Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Declaration
I hereby declare that the project work entitled UNCITRAL MODEL LAW AND INDIAN
ARBITRATION LAW: A COMPARATIVE STUDY submitted to HNLU, Raipur, is record of an
original work done by me under the able guidance of Mr. Manoj Kumar , Assistant Lecturer ,
HNLU, Raipur.
Ayushi Dwivedi
Roll No. 47
Semester-VI
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The successful completion of any task would be, but incomplete, without the mention of people
who made it possible and whose constant guidance and encouragement crowned my effort with
success.
I would like to thank my course teacher Mr. Manoj Kumar for providing me the topic of my
interest.
Secondly, I would like to thank our Vice Chancellor for providing the best possible facilities of
I.T. and library in the university.
I would also like to extend my warm and sincere thanks to all my colleagues, who contributed in
innumerable ways in the accomplishment of this project.
Ayushi Dwivedi
Semester VI
TABLE OF CASES
S.No
.
1.
2.
Service Inc.
Dealim Industrial Co. vs. Numaligarh Refinery Ltd.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Ltd.
Nimet Resources v. Essar Steels
CITATION
Pg.
No.
11
11
11
1997
2006 (11) SCC 181
10
Arbitration Petition 19 of
11
9
7.
2000
AIR 2003 Guj 145
8.
9.
10
10
11.
Pvt. Ltd.
&
And
i.e.
That is
eg.
Example
AIR
Asst.
Assistant
Govt.
Government
Edn.
Edition.
SC
Supreme Court.
SCC
Contents
Declaration..i
Acknowledgements..ii
Table of Cases....iii
Acronyms and Abbreviations....iv
1. Research Methodology.1
2. Objectives..........1
3. Hypothesis.1
4. Introduction...2
5. Arbitration in India.3-4
6. UNCITRAL Model Law5
7. Comparison between UNCITRAL Model Law and Indian Arbitration Law.........6-13
8. Conclusion.....14
9. References..15