COMPLAINT MAIL TO: ‘Judicial Inquiry and Review Commission Post Office Box 367 mond, Virginia 23218-0367 Note: The Commission does not accept fax or e-mail complaints. Name of Judge, Location of Court, Date of Incident Gase Name or Number (if known) T Current Status of Ca Name and telephone number of persons who witnessed the judge's conduct: Description of what the judge said or did that you believe was improper: additional pages may be attached) DO NOT SEND ORIGINAL COURT RECORDS/RECORD WILL NOT BE RETURNED Name Daytimo (Please Print Clearly) Janice Wolk Grenadier Telephone (202) 366-7178 Date Bly (2 evan 00040016: aL B @ COMPLAINT Noi am ~ ay eee fen io eel ent Vi I scan) ae Vie 4) vocaion ot 1A lexan dus. Ouro part Dat of aiden Seppe ben. i CaeNancor Numer Grinowm LHe OLN SY [Name and telephone number of persons who witnessed the judge's conduct Desrng of what the jue sig opto breve yas proper, ‘additional pages may be atached) Nome xcs aes Walle Grenade 22688.(705) ba3-465S aie V5 Vilexandry a Wg. A492! Patou 4, 2008 () Signature C'The Commission doesnot accept unsigned complainis®) as 3/30/06@ September 28, 2008 (on Fray September 26, 2008 | made @ phone cal to the Jul Inquty & Review Commission. In that conversation learned that Judge McGrath the judge in my case was from the Arington area. Iwas led to believe that this judge had been chosen to hear my case ashe was from Harrisonburg, Va and now 2 retired judge and not familar with this area and would be abl to ste to my case with objectivity. | believe with 100% of my heart and with the fllowing information that under Type of Complaints the commision investigates that it would come under 1 Allowing family, socal or cher relationships to Influence this judgment 2. Engaging in private conversations which may influence judicial actions 3 ‘And possible falling to disqualify n a proceeding in which impartiality reasonably might be questioned, because of his Actions under 4 & 2 ‘Our case was heard on Thursday September 12, 2008. The day started with Judge McGrat calling us ance Wolk Grenadier and lona Grenadier Heckman) backto chambers. He sali he knew not to call but one of the defendants in (David Grenadier). Hein 45 minutes knew not to cal both defendants in ‘with having just looked atthe case for 4 minutes? Which think that made me question what was ‘goin to happen. Then he made a suggestion of an offer fora settlement that had been ina letter from the defendant llona Grenadier where she had also threatened me | had better drop this suitor else Here is aman thats supposed tobe impartial. That sald he had had only 45 minutes that morning to review the case fle which was easly several inches thick. Had already made a call not to callin both defendants to discuss a settlement. | had already had judges that had allowed the defendants tole in court inthe Gy of Alexandria. Unfortunatly this has happened again, The defendants tlona Ely Freedman Grenadier Heckman was married to the late Judge Albert Grenadier who was a good friend ‘and well respected through out the state of Virginia the other defendant David Grenadier is the son of ‘the Judge. was told on several occasions! wouldnt get a fair tral, this Included one ofthe crcult court Judges her in Alexandria. I wes nieve enough to believe inthe truth. | also am raising my eildren having beon given without asking sole custody of my gis, from this cour. believe this courtis aware ofhow these defendants are. | believe that this Judge did discuss this case with the others, He also ‘went to lunch with one ofthe judges they looked very fiend during this lunch. {was ignorant enough tobelieve | stil hada chance withthe truth. ‘The following facts! believe support my complaint: 1. The moming conference with only one defendant and how it was handled. 2. How uncomfortable the Judge McGrath seemed during this discussion 3. How Mrs. Grenadier brought out the question of the Sonia Grenadier Tris situation and the judge even said he didnt understand, but, allowed the defendant a three diferent times to bring it up, evento question me about it. But, would not allow me to question them about, and even stated he didnt really understand the issue, ust wast going heart. The Sonia ‘Grenadier Trust situation is of Mr. ona Grenadier Heckman and David Grenadier having access ‘through agents forthe Trust of Sonia Grenager tothe mismanagement her Trust and the financial benefit from this mismanagement. | belleve he knew the allocations that were going to s ee@ 4. He then allowed with out any type of comment fr the defendants to ie