0 оценок0% нашли этот документ полезным (0 голосов)
58 просмотров2 страницы
This document provides a summary of a student's assessment feedback for a project in a Broadcast Technology program. It includes:
1. Student information like name, ID, program, level, project title, and unit details.
2. A list of 10 assessment criteria graded on a scale of excellent to fail, covering things like application of techniques, understanding of principles, knowledge of standards, application of methods/measurements, and ability to articulate processes.
3. An overall comment section for strengths and areas for improvement.
4. A grading scale from A+ to F- that provides brief descriptors for performance levels and an overall grade for the student's work.
This document provides a summary of a student's assessment feedback for a project in a Broadcast Technology program. It includes:
1. Student information like name, ID, program, level, project title, and unit details.
2. A list of 10 assessment criteria graded on a scale of excellent to fail, covering things like application of techniques, understanding of principles, knowledge of standards, application of methods/measurements, and ability to articulate processes.
3. An overall comment section for strengths and areas for improvement.
4. A grading scale from A+ to F- that provides brief descriptors for performance levels and an overall grade for the student's work.
Авторское право:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Доступные форматы
Скачайте в формате DOC, PDF, TXT или читайте онлайн в Scribd
This document provides a summary of a student's assessment feedback for a project in a Broadcast Technology program. It includes:
1. Student information like name, ID, program, level, project title, and unit details.
2. A list of 10 assessment criteria graded on a scale of excellent to fail, covering things like application of techniques, understanding of principles, knowledge of standards, application of methods/measurements, and ability to articulate processes.
3. An overall comment section for strengths and areas for improvement.
4. A grading scale from A+ to F- that provides brief descriptors for performance levels and an overall grade for the student's work.
Авторское право:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Доступные форматы
Скачайте в формате DOC, PDF, TXT или читайте онлайн в Scribd
Project Title Project Value Unit Title Communications and Networks Unit Code BTC303 Project Leader Unit Leader
Assessment Criteria Indicative Grading
Excellent V Good Good Satisfactory Basic Fail N/A Coursework 1 Level of ability to apply advanced techniques of analysis and enquiry to solve complex problems in both practical and theoretical arenas; (LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4) 2 Depth of understanding of principles and applications (some of which may be at the forefront of broadcast engineering) in problem solving; (LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4) 3 Degree of knowledge of public data network standards; (LO6) 4 Level of application of learned methods and techniques in monitoring and carrying out measurements in practical exercises; (LO5) 5 Level of ability in articulating processes clearly in order to devise and sustain arguments and solve problems. (LO7) Test 6 Depth of advanced understanding of functions and performance of digital communications channels; (LO1) 7 Ability to accurately deploy coherent and detailed knowledge of complex theory; (LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4) 8 Level of systematic knowledge of channel coding; (LO2) 9 Degree of application of understanding of error handling principles; (LO3) 10 Ability to apply detailed understanding of packet switching networks. (LO4) Note 1 - Unless specified in the Project Brief it is assumed that all assessment criteria are equally weighted
Overall comment including strengths and areas for improvement
Assessment Feedback
Grade Banding Brief Grade Descriptor
A+ 90-100 High Excellent all round work or outstanding A 80-89 Medium performance Grade (where appropriate) A- 70-79 Low B+ 67-69 High High level achievement or very good level of B 64-66 Medium performance B- 60-63 Low C+ 57-59 High Good level of achievement or proficient C 54-56 Medium performance C- 50-53 Low D+ 47-49 High Satisfactory level of achievement or competent D 44-46 Medium performance D- 40-43 Low E 35-39 Marginal Elementary achievement or basic level of Note 2 - All summative grades are subject to ratification by the Examination Board Pass performance F+ 30-34 Marginal Does not achieve the learning outcomes but Fail may be some element of understanding or Please contact your Unit Leader about retrieval competence arrangements (where appropriate) Assessor(s) F < 30 Name: Fail No evidence of achievement or competence F- > 10 Poor Fail 0 0 no submission or special circumstances