Scribd Logo
Загрузить

Добро пожаловать в Scribd!

  • Research Scoring Sheet

    Загружено:

    beingfired
    17 просмотров2 страницы
    This document outlines the criteria for judging oral and poster presentations. It provides scales for evaluating elements of the research project such as justifying the research, explaining the methodology, presenting findings and conclusions. It also provides scales for evaluating the presentation elements such as adhering to time limits, using clear speaking, engaging the audience, and handling questions well. Judges are asked to score each criterion on the provided scale and give an overall evaluation on a line scale ranging from excellent to satisfactory.

    Исходное описание:

    Research Scoring Sheet

    Авторское право

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Доступные форматы

    DOCX, PDF, TXT или читайте онлайн в Scribd

    Этот документ был вам полезен?

    Это неприемлемый материал?

    Пожаловаться на этот документ
    This document outlines the criteria for judging oral and poster presentations. It provides scales for evaluating elements of the research project such as justifying the research, explaining the methodology, presenting findings and conclusions. It also provides scales for evaluating the presentation elements such as adhering to time limits, using clear speaking, engaging the audience, and handling questions well. Judges are asked to score each criterion on the provided scale and give an overall evaluation on a line scale ranging from excellent to satisfactory.

    Авторское право:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Скачайте в формате DOCX, PDF, TXT или читайте онлайн в Scribd
    Отметить как неприемлемый контент
    17 просмотров2 страницы

    Research Scoring Sheet

    Загружено:

    beingfired
    This document outlines the criteria for judging oral and poster presentations. It provides scales for evaluating elements of the research project such as justifying the research, explaining the methodology, presenting findings and conclusions. It also provides scales for evaluating the presentation elements such as adhering to time limits, using clear speaking, engaging the audience, and handling questions well. Judges are asked to score each criterion on the provided scale and give an overall evaluation on a line scale ranging from excellent to satisfactory.

    Авторское право:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Скачайте в формате DOCX, PDF, TXT или читайте онлайн в Scribd
    Отметить как неприемлемый контент
    из 2

    Oral Presentation Judging Criteria

    TOTAL SCORE:
    _________
    Presenters Name and Session # ______________________________________________
    Score each criterion using the scale: 3 (excellent) 2 (good), 1(satisfactory), 0 (poor).
    Please indicate your overall evaluation on the line scale below.
    Provide comments in the bottom section.
    The Research Project
    _____
    _____
    _____
    _____
    _____
    _____
    _____

    importance of /justification for the research explained


    research question(s) expressed as a question or aim or objective
    method
    principal findings / inferences with some supporting evidence
    conclusion / claim
    significance: whats coming next
    accessible to a non-specialist audience

    The Presentation
    _____
    _____
    _____
    _____

    adheres to the time limit with good pacing


    clear audible speaking voice
    audience oriented
    audience engagement

    _____
    _____
    _____
    _____

    Powerpoint slides related to spoken text


    slides support the speaker rather than distract attention
    appropriate number and pacing of slides
    text sufficiently large

    _____ handles questions well


    Overall Evaluation (circle an appropriate place on the line)
    |______________|_________________________|___________________________|_______|
    Excellent
    Very good
    Good
    Satisfactory
    Comments

    Poster Presentation Judging Criteria


    TOTAL SCORE:
    _________
    Presenters Name and Session # ______________________________________________
    Score each criterion using the scale: 3 (excellent), 2 (good), 1(satisfactory), 0 (poor)
    Please indicate your overall evaluation on the line scale below.
    The Research Project
    _____
    _____
    _____
    _____
    _____
    _____
    _____

    importance of /justification for the research explained


    research question(s) expressed as a question or aim or objective
    method
    principal findings / inferences with some supporting evidence
    conclusion / claim
    significance: whats coming next
    accessible to a non-specialist audience

    The Presentation
    _____
    _____
    _____
    _____
    _____
    _____
    _____

    visually attractive
    logical layout; easy to navigate
    colour scheme coherent
    text legible
    images relevant
    balanced; text boxes appropriate length
    contact information and acknowledgments

    _____ presenter prepared with an overview


    _____ handles questions well
    Overall Evaluation (circle an appropriate place on the line)
    |______________|_________________________|___________________________|_______|
    Excellent
    Very good
    Good
    Satisfactory
    Comments

    Вам также может понравиться