under oath. Iwas able to proveit, and | was ust told to move on. 5. That when | went to ask Mrs. Grenadier questions was warned how | approached the questions wen the defendants had been allowed to hammer me, 6. The defendants had been allowed to ask me the same question several imes, between the two ‘of them, when | objected the judge allowed them to go forward. When ever | asked a question ‘twice Iwas told to move on, he allowed there objections. He allowed them to li 7. Maybe twes innocent. But, Judge McGrath had a very frendly inch with one ofthe focal Judges who was aware of everything, it may have been innocent but, now | have learned that ‘Judge MeGrath was from this area, It didn’t have the look of appropriate and innocent atthe time, and now with my new knowledge that Judge McGrath has done substantial wockin this reat really doesn’t have the look of appropriate. Judge Brown had heard our case before and afterwards Mrs llona Grenadier Heckman was commenting on there relationship and Lam not sure he should have heard the complaint after eared ef that. She was commenting onthe help she hed given him before on cases. So was very specific with the judge's chambers on ‘making sure there was an impartial Judge. 8. On Monday September 22, 2008 filed 2 Motion fr Reconsideration with the Alexandta Creu Court. New information had been provided to me on the Loan of the funds to ona Grenade / David Grenadier / GiC from the cas. it was letter the settlement attomey hid me write atthe time of settement. | didn’t have this letter prior tothe court date, {also gave the back upto prove the dlsingenuous statements made by the defendants and ther attorneys. | then followed up withthe Circuit Court's Judges Chambersto be sure since the Judge was from out of this area he received The Motion and the Exhibits. On Wednesday September 24,2008 | was informed they had reached him and he only requested The Mation be sent and none of the Exhibits. On Thursday he stil had not requested any Exhibits. On Friday afternoon lreceved a «all from the Judges Chambers that he had denied the Motion and had never requested or ‘asked about the Exhibits. The Motion had been denled on September 24,2008 the same day he received the motion. Ihave sine then gone tothe Commonwealths Attorney's Office. ‘When | caled and spoke with Don atthe board and learned that Judge McGrath was fom the Aington ‘area and he knew weil of Burke and Herbert Ban, Ithen realized more then ever there was a good possibility that Judge McGrath should not have heard this case. | hope you wil look seriousat these allegations as fim beleve Judge McGrath shouldnt have heard this case ora best did discuss this «case with others that were familar with this case, and fiir withthe family situation. ‘Tome this isa very sad day. | belleve in our country and in aur system, this court has shattered that believe forme. | pray this board look seriously at this. | feo strongly that this hudge shoul have heard this case, he should have excused himself, Especialy after the conference prior tothe tra GiveCOMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA Judicial Inquiry and Review Commission poate rua. cumin nae, EE a tte aae oupr.cumy ee ee smgennrcino eee ‘oa cua October 25, 2008 “Aadomascrmtee Aaiaeant Ms. Janice W. Grenadier 15 West Spring Street ‘Alexandria, VA 22307 Dear Ms, Grenadier: @ This n ays: o you sma ued Cc 21, 008, ted pon whe youve ninived mal leg eve toad on tae rs coca nat S's volion ofthe Caren’ "A' ma “tele” at an cre sonata sexe wtbout mere, oes ot pve slit bas fa Cosine ato Pins be add, merece tht BE pe shut nis ou comin ea eee ge from the 26" Circuit (Rockingham, Harrisonburg, Page, Shenandoah, Warren, Clarke and. Frederick, sincerely. Donald. Curry Counsel abCOMPLAINT Judicial Inquiry and Review Commission Post Office Box 367 Richmond, Virginia 25218-0367 ("The Commission does not accept fax or email complaints") MAILTO: Cy ‘Name of Judge, Jan od W lyatt —— Loatiocercot CUrcuut Court of Alevandarso. vor Date of ircident, aplen ber 72 exe or Number (€taown) (Lp L /moloo a2. Seapine ‘Desrition of what the judee suid or did that you believe was improper: (additional pages may be attached) Pima crynclamies Wall (ofemradiey resi WA]bAS- 45S “ AW B e 34 36]@ Janice Wolk Grenadier 15W Sprng Street Alexandria, Virginia 22301 703-623-9655 jwokkgrenadier@aol.com ‘September 21, 2011, Judge James McGrath Gircuit Court of Alexandria Virginia 520 King Street Alexandria, Virginia 22314 E-mailed Dear Judge James McGrath, On September 11,2008 as asked by the Circuit