Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Research Proposal
Sandra R. Tice
UBC Master of Educational Technology Program
ETEC 500
August 2, 2014
UBC Student #92576123
Table of Contents
Introduction........ 3
Rationale for the Study .. 3
Research Problem . 4
Research Questions ... ... 5
Review of Literature ...5
Methods ................ 11
Implementation Plan 13
Logistics Plan .13
Timeline and Milestones 14
Data Analysis Plan 14
Limitations of the Study 14
References . 15
Appendices 17
Appendix 1 Survey Questions.17
Appendix 2 Parental permission letter.21
Appendix 3 Principal permission letter... 23
Appendix 4 Teacher permission letter.24
Appendix 5 Classroom observation matrix..27
Introduction
Technology usage within K-12 education has evolved from use in isolated and
designated computer labs to a point where mobile laptops, notebooks, and other personal
devices are now integrated into traditional classroom layouts and transitional spaces
within schools. Technology can be seamlessly integrated virtually anywhere and at any
time. Although administrators are responsible for budgetary concerns regarding space
usage and technology purchases, teachers face increasing demands to implement
technology and how to plan for the physical space requirements in which it will be used,
oftentimes with limited professional development training in how to best accomplish
these tasks. Technology is changing teacher practice and student learning and greatly
impacts upon the spaces in which we learn. Bruecki (2014) speaks to the importance of
creating new learning spaces for the future:
We are in a new age, a new time and we need to create new places and spaces that
nurture mobile content in the richly literate classroom. From a pedagogical
perspective, we are adrift as mobile devices make their way into the hands of our
children and spread ever more widely into everyday life. Although a growing body
of research points to the potential of mobile computing for influencing childrens
emerging literacy skills, empirical studies on mobile learning in early elementary
are rare. Even less is known about developing learning spaces that can support our
youngest mobile students.
Rationale
Design of learning spaces should be based on current learning theories to ensure
that the physical learning space will contribute to the learning process of the students
using it. Monahan (2002) explains that learning spaces have a built pedagogy or
architectural embodiment of learning theories (p. 4). I have observed through practice
that very little thought has been put into helping intermediate elementary students work
in effectively designed learning spaces, and instead, students struggle with balancing
laptops on too-small desks, or try to do group work on cold, uncomfortable hallway
floors. Teachers express questions regarding technology in practice. Bulky equipment
carts take up valuable classroom space in already crowded rooms. The computer labs in
two of the schools where I work are currently being de-commissioned, but there is no
alternative space designated for the technology. Despite limited funding, there is a need
for teachers to have access to sound pedagogy to support decisions they make every day
in the classroom regarding classroom space usage and technology integration. According
to a study commissioned in Australia, there are many sweeping claims about the possible
effects of various aspects of learning spaces on student learning that are not substantiated
empirically (Tanner, 2000, as cited by Blackmore, 2011). Emerging pedagogical
approaches from other parts of the world including Australia, Europe, and Asia are
resulting in exciting new trends in learning space design that may be beneficial for use in
Canadian classrooms. Ultimately, I am curious to explore how flexible learning space
design is implemented within classrooms in the school district where I teach and to
implement current best practices locally.
Research Problem
The purpose of this mixed methods research study is to explore the connections
between learning spaces and technology usage in elementary education within classrooms
and common areas located in Surrey, British Columbia, and to find out how teachers are
effectively using existing space, and to explore what challenges they currently face while
incorporating technology towards effective student learning.
Research Questions
1) What is the relationship between purposefully designed flexible learning spaces in
classrooms and within the common areas within the school, that supports
integrated technology usage and the teachers pedagogical practice?
2) How are learning outcomes (behavior, engagement and achievement) impacted by
creative usage of space?
Additional questions that may arise from research:
- What recent changes, if any, are teachers making to their space to support
student technology usage?
- What do teachers identify in terms of wishes and needs for technology, space
and furniture to support their students learning?
- Do teachers and administration support usage of personal mobile technologies
with their students and is there an existing personal mobile device policy?
- What are the attitudes within the school culture that influence technology
integration in the classrooms?
