Workforce Education and Development Program

The Pennsylvania State University

301 Keller Building
University Park, PA 16802
EVALUATING TEACHING EFFECTIVENESS
Student Teacher:

______Donna Driscoll___________________________________________

Master Teacher:

______Warren Anders___________________________________________

Lesson Title:

______Beginning Makeup___________________________________________

Date: ____3/1/16_____
Rating Scale: 5 = Excellent

Time Started: ___9:30_____ Time Ended: ___9:56_____

4 = Above
Average

3 = Average

2 = Below
Average

1 = Unsatisfactory

Criteria

Rating

Preparation for Lesson Presentation

Lesson Plan Prepared (written, logically organized, objectives)

__5__

Integrated Appropriate Safety Practices into Lesson Plan

__5__

Teaching Aids in Order for Lesson Presentation

__5__

Teaching Station Organized for Lesson Presentation

__5__

Organization of Lesson Presentation

Selected Appropriate Lesson Presentation Technique

__5__

Selected Appropriate Instructional Materials (visual aids, books, samples, etc.)

__5__

Introduction to Lesson Brief, Clear

__5__

Body of Lesson Well-Organized

__5__

Summary of Lesson Included Review of Key Points

__5__

Included Student Application/Practice

__5__

Delivery of Lesson Presentation

IntroductionArousedInterestofStudents

__4__

Objectives of Lesson Communicated to Students

__5__

Pacing of Delivery was Appropriate for Topic/Students

__5__

ProfessionalPersonnelDevelopmentCenter

Criteria

Rating

DeliveryofLessonPresentation(continued)
Maintained Eye Contact with Students

__5__

AppearedEnthusiastic,Confident

__5__

Speech(volume,clarity,useofEnglishlanguage)

__5__

UsedQuestionstoEngageStudentsinLesson

__5__

RespondedPositivelytoStudentQuestions

__5__

UsedHigherOrderQuestions(Evaluation,ProblemSolving)

__5__

EffectivelyUsedSelectedInstructionalMaterials(visualaids)

__5__

UsedAppropriateSafetyEquipment/Devices

__5__

ClassroomManagement
DemonstratedRapportWithStudents(abilitytointeractandrelate)

__5__

MaintainedControloftheClassroom/Laboratory

__5__

LimitedNonProductiveInterruptions

__4__

UsedAllottedTimeEffectively

__5__

Comments:
StrongPointsofLessonPresentation:
__Thiswasa9thand10thgradebeginnerslessondemonstratingdaytimemakeup.Priortotodays
lesson,theintroductionfortodaywasaclassdiscussionaboutallofthedifferentcareeropportunities
thatareavailablewiththeknowledgethattheyhadbeenreceivingoverthelastfourdays.Wespoke
aboutworkinginsalons,highendspas,departmentstore,travelingmakeupartist,andmuchmore.I
wasverysurprisedastudentevennamedakiosk.TherewasaninterruptionwhentheschoolDirector
neededtospeaktome.BeforespeakingwiththeDirector,thestudentswereinstructedtopickouttheir
productsandmaterials,buttheywerenottosetuporstartuntilIreturned.Whenwestartedthevideo
again,Inoticedthatthebatterieshaddiedandthestudentswereeagertogetstarted.Afterreplacingthe
batteries,IstartedthelessonwereIhadleftoff.Overthelastfourdaysthestudentshadbeenworking
withtheproductsonpaperactivitiessuchas;lipcorrectionsusinglipliner,eyesandeyeshadow,also
usingeyeliner,faceshapesandcontouring.

ProfessionalPersonnelDevelopmentCenter

Comments(continued):
SuggestionsforImprovementofLessonPresentation:
_____AsIwatchedthevideo,InoticedthatIhadalotofquitetime.Iwillbemoreawareoftryingto
speakmoreduringthedemonstration.Themakeupapplicationtookapproximately28minutesmakingit
abitlittlelong.IfIcutasteportwooutsuchas,thelipstickandeyebrowslining,Istillcouldhave
gottenthepointacross.Ialsocouldseehowstillthestudentswereinbetweenthequestions;itdidnot
looklikeboredom,butwiththetwointerruptionsthestudentsjustwantedtogettheirhandsinit.
OverallEffectivenessofLessonPresentation:
(Pleasecircletheappropriatelettergrade)
A

B+

C+

D+

SignatureofMasterTeacher:

______________________________________________________

SignatureofStudentTeacher:

______________________________________________________

ProfessionalPersonnelDevelopmentCenter

Suggested Guides for Applying the Rating Scales to the Lesson Presentation
Excellent: 5 on rating scale; letter grade of A
Uses eye contact
Clarifies lesson (flow, accurate knowledge, clear directions)
Articulates clearly, with good grammar
Interacts with students positively
Is organized and prepared
Communicates at level appropriate for students/content
Uses appropriate facial expressions/body language
Relates purpose, objectives, and has closure through summary and application
Uses variety of attention-getting techniques in lesson
Uses appropriate instructional materials and high-level questioning
Checks for understanding through questions, application
Uses mobility
Average: 3 on rating scale; letter grade of C
Makes eye contact occasionally
Has some flaws in lesson delivery
Uses poor grammar; articulation or clarity of voice is occasionally evident
Interacts with students occasionally, or some interactions are negative
Loses place in lesson; somewhat disorganized
Communicates at appropriate level for students/content most of the lesson
Generally has open and accepting facial expressions and body language
Relates purpose, objectives, and has closure, though weak
Uses attention-getting and varied strategies; sometimes ineffectively
Uses appropriate instructional materials and high-level questioning most of the time
Randomly checks for understanding; limited questions, limited application
Is somewhat mobile during the presentation
Unsatisfactory: 1 on rating scale; letter grade of E
Seldom uses eye contact or interacts with students
Lacks clarity in lesson
Lacks clarity in articulation; uses poor grammar
Lacks organization; seems unprepared
Is unsure of instructional level
Uses un-welcoming facial expressions and body language
Is uncertain of purpose; doesnt present objectives, closure is missing
Lacks variety; lesson is not attention-getting
Uses inappropriate instructional materials; asks only low-level questions

ProfessionalPersonnelDevelopmentCenter

Provides no checks for understanding

Lacks mobility

ProfessionalPersonnelDevelopmentCenter