a branch of its government, empowered to act
for it upon the subject to which the particular act relates, and for any act which, after it has been
done, has been lawfully ratified by the corporation."

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1967/7
Misrepresentation Act 1967

16 | P a g e

https://www.usadot-gov.org/jurisdiction.html
State Has No Jurisdiction To Require
Registration To Travel On The Highways
"No State government entity has the power to allow or deny passage on the highways, byways, nor
waterways... transporting his vehicles and personal property for either recreation or business, but by
being subject only to local regulation i.e., safety, caution, traffic lights, speed limits, etc. Travel is not a
privilege requiring, licensing, vehicle registration, or forced insurances." Chicago Coach Co. v. City of
Chicago, 337
111. 200, 169 N.E. 22.
"Even the legislature has no power to deny to a citizen the right to travel upon the highway and transport
his property in the ordinary course of his business or pleasure, though this right may be regulated in
accordance with public interest and convenience. Chicago Coach Co. v. City of Chicago , 337 111. 200,
169 N.E. 22, 206.
"Privately owned Buses not engaged in for hire Transportation are outside the jurisdiction of Division of
Motor Vehicles enforcement of N.C. G.S. Article 17, Chapter 20***" 58 N.C.A.G. 1 (It follows that those
Citizens not engaged in extraordinary use of the highway for profit or gain are likewise outside the
jurisdiction of the Division of Motor Vehicles.)
The California Constitution in Article I, Section 8 (and similar statements made in all other state
constitutions) , mandates that no one "be compelled to be a witness against himself, " is in agreement
with the Supreme Court ruling in Haynes v. U.S. , 390 U.S. 85, 88 S . Ct . 722, wherein the ruling was that
to force anyone to register anything is communicative, and such communicative evidence is precluded by
the 5th Amendment.
"In view of this rule a statutory provision that the supervising officials "may" exempt such persons when
the transportation is not on a commercial basis means that they "must" exempt them." State v. Johnson,
243 P. 1073; 60 C.J.S. section 94 page 581.
"It is now universally recognized that the state does possess such power [to impose such burdens and
limitations upon private carriers when using the public highways for the transaction of their business]
with respect to common carriers using the public highways for the transaction of their business in the
transportation of persons or property for hire. That rule is stated as follows by the supreme court of the
United States: 'A citizen may have, under the fourteenth amendment, the right to travel and transport his
property upon them (the public highways) by auto vehicle, but he has no right to make the highways his

17 | P a g e

place of business by using them as a common carrier for hire. Such use is a privilege which may be
granted or withheld by the state in its discretion, without violating either the due process clause or the
equal protection clause.' ( Buck v. Kuykendall , 267 U. S. 307 [38 A. L. R. 286, 69 L. Ed. 623, 45 Sup. Ct .
Rep. 324].)
The fundamental Right to travel is NOT a Privilege, it is a gift granted by your Maker, and restated by our
founding fathers as Unalienable and cannot be taken by any Man / Government made Law or color of law
known as a private Code (secret) or a Statute.
No Registration, Licensing or Certificate of Title Required
"Since a sale of personal property is not required to be evidenced by any written instrument in order to be
valid, it has been held in North Carolina that there may be a transfer of title to an automobile without
complying with the registration statute which requires a transfer and delivery of a certificate of title." N.C.
Law Review Vol. 32 page 545, Carolina Discount Corp. v. Landis Motor Co. , 190 N.C. 157.
"The following shall be exempt from the requirements of registration and the certificate of title: 1.) Any
such vehicle driven or moved upon the highway in conformance with the provisions of this Article relating
to manufacturers, dealers, or nonresidents." 2.) Any such vehicle which is driven or moved upon a
highway only for the purpose of crossing such highway from one property to another. North Carolina G.S.
20-51 (1)(2) (comment: not driven or moved upon the highway for transporting persons or property for
profit.) (Case note to North Carolina G.S. 12-3 "Statutory Construction")
Private Automobile is NOT required to be registered by Law The California Motor Vehicle Code, section
260: Private cars/vans etc. not in commerce / for profit, are immune to registration fees:
(a) A "commercial vehicle" is a vehicle of a type REQUIRED to be REGISTERED under this code".
(b) "Passenger vehicles which are not used for the transportation of persons for hire, compensation or
profit, and house cars, are not commercial vehicles".
(c) "a vanpool vehicle is not a commercial vehicle" and "a vehicle not used for commercial activity is a
"consumer goods", ...it is NOT a type of vehicle required to be registered and "use tax" paid of which the
tab is evidence of receipt of the tax." Bank of Boston vs. Jones, 4 UCC Rep. Serv. 1021, 236 A2d 484,
UCC PP 9-109.14. And;
"Persons faced with an unconstitutional licensing law which purports to require a license as a prerequisite
to exercise of right... may ignore the law and engage with impunity in exercise of such right."
Shuttlesworth v. Birmingham 394 U.S. 147 (1969)
The Washington State Supreme Court has already made it clear in the following case that the drivers
license is intended to apply only to for hire vehicles. (Emphasis added.)
Sec. 103 It shall be unlawful for any person to drive an automobile or other motor vehicle carrying
passengers for hire, within the city of Seattle, without having a valid and subsisting license so to do, to be
known as a drivers license ...Drivers license, first class shall entitle the holder thereof to drive any kind
or class of motor vehicles for hire within the city of Seattle. Drivers license, second class shall be limited
to stages, sight-seeing cars, or other motor vehicles operating over a specified route and having a fixed