- How would students wish to change existing space and technology usage within
their schools?
Review of Literature
This literature review identifies theoretical connections made between learning
spaces, pedagogy, student learning outcomes and attitudes, and any existing gaps and to
interpret whether learning within a 21st century context changes environmental learning
conditions and technology usage. The review will also examine progressive case studies
from around the world where learning spaces have been re-designed to support better
learning outcomes. Outcomes may include improved behavior, increased skill levels, and
greater engagement from students and with curricular content.
The themes that have emerged from this literature review are: how flexible
learning spaces support student learning with student-centered design, and how providing
an environment for social learning utilizing active learning principles may affect learning
outcomes.
Elementary classroom design should support teaching practices and provide
spaces for learning that occur through an interdisciplinary approach and project-based
work. According to Selenger (2011) technology should be readily accessible, easily
available and seamlessly integrated into the classroom environment. To ensure learner
success, Selenger proposes a model placing students and teachers at the centre, and
including the following components: school building and environmental design,
curriculum and assessment systems, professional development of both teachers and
school leaders, content and services, network infrastructure, and devices for technology
access. She advises that students need to be able to move freely around the room in order
to interact with each other and with different technology artifacts. Most importantly,
technology must not be isolated if it is to be a catalyst for learning.
Tapscotts (2007) definition of Net-Geners indicates how this generation of
learners view computers as a normal, everyday part of life. Much of the literature
explored within this proposal supports that view and further supports the idea that
technology should now be integrated thoughtfully in school settings. Students today
regularly access the Internet for many purposes including social interaction, research,
publishing, game-playing, homework, entertainment and much more. This speaks to how
the Internet has changed how people regard space, time and place. Effective classroom
design should incorporate the ways that students learn using technology, whether in a
classroom or in a real world setting.
Learning space has emerged as an important consideration to learning outcomes
(Oblinger, 2005) and this researcher demonstrates how key studies link learning space
and course design with student achievement, mastery, and retention. Given these
implications, space should reflect the learners needs, learning modes, and existing space
usage. Oblinger believes that space should reflect institutional values, be designed around
people and multiple types of learning, be flexible, comfortable, secure and functional, as
well as be a convergence of technology, pedagogy, and space.
Oblingers work goes on to suggest that two important learning principles should
be considered in learning space design. First, she states that learning is social, requiring
feedback and interaction among participants, and designated space should be where
learners can engage in dialogue, work on group projects, interact in a variety of ways, and
can present work publicly either by teaching others or giving feedback; and secondly,
classroom design should utilize principles of active learning, whereby learners are able to
practice and receive feedback from peers and experts, and work together to address realworld problems through interactions with people and information from outside the
classroom. Additionally, classroom areas should support student work including debate,
research, inquiry, and problem solving, engagement in simulations, virtual field trips, and
role-playing.
Research conducted by Hunley (2009) makes connections between learning
space, learning and pedagogical methods and identifies a reciprocal interaction between
learning space and its users whereas the effectiveness and quality of learning outcomes
partially results from both student and faculty engagement. Although this study occurs
within a post-secondary institution, it outlines a model that may also apply to elementary
schools. Hunley says learning spaces that are likely to increase the engagement of the
learning facilitators and its learners promote a sense of connection with the environment,
stimulate positive emotional responses, interest and enjoyment, and encourage feelings of
autonomy and competency during challenging tasks. Design elements should include
spaces for individual work with computer stations and study carrels, and group work
areas should contain soft furnishings, four-to-six personal tables for shared computer use.
Her work illustrates how learning is optimized through engagement and its promotion
through thoughtful learning facilitation within appropriate learning contexts.
Loveless (2002) conducts a substantial literature review regarding creativity, new
technologies and learning. This literature speaks to the importance of collaborative
learning, and how knowledge is constructed through interaction and communication with
others in communities (Lave and Wenger, 1991; Somekj, 2001 as cited by Loveless).
Classroom implications indicate that learners should have opportunities to develop ICT
skills and techniques in authentic and challenging creative contexts, and that
considerations should be given to flexibility in time and space for creative activities.
Loveless stresses the importance of access to a range of technologies to support student
learning and creative learning processes.