Court of Alexandria to oversee a case that the Judges of the Circuit Court had recused themselves. The Circuit Court of ‘Alexandria had not followed the rules of The Supreme Court of Virginia Rule 17.1- 105(b) This was in violation of my Civil Rights, my Constitutional Rights, and The Law of the Supreme Court of Virginia were broken, which as a Judge you the responsibilty Cf knowing, In conclusion you either you did not know the law ~ incompetence, or, you ignored the law — unconscionable! | understand many courts have found that judges who have acted in thei judicial Capacity were entitled to immunity. But, courts have found that the judges who acted uiside oftheir judicial capacity were not entitled to immunity. Which | believe is in Yours and all the Judges from September 7, 2007 who have ruled on my case are in Violation of many different laws which you lose immunity. Under the common lw, judges are generally immune from civil liability for judicial acts, but they do not enjoy this: Immunity when there is criminal labilty. Judges are not protected by immunity when they have acted in "the clear absence of all jurisdictions." | believe in this case You and all the Judge's from thio dato have acted will Malice and Clear intent to folow the wants. of Judge Haddock the head Judge ofthe Circuit Court of Alexandria — who to my face told me | would not get a fair tral and how they “Loved llona" ‘Your actions in Violating the Rule, acting with impropriety created the appearance of ‘Supporting the unprofessional behavior ofthe Virginia Circuit Court of Alexandiia, and, Supporting the wishes of Judge Haddock, Judge Klock and Judge Bondareff Kemer, ‘and Judge Nolan B. Dawkins. You are a trespasser of the law, you did not have subject-matter jurisdiction and your order is void, of no legal force or effect. Whenever a judge acts where helshe does not have jurisdiction to act, the judge is engaged in an act oracts of treason. When judges act when they do not have jurisdiction to act, or they ‘enforce a void order (an order issued by a judge without jurisdiction), they become trespassers of the law, and are engaged in treason.@ @ | gave The Circuit Court of Alexandria an opportunity to fix this error ~ Instead they have ‘added insult to injury causing me much stress - even more upsetting what this has done tomy children. They are well aware of how many times the police have come to my hhome to make sure | have not committed suicide over what actions they and you have taken, ‘You have lost your immunity. You as a judge did not foliow the law. Le. you are a trespasser of the law, you as a judge have lost subject-matter jurisdiction and your orders should be void, of no legal force or effect. The U.S. Supreme Court, in Scheuer Vv. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 94 S.Ct. 1683, 1687 (1974) stated that "when a state officer acts under a state law in a manner violative of the Federal Constitution, he "comes into conflict with the superior authority of that Constitution, and he isin that case stripped of his official or representative character and is subjected in his person to the ‘consequences of his individual conduct. The State has no power to impart to him any immunity from responsibilty to the supreme authority of the United States, | would be writing a motion to have your ruling against me dismissed, again presenting ‘my Motion to Dismiss and to have my case heard by a Judge with Jurisdiction. | tried this with the Circuit Court. They denied it. So | have gone to the JIRK committee to the VSB - The Supreme Court of Viginia, to my State Representative, To be told | have no rights | am not a part of The Virginia Old Boys network. ‘THEREFORE | willbe fling suit against all parties who have decided | am not of value to deserve a fair trial. Who have violated The Rules and discriminated against me. | _am notifying everyone of this - On Wednesday September 28, 2011 if | have not heard from you I will assume you are not interested in setting this and wil fle suit against you. Warmly, Janice Wolk Grenadier Pro-se PartyExhibit 14 Judge John MeGrath 1) On September 11, 2008 as asked by the Circuit Court of Alexandria to oversee a case that the Judges of the Circuit Court had recused themselves. The Circuit Court of Alexandria had not followed the rules of The Supreme Court of Virginia, Fuule 17.1-105(b) This was in violation of Plaintifs Civil Rights, Constitutional Rights, and The Law of the Supreme Court of Virginia were broken, which as a ‘Judge he had the responsibilty of knowing. In conclusion he either