18 | P a g e

terminal. Drivers license, third class shall be limited to drivers of taxicabs, for hire cars, or other
automobiles not operating on fixed routes, and having a passenger capacity of less than seven (7)
persons, not including the driver. ...It is intended to apply to for hire vehicles as provided in section 6313,
Rem. Comp. Stats., are defined to mean all motor vehicles other than auto- mobile stages used for the
transportation of persons for which remuneration of any kind is received, either directly or indirectly.
INTERNATIONAL MOTOR TRANSIT CO. et al. V. CITY OF SEATTLE et al. , (No. 19992) 251 PACIFIC
REPORTER 120-123 (Dec. 6, 1926.)

114 pacer as proof

115 these documents are coming straight off government websites I'm not making this stuff up
that's why I went to the library and took pictures of corpus juris

122 ...A federal court not of United States District Court ( Created after the constitution (inferior
court ( for the purpose of maintaining the proper functions of gov not for the poeple.) )
In contrast to the Supreme Court, which was established by Article III of the Constitution, the district
courts were established by Congress.[note 1] There is no constitutional requirement that district courts
exist at all.

19 | P a g e

extra
1 Timothy 5:18King James Version (KJV)
For the scripture saith, thou shalt not muzzle the ox that treadeth out the corn. And, The labourer is
worthy of his reward.
18

luke 10 : 7 KJV
And in the same house remain, eating and drinking such things as they give: for the labourer is
worthy of his hire.
123 No branch of government Codified the law in America it is done and out sourced to a Canadian
company called Thompsons Publishing Company

126 In an Administrative Court to have no constitutional rights they're not going to tell you that you're
an admin court so be weary.
127 Their classes going to try and put you under title 42 do not go under that you are a tort claim
You can't file a claim on a complaint side of court .

128 The clerk is just going to be signing your orders and sending them back to you with a seal on it
129 When you Get an order 4 billion dollars from a federal court The u.s. marshals will go and carry
it out for you.. That's the advantage. but if you go to a local county court or a state court and get a
four billion dollar order You have to figure out how you're going to collect on that judgment ...You
could follow writ of debt And then try and get a rid of attachment And then drying at the sheriff's
department to go carry it out for you

writ defined...Law.
a. a formal order under seal, issued in the name ofa sovereign, government, court, or
othercompetent authority, enjoining the officer orother person to whom it is issued or addressed
todo or refrain from some specified act.
b. (in early English law) any formal document inletter form, under seal, and in the sovereign'sname.
2.
something written; a writing:

20 | P a g e

sacred writ.

131. You file a claim and it's going to go first before their complaint that they filed against you ...Your
claim will have something about that they interfered with you your right To move You make a claim for all
kinds of broken windows kinds of things..
You don't file a cross complaint or a counterclaim in there admin court..
You can presented to the same judge because he's supposed to wear many different hats from a tax
court or to a common law court

134 Before you file a lawsuit you have to give a fair warning letter :

139 i Robin Mitchell give no entity The right to administrate my property

I say that baby Johnson [ Your car has been towed anything ] is my property
I say that no man or woman will Make a claim saying my claim is untrue
I want my property returned to me
Said property is to be totally under my control posthaste Within 3 days [ whatever time limit you want to
give them ]
I will charge The wrongful holder of said property $XXXXXXX For every day [ Minute ] said property is
not returned Starting on the 22nd day After they received this summons and this Suit (see attached claim
)

142 Government cannot be harmed they can only be injured as they are not flesh and blood
143 I'm a man and I have been defrauded of my rights

Defraud
DEFRAUD, verb transitive [Latin To cheat.]