There is a scarcity of literature that demonstrates either quantitative or qualitative
data regarding student outcomes as affected by learning space design within elementary
schools. Whitesides (2009) research focuses on developing evidence-based criteria for
student-centered, integrated, active learning spaces using flexible design and innovative
use of technology tools. It asks the primary question, to what extent, if any, do formal and
informal learning environments shape teaching and learning practices and student
learning outcomes? For answers, this Minnesota-based study incorporates instructor
interviews, student focus groups, and classroom observations and photo surveys to
support a visually rich understanding of students usage of formal and informal learning
spaces. In this work, three case studies were prepared. The results provide a useful model
of learning space research can be conducted in future settings and also identifies which
methods to employ. Active learning classrooms (ACL) were studied providing evidence
relating to instructor and student perceptions and the positive effects these spaces had on
their collaborative projects. The study evaluates implications of various space-related
features including round table room set-up, open formal learning space, furniture layout,
comfort and convenience, availability and access to technologies such as glass markerboards, document cameras and student display apparatus. One recommendation from this
study is to incorporate innovative research tools such as student logs and photo surveys to
provide deeper data that may lead to future evidence-based solutions. Again, this research
was conducted at the post-secondary level, but can also be applied to learning at lower
levels.
Miller (2008) contends that the design of learning space should increase levels of
engagement for students, fostering active learning and teaching, and notes that getting
and keeping students engaged is perhaps the most important step in creating a successful
learning outcome. He suggests designing space to influence self-directed learning by
allowing greater involvement in group activities, helping create an environment that is
10
11
in mind, effectively designed learning spaces can enhance diverse teaching styles and
flexible student groupings. Use of ergonomically designed furnishings and a teaching
style that approaches learning with an open mind as well as open space can offer
accessibility, security, comfort, increased engagement and improved outcomes for
students of all ages.
My research going forward will gather evidence from current practice in Surrey
elementary schools, and will examine connections between existing learning spaces in
intermediate classrooms, technology accessibility, and perceived teacher and student
engagement, through the use of surveys and observations.
Methods
This section outlines the methods used to explore the current space usage utilized
by teachers in a classroom setting. Given the context above, my two research questions
will be addressed in the study.
Survey and Observations
a. Description My research will gather data with a focus on two different grade
6/7 classrooms with the Surrey School District, and on the teachers within each
school, along with their students. Each school will have at least 300 students, and
be pre-identified as using technology as one of their school goals. At least one
school will be less than 10 years old, and at least one school more than 10 years
old.
b. Research Participants Grade 6/7 teachers and their students in Surrey School
District 36. It is anticipated that each classroom will accommodate 30 children.
12
c. Data Collection and Instruments The type of design for the observations in
this study will be naturalistic, to gain a more realistic picture of childrens
behavior. Both quantitative and qualitative data will be gathered through the use
of a survey of teachers regarding classroom space usage, technology integration,
as well as perceived student outcomes in their teaching. Further research in the
schools will provide qualitative data from that will be gathered through
observation of teachers and students, while they are using existing technology as
part of their lesson, either in classrooms or in common areas (library, learning
commons, shared space or hallways). This mixed methods research approach
contains the underlying assumption that flexible, adaptable shared learning spaces
are lacking in design and are not adequate for the technology integration that is
occurring. Qualitative methodology to be used will be used to develop a case
study, with purposeful selection (Stake, 1995) combined with a quantitative
approach to acquiring data through a survey. The researcher will be a passive
observer while conducting observations, although may speak to the students in
order to make them feel at ease or to clarify details of what is being observed.
Coding will be utilized during and following observations. The researcher will
interact and speak with the classroom teachers to gain greater insights about
teachers opinions.