did not know the law ~ incompetence, or, he ignored the law — unconscionable! On August 12, 2010 Judge Kloch recuse himselt because of the same relationship that Judge McGrath & Judge Kloch shared at the time of Plaintiff's trial. With the ‘acknowledgement: “Appearance of Justice is just as important as Justice itself” ‘September 11, 2008 — Thursday Trial Judge John McGrath 1. The 1% issue JWG has is first thing Judge McGrath did that moming was to call iona and JWG into Chambers to have a conference to see if case could be settled. Judge McGrath informed JWG he had studied the fie for the last ‘45 minutes and understood there to be an issue in including David in the conference. He also made a comment that the moneyisettlement shouldn't {90 directly to JWG because of judgments against JWG which JWG had none at that time. He then suggested the funds could be disbursed through Burke {& Herbert Bank towards JWG's daughter's education, This was Plaintifs ‘money, not Plaintitfs daughters. Not that every cent Plaintiff has doesn't go to them. ‘Now please keep in mind Plaintif had been led to believe this was a judge from Harrisonburg, he had no ties to this area, Not a judge coming to play Kangaroo Court. JWG noticed during conversation Judge Kloch lingered inthe hall way. JWG had been very specific with the Judge's ofice in Alexandria; Plaintif expected to have a fair judge. especially ater llona’s comments about Judge Brown, and other Judge's. 2. Then Ilona was allowed to bring up a situation which dealt with the theft of money from the Sonia Grenadier Trust that was run out of her law office. First in the Opening Statement, and then with questioning Plaintiff under oath,3. When Plaintif went to question David and llona, JWG wasn't allowed to ‘question them or bring The Sonia Grenadier Trust. Judge McGrath said he Wasn't going to allow it brought into his court room and he really didn't understand it. JWG requested to explain it to him, he wouldn't hear of i. JWG ‘mentioned llona had brought it up he just went on to say he wasr't allowing it in his Kangaroo court room. 4. David Grenadier lied under oath. Judge McGrath allowed itn his Kangaroo ‘Court room to protect one of the partes to the Network. 5. When llona got on the stand JWG was WARNED on how Plaintiff could Question llona and what questions. JWG started asking llonaquestions, llona broke down crying. JWG asked for recess to give liona a chance to compose herself and was denied. Kangaroo Court as you have never seen ito protect The Network. 6. Judge McGrath then went and had a very friendly lunch with Judge Kloch at ‘Jackson 20 a new restaurant in Old Town. Most likely discussing their work together al Judicial Solutions. 7. Judge McGrath then of course found in favor of llona and Davic. JWG would ‘not have had a problem with fit had been a fair trial with a Judge that had Integnly. Judge McGrath was tainted and had discussed this case prior to. court with Judge Kloch, and possible other Judge's in the chamoers. ‘The order was written prior to closing arguments. ‘September 22, 200 ~ JWG Filed Motion for Reconsideration With new evidence that had been dropped off at Plantifs house ~ A letter that David Ellsberg the Settlement altomey fer Bellefonte that he had Plaintiff write him that showed Plaintiff was loaning the money to ona / David / GIC ‘September 23, 2008 - 1, Diane Fiske - Question: Protocol (Judge was out of town last week) ~ She will e-mail / call Judge see if he wants mailed to tim or in area to stop by, 2. Commenwealth Attomey's Oifice Randy Sengel explains to JWG that Judge McGrath did a lot of work in the Circuit Court of Alexandria and was well known with the Judge's ‘September 24, 2008 — Diane — heard from Judge sent him Motion-but he didn't want Exhibits ~ So basically didn’t even consider Motion ‘September 26, 2008 -1. Diane Fiske - 21 days hopefully something today Judge has everything except Exhibits 2, Diane Attemoon received order from Judge in mail sent on 24"— denying and he never looked at Exhibits confirmed by Diane 3, Randy Sengel ~ Commonwealth Attomey tells Plaintf the JIRC Commission is appropriate place to file a complaint - again Informs me that Judge McGrath has done a lot of work in Alexandria Circuit Court 4, Call to Judicial Inquiry & Review Commission Donald Curry informed JWG that Judge McGrath was from the Arlington Area and that is how he knew about Burke & Herbert Bank ~ had done extencive work in Alexandria Courts 5. Plaintf realized thatthe fact he was from Harrisonburg was mute it was a farce. With this new