21 | P a g e

1. To deprive of right, either by obtaining something by deception or artifice, or by taking something

wrongfully without the knowledge or consent of the owner; to cheat; to cozen; followed by of before the
thing taken; as, to defraud; a man of his right.
We have corrupted no man, we have defrauded no man. 2 Corinthians 7:2.
The agent who embezzles public property, defrauds the state.
The man who by deception obtains a price for a commodity above its value, defrauds the purchaser.
2. To withhold wrongfully from another what is due to him. defraud not the hireling of his wages.
3. To prevent one wrongfully from obtaining what he may justly claim.
A man of fortune who permits his son to consume the season of education in hunting, shooting, or in
frequenting horse-races, assemblies, etc., defrauds the community of a benefactor, and bequeaths them
a nuissance.
4. To defeat or frustrate wrongfully.
By the duties deserted-by the claims defrauded.

Defrauded
DEFRAUDED, participle passive Deprived of property or right by trick, artifice or deception; injured by the
withholding of what is due.

152 If you use their words you lose your court And it goes back into an admin court

153 I'm giving you fair warning.keep it simple

155 Exodus 21King James Version (KJV)
24 Eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot,
25 Burning for burning, wound for wound, stripe for stripe.
156 Making a claim I'm a man I have rights Protected and secured by the United States Constitution
Have to demanding the judge signed sealed and delivered To the Marshalls

22 | P a g e

Make the judges Hold up their oath of office to the Constitution ...Did they or did they not Under
Article 6, 2 and 3 Swear to uphold the Constitution that the law of the land

That I'm going to go after their bond..

CJS 67 ss 60-61

159 Official bonds the Fidelity bonds and surety bonds

203 I don't have civil rights civil rights of a certain protected individuals and society And I'm not it it's
not a prophylactic remedy for all society's ills..

212 Trinsey vs Pagliaro essentially means

Anytime the state prosecutor moved the court and create an order As a judgement passed Against
you Is void because no one came into open court Under oath or affirmation That you did something
wrong

213 If the judge ask you if you're an idiot you better say yes

Bail

Traditionally, bail is some form of property deposited or pledged to a court to persuade it to release a
suspect from jail, on the understanding that the suspect will return for trial or forfeit the bail (and possibly
be brought up on charges of the crime of failure to appear). In some cases, bail money may be returned
at the end of the trial, if all court appearances are made, regardless of whether the person is found guilty

23 | P a g e

or not guilty of the crime accused. If a bondsman is used and a surety bond has been obtained, the fee
for that bond is the fee for the insurance policy purchased and is not refundable.
In some countries, granting bail is common. Even in such countries, however, bail may not be offered by
some courts under some circumstances; for instance, if the accused is considered likely not to appear for
trial regardless of bail. Legislatures may also set out certain crimes to be not bailable, such as those that
carry the penalty of capital punishment. Even for lesser crimes, bail will not be granted if it is deemed
likely that the accused will flee, tamper with evidence, or commit the same offense before trial.

219 Don't let it go to explain you what it means you don't understand anything what a code is or any
of their gibberish that they come at you I don't understand we leave at all that's the position you
maintain

220 Man is not bound by latches

221 Finally a verdict by a jury I laugh ..Probably rubber stamped signed..

223 The government does not have a right to come After you it only has duties and obligations

224 All men are created equal.if anyone was in traffic traffic court and their name was called
.they call it all three times [ Is there anyone making a claim against a Robin Mitchell] and move
on... well we can do same we show up for the 9 o'clock summons, we call out at 9 3x in open court
...if you get no response, then you can leave. if they give you any guff you know what to say...I
was there .

229 file your claim at least 10 days before your admin trial

230 when a cop gives you a ticket to take it to the Prosecuting attorney the next day and you try to
return it to him saying that the officer is making a false claim because you have done no wrong To
no man and it is my wish that you discharge o r dismiss it this ticket ...Will just say you wrote it in
error

24 | P a g e

25 | P a g e