Special Materials or Apparatus Items required will include: a survey for classroom
teachers, special permissions from school administration, classroom teachers to conduct
observations and to photograph locations (both with and without students), parental
permissions for classroom observations and photography release. Regarding ethics and
13
permission, informed consent will be obtained from the elementary school principal as
well as the elementary school class teacher. Before the observation session, two letters
will be sent, one to the principal of each school, and one to the classroom teacher
formally asking for permission to sit in on two 45-minute sessions of each class. Parental
permission will also be obtained as the researcher may minimally interact with the
children, and permission is needed to take photographs of children using the learning
space. The photographs will be used to analyze student and teacher movement within the
room as well as ICT usage (height of tables, where students choose to sit, etc.) and for
researcher presentations resulting from the research. Both teachers and the principals at
each school will be invited to evaluate research results.
Research Design
The naturalistic design of this research allows for observation of normal
classroom activities. The methods as described above will employ teacher surveys
regarding usage and attitudes followed by classroom observations. Developing a comfort
level with the classroom teacher in conducting this research will help to gain greater
detail and understanding of collected data, and will help inform the researcher in
development of the case studies of each classroom. Purposeful selection will be used to
determine the sample schools to ensure that technology usage is one of the school-wide
goals.
Implementation Plan
Surveys will be delivered to grade 6/7 teachers personally to ensure higher rate of
participation and to promote understanding of research. Observations will be conducted
within the same semester at both locations.
14
Logistics Plan
Research permissions will be sought during the fall 2014 semester, with research
to commence as soon as permissions have been granted. Budget to include mileage,
photocopying, and coffee and snacks for participating teachers.
Timeline and Milestones
Fall 2014, study to be completed Winter 2015. Final reports completed by June 2015.
figure 1
Data Analysis Plan
Data will be comprised of an analysis of survey results and from notes from
observations. Coding will be utilized both during and following observations as notes and
photographs are reviewed. Since there is more than one site included, analysis will
require a cross-site analysis (Miles and Huberman, cited by Gay, Mills, and Airasian
2012). A site-ordered effects matrix will be used to display probably cause-and-effect
relations among student space usage and learning outcomes (behavior, engagement, and
achievement).
Limitations of the Study
15
School selection will not be random to ensure both older and new schools are
included and that technology usage is a pre-identified school-wide goal, as well as to
ensure that access will be granted based on prior connections to school administrators
and/or teachers. Data may not necessarily apply or be generalized to schools outside of
the district. Primary classes will be excluded due to existing play-based design of
classroom areas.
References
Blackmore, J. & Hayes, D. 2007-2010, Redesigning schools and school leadership:
An Australian comparative study, ARC Discovery Project.
Brueckei, I., Lessons about space from K-6 and implications for secondary schools.
(2012). Retrieved from http://www.brueckei.org/RaisedDigital/2012/01/29/lessons-about-space-from-k-6-and-implications-for-secondaryschools/
Carlson, E., Innovative learning designs a weblog, Retrieved from the Internet, July 5,
2014. http://innovativelearningdesigns.ca/wordpress/?cat=3&paged=2
Davies, D., Jindal-Snape, D., Collier, C., Digby, R., Hay, P., & Howe, A. (2013).
Creative Learning Environments in Education--A Systematic Literature Review.
Thinking Skills And Creativity, 880-91.
Gay, L.R., Mills G.E., & Airasian P. W. (2012) Educational research. Competencies for
analysis and applications. International version. New Jersey, Pearson Education
Inc.
Hall, M. Johnston Heights Secondary School: A local library transformed into a learning
commons, Surrey, BC. Retrieved from the Internet July 14, 2014.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdkNWESBv1g
Hunley, S., & Schaller, M. (2009). Assessment: The Key to Creating Spaces that Promote
Learning. Educause Review, 44(2), 26.
Korones, S., Sweden Debuts First Classroom-less School, Retrieved from the Internet
May 2014.
http://www.smartplanet.com/blog/smart-takes/sweden-debuts-first-classroom-less-school/
Loveless, A. (2002). Literature review in creativity, new technologies and learning.
16
17
Appendices
Appendix 1 Survey Questions
UBC Master of Educational Technology Student Research Project - draft
November 2014
The purpose of this study is to ascertain teachers views on how students best learn in
flexible or fixed learning spaces and how these learning spaces affect technology usage,
your teaching practice and student learning outcomes. Please return the completed
questionnaire in the enclosed envelope. If you have any questions on how to proceed,
please call Sandra R. Tice, Project Coordinators at 604-351-xxxx, or e-mail:
sandraticeUBC@gmail.com
Thank-you very much for your participation in this study!
The first set of questions asks about your classroom and the number of students
1. How many students are in your classroom? _______________
2. What is the grade level _______Gr. 6 _________Gr. 7
The next set of questions asks about your classroom space.
Please check off as many as apply.
3. In your classroom, where do students use individual technology such as laptops or
tablets (iPads)?
___On their individual desks
___On group tables
___On the floor
___In other areas (For example, in hallways, please explain)
_____________________________________________________________________
This section asks about your opinion about using technology in your classroom.
Please rate the following by circling the answer that best describes your opinion.
4. How important to you is it that you are able to integrate technology into the grade
level or subject taught?
VERY
IMPORTANT
FAIRLY
IMPORTANT
NOT
IMPORTANT
VERY
UNIMPORTANT
NO
OPINION
18
5. How important is it that you are able to implement collaborative or group methods
of teaching (e.g. cooperative learning) using technology in your lessons?
VERY
IMPORTANT
FAIRLY
IMPORTANT
NOT
IMPORTANT
VERY
UNIMPORTANT
NO
OPINION
6. How important is it that you are able to address the diverse needs of students with
specific technology usage within your classroom?
VERY
IMPORTANT
FAIRLY
IMPORTANT
NOT
IMPORTANT
VERY
UNIMPORTANT
NO
OPINION
7.How important is it that you are able to integrate personal devices (phones, tablets)
within your classroom?
VERY
IMPORTANT
FAIRLY
IMPORTANT
NOT
IMPORTANT
VERY
UNIMPORTANT
NO
OPINION
The next section asks about amount of technology usage and how you adapt your
learning space to utilize technology for your students.
8. Have you changed your classroom set-up to adapt to using more technology in your
classroom within the past year? _______Yes ________No
What did you do? _____________________________________
____________________________________________________
9. How often do your students use technology (tablets, laptops, or personal devices such
as phones within the school day as part of their technology tools for learning? Circle one.
a) None
b) Less than 30 minutes per week.
c) Between 30 minutes and one hour per week.
d) Between 1 and 3 hours per week.
e) Between 3 and 5 hours per week.
f) Every day and for more than 1 hour per day.
10. Which technology tools (if any ) do you use at least two times per month as part of
your lessons in your classroom? (Please check all that apply).
________laptops
________iPads or other tablets
________iPods
________iPhones or other cell phones
________computer in computer lab
________computer station(s) in your classroom
________digital still cameras
________Other (type) _______________________
19
11. How frequently do students re-group or change seats or desks during a typical day
when they are using technology? Circle one.
a) Never
b) One time per day
c) Twice per day
d) 3-5 times per day
e) Multiple times per day (lots of flexibility and choice for students)
12. Do you believe that students learning outcomes (engagement, behavior, or
achievement) improve when students are able to freely move within the classroom?
Circle one.
a) No, behavior and learning outcomes get noticeably poorer.
b) No, not at all.
c) Yes, improve a little bit.
e) Yes, good improvement.
f) Yes, very improved.
Can you give a brief example of an improvement that you have observed
(engagement, behavior, or achievement.) CIRCLE one and describe below.
________________________________________________________________________
13) Do you believe that students learning outcomes (engagement, behavior, or
achievement) improve when students are learning with the use of integrated technology?
a) No, outcomes get noticeably poorer.
b) No, not at all.
c) Yes, improves a little bit.
e) Yes, good improvement.
f) Yes, very improved.
14) Can you give an example of which specific learning outcomes have shown
improvement when your students use integrated technology?
The last section asks about your future wants and needs, regarding space, furniture and
technology within your classroom.
15) Do you have adequate access to the technology that you need for your students?
Circle answer.
a) Yes
b) No
20
17) Do you have enough classroom space for the types of learning with technology that
you wish to facilitate within your school?
a) Yes
b) No
c) If no, briefly describe what you wish for in the immediate future?
18) Do you have any additional comments that you would like to add regarding flexible
learning spaces or technology integration within your classroom?
21
I
do
give
permission
for
my
child
to
participate
in
the
research
project
describe
above.
I
do
give
permission
for
my
child
to
have
his/her
photographs
taken
as
part
of
the
project.
Signature of Parent/Guardian
Date
22
23
Dear
Mr./Ms.
___________
(Principal),
I
am
currently
doing
graduate
work
in
education
at
the
University
of
British
Columbia,
and
I
am
preparing
to
begin
work
on
a
research
project.
This
project
is
a
requirement
of
an
Educational
course,
is
supervised
by
NAME
ETEC
XXX
INSTRUCTOR,
and
it
is
designed
to
help
improve
my
practice
as
an
educator.
My
research
topic
is
students
learning
with
technology
in
flexible
learning
spaces,
which
I
will
pursue
in
the
context
of
observing
students
using
technology
within
both
the
classroom
and
common
areas
of
the
school.
Better
understanding
about
what
motivates
students
as
they
work
both
individually
and
collaboratively
using
technology
in
spaces
that
support
their
learning
will
help
me
improve
as
a
teacher
and
contribute
to
improving
education
at
our
school.
Since
the
research
Im
proposing
will
involve
conducting
two
45-60
minutes
classroom
observations
within
a
grade
6/7
class,
as
well
as
distributing
a
survey
to
the
classroom
teachers,
I
am
seeking
your
approval
to
carry
out
this
research
project.
The
observations
will
be
held
at
during
the
Fall
2014
semester.
I
will
choose
a
time
that
is
convenient
for
the
classroom
teachers
and
myself.
I
will
also
gather
data
for
my
research,
using
information
and
photographs
(with
parental
permission)
about
what
I
am
generally
hearing
from
the
classroom
teachers
about
how
they
integrate
technology
into
their
classroom
spaces.
Any
follow-up
with
the
classroom
teacher
would
occur
outside
of
classroom
instructional
time.
The
other
data
I
would
collect
specifically
for
the
research
project
involves
my
recording
of
my
observations
about
student
learning
outcomes
and
behaviors
as
a
result
of
using
technology
in
a
flexible
environment
,
and
so,
generally
would
not
require
any
extra
work
on
the
part
of
the
students.
I
also
want
to
stress
that
this
research
project
is
an
extension
of
the
work
I
do
as
part
of
my
normal
responsibilities
as
a
teacher.
I
will
probably
include
some
of
my
observations
and
photographs
in
my
reports,
which
I
will
present
to
the
my
supervising
faculty
and
peers
within
the
program.
In
addition,
I
may
present
my
research
report
to
teachers
at
XYZ
Elementary
School
or
at
upcoming
professional
development
conferences,
if
I
think
my
findings
would
help
others
improve
their
teaching.
I
will
keep
all
the
data
I
collect
completely
confidential,
and
I
will
not
use
our
schools
name
nor
any
students
names
in
any
research
reports.
Any
information
that
I
present
will
not
be
linked
to
any
personal
information
that
could
be
used
to
identify
individual
students.
I
am
confident
that
I
have
taken
the
necessary
steps
to
ensure
that
my
research
will
be
conducted
in
ways
that
meet
ethical
standards.
I
have
attached
the
consent
letters
that
I
wish
to
give
to
the
students
and
to
their
parents/guardians.
Please
sign
below
and
return
a
copy
of
this
letter
to
me
indicating
whether
or
not
you
give
me
permission
to
conduct
this
action
research
project.
Thank
you
for
your
consideration.
Sincerely,
RESEARCHER
NAME
I
give
permission
to
you
to
conduct
the
action
research
project
described
above.
I
give
permission
to
you
to
take
photographs
of
the
students
and
space
with
parental
permission.
I
do
not
give
permission
to
you
to
conduct
the
research
project
described
above.
Typed name of Principal
Signature of Principal
Date
24
25
Dear
Mr./Ms.
___________
(Teacher),
I
am
currently
doing
graduate
work
in
education
at
the
University
of
British
Columbia,
and
I
am
preparing
to
begin
work
on
a
research
project.
This
project
is
a
requirement
of
an
Educational
course,
is
supervised
by
NAME
ETEC
XXX
INSTRUCTOR,
and
it
is
designed
to
help
improve
my
practice
as
an
educator.
My
research
topic
is
students
learning
with
technology
in
flexible
learning
spaces,
which
I
will
pursue
in
the
context
of
observing
students
using
technology
within
both
the
classroom
and
common
areas
of
the
school.
Better
understanding
about
what
motivates
students
as
they
work
both
individually
and
collaboratively
using
technology
in
spaces
that
support
their
learning
will
help
me
improve
as
a
teacher
and
contribute
to
improving
education
at
our
school.
Since
the
research
Im
proposing
will
involve
conducting
two
45-60
minutes
classroom
observations
within
a
grade
6/7
class,
as
well
as
distributing
a
survey
to
the
classroom
teachers,
I
am
seeking
your
approval
to
carry
out
this
research
project
within
your
classroom.
The
observations
will
be
held
at
during
the
Fall
2014
semester.
I
will
choose
a
time
that
is
convenient
for
the
you,
the
classroom
teacher
and
myself.
I
will
also
gather
data
for
my
research,
using
information
and
photographs
(with
parental
permission)
about
what
I
am
generally
hearing
from
you,
about
how
you
integrate
technology
into
your
classroom
spaces.
Any
follow-up
with
you
would
occur
outside
of
classroom
instructional
time.
The
other
data
I
would
collect
specifically
for
the
research
project
involves
my
recording
of
my
observations
about
student
learning
outcomes
and
behaviors
as
a
result
of
using
technology
in
a
flexible
environment
and
so,
generally
would
not
require
any
extra
work
on
the
part
of
the
students.
I
also
want
to
stress
that
this
research
project
is
an
extension
of
the
work
I
do
as
part
of
my
normal
responsibilities
as
a
teacher.
I
will
probably
include
some
of
my
observations
and
photographs
in
my
reports,
which
I
will
present
to
my
supervising
faculty
and
peers
within
the
program.
In
addition,
I
may
present
my
research
report
to
teachers
at
XYZ
Elementary
School
or
at
upcoming
professional
development
conferences,
if
I
think
my
findings
would
help
others
improve
their
teaching.
I
will
keep
all
the
data
I
collect
completely
confidential,
and
I
will
not
use
our
schools
name
nor
any
students
names
in
any
research
reports.
Any
information
that
I
present
will
not
be
linked
to
any
personal
information
that
could
be
used
to
identify
individual
students.
I
am
confident
that
I
have
taken
the
necessary
steps
to
ensure
that
my
research
will
be
conducted
in
ways
that
meet
ethical
standards.
I
have
attached
the
consent
letters
that
I
wish
to
give
to
the
students
and
to
their
parents/guardians.
Please
sign
below
and
return
a
copy
of
this
letter
to
me
indicating
whether
or
not
you
give
me
permission
to
conduct
this
action
research
project.
Thank
you
for
your
consideration.
Sincerely,
RESEARCHER
NAME
I
give
permission
to
you
to
conduct
the
action
research
project
described
above.
I
give
permission
to
you
to
take
photographs
of
the
students
and
space
with
parental
permission.
I
do
not
give
permission
to
you
to
conduct
the
research
project
described
above.
Typed name of Principal
Signature of Principal
Date
26
27
Appendix 5
Student and Teacher Activity Observation Matrix
Flexible Space and Technology Research Study S. Tice
Date _________________________
ACTIVITY
2.What are
Students LEARNING?
3.What technologies are
students USING?
4.How are students
working within the
SPACE?
5.What is noticed about
COMFORT?
6.What is noticed about
STUDENT
ENGAGEMENT?
7.What is noticed about
STUDENT
MOVEMENT?
8.What is noticed about
TEACHER
MOVEMENT?
When
students enter
class
When students
are listening to
directions
When
students are
in activities
When
students are
cleaning up
When
students
Transition
to next
activity
ACTIVITY
When
students enter
class
When students
are listening to
directions
When
students are
in activities
When
students are
cleaning up
28
When
students
Transition
to next
activity