knowledge JWG realized the following was true - Type of ‘Complaints the commission investigates comes under: 1. Allowing Family, social or other relationships to influence this judgment 2. Engaging in private conversations which may influence judicial actions 3. Failing to disqualify ina proceeding in which impartiality reasonably might be quoetioned, because of his Actions under 1 & 2 October 21, 2008 - Mailed from Alexandria Virginia a complaint against Judge John ‘McGrath to his good friend Donald Curry w/ the JIC Commission. ‘October 23, 2008 — Donald R Curry Counsel for JIC committee sent me the following: “This is in response to your complaint dated October 21, 2008, Based upon what you have submitted and alleged, we have found no basis for a conclusion that there has been a violation of the Canons. A mere “belief that an ex parte communication, occurred, without more, does not provide a sufficient basis for Commission action, Please be advised, moreover, that the judge about whom you complaint is a retired judge from the 26" Circuit." ‘The complaint was never researched Plaintiff tried to take it further but The Network, was to busy protecting each other.John J. McGrath Jr. Judge James McGrath 2%! JIRC Complaint 1.12.2012 Circuit Court of Alexandria Virginia 1520 King Street Alexandria, Virginia 22314 On September 11,2008 as asked by the Circuit Court of Alexandria to oversee a case that the Judges of the Circuit Court had recused themselves. The Circuit Court of ‘Alexandria had not followed the rules of The Supreme Court of Virginia Rule 17.1- 105(b) This was in violation of my Civil Rights, my Constitutional Rights, and The Law of the Supreme Court of Virginia were broken, which as a Judge you the responsibilty cof knowing. In conclusion you either he did nat know the law — incompetence, or, he ignored the law ~ unconscionable! |lunderstand many courts have found that judges who have acted in their judicial ‘capacity were entiled to immunity. But, courts have found that the judges who acted outside of their judicial capacity were not entitled to immunity. Which | believe is in Judge McGrath's and all the Judges from September 7, 2007 who have ruled on my ‘case are in violation of many different laws which you lose immunity. Under the ‘common law, judges are generally immune from civil ability for judicial acs, but they do. ‘not enjoy this immunity when there is criminal iablity. Judges are not protected by immunity when they have acted in “the clear absence of al jurisdictions.” | believe hy this case Judge McGrath and all the Judge's from this date have acted with Malice and Clear intent to follow the wants of Judge Haddock the head Judge of the Circuit Court of ‘Alexandria — who to my face told me | would not get a far tral and how they ‘Loved ona’. His actions in Violating the Rule, acting with impropriety created the appearance of ‘supporting the unprofessional behavior of the Virginia Circuit Court of Alexandria, and ‘Supporting the wishes of Judge Haddock, Judge Klock and Judge Bondareff Kemler ‘and Judge Nolan B. Dawkins. All wth all the other rules of the court and unprofessional {and disingenuous behavior included in the other documents, You are a trespasser of the law, you did not have subject-matter jurisdiction and your order is void, of no legal force or effect. Whenever a judge acts where helshe does not have jurisdiction to act, the judge is engaged in an act or acts of treason. When judges act when they do not have jurisdiction to act, or they ‘enforce a void order (an order issued by a judge without jurisdiction), they become trespassers of the law, and are engaged in treason. | gave The Circuit Court of Alexandria an opportunity to fix this error - Instead they have ‘added insutt to injury causing me much stress - even more upsetting what this has dane tomy children. They are well aware of how many times the police have come to my home to make sure I have not committed suicide over what actions they and you have taken. 2Judge McGrath has lost his immunity. As. a judge he did not follow the law, ie. he is a ‘trespasser of the law, he as a judge has lost subject-matter jurisdiction and his orders should be void, of no legal force or effect. The U.S. Supreme Court, in Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 94 S.Ct. 1683, 1687 (1974) stated that ‘when a state officer acts under a state law in a manner violative of the Federal Constitution, he "comes into cconfict wth the superior authority ofthat Constitution, and he is in that case stripped of his official or representative character and is subjected in his person to the ‘consequences of his individual conduct. The State has no power to impart to him any immunity from responsibilty to the supreme authority ofthe United States.” ‘This commitee needs to send a very strong message to Judge McGrath that Virginia, ‘expects it's Judge's to follow the Rules of the State of Virginia Code. ‘the Judge in September who heard my Bellefonte Case agains ona Grenadier & David Grenadier. The problem was he was tainted. He had dscussed the cate withthe other ludges, ‘urdical Solutions PLC isan organization which hasbeen established to provide a broad array of professional, efficient, ané prompt Alternate Dispute Resolution services throughout the Mid-Atlantic Allof the Senior Professionals provided by Juriical Solutions PLC are retired Judges. ue to the unique nature Jura Selutlons, we are able o provide the services of @ highly experienced profesional staff at reasonable costs, BVIRGINIA: IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE CITY OF ALEXANDRIA AT ITS CRIMINAL TERM COMMENCING October 11,2011 ‘Direct Indictment - Perjury Commonwealth of Virginia JOHN J. McGRATH ‘Works at: S20 King Street Alsxandri, Virginia 22314 Race: Caucasian Sex: Male Het: (’) WGT: (2) Eye 1 Gand Jus oft Comonweath of Via ante Cy of Alana, ateing he Cou fra Potente peso acy ofA NOLAN B DAWKINS vio Vigna Code Sets.) § 182-434, What deemed perjury; punishment and penalty, ~S<=—~ ary pronto whom anethsefullyaniterdo ny ocasca wy ears bly 0 ch oct ouhinany material ater hing ova pon ally ate ea ray ero Strrofgerls ra ocbtnsnarge ies fore ee os. or ay Poon ny wen {ton ene vnaonor sere anr perl of ey pemonng casei sare ean rl rhb dort nef a rey, pn os ia ty Up eon ay poner peu. exh pron ey sal ie oer Stayt olden occa hor per taana he Costavon Von ort ene me § 8.01-4.3. Unsworn declarations under penalty of perjury; penalty. Ifa matter in any judicial proceeding or administrative hearing is required or permitted to be established by ‘a swom written declaration, verification, certificate statement, oath, or affidavit, suck matter may, with ike force and effect, be evidenced, by the unswom written declaration, certificate, verification, or statement, which is subscribed by the maker as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form: "1 declare (or certify, verify or state) under penalty of perjury thatthe foregoing is true and correct.” Thissection shall not apply to deposition, an oath of office, or an oath required tobe taken before a specified offal other than a notary publi. Punishment: A Class 5 felony, which Is punishable by a minimum of a term of imprisonment of two years and a maximum of 10 years and a fine of up to $2,500. Grasd Jury Witness: ATrue Bill__ Not ATrue Bill __ Special Grand Jury_ Majority Janice Wolk Grenadier, Citizen ‘Special Grand Jury Minority Foreman of the Grand Jury NOTE: Under Virginia law, there is NO “Statute of Limitations” on Felony Crimes.“VIRGINIA: INTHE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE CITY OF ALEXANDRIA AT ITS CRIMINAL TERM COMMENCING October 11, 2011 ‘Direct Indictment - Resisting the execution of the laws under color ofits authority. Commonwealth of Virgin JOHN J. MeGRATH ‘Works at: 520 King Street, Alexandr Race: Caueasian Sex: Male (2) WGT: (2) Eyes: (2) Hair: (2) Virginia 22314 Defendant The Grand Jurors of the Commonwealth of Vireinia and the City of Alexandria, attending the Court aforesaid, "upon ther oaths present that, in the City of Alexandria, in violation of Virginia Code Section § 182-481. §§ 182-481, Treason define; how proved and punished. “Treason shal! consist ony in (1) Levying war against the Commonwealth; (2) Adhering tits enemies, ving them aid and comfort (@) Establishing, without authority ofthe legislature, any government within its limits separate from the existing -governmen: (4) Holding or execu in such usurped government, any ci (5) Resisting the execation ofthe laws under color ofits authority. ‘Such reason, if proved by the testimony of two witnesses 1 the same overt at, or by confession in cour, hall be punishable asa Class 2 felony. NOTE: Under Virginia law, there is NO “Statute of Limitations” on Felony Crimes. 4 17.-105, Designation of jodges to hold courts and assist other jdges. B. If all the judges of any court of record are so situated in respect to any case, civil or criminal, pending in ther court ns to render it improper in their opinion, for them to preside a the iia, unless the cause ‘or proceeding is removed, as provided by law, they shall enter the fact of record and the clerk ofthe court ‘hall at once certify the same to the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, who shall designate a judge of some other cour of record oa retired judge of any such court we preside at the trial of such case, {In this ease against the widow of a former Alexandria judge, the Alexandria judges refused to obey the law. professing allegiance or fidelity tot or § 182-21. When and where accessories tried; how indicted. ‘An accessory, either before or after the fact, may, whether the principal felon be convicted or not, or be amenable to justice or not, be indicted, tried, convicted and punished in the county or corporation in which hhe became accessory. or in which the principal felon might he indicted. Any such accessory hefore the f ‘may be indicted either with such principal or separately. § 192-191, Functions ofa grand jury. ‘The functions ofa grand jury are wofole: (1) To consider bills of indictment prepared by the attorney for tie Commonwealth and to determine whether 25 to each such bill there is suficient probable cause to retura such indictment "a true bill” (Q) To investigate and report on any condition that involves or tends to promote criminal activity either in the community or by any governmental authority, agency or oficial thereof. These functions may be exercised by either a special grand jury or a regular grand jury as hereinafter provided.VIRGINIA: IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE CITY OF ALEXANDRIA AT ITS CRIMINAL TERM COMMENCING Ociober 11, 2011 Direct Indictment - Resisting the execution of the laws under color ofits authority. § 192-197 states in part: foreman who shall be sworn as follows: "You shall diligently inquire. and tne presentment make, of all ‘such matters as may be given you in charge, or come to your knowledge, touching the present service. You shall present no person through prejudice or ill-will, nor leave any unpresented through fear oF Vor, but in all your presentments you shall present the ruth, the whole truth,and nothing but the truth. So help you God.” ‘Virginia Law states the Jury Foreman is not to “leave any unpresented through fear or favor”, that ‘would mean Presentments from any Citizen about Violation of Laws or Abuse of Authority by a Judge or Judges, a Commonwealth Attorney, an elected Court Clerk, or other Governmental Official, ‘are part of the Juror's Duty to God and Country and the Commonwealth of Virginia. Equal Justice for All includes the lowliest Citizen is equally protected by the laws as protects any attorney or judge. § 192-208, Subpoena power of special grand jury “The special gran jury may subpoena persons to appear before it o testify and to prodie specified records, papers, and documents or other tangible things. In adition, the Virginia State Police website revels the can be asizned to conduct en investigation by the Governor, the Attomey General, ora Grand Jury. Of.en an invest galon would take longer than ‘he three months tha‘ a typical Regular Grand Jury is impancled to serve, so separate pane of Citizens convened asa Special Grand Jury is wise § 19.2-200 states in part: “..the court shall inquire of it whether it recommends that a special grand jury ‘be impanelled to perform any ofthe functions provided for in subdivision (2) of § 92-103. If a ‘majority of the grand jurors responds in the affirmative, the court shall impanel so many of that {jury as answer in the affirmative and are also willing to serve thereon, plus any additional members as ‘may be necessary to complete the pane!,as.a special grand jury and if a minority of the grand Jurors responds in the affirmative, the court may impanel a special grand jury in the same manner, § 192-195 sates: A regular grand jary shall consist of not less than five nor more than seven persons (On the other hand, § 19.2207, Composition of «special grand jury. Special grand juries shall consist of not less ‘than seven and not more than 11 members, NOTE: Regular Grand Jury maximum is7 members, Special Grand Jury minimem is 7;maximum 11. NOTE: Ifthe Regular Grane Jury is not quite prepared to vote @ Truc Bill for « Diroot Indictment for ‘Government Agencies (Court) or official thereof (Clerk and Judges) violation of the law, then the wise ‘course would be a majority to vote to convene a new panel of 9 or 11 Citizens asa Special Grand Jury. Grand Jury Witness: ATrue Bill__NotATrue BI _Spesial Grand Jury _ Majority Janice Wolk Grenadier, Citizen Special Grand Jury Minority Foreman of the Grand Juryne Grate ee pau Soph